Abstract
The goals of procurement managers in every industry usually are acquiring the right materials at the right time, at the right prices and quantities. To achieve these goals, the best suppliers should be selected. Supplier selection and order allocation have been studied extensively in the past. In this paper, we review the peer-reviewed journal publications in this area. The taxonomy in this research includes problem domain and operations research techniques. The problem domain is examined in three subcategories including Literature Reviews (LR), Deterministic Optimization (DO) models, and Uncertain Optimization (UO) models. Then, observations, recommendations, and future research directions in the field of supplier selection and order allocation are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
1 Introduction
Purchasing and procurements are important activities in every organization. Supplier Selection and Order Allocation (SSOA) are prominent elements of purchasing and procurement (Bohner and Minner 2017). Both qualitative and quantitative factors such as quality, cost, and delivery time should be considered in the supplier selection problem (Arabsheybani et al. 2018). Therefore, supplier selection is a Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) problem (Cheraghalipour and Farsad 2018; Moheb-Alizadeh and Handfield 2019).
Cost saving and minimization of risks can be achieved by using suitable supplier selection methods (Çebi and Otay 2016; Arabsheybani et al. 2018). Some authors have combined supplier selection and order allocation together to solve these two problems simultaneously (e.g., Babbar and Amin 2018). Supplier selection and order allocation are very important in green supply chain management considering sustainability and environmental factors (Hamdan and Cheaitou 2017a). Sustainable supplier selection encompasses cost, environmental, and social criteria and supplier’s performance history (Hamdan and Cheaitou 2017b; Ghadimi et al. 2018).
Supplier selection is a strategic process in organizations, and plays a critical role in the success of them (Razaei et al. 2020). Offering quantity discount is an important feature in the selection of the best suppliers. Therefore, each company can achieve low cost while allocating large volume orders to the suppliers (Alegoz and Yapicioglu 2019).
In this paper, the related peer-reviewed journal papers have been found and reviewed via search in globally recognised databases such as ScienceDirect (Elsevier), Taylor and Francis, and Google Scholar. The main keyword is “supplier selection and order allocation” which is used to search related papers published between 2015 and 2020. As a result, 92 articles are analysed. The majority of other literature review papers in this field just have focused on supplier selection, and order allocation has been ignored. In addition, they have been written some years ago, and there is a need to have an updated literature review paper about supplier selection and order allocation. The structure of our paper is new among those literature review papers. Considering uncertainty in the reviewed papers and reviewing the applied operations research techniques are other main characteristics of our paper.
The other parts of this paper are as follows. The taxonomy and classification of the literature are provided in Section 2. Then, some observations and discussions are mentioned in Section 3. In addition, the related conclusions and future research avenues are provided in Section 4.
2 Taxonomy
Two dimensions are utilized in this review paper to categorize the papers. The first one is the problem domain. Besides, the second one is the operations research (optimization) methods. This classification is useful to analyze the supplier selection and order allocation problem based on both conceptual and mathematical viewpoints.
2.1 Problem domain
The problem domain comprises three subsections: Literature Reviews (LR), Deterministic Optimization (DO) models, and Uncertain Optimization (UO) models. Table 1 includes the related papers.
2.1.1 Literature reviews
Some authors have published literature review papers in the field of supplier selection and order allocation. Govindan et al. (2015) reviewed green purchasing and green supplier selection process of some articles published between 1997 and 2011. They found that Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is the most popular MCDM method for assessing green suppliers. In addition, Fuzzy AHP is very popular in the environmental management systems. Yildiz and Yayla (2015) reviewed 91 articles that have been published between 2001 and 2014 about supplier selection. They stated that quality and cost are the most significant criteria in the supplier selection problem.
Wetzstein et al. (2016) reviewed several papers in the supplier selection field published between 1990 and 2015. They mentioned that there are future research avenues in considering green and sustainable factors. Karsak and Dursun (2016) reviewed 149 articles published between 2001 and 2013 concentrating nondeterministic analytical methods (i.e., stochastic/fuzzy) under imprecise data.
