Skip to main content
Log in

An explicit basis for admissible inference rules in table modal logics of width 2

  • Published:
Algebra and Logic Aims and scope

We construct an explicit finite basis for admissible inference rules in an arbitrary modal logic of width 2 extending the logic Grz.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. P. Lorenzen, Einführung in die Operative Logik und Mathematik, Springer, Berlin (1955).

    Google Scholar 

  2. H. Friedman, “One hundred and two problems in mathematical logic,” J. Symb. Log., 40, No. 3, 113–129 (1975).

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. V. V. Rybakov, Admissibility of Logical Inference Rules, Stud. Log. Found. Math., 136, Elsevier, Amsterdam (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  4. S. Ghilardi, “Unification in intuitionistic logic,” J. Symb. Log., 64, No. 2, 859–880 (1999).

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. A. I. Citkin, “Admissible rules of intuitionistic propositional logic,” Mat. Sb., 102(144), No. 2, 314–323 (1977).

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. V. V. Rybakov, “Bases of admissible rules for logics S4 and Int,” Algebra Logika, 24, No. 1, 87–107 (1985).

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. V. V. Rybakov, “Bases of admissible rules for the modal system Grz and the intuitionistic logic,” Mat. Sb., 128(170), No. 3(11), 321–338 (1985).

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. V. V. Rimatskii, “Bases of admissible inference rules for table modal logics of depth 2,” Algebra Logika, 35, No. 5, 612–622 (1996).

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. V. V. Rimatskii, “Finite bases with respect to admissibility for modal logics of width 2,” Algebra Logika, 38, No. 4, 436–455 (1999).

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. V. V. Rybakov, M. Terziler, and V. Rimazki, “Bases in semi-reduced form for admissible rules of the intuitionistic logic IPC,”Math. Log. Q., 46, No. 2, 207–218 (2000).

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. R. Iemhoff, “On the admissible rules of intuitionistic propositional logic,” J. Symb. Log., 66, No. 2, 281–294 (2001).

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. R. Iemhoff, “A(nother) characterization of intuitionistic propositional logic,” Ann. Pure Appl. Log., 113, Nos. 1–3, 161–173 (2002).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. V. V. Rybakov, “An explicit basis for rules admissible in modal system S4,” Bull. Sect. Log., Univ. Lodz, Dep. Log., 28, No. 3, 135–143 (1999).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. V. Rimatskii.

Additional information

Translated from Algebra i Logika, Vol. 48, No. 1, pp. 122–148, January–February, 2009.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rimatskii, V.V. An explicit basis for admissible inference rules in table modal logics of width 2. Algebra Logic 48, 72–86 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10469-009-9041-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10469-009-9041-5

Keywords

Navigation