Abstract
While humanitarian efforts are critical for assisting those affected by natural disasters, it is also essential for those affected by poverty, such as China’s rural poor. In this regard, China introduced the rural minimum living security system to provide humanitarian relief to its rural poor. The aim of this study is to explore the influencing factors and efficiency of humanitarian supply chains funds using rural minimum living security funds (RMLSF) as an example. Based on data from 31 provinces (autonomous regions and municipalities) in China from 2007 to 2016, this study employs the logarithmic mean Divisia index approach to decompose the RMLSF and investigates the contributions of seven factors on the change therein. This study also uses the three-stage data envelopment analysis method to assess the poverty reduction efficiency of RMLSF. The results show that the economic development level, the extent to which minimum living security funds are tilted toward rural areas, and the fiscal expenditure scale are the three main factors for the increase in RMLSF. Moreover, the technical efficiency in most provinces and the average technical efficiency in the eastern and central regions are underestimated due to external ambient factors, whereas the average technical efficiency in the western region is overestimated. These results provide a basis for increasing the scale and efficiency of RMLSF.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
For details, please see http://10.8.30.179:91/page/Default.aspx.
References
Abidi, H., de Leeuw, S., & Klumpp, M. (2014). Humanitarian supply chain performance management: A systematic literature review. Supply Chain Management, 19, 592–608. https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-09-2013-0349.
Altay, N., & Labonte, M. (2014). Challenges in humanitarian information management and exchange: Evidence from Haiti. Disasters, 38(s1), S50–S72. https://doi.org/10.1111/disa.12052.
Anaya-Arenas, A. M., Ruiz, A., & Renaud, J. (2018). Importance of fairness in humanitarian relief distribution. Production Planning & Control, 29(14), 1145–1157. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2018.1542157.
Ang, B. W. (2015). LMDI decomposition approach: A guide for implementation. Energy Policy, 86, 233–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2015.07.007.
Ang, B., Zhang, F., & Choi, K. (1998). Factorizing changes in energy and environmental indicators through decomposition. Energy, 23(6), 489–495. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0360-5442(98)00016-4.
Balcik, B., Beamon, B. M., Krejci, C. C., Muramatsu, K. M., & Ramirez, M. (2010). Coordination in humanitarian relief chains: Practices, challenges, and opportunities. International Journal of Production Economics, 126(1), 22–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2009.09.008.
Ben, W. (2018). Do government transfers reduce poverty in China? Micro evidence from five regions. China Economic Review, 51, 59–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2018.05.009.
Bhattacharya, S., Hasija, S., & Van Wassenhove, L. N. (2014). Designing efficient infrastructural investment and asset transfer mechanisms in humanitarian supply chains. Production and Operations Management, 23(9), 1511–1521. https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.12177.
Blejer, M. I., & Guerrero, I. (1990). The impact of macroeconomic policies on income distribution: An empirical study of the Philippines. Review of Economics and Statistics, 72(3), 414–423. https://doi.org/10.2307/2109349.
Cai, F., Giles, J., O’Keefe, P., & Wang, D. (2013). The elderly and old age support in rural China: Challenges and prospects. Population & Development Review, 39(1), 168–169. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-0-8213-8685-9.
Celik, E., & Gumus, A. T. (2015). An assessment approach for non-governmental organizations in humanitarian relief logistics and an application in Turkey. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 24(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.3846/20294913.2015.1056277.
Chen, W., & Li, C. (2018). Promotion or inhibition: The impact of Chinese fiscal decentralization on minimum living security expenditure. Chinese Public Administration, 11, 94–101. (Chinese).
Chen, J. D., Rong, S. S., Song, M. L., & Shi, B. F. (2019). Evaluation of the rural minimum living standard line in China. Emerging Markets Finance & Trade. https://doi.org/10.1080/1540496X.2019.1588108.
Chen, J. D., Wang, P., Cui, L. B., Huang, S., & Song, M. L. (2018). Decomposition and decoupling analysis of CO2 emissions in OECD. Applied Energy, 231(1), 937–950. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.09.179.
Chen, J. D., Wang, Y., Wen, J., Fang, F. Q., & Song, M. L. (2016). The influences of aging population and economic growth on Chinese rural poverty. Journal of Rural Studies, 47, 665–676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2015.11.002.