Simić et al. (2017) examined the last 50 years (50th anniversary of fuzzy sets theory established by Lotfiali Askar Zadeh in 1965) of articles in supplier selection and evaluation that are based on fuzzy sets theory, fuzzy models, and fuzzy hybridization. The authors combined individual and integrated approaches to effectively review the fuzzy supplier selection methods. The authors selected 54 papers published in the reputable journals.
Alkahtani and Kaid (2018) studied some journal papers published between 1995 and 2018 focusing on supplier selection. They provided information about the trends, the research gaps, and the selection criteria in the supplier selection field. Ocampo et al. (2018) reviewed 240 articles from peer-reviewed journals published between 2006 and 2016 focusing on the applications of different approaches for supplier selection and evaluation which include individual and hybrid methods. The authors indicated that the novel methods in the literature include uncertainty, risk analysis, and sustainability factors.
Aouadni et al. (2019) reviewed 270 articles published between 2000 and 2017 about supplier selection and order allocation. In their paper, about 17 %, 9 %, and 7 % of the reviewed papers were about AHP, TOPSIS, and ANP methods, respectively. They mentioned that fuzzy multiple-objective programming is a popular method in this area. In addition, some papers have used genetic algorithm to determine the orders. Chai and Ngai (2019) reviewed SSOA papers published among 2013 and 2018. They brought to light that MCDM methods and optimization are the most popular techniques for supplier selection and order allocation.
2.1.2 Deterministic optimization models
In this part, deterministic optimization methods for supplier selection and order allocation are discussed. We provide some information about the publications that have received several citations. Other publications are written and mentioned in the following table.
Sodenkamp et al. (2016) used a novel approach (trade-off mechanism) because the current multi-objective methods were not capable to create positive and negative performance synergies. Bohner and Minner (2017) disscussed a mixed-integer linear programming model for solving the intricate issue of supplier selection by having a backup supplier who is not cost effective. However, it minimizes the risk related to the stock out condition. Nourmohamadi Shalke et al. (2018) studied purchasing decision-making through a TOPSIS method and a multi-choice goal programming model. In addition, they developed rough set theory and grey system. Moheb-Alizadeh and Handfield (2019) constructed a multi-objective optimization model for a manufacturer of automobile transmission systems for order allocation considering minimization of the CO2 emissions.
Nazeri et al. (2019) proposed a multi-objective model to test effective ranking in military’s SSOA for outsourcing of hazardous materials. Wang et al. (2020) implemented carbon emission trading schemes using analytic network process-integer programming model and stipulated approach. They minimized cost and carbon emissions. The deterministic optimization models of supplier selection and order allocation are classified in Table 2 according to the multiple elements (sets) including parts, products, periods, suppliers, and scenarios. In some papers, it has been assumed that the parts can be assembled to make a product. Products usually represent the final products that can be sold in the markets. In addition, some papers have considered different periods such as months in their mathematical models. Besides, multiple potential suppliers have been considered by some authors. Furthermore, some authors have assumed different scenarios to analyze the problem under uncertainty.
2.1.3 Uncertain optimization models
In this part, we mention some important publications that have developed uncertain optimization models and have received several citations. Other papers are mentioned in the following two tables.
The paper of Azadnia et al. (2015) has been cited by more than 200 papers in Google Scholar. In this article, the authors introduced sustainable supplier selection by adding occupational health and safety management system. Those sub-criteria are important components in sustainable supplier criteria. The authors utilized a fuzzy AHP and a rule based weighted fuzzy approach. They selected a sustainable supplier using a multi-product lot sizing order model. Çebi and Otay (2016) proposed a two-stage fuzzy method including fuzzy MULTIMOORA and fuzzy goal programming for the supplier selection and order allocation problem. They considered green supplier selection in the beverage industry. Govindan and Sivakumar (2016) studied the selection of the best supplier by minimizing the greenhouse gas emissions using a fuzzy TOPSIS and a multi-objective method. They determined the ranks of the green suppliers, and they classified the potential suppliers. Pazhani et al. (2016) proposed a mathematical model to find the optimal inventory level and showed that cost could be minimized if the transportation cost is considered in the objective. They also discussed the benefits of the integrated inventory management system approach comparing the sequential approach for solving the supplier selection problem.
