Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A Robust optimization approach to assess the effect of delays in the connection-to-the-grid time of new generation power plants over transmission expansion planning

  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Construction times of new power plants are subject to uncertainty in deregulated electricity markets and they have an important impact on the planning of the expansion of the transmission network. In this paper, we develop a model of transmission expansion planning that is based on Robust optimization and considers the uncertainty in the instant when new power plants are connected into the electricity grid. Using this transmission expansion planning model, we assess the impact of postponing the connection time of some new power plants over the system cost and the optimal network expansion plan. By obtaining the optimal solutions of the proposed model for different levels of robustness, we are able to rank the new power plants with respect to how much the delay of each project negatively affects the system cost. We illustrate our methodology and the performance of two solution approaches proposed to solve our model by using a 34-node stylized version of the main Chilean grid. In the case of the main Chilean grid, the results obtained indicate that some of the projects whose delays negatively affect the most to the system cost are the renewable power plants projected for the next ten years. This is important from the regulator viewpoint because it allows the assessment of renewable energy policies that accelerate the installation of renewable new power plants also in terms of their impact over the transmission expansion planning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alguacil, N., Motto, A., & Conejo, A. (2003). Transmission expansion planning: A mixed-integer LP approach. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 18(3), 1070–1077.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Tal, A., El Ghaoui, L., & Nemirovski, A. (2008). Robust optimization. Princeton Series in Applied Mathematics.

  • Ben-Tal, A., & Nemirovski, A. (1999). Robust solutions of uncertain linear programs. Operations Research Letters, 25(1), 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Tal, A., Goryashko, A., Guslitzer, E., & Nemirovski, A. (2004). Adjustable robust solutions of uncertain linear programs. Mathematical Programming, 99(2), 351–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergey, P., Ragsdale, C., & Hoskote, M. (2003). A simulated annealing genetic algorithm for the electrical power districting problem. Annals of Operations Research, 121, 33–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertsimas, D., & Sim, M. (2004). The price of robustness. Operations Research, 52(1), 35–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertsimas, D., & Thiele, A. (2004). A robust optimization approach to supply chain management. Integer Programming and Combinatorial Optimization, 3064, 86–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bienstock, D., & Özbay, N. (2008). Computing robust base stock levels. Discrete Optimization, 5(2), 389–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Binato, S., Pereira, M., & Granville, S. (2001). A new benders decomposition approach to solve power transmission network design problems. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 16(2), 235–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bohle, C., Maturana, S., & Vera, J. (2010). A robust optimization approach to wine grape harvesting schedule. European Journal of Operations Research, 200(1), 245–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buigy, M. O., Balzer, G., Shanechi, H. M., & Shahidehpour, M. (2004). Market based transmission planning. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 19(4), 2060–2067.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Centro de Despacho Económico de Carga -Sistema Interconectado Central (CDEC-SIC). (2009). Operation statistics 1999–2008. Staff report. http://www.cdec-sic.cl/datos/anuario2009/index.html.

  • Contreras, J., & Wu, F. (1999). Coalition formation in transmission expansion planning. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 14(3), 1144–1152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Contreras, J., & Wu, F. (2000). A Kernel-oriented algorithm for transmission expansion planning. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 15(4), 1434–1440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dusonchet, Y. (1973). Transmission planning using discrete dynamic optimization. IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus & Systems, PAS–92(5), 1358–1371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallego, R., Monticelli, A., & Romero, R. (1998). Transmission system expansion planning by an extended genetic algorithm. IEE Procedings - Generation, Transmission & Distribution, 145(3), 329–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garver, L. L. (1970). Transmission network estimation using linear programming. IEEE Transaction on Power Apparatus and Systems, PAS–89(7), 1688–1697.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirschen, D. S., & Strbac, G. (2004). Fundamentals of power system economics. Chichester: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kuznia, L., Zeng, B., Centeno, G., & Miao, Z. (2013). Stochastic optimization for power system configuration with renewable energy in remote areas. Annals of Operations Research, 210, 411–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malcolm, S. A., & Zenios, S. A. (1994). Robust optimization for power system capacity expansion under uncertainty. Journal of Operational Research Society, 45(9), 1040–1049.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martzoukos, S., & Teplitz-Sembitzky, W. (1992). Optimal timing of transmission line investments in the face of uncertain demand: An option valuation approach. Energy Economics, 14(1), 3–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulvey, J. M., Vanderbei, R. J., & Zenios, S. A. (1995). Robust optimization of large-scale systems. Operations Research, 43(2), 264–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Energy Commission (NEC). (April 2009). Nodal price setting, SIC: Final technical report. http://www.cne.cl/cnewww/opencms/07_Tarificacion/01_Electricidad/Otros/Precios_nudo/otros_precios_de_nudo/abril2009.html.

  • Pozo, D., Contreras, J., & Sauma, E. (2013). If you build it, he will come: Anticipative power transmission planning. Energy Economics, 36, 135–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Price, A. (2007). Formulation of an electricity spot-market model in the Chilean Central Interconnected System, SIC. Thesis for the industrial-engineering degree. Santiago: Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romero, R., & Monticelli, A. (1994). A hierarchical decomposition approach for transmission network expansion planning. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 9(1), 373–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romero, R., Gallego, R., & Monticelli, A. (1996). Transmission system expansion planning by simulated annealing. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 11(1), 364–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sauma, E., & Oren, S. (2006). Proactive planning and valuation of transmission investments in restructured electricity markets. Journal of Regulatory Economics, 30(3), 261–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sauma, E., & Oren, S. (2007). Economic criteria for planning transmission investment in restructured electricity markets. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 22(4), 1394–1405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sauma, E. (2009). Inter-temporal planning of transmission expansions in restructured electricity markets. Journal of Energy Engineering - ASCE, 135(3), 73–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siddiqui, A., & Gupta, H. (November 2007). Transmission investment timing and sizing under uncertainty. Research Report No. 285; London: Department of Statistical Science, University College.

  • Soyster, A. L. (1973). Convex programming with set-inclusive constraint and applications to inexact linear programming. Operations Research, 21, 1154–1157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Villasana, R., Garver, L. L., & Salon, S. J. (1985). Transmission network planning using linear programming. IEEE Transaction on Power Apparatus and Systems, PAS–104(2), 349–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The work reported in this paper was partially supported by the CONICYT, FONDECYT/Regular 1100434, 1100412, and 1130781 Grants, by the Fulbright NEXUS Program, and by Iniciativa Científica Milenio Nucleous in Coordination and Information in Networks, Project ICM/FIC P10-024-F. The authors would like to specially thank Mr. Juan Carlos Araneda, from Transelec S.A., for his valuable comments during the development of this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Enzo Sauma.

Appendix

Appendix

See Tables 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10.

Table 4 Lines with a similar power growth pattern in same period
Table 5 Lines with an anticipated growth pattern in the robust network
Table 6 Lines with a late growth pattern in the robust network
Table 7 Lines with a larger power increase pattern in the robust network
Table 8 Lines with a smaller power increase pattern in the robust network
Table 9 Lines without a defined pattern
Table 10 Lines that do not require expansion of capacity

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sauma, E., Traub, F. & Vera, J. A Robust optimization approach to assess the effect of delays in the connection-to-the-grid time of new generation power plants over transmission expansion planning. Ann Oper Res 229, 703–741 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-015-1833-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-015-1833-5

Keywords

Navigation