Skip to main content
Log in

AHP-based resources and environment efficiency evaluation index system construction about the west side of Taiwan Straits

  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to use the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method to build the resource and environment efficiency evaluation index system about economic zone on the west side of Taiwan Straits from the following three perspectives: the economic and social factors, resource using efficiency, and environmental pollution degree. It quantifies the weight of each index according to literature review and experts’ opinions. Meanwhile, the reliability of the index system is validated from index data availability, standard availability and evaluation operability in order to improve resources and the environment efficiency of the economic zone. Finally, the conclusions can provide references for other regions to build the index system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Schmidheiny (1992). Changing Course: A Global Business Perspective on Development and the Environment. MIT Press.

References

  • Breedveld, L., Timellini, G., Casoni, G., et al. (2007). Eco-efficiency of fabric filters in the Italian ceramic tile industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 15, 86–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2(6), 429–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charmondusit, K., & Kearpakpraek, K. (2011). Eco-efficiency evaluation of the petroleum and petrochemical group in the map Ta Phut industrial estate, Thailand. Journal of Cleaner Production, 19(2), 241–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helminen, R. R. (2000). Developing tangible measure for eco-efficiency: the case of Finnish and Swedish pulp and paper industry. Business Strategy and the Environment, 9, 196–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huppes, G., & Ishikawa, M. (2005). A framework for quantified eco-efficiency analysis. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 9(4), 25–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korhonen, P. J., & Luptacik, M. (2004). Eco-efficiency analysis of power plants: an extension of data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 154, 437–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuosmanen, T. (2005). Measurement and analysis of eco-efficiency: an economist’s perspective. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 9(4), 15–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindmark, M., & Vikstrm, P. (2003). Lobar convergence in productivity—a distance function approach to technical change and efficiency improvement. In Paper for conference catching-up growth and technology transfers in Asia and Western Europe (Vol. 10, pp. 17–18).

    Google Scholar 

  • Maxime, D., Mareotte, M., & Arcand, Y. (2006). Development of eco-efficiency indicators for the Canadian food and beverage industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 14, 636–648.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melanen, M., Koskela, S., Maenpaa, I., et al. (2004). The eco-efficiency of regions-case kymenlaakso: ECOREG Project 2002–2004. Management of Environmental Quality, 15(1), 33–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mickwitz, P. M., Rosenstrom, U., et al. (2006). Regional eco-efficiency indicators—a participatory approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 14(18), 1603–1611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morales, M. A., Herrero, V. M., Martinez, S. A., et al. (2006). Cleaner production and methodological proposal of eco-efficiency measurement in a Mexican petrochemical complex. Water Science & Technology, 153(11), 11–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saaty, T. L. (1972). Optimum positions for m airports. Naval Research Logistics, 19(1), 101–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaltegger, S., & Sturm, A. (1990). Okologische Rationaliat. Die Unternehmung, 4/90, 273–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidheiny, S. (1992). Changing course: a global business perspective on development and the environment. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seppala, J., & Melanen, M. (2005). How can the eco-efficiency of a region be measured and monitored. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 9(4), 117–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sturm, A., & Waekernage, M. (2003). Winners and losers in global competition: why eco-efficiency reinforces competitiveness. West Lafayette: Purdue University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szargut, J., Ziebik, A., & Stanek, W. (2002). Depletion of the non-renewable natural exergy resources as a measure of the ecological cost. Energy Conversion and Management, 43(9), 1149–1163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vogtltinder, G., Joost, B. A., & Brezet, C. H. (2002). Communicating the eco-efficiency of products and services by means of the eco-costs/value model. Journal of Cleaner Production, 10(1), 57–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, B., & Bi, J. (2008). Eco-efficiency analysis of industrial system in China: a data envelopment analysis approach. Ecological Economics, 68(2), 306–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng, H. F. (2003). Exergy philosophy of natural resource. Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology: Social Sciences Edition, 5(2), 37–39.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xianguo Li.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Li, X., Zhang, Q. AHP-based resources and environment efficiency evaluation index system construction about the west side of Taiwan Straits. Ann Oper Res 228, 97–111 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-012-1072-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-012-1072-y

Keywords

Navigation