Ghorabaee et al. (2017) stated that a novel EDAS technique and interval type-2 fuzzy sets lead to a good multi-criteria green supplier selection model. Hamdan and Cheaitou (2017b) proposed a model to choose a green supplier and allocate the orders using a multi-objective optimization model. For solving the problem, the authors utilized AHP, Fuzzy TOPSIS, and multi-objective optimization techniques. Arabsheybani et al. (2108) considered some risk factors and enhanced FMEA method to determine the risk and price criteria.
Babbar and Amin (2018) proposed a novel two-stage QFD model and an optimization model for SSOA. They solved the optimization model using GAMS software. Their method can handle the vagueness and uncertainty considering qualitative and quantitative criteria. Ahmadi and Amin (2019) introduced the supplier selection and order allocation in closed-loop network of cellular phone industry in Toronto Canada. They developed a fuzzy based solution approach using IBM ILOG CPLEX 12.7.1.0 software. Hosseini et al. (2019) developed a bi-objective mixed-integer programming model (stochastic) for the SSOA problem. They illustrated the application of the model in the automotive industry. Bektur (2020) introduced F-AHP and F-PROMETHEE to study uncertainty in the decision-making environment. Govindan et al. (2020) described sustainability through incorporating circular supplier selection and order allocation. They combined all activities such as waste reduction in transportation. Hasan et al. (2020) developed a Decision Support System (DSS) for companies operating under logistics industry 4.0.
Jia et al. (2020) developed a robust optimization goal programming model for a steel company. They solved the problem by CPLEX, and optimized it considering the total cost, CO2 emission, and environmental objectives. Kaur and Singh (2020) proposed a model with consideration of risks and disruption (both natural and man made), suitable for industry 4.0 environment. The uncertain optimization models are categorized in Table 3 according to the multiple elements. In addition, the uncertainty sources are shown in Table 4; Fig. 1. Demand, capacity, and cost are the major sources of uncertainty in the reviewed papers.
2.2 Operations research techniques
We divide the references according to the operations research (optimization) techniques in Table 5. Several authors have utilized hybrid techniques in this field. Table 6 includes the types of the objective functions in different papers. In addition, single objective and multi-objective functions are illustrated in Fig. 2.
3 Observations and related recommendations
In this part, observations and recommendations according to the reviewed papers are provided.
3.1 The most popular domain
In this paper, we discussed three domains of supplier selection and order allocation including literature reviews, deterministic optimization models, and uncertain optimization models. The most popular domain is the uncertain optimization models (73 % of the papers). Deterministic optimization models (17 % of the papers), and Literature reviews (10 % of the papers) domains have the next ranks.
3.2 The most popular uncertainty source
According to Table 4; Fig. 1, the most popular sources of uncertainty are demand, capacity, and cost, respectively. Among them, demand has been considered more than the other factors (29 % of the papers). This parameter usually affects the order allocation significantly, and it is considered as one of the constraints of the optimization models.
3.3 The most popular technique
Based on the information in Table 5, Fuzzy TOPSIS, Fuzzy-multi objective programming, Stochastic programming, and Mixed-integer linear programming are the most popular techniques in the literature of SSOA. Fuzzy TOPSIS is a useful technique to determine the weights (importance) of the suppliers. Fuzzy sets theory enables researchers to consider uncertainty in the parameters. Fuzzy multi-objective programming considers uncertainty and the effects of some objectives on the problem. There are several stochastic programing models in the literature which are based on the probabilities in the SSOA problem. Mixed-integer linear programming also have been utilized in the literature because it can handle both non-negative and 0–1 variables.
3.4 The most popular multi-objective method
There are several techniques for solving multi-objective problems. Based on our observation, weighted-sums method is the most popular one. Several authors also have utilized goal programming and ɛ-constraints method to solve multi-objective SSOA problems.