Cozzolino, A. (Ed.). (2012). Humanitarian logistics and supply chain management. In Humanitarian logistics (pp. 5–16). Berlin: Springer.
Ding, L., Zheng, H., & Kang, W. (2017). Measuring the green efficiency of ocean economy in China: An improved three-stage DEA model. Journal for Economic Forecasting, 20(1), 5–22.
Du, Y., & Wang, M. (2010). Demographic aging and employment in China. Geneva: ILO Publications.
Dubey, R., Ali, S. S., Aital, P., & Venkatesh, V. G. (2014). Mechanics of humanitarian supply chain agility and resilience and its empirical validation. International Journal of Services and Operations Management, 17(4), 367–384. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSOM.2014.059999.
Dubey, R., Altay, N., & Blome, C. (2019a). Swift trust and commitment: The missing links for humanitarian supply chain coordination? Annals of Operations Research, 283(1), 159–177. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-017-2676-z.
Dubey, R., & Gunasekaran, A. (2016). The sustainable humanitarian supply chain design: Agility, adaptability and alignment. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 19(1), 62–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/13675567.2015.1015511.
Dubey, R., Gunasekaran, A., Childe, S. J., Roubaud, D., Wamba, S. F., Giannakis, M., et al. (2019b). Big data analytics and organizational culture as complements to swift trust and collaborative performance in the humanitarian supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics, 210, 120–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.01.023.
Duran, S., Ergun, Ö., Keskinocak, P., & Swann, J. L. (2013). Humanitarian logistics: Advanced purchasing and pre-positioning of relief items. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, 181, 447–462. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6132-7_18.
Fried, H. O., Lovell, C. A. K., Schmidt, S. S., & Yaisawarng, S. (2002). Accounting for environmental effects and statistical noise in data envelopment analysis. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 17(1–2), 157–174. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013548723393.
Gao, Q., Yang, S., & Li, S. (2015). Welfare, targeting, and anti-poverty effectiveness: The case of urban China. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 56, 30–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.qref.2014.06.005.
Gao, Q., Zhai, F., & Garfinkel, I. (2010). How does public assistance affect family expenditures? The case of urban China. World Development, 38(7), 989–1000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2009.12.005.
Gao, Q., Zhai, F., Yang, S., & Li, S. (2014). Does welfare enable family expenditures on human capital? Evidence from China. World Development, 64, 219–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.06.003.
Gertler, P. J., Martinez, S. W., & Rubio-Codina, M. (2012). Investing cash transfers to raise long-term living standards. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 4(1), 164–192. https://doi.org/10.1257/app.4.1.164.
Golan, J., Sicular, T., & Umapathi, N. (2015). Unconditional cash transfers in China: An analysis of the rural minimum living standard security program. Policy Research Working Paper Series, 201(1), 95–108. https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-7374.
Golan, J., Sicular, T., & Umapathi, N. (2017). Unconditional cash transfers in China: Who benefits from the rural minimum living standard security (Dibao) program? World Development, 93, 316–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.12.011.
Gustafsson, B. A., & Deng, Q. H. (2011). Di Bao receipt and its importance for combating poverty in urban China. Poverty & Public Policy, 3(1), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.2202/1944-2858.1127.
Gustafsson, B., Shi, L., & Sato, H. (2014). Data for studying earnings, the distribution of household income and poverty in China. China Economic Review, 30, 419–431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2014.05.012.
Jabbour, C. J., Sobreiro, V. A., Jabbour, A. B., Campos, L. M., Mariano, E. B., & Renwick, D. W. (2019). An analysis of the literature on humanitarian logistics and supply chain management: Paving the way for future studies. Annals of Operations Research, 283(1), 289–307. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-017-2536-x.
Jahre, M., & Heigh, I. (2008). Does the current constraints in funding promote failure in humanitarian supply chains? Supply Chain Forum: An International Journal, 9(2), 44–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/16258312.2008.11517198.
Jin, S., Jeong, S., Kim, J., & Kim, K. (2015). A logistics model for the transport of disaster victims with various injuries and survival probabilities. Annals of Operations Research, 230(1), 17–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-013-1515-0.
