Skip to main content
Log in

The scheduling of deliveries in a production-distribution system with multiple buyers

  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In a real production and distribution business environment with one supplier and multiple heterogeneous buyers, the differences in buyers’ ordering cycles have influence on production arrangements. Consequently, the average inventory level (AIL) at the supplier’s end is affected by both the production policy and the ordering policy, typically by the scheduling of deliveries. Consequently, the average inventory holding cost is most deeply affected. In this paper, it is proposed that the scheduling of deliveries be formulated as a decision problem to determine the time point at which deliveries are made to buyers in order to minimize the supplier’s average inventory. A formulation of the average inventory level (AIL) in a production cycle at the supplier’s end using a lot-for-lot policy is developed. Under the lot-for-lot policy, the scheduling of deliveries (SP) is formulated as a nonlinear programming model used to determine the first delivery point for each buyer with an objective to minimize the sum of the product of the individual demand quantity and the first delivery time for each buyer. Thus, the SP model determines not only the sequence of the first deliveries to individual buyers, but also the time when the deliveries are made. An iterative heuristic procedure (IHP) is developed to solve the SP model assuming a given sequence of buyers. Six sequence rules are considered and evaluated via simulation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adam, E. E., & Ebert, R. J. (1992). Production and operations management: Concepts, models and management (5th ed.). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agnetis, A., Detti, P., Meloni, C., & Pacciarelli, D. (2001). Set-up coordination between two stages of a supply chain. Annals of Operations Research, 107(1), 15–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee, A. (1986). On ‘A quantity discount pricing model to increase vendor’s profits’. Management Science, 32, 1513–1517.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee, A., & Burton, J. S. (1994). Coordinated vs. independent inventory replenishment policies for a vendor and multiple buyers. International Journal of Production Economics, 35(1–3), 215–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bylka, S. (1999). A dynamic model for the single-vendor, multi-buyer problem. International Journal of Production Economics, 59(1–3), 297–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cachon, G. P. (2001). Stock wars: Inventory competition in a two-echelon supply chain with multiple retailers. Operations Research, 49(5), 658–674.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, Y.-C., & Lee, C. Y. (2002). Logistics scheduling: Analysis of two-stage problems (Working paper). Department of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology.

  • Chen, Z. L., & Vairaktarakis, G. L. (2005). Integrated scheduling of production and distribution operations. Management Science, 51(4), 614–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, F., Federgruen, A., & Zheng, Y. S. (2001). Coordination mechanisms for a distribution system with one supplier and multiple retailers. Management Sciences, 47(5), 693–708.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chakravarty, A. K., & Martin, G. E. (1988). An optimal joint buyer-seller discount pricing model. Computers and Operations Research, 15(3), 271–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dada, M., & Srikanth, N. K. (1987). Pricing policies for quantity discounts. Management Sciences, 33, 1247–1252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goyal, S. K. (1977). An integrated inventory model for a single supply-single customer problem. International Journal of Production Research, 15(1), 107–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goyal, S. K., & Gupta, Y. P. (1989). Integrated inventory and models: The buyer and vendor co-ordination. European Journal of Operations Research, 41(3), 261–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goyal, S. K., & Nebebe, F. (2000). Determination of economic production-shipment policy for a single-vendor-single-buyer system. European Journal of Operation Research, 121, 175–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, R. M. (1999). The optimal production and shipment policy for the single-vendor single-buyer integrated production-inventory problem. International Journal of Production Research, 37(11), 2463–2475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofmann, C. (2000). Supplier’s pricing policy in a just-in-time environment. Computers and Operations Research, 27(14), 1357–1373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ingene, C., & Parry, M. (1995). Coordination and manufacturer profit maximization: The multiple retailer channel. Journal of Retailing, 71, 129–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu, L. A. (1995). One-vendor multi-buyer integrated inventory model. European Journal of Operational Research, 81, 312–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mishra, A. K. (2003). Selective discount for supplier-buyer coordination using common replenishment epochs. European Journal of Operational Research, 153(3), 751–756.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monahan, J. (1984). A quantity discount pricing model to increase vendor profits. Management Science, 30(6), 720–726.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nanda, R., & Nam, H. K. (1993). Quantity discounts using a joint lot size model under learning effects—multiple buyers case. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 24(3), 487–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharafali, M., & Co, H. C. (2000). Some models for understanding the cooperation between the supplier and the buyer. International Journal of Production Research, 38(15), 3425–3449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Viswanathan, S. (1998). Optimal strategy for the integrated vendor-buyer inventory model. European Journal of Operational Research, 105, 38–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Viswanathan, S., & Piplani, R. (2001). Coordinating supply chain inventories through common replenishment epochs. European Journal of Operational Research, 129(2), 277–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Q. (2002). Determination of suppliers’ optimal quantity discount schedules with heterogeneous buyers. Naval Research Logistics, 49, 46–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Q., & Wu, Z. (2000). Improving a supplier’s quantity discount gain from many different buyers. IIE Transactions, 32, 1071–1079.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weng, Z. K., & Zeng, A. Z. (2001). The role of quantity discounts in the presence of heterogeneous buyers. Annals of Operations Research, 107(1–4), 369–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woo, Y., Hsu, S.-L., & Wu, S. (2001). An integrated inventory model for a single vendor and multiple buyers with ordering cost reduction. International Journal Production Economics, 73, 203–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yan, P. C., & Wee, H. M. (2002). A single-vendor and multiple-buyers production–inventory policy for a deteriorating item. European Journal of Operational Research, 143(3), 570–581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yao, M. J., & Chiou, C. C. (2004). On a replenishment coordination model in an integrated supply chain with one vendor and multiple buyers. European Journal of Operational Research, 159(2), 406–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jiafu Tang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tang, J., Yung, KL., Kaku, I. et al. The scheduling of deliveries in a production-distribution system with multiple buyers. Ann Oper Res 161, 5–23 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-007-0291-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-007-0291-0

Keywords

Navigation