3.5 The most popular applications
The applications of the models have been categorized in Table 7. Several authors have considered case studies. “Automotive industry” is a popular application in the supplier selection and order allocation field.
3.6 The list of publications
Table 8 includes the information related to the names of the journals. These journals have published papers related to SSOA. “Journal of Cleaner Production”, “Computers & Industrial Engineering”, “International Journal of Production Research”, “International Journal of Production Economics”, and “Expert Systems with Applications” have published several papers in this field.
3.7 Classification of the articles based on year
Table 9 includes the classification of the papers based on year and the mentioned three domains. The journal papers from 2015 to 2020 have been examined in this research. It is noticeable that our paper has been written in 2020. Therefore, the number of the published journal papers in 2020 are limited in Table 9.
4 Conclusions
In this research, three problem domains including literature reviews, deterministic optimization models, and uncertain optimization models have been considered, and the related papers have been gathered and analyzed. In addition, these papers (92 publications between 2015 and 2020) have been classified according to the operations research methods. Furthermore, observations have been provided and discussed. We have observed that most of the mathematical models in SSOA belong to the uncertain optimization models category. Supplier selection and order allocation methods may create competitive advantages for companies, and at the same time, poor selection of the suppliers may result in the failure of the companies. The basic criteria for supplier selection include cost, quality, and time. Recently, more green and environmental factors such as minimization of carbon emissions have been considered in the SSOA process. There are numerous directions for future research in the SSOA problem. Some of them are as follow:
-
(i)
Usually a few sources of uncertainty have been considered in the optimization models of order It is useful to consider several sources of uncertainty simultaneously using advanced methods such as robust optimization.
-
(ii)
Most of the SSOA papers have focused on manufacturing systems such as automobile It is valuable to consider SSOA in service industry such as healthcare systems (e.g., hospitals).
-
(iii)
Fuzzy sets theory and fuzzy logic have been combined with other techniques to handle However, there are some practical challenges in applying these methods in More case studies can be considered in this area to show and discuss the applications of these methods.
-
(iv)
Under special circumstances such as COVID-19, the normal supplier selection and order allocation may not lead to excellent Developing new methods for these situations can be an avenue of future research.
-
(v)
There are several parameters such as cost, capacity, and demand in the optimization models of the order These parameters can be estimated using advanced forecasting techniques such as machine learning, deep learning, and neural To our knowledge, this area of research is new, and has not been explored in the SSOA papers.
References
Aggarwal R, Singh SP, Kapur PK (2018) Integrated dynamic vendor selection and order allocation problem for the time dependent and stochastic data. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 25(3):777-796.
Ahmadi S, Amin SH (2019) An integrated chance-constrained stochastic model for a mobile phone closed-loop supply chain network with supplier selection. J Clean Prod 226:988–1003
Alegoz M, Yapicioglu H (2019) Supplier selection and order allocation decisions under quantity discount and fast service options. Sustain Prod Consump 18:179–189
Alkahtani M, Kaid H (2018) Supplier selection in supply chain management: a review study. Int J Bus Perform Supply Chain Model 10(2):107–130
Almasi M, Khoshfetrat S, Galankashi MR (2019) Sustainable supplier selection and order allocation under risk and inflation condition. IEEE Trans Eng Manag, 68(3):823-837.
