Skip to main content
Log in

HBagging-MCDM: an ensemble classifier combined with multiple criteria decision making for rectal cancer survival prediction

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As a main type of colorectal cancer, rectal cancer has a high risk and mortality rate so it is very important to accurately predict the survivability of patients to make better decisions on medical treatment and preparation for medical expenses. In recent years, many scholars have studied the survivability of selected common cancers such as lung cancer using machine learning approaches. Therefore, this research proposes a heterogeneous ensemble classification model to predict the survivability of rectal cancer patients. The model employs four different types of classifiers as component classifiers and Bagging algorithm to generate example sets for training component classifiers. In the proposed model, heterogeneous ensemble can help improve the diversity of component classifiers and Bagging can lower the variance and enhance the stability of the model. Finally, a fuzzy multiple criteria decision making method named fuzzy TOPSIS is employed to fuse the results of component classifiers. We evaluated the proposed model on the rectal cancer patient records dataset extracted from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. The results show that the proposed model obtains a significant improvement in terms of four standard metrics, including accuracy, specificity, sensitivity and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, compared with single component classifiers and some other state-of-the-art ensemble classification models, such as Random Forest and Gradient Boosting Tree. Experiments also show that fusing component classifiers with fuzzy TOPSIS is superior to voting and simple weighted average methods. The proposed model outperforms other techniques in rectal cancer survival prediction, thereby improving the prognosis of rectal cancer patients and further assisting clinicians in developing better treatment plans.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data this paper uses is extracted from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER), a public cancer records database in the United States. Every legitimate researcher has access to the data.

Code availability

For privacy, the code has not been publicly available.

References

Download references

Funding

This research was funded by National Nature Science Foundation of China (71971223).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

XL: Study design and development, literature collection, continued research support, final paper review, FZ: Study design and development, programming, data collection and analysis, final paper review.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xihua Li.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors (Xihua Li, Fengyu Zhang) do not have any commercial or associative interest that represents a conflict of interest in connection with the work submitted.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, F., Li, X. HBagging-MCDM: an ensemble classifier combined with multiple criteria decision making for rectal cancer survival prediction. Ann Oper Res 335, 469–490 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-023-05642-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-023-05642-6

Keywords

Navigation