Kabra, G., & Ramesh, A. (2015). Analyzing drivers and barriers of coordination in humanitarian supply chain management under fuzzy environment. Benchmarking, 22(4), 559–587. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-05-2014-0041.
Kabra, G., Ramesh, A., & Arshinder, K. (2015). Identification and prioritization of coordination barriers in humanitarian supply chain management. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 13, 128–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2015.01.011.
Kakwani, N., Li, S., Wang, X. B., & Zhu, M. B. (2019). Evaluating the effectiveness of the rural minimum living standard security (Dibao) program in China. China Economic Review, 53, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2018.07.010.
Kohl, S., Schoenfelder, J., Fügener, A., & Brunner, J. O. (2019). The use of data envelopment analysis (DEA) in healthcare with a focus on hospitals. Health Care Management Science, 22(2), 245–286. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10729-018-9436-8.
Kovács, G., & Spens, K. (2010). Knowledge sharing in relief supply chains. International Journal of Networking and Virtual Organisations, 7(2–3), 222–239. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJNVO.2010.031219.
Liu, J. (2014). Ageing, migration and familial support in rural China. Geoforum, 51, 305–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2013.04.013.
Liu, L., Kang, C. H., Yin, Z. Y., & Liu, Z. Y. (2019). The effects of fiscal and taxation policies on the innovation efficiency of manufacturing enterprises: A comparative study from the perspective of economic regions. Transformations in Business & Economics, 18(3), 206–228.
Liu, Y. S., Liu, J. L., & Zhou, Y. (2017). Spatio-temporal patterns of rural poverty in China and targeted poverty alleviation strategies. Journal of Rural Studies, 52, 66–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.04.002.
Liu, Y., & Xu, Y. (2016). A geographic identification of multidimensional poverty in rural China under the framework of sustainable livelihoods analysis. Applied Geography, 73, 62–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2016.06.004.
Mentzer, J. T., DeWitt, W., Keebler, J. S., Min, S., Nix, N. W., Smith, C. D., et al. (2001). Defining supply chain management. Journal of Business Logistics, 22(2), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2158-1592.2001.tb00001.x.
Ministry of Civil Affairs. (2008). Statistical Bulletin on Social Service Development 2007 [EB/OL]. Accessed 26 May 2008, from http://www.mca.gov.cn/article/sj/tjgb/200805/200805150154119.shtml(Chinese).
Ministry of Civil Affairs. (2017). Statistical Bulletin on Social Service Development 2016 [EB/OL]. Accessed 3 August 2017, from http://www.mca.gov.cn/article/sj/tjgb/201708/20170815005382.shtml(Chinese).
Moore, S., Eng, E., & Daniel, M. (2003). International NGOs and the role of network centrality in humanitarian aid operations: A case study of coordination during the 2000 Mozambique floods. Disasters, 27(4), 305–318. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0361-3666.2003.00235.x.
Musa, H., Natorin, V., Musova, Z., & Durana, P. (2020). Comparison of the efficiency measurement of the conventional and Islamic banks. Oeconomia Copernicana, 11(1), 29–58. https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.2020.002.
Notten, G. (2016). How poverty indicators confound poverty reduction evaluations: The targeting performance of income transfers in Europe. Social Indicators Research, 127(3), 1039–1056. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-015-0996-4.
Olaogbebikan, J. E., & Oloruntoba, R. (2019). Similarities between disaster supply chains and commercial supply chains: A SCM process view. Annals of Operations Research, 283(1–2), 517–542. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-017-2690-1.
Oloruntoba, R., & Gray, R. (2006). Humanitarian aid: An agile supply chain? Supply Chain Management, 11(2), 115–120. https://doi.org/10.1108/13598540610652492.
Ouenniche, J., & Carrales, S. (2018). Assessing efficiency profiles of UK commercial banks: A DEA analysis with regression-based feedback. Annals of Operations Research, 266(1–2), 551–587. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-018-2797-z.
Pahlavan, R., Omid, M., & Akram, A. (2012). Application of data envelopment analysis for performance assessment and energy efficiency improvement opportunities in greenhouses cucumber production. Journal of Agricultural Science & Technology, 14(3), 1465–1475. https://doi.org/10.5367/oa.2012.0109.