Aouadni S, Aouadni I, Rebaï A (2019) A systematic review on supplier selection and order allocation problems. J Ind Eng Int 15(1):267–289
Arabsheybani A, Paydar MM, Safaei AS (2018) An integrated fuzzy MOORA method and FMEA technique for sustainable supplier selection considering quantity discounts and supplier’s risk. J Clean Prod 190:577–591
Arabzad SM, Ghorbani M, Razmi J, Shirouyehzad H (2015) Employing fuzzy TOPSIS and SWOT for supplier selection and order allocation problem. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 76(5–8):803–818
Azadnia AH (2016) A multi-objective mathematical model for sustainable supplier selection and order lot-sizing under inflation. Int J Eng 29(8):1141–1150
Azadnia AH, Ghadimi P (2018) An integrated approach of fuzzy quality function deployment and fuzzy multi-objective programming tosustainable supplier selection and order allocation. J Optim Ind Eng 11(1):1–22
Azadnia AH, Saman MZM, Wong KY (2015) Sustainable supplier selection and order lot-sizing: an integrated multi-objective decision-making process. Int J Prod Res 53(2):383–408
Babbar C, Amin SH (2018) A multi-objective mathematical model integrating environmental concerns for supplier selection and order allocation based on fuzzy QFD in beverages industry. Expert Syst Appl 92:27–38
Beauchamp H, Novoa C, Ameri F (2015) Supplier selection and order allocation based on integer programming. Int J Oper Res Inf Syst (IJORIS) 6(3):60–79
Bektur G (2020) An integrated methodology for the selection of sustainable suppliers and order allocation problem with quantity discounts, lost sales and varying supplier availabilities. Sustain Prod Consump
Bodaghi G, Jolai F, Rabbani M (2018) An integrated weighted fuzzy multi-objective model for supplier selection and order scheduling in a supply chain. Int J Prod Res 56(10):3590–3614
Bohner C, Minner S (2017) Supplier selection under failure risk, quantity and business volume discounts. Comput Ind Eng 104:145–155
Çebi F, Otay İ (2016) A two-stage fuzzy approach for supplier evaluation and order allocation problem with quantity discounts and lead time. Inf Sci 339:143–157
Chai J, Ngai EW (2019) Decision-making techniques in supplier selection: Recent accomplishments and what lies ahead. Expert Syst Appl 140:112903
Cheraghalipour A, Farsad S (2018) A bi-objective sustainable supplier selection and order allocation considering quantity discounts under disruption risks: A case study in plastic industry. Comput Ind Eng 118:237–250
Cui LX, Mak KL, Newman ST (2015) Optimal supplier selection and order allocation for multi-product manufacturing featuring customer flexibility. Int J Comput Integr Manuf 28(7):729–744
Dotoli M, Epicoco N, Falagario M (2015, September) Integrated supplier selection and order allocation under uncertainty in agile supply chains. In: 2015 IEEE 20th Conference on Emerging Technologies & Factory Automation (ETFA). IEEE, New York, pp 1–6
Duan CY, Liu HC, Zhang LJ, Shi H (2019) An extended alternative queuing method with linguistic Z-numbers and its application for green supplier selection and order allocation. Int J Fuzzy Syst 21(8):2510–2523
Esmaeili-Najafabadi E, Nezhad MSF, Pourmohammadi H, Honarvar M, Vahdatzad MA (2019) A joint supplier selection and order allocation model with disruption risks in centralized supply chain. Comput Ind Eng 127:734–748
Feng J, Gong Z (2020) Integrated linguistic entropy weight method and multi-objective programming model for supplier selection and order allocation in a circular economy: A case study. J Clean Prod 277:122597
Fu Y, Lai KK, Liang L (2016) A robust optimisation approach to the problem of supplier selection and allocation in outsourcing. Int J Syst Sci 47(4):913–918
Ghadimi P, Toosi FG, Heavey C (2018) A multi-agent systems approach for sustainable supplier selection and order allocation in a partnership supply chain. Eur J Oper Res 269(1):286–301
Ghorabaee MK, Amiri M, Zavadskas EK, Turskis Z, Antucheviciene J (2017) A new multi-criteria model based on interval type-2 fuzzy sets and EDAS method for supplier evaluation and order allocation with environmental considerations. Comput Ind Eng 112:156–174
Gören HG (2018) A decision framework for sustainable supplier selection and order allocation with lost sales. J Clean Prod 183:1156–1169
Govindan K, Sivakumar R (2016) Green supplier selection and order allocation in a low-carbon paper industry: integrated multi-criteria heterogeneous decision-making and multi-objective linear programming approaches. Ann Oper Res 238(1–2):243–276
Govindan K, Rajendran S, Sarkis J, Murugesan P (2015) Multi criteria decision making approaches for green supplier evaluation and selection: a literature review. J Clean Prod 98:66–83
Govindan K, Mina H, Esmaeili A, Gholami-Zanjani SM (2020) An integrated hybrid approach for circular supplier selection and closed loop supply chain network design under uncertainty. J Clean Prod 242:118317
Gupta P, Govindan K, Mehlawat MK, Kumar S (2016) A weighted possibilistic programming approach for sustainable vendor selection and order allocation in fuzzy environment. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 86(5–8):1785–1804
Hajikhani A, Khalilzadeh M, Sadjadi SJ (2018) A fuzzy multi-objective multi-product supplier selection and order allocation problem in supply chain under coverage and price considerations: An urban agricultural case study. Sci Iran 25(1):431–449
Hamdan S, Cheaitou A (2015) Green supplier selection and order allocation using an integrated fuzzy TOPSIS, AHP and IP approach. In: 2015 International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management (IEOM). IEEE, New York, pp 1–10
Hamdan S, Cheaitou A (2017a) Dynamic green supplier selection and order allocation with quantity discounts and varying supplier availability. Comput Ind Eng 110:573–589
Hamdan S, Cheaitou A (2017b) Supplier selection and order allocation with green criteria: An MCDM and multi-objective optimization approach. Comput Oper Res 81:282–304
Hamdan S, Jarndal A (2017) A two-stage green supplier selection and order allocation using AHP and multi-objective genetic algorithm optimization. In: 2017 7th International Conference on Modeling, Simulation, and Applied Optimization (ICMSAO). IEEE, New York, pp 1–6
Hamdi F, Dupont L, Ghorbel A, Masmoudi F (2016) Supplier selection and order allocation under disruption risk. IFAC-PapersOnLine 49(12):449–454
Hasan MM, Jiang D, Ullah AS, Noor-E-Alam M (2020) Resilient supplier selection in logistics 4.0 with heterogeneous information. Expert Syst Appl 139:112799
Hosseini ZS, Nezha MSF (2019) Developing an optimal policy for green supplier selection and order allocation using dynamic programming. Int J Supply Oper Manag 6(2):168–181
Hosseini S, Morshedlou N, Ivanov D, Sarder MD, Barker K, Khaled A (2019) Resilient supplier selection and optimal order allocation under disruption risks. Int J Prod Econ 213:124–137
Hu X, Wang G, Li X, Zhang Y, Feng S, Yang A (2018) Joint decision model of supplier selection and order allocation for the mass customization of logistics services. Transp Res E 120:76–95
Hu H, Xiong H, You Y, Yan W (2016) A mixed integer programming model for supplier selection and order allocation problem with fuzzy multiobjective. Sci Program 2016, 1-13
Jadidi O, Cavalieri S, Zolfaghari S (2015) An improved multi-choice goal programming approach for supplier selection problems. Appl Math Model 39(14):4213–4222
Jain V, Kundu A, Chan FT, Patel M (2015) A Chaotic Bee Colony approach for supplier selection-order allocation with different discounting policies in a coopetitive multi-echelon supply chain. J Intell Manuf 26(6):1131–1144
Jia R, Liu Y, Bai X (2020) Sustainable supplier selection and order allocation: Distributionally robust goal programming model and tractable approximation. Comput Ind Eng, 140:106267
Karsak EE, Dursun M (2016) Taxonomy and review of non-deterministic analytical methods for supplier selection. Int J Comput Integr Manuf 29(3):263–286
Kaur H, Singh SP (2020) Multi-stage hybrid model for supplier selection and order allocation considering disruption risks and disruptive technologies. Int J Prod Econ, 231:107830
Kazemi N, Ehsani E, Glock CH, Schwindl K (2015) A mathematical programming model for a multi-objective supplier selection and order allocation problem with fuzzy objectives. Int J Serv Oper Manag 21(4):435–465
Kellner F, Utz S (2019) Sustainability in supplier selection and order allocation: combining integer variables with Markowitz portfolio theory. J Clean Prod 214:462–474
Khoshfetrat S, Galankashi R, M., & Almasi M (2019) Sustainable supplier selection and order allocation: a fuzzy approach. Eng Optim 52(9):1494-1507.