Qian, Y., & Roland, G. (1998). Federalism and the soft budget constraint. American Economic Review, 88(5), 1143–1162.
Ravallion, M., & Chen, S. (2007). China’s (uneven) progress against poverty. Journal of Development Economics, 82(1), 1–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2005.07.003.
Ravallion, M., & Chen, S. (2015). Benefit incidence with incentive effects, measurement errors and latent heterogeneity: A case study for China. Journal of Public Economics, 128, 124–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2015.04.004.
Robinson, T. D., Oliveira, T. M., & Kayden, S. (2017). Factors affecting the United Nations’ response to natural disasters: What determines the allocation of the Central Emergency Response Fund? Disasters, 41(4), 631–648. https://doi.org/10.1111/disa.12226.
Simar, L., & Wilson, P. W. (2007). Estimation and inference in two-stage, semi-parametric models of production processes. Journal of Econometrics, 136(1), 31–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2005.07.009.
State Statistical Bureau. (2020). National economic and social development statistics bulletin of the People’s Republic of China in 2019. http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/zxfb/202002/t20200228_1728913.html(Chinese).
Tatham, P., Pettit, S., Charles, A., Lauras, M., & Van Wassenhove, L. (2010). A model to define and assess the agility of supply chains: Building on humanitarian experience. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 40, 722–741. https://doi.org/10.1108/09600031011079355.
Tomasini, R. M., & Van Wassenhove, L. N. (2009). From preparedness to partnerships: Case study research on humanitarian logistics. International Transactions in Operational Research, 16(5), 549–559. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-3995.2009.00697.x.
Tse, C. W. (2013). Migration and health outcomes of left-behind elderly in rural China. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2440403.
Venkatesh, V. G., Dubey, R., & Ali, S. S. (2014). Disaster relief operations and continuous aid program in human supply networks: Are they congruent? An analysis. In Proceedings of the third international conference on soft computing for problem solving (Vol. 259, pp. 959–973). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-1768-8_79.
Wang, M. (2007). Emerging urban poverty and effects of the “dibao” program on alleviating poverty in China. China & World Economy, 15(1), 74–88. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-124X.2007.00062.x.
Wang, S., Xing, L., & Chen, H. (2020). Impact of marine industrial structure on environmental efficiency. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 31(1), 111–129. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-06-2019-0119.
Wei, J., Wang, A., & Wang, F. (2019). Humanitarian organizations in international disaster relief: Understanding the linkage between donors and recipient countries. Voluntas, 30(6), 1212–1228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-019-00172-x.
World Bank. (2001). World Development Report 2000/2001. Beijing: China Finance and Economics Press. (Chinese).
World Bank. (2014). The state of social safety nets. Washington, D.C.: World Bank Publication.
Wu, A. M., & Ramesh, M. (2014). Poverty reduction in urban China: The impact of cash transfers. Social Policy and Society, 13(2), 285–299. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474746413000626.
Yadav, D. K., & Barve, A. (2015). Analysis of critical success factors of humanitarian supply chain: An application of interpretive structural modeling. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 12, 213–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2015.01.008.
Yang, X., Wang, S., Zhang, W., Li, J., & Zou, Y. (2016). Impacts of energy consumption, energy structure, and treatment technology on SO2 emissions: A multi-scale LMDI decomposition analysis in China. Applied Energy, 184, 714–726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.11.013.
Yao, J. (2012). Analysis of the standard level of urban minimum living security in China. China Soft Science, 11, 57–67. (Chinese).
Yao, S. J., Zhang, Z. Y., & Hanmer, L. (2004). Growing inequality and poverty in China. China Economic Review, 15(2), 145–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2003.09.002.
Zhao, L., Guo, Y., & Shao, T. (2017). Can the minimum living standard security scheme enable the poor to escape the poverty trap in rural China? International Journal of Social Welfare, 26(4), 314–332. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsw.12265.
Zhong, H. (2011). The impact of population aging on income inequality in developing countries: Evidence from rural China. China Economic Review, 22(1), 98–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2010.09.003.