Kilic HS, Yalcin AS (2020) Modified two-phase fuzzy goal programming integrated with IF-TOPSIS for green supplier selection. Appl Soft Comput 93:106371
Kumar D, Rahman Z, Chan FT (2017) A fuzzy AHP and fuzzy multi-objective linear programming model for order allocation in a sustainable supply chain: A case study. Int J Comput Integr Manuf 30(6):535–551
Kuo RJ, Pai CM, Lin RH, Chu H (2015) The integration of association rule mining and artificial immune network for supplier selection and order quantity allocation. Appl Math Comput 250:958–972
Lee J, Cho H, Kim YS (2015) Assessing business impacts of agility criterion and order allocation strategy in multi-criteria supplier selection. Expert Syst Appl 42(3):1136–1148
Lo HW, Liou JJ, Wang HS, Tsai YS (2018) An integrated model for solving problems in green supplier selection and order allocation. J Clean Prod 190:339–352
Meena PL, Sarmah SP (2016) Supplier selection and demand allocation under supply disruption risks. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 83(1–4):265–274
Memon MS, Lee YH, Mari SI (2015) Group multi-criteria supplier selection using combined grey systems theory and uncertainty theory. Expert Syst Appl 42(21):7951–7959
Mirzaee H, Naderi B, Pasandideh SHR (2018) A preemptive fuzzy goal programming model for generalized supplier selection and order allocation with incremental discount. Comput Ind Eng 122:292–302
Moghaddam KS (2015a) Fuzzy multi-objective model for supplier selection and order allocation in reverse logistics systems under supply and demand uncertainty. Expert Syst Appl 42(15–16):6237–6254
Moghaddam KS (2015b) Supplier selection and order allocation in closed-loop supply chain systems using hybrid Monte Carlo simulation and goal programming. Int J Prod Res 53(20):6320–6338
Mohammaditabar D, Ghodsypour SH (2016) A supplier-selection model with classification and joint replenishment of inventory items. Int J Syst Sci 47(8):1745–1754
Mohammed A, Setchi R, Filip M, Harris I, Li X (2018) An integrated methodology for a sustainable two-stage supplier selection and order allocation problem. J Clean Prod 192:99–114
Mohammed A, Harris I, Govindan K (2019) A hybrid MCDM-FMOO approach for sustainable supplier selection and order allocation. Int J Prod Econ 217:171–184
Moheb-Moheb-Alizadeh H, Handfield R (2018) An integrated chance-constrained stochastic model for efficient and sustainable supplier selection and order allocation. Int J Prod Res 56(21):6890–6916
Moheb-Moheb-Alizadeh H, Handfield R (2019) Sustainable supplier selection and order allocation: A novel multi-objective programming model with a hybrid solution approach. Comput Ind Eng 129:192–209
Moheb-Moheb-Alizadeh H, Mahmoudi M, Bagheri R (2017) Supplier selection and order allocation using a stochastic multi-objective programming model and genetic algorithm. Int J Integr Supply Manag 11(4):291–315
Nazeri A, Soofifard R, Asili GR (2019) Supplier selection and evaluation in military supply chain and order allocation. Int J Procure Manag 12(4):376–390
Noori-Daryan M, Taleizadeh AA, Jolai F (2019) Analyzing pricing, promised delivery lead time, supplier-selection, and ordering decisions of a multi-national supply chain under uncertain environment. Int J Prod Econ 209:236–248
Nourmohamadi Shalke P, Paydar MM, Hajiaghaei-Keshteli M (2018) Sustainable supplier selection and order allocation through quantity discounts. Int J Manag Sci Eng Manag 13(1):20–32
Ocampo LA, Abad GKM, Cabusas KGL, Padon MLA, Sevilla NC (2018) Recent approaches to supplier selection: a review of literature within 2006–2016. Int J Integr Supply Manag 12(1–2):22–68
Park K, Kremer GEO, Ma J (2018) A regional information-based multi-attribute and multi-objective decision-making approach for sustainable supplier selection and order allocation. J Clean Prod 187:590–604
Pazhani S, Ventura JA, Mendoza A (2016) A serial inventory system with supplier selection and order quantity allocation considering transportation costs. Appl Math Model 40(1):612–634
Prasanna Venkatesan S, Goh M (2016) Multi-objective supplier selection and order allocation under disruption risk. Transp Res E 95:124–142
Rao MS, Rao VK (2018) Supplier selection and order allocation in supply chain. Mater Today Proc 5(5):12161–12173
Rezaei A, Rahiminezhad Galankashi M, Mansoorzadeh S, Mokhatab Rafiei F (2020) Supplier Selection and Order Allocation with Lean Manufacturing Criteria: An Integrated MCDM and Bi-objective Modelling Approach. Eng Manag J, 32(4):253-271
Rosyidi CN, Murtisari R, Jauhari WA (2016) A concurrent optimization model for supplier’s selection, tolerance and component allocation with fuzzy quality loss. Cogent Eng 3(1):1222043
Sawik T (2016) On the risk-averse optimization of service level in a supply chain under disruption risks. Int J Prod Res 54(1):98–113
Scott J, Ho W, Dey PK, Talluri S (2015) A decision support system for supplier selection and order allocation in stochastic, multi-stakeholder and multi-criteria environments. Int J Prod Econ 166:226–237
Shadkam E, Bijari M (2017) Multi-objective simulation optimization for selection and determination of order quantity in supplier selection problem under uncertainty and quality criteria. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 93(1–4):161–173
Simić D, Kovačević I, Svirčević V, Simić S (2017) 50 years of fuzzy set theory and models for supplier assessment and selection: A literature review. J Appl Log 24:85–96
Sodenkamp MA, Tavana M, Di Caprio D (2016) Modeling synergies in multi-criteria supplier selection and order allocation: An application to commodity trading. Eur J Oper Res 254(3):859–874
Suprasongsin S, Yenradee P, Huynh VN (2019) A weight-consistent model for fuzzy supplier selection and order allocation problem. Ann Oper Res, 293:587–605
Talebi F, Jafari D (2015) Vendor selection and order allocation using an integrated fuzzy mathematical programming model. Decis Sci Lett 4(4):551–558
Tirkolaee EB, Mardani A, Dashtian Z, Soltani M, Weber GW (2020) A novel hybrid method using fuzzy decision making and multi-objective programming for sustainable-reliable supplier selection in two-echelon supply chain design. J Clean Prod 250:119517
Torabi SA, Baghersad M, Mansouri SA (2015) Resilient supplier selection and order allocation under operational and disruption risks. Transp Res E 79:22–48
Tsai WC (2015) Order allocation for multi-item sourcing with supply disruptions in shipment quality and delivery. Int J Log Res Appl 18(6):494–517
Vahidi F, Torabi SA, Ramezankhani MJ (2018) Sustainable supplier selection and order allocation under operational and disruption risks. J Clean Prod 174:1351–1365
Wang C, Yang Q, Dai S (2020) Supplier selection and order allocation under a carbon emission trading scheme: a case study from China. Int J Environ Res Public Health 17(1):111
Wetzstein A, Hartmann E, Benton Jr WC, Hohenstein NO (2016) A systematic assessment of supplier selection literature–state-of-the-art and future scope. Int J Prod Econ 182:304–323
Wong JT (2020) Dynamic procurement risk management with supplier portfolio selection and order allocation under green market segmentation. J Clean Prod 253:119835
Yildiz A, Yayla AY (2015) Multi-criteria decision-making methods for supplier selection: A literature review. S Afr J Ind Eng 26(2):158–177
Acknowledgements
This research has been supported by a NSERC Discovery grant.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Naqvi, M.A., Amin, S.H. Supplier selection and order allocation: a literature review. J. of Data, Inf. and Manag. 3, 125–139 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42488-021-00049-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42488-021-00049-z