Funding
This work was supported by the Major Program of National Social Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 20ZDA084); The Key Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 71934001). The National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 71934001, 71471001, 41771568, 71533004); the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2016YFA0602500); the Strategic Priority Research Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Grant No. XDA23070400); Sichuan Province Social Science High Level Research Team Building.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix A
Appendix A
1.1 A.1. The first stage
In this stage, we will use the BCC model, which can separate the two causes of DMU technology inefficiency: the poor efficiency of production technology, and not being in the optimum scale. The calculated efficiency values include three parts: technical efficiency (TE), pure technical efficiency (PTE), and scale efficiency (SE). The relationship among them is given by \( TE = PTE \times SE \).
The DEA model is generally divided into output-oriented, input-oriented, and non-oriented. This study focuses on minimizing the inputs of RMLSF without reducing outputs. Thus, it chooses the input-oriented BCC model for efficiency analysis.
1.2 A.2. The second stage
DMU’s efficiency value calculated at the first stage is affected by its internal management level as well as external environments and random errors (Fried et al. 2002). To remove the impacts of ambient factors and random errors, we will construct an SFA model for regression adjustment. In this model, the differences between the actual value and the target value of each input indicator (that is, the slack variable of each input indicator obtained at the first stage) are considered dependent variables, and the ambient variables (supposing the number is \( p \)) are considered independent variables. The model is constructed as below.
where \( i \) and \( j \) represent the input \( i \) and the DMU \( j \) (\( i = 1,2, \ldots ,m \); \( j = 1,2, \ldots ,n \)), \( s_{ij} \) indicates the slack variable of input \( i \) of the DMU \( j \), \( z_{j} \) represents the vector composed of \( p \) observable ambient variables of the DMU \( j \), \( z_{j} = \left( {z_{j1} ,z_{j2} , \ldots ,z_{jp} } \right) \), \( \beta^{i} \) denotes the parameter vector to be estimated, and \( f\left( \cdot \right) \) is a functional form to express the impact of ambient variables on input slack variable. Generally, \( f\left( \cdot \right) = z_{j} \beta^{i} \). \( v_{ij} + u_{ij} \) denotes a mixed error, where \( v_{ij} \) demonstrates the stochastic disturbance term, \( v_{ij} \sim\,N\left( {0,\sigma_{vj}^{2} } \right) \); \( u_{ij} \) denotes the management inefficiency term, \( u_{ij} \sim\,N^{ + } \left( {u^{j} ,\sigma_{uj}^{2} } \right) \); and \( v_{ij} \) and \( u_{ij} \) are independent of each other. \( \gamma = \frac{{\sigma_{uj}^{2} }}{{\sigma_{uj}^{2} + \sigma_{vj}^{2} }} \) indicates the proportion of variance of management inefficiency to the total variance. If \( \gamma \approx 1 \), management inefficiency is the primary cause. If \( \gamma \approx 0 \), \( u_{ij} \) can be removed from model (A.1). At this time, we can utilize ordinary least squares (OLS) directly to estimate model (A.1).Then, we use the ambient variable coefficients obtained to adjust the initial input indicators of each DMU; thus, all DMUs are in identical external environments and suffer the same random impact. The specific adjustments are as follows.
In the above equation, \( x_{ij} \) and \( \hat{x}_{ij} \) represent the actual value and adjusted value of input \( i \) of DMU \( j \), respectively, while the remaining terms have the same meaning as in Eq. (A.1). Moreover, “^” represents the estimated value, \( \left[ {\max_{j} \left\{ {z_{j} \hat{\beta }^{i} } \right\} - z_{j} \hat{\beta }^{i} } \right] \) denotes the adjustment of ambient variables, and \( \left[ {\max_{j} \left\{ {\hat{v}_{ij} } \right\} - \hat{v}_{ij} } \right] \) represents the adjustment of random error terms.
1.3 A.3. The third stage
The adjusted input \( \hat{x}_{ij} \) computed in the second stage replaces the primitive input \( x_{ij} \) as a new input indicator, and the output indicators remain unchanged. Then, we utilize the BCC model to compute DMUs’ efficiency values after excluding the impacts of ambient factors and random errors.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chen, J., Wang, P., Zhou, J. et al. Influencing factors and efficiency of funds in humanitarian supply chains: the case of Chinese rural minimum living security funds. Ann Oper Res 319, 413–438 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-020-03660-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-020-03660-2