Skip to main content
Log in

A Research Framework for Understanding the Practical Impact of Family Involvement in the Juvenile Justice System: The Juvenile Justice Family Involvement Model

  • Original Article
  • Published:
American Journal of Community Psychology

Abstract

Family involvement is recognized as a critical element of service planning for children’s mental health, welfare and education. For the juvenile justice system, however, parents’ roles in this system are complex due to youths’ legal rights, public safety, a process which can legally position parents as plaintiffs, and a historical legacy of blaming parents for youth indiscretions. Three recent national surveys of juvenile justice-involved parents reveal that the current paradigm elicits feelings of stress, shame and distrust among parents and is likely leading to worse outcomes for youth, families and communities. While research on the impact of family involvement in the justice system is starting to emerge, the field currently has no organizing framework to guide a research agenda, interpret outcomes or translate findings for practitioners. We propose a research framework for family involvement that is informed by a comprehensive review and content analysis of current, published arguments for family involvement in juvenile justice along with a synthesis of family involvement efforts in other child-serving systems. In this model, family involvement is presented as an ascending, ordinal concept beginning with (1) exclusion, and moving toward climates characterized by (2) information-giving, (3) information-eliciting and (4) full, decision-making partnerships. Specific examples of how courts and facilities might align with these levels are described. Further, the model makes predictions for how involvement will impact outcomes at multiple levels with applications for other child-serving systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agudelo, S. V. (2013). The impact of family visitation on incarcerated youth’s behavior and school performance: Findings from the families as partners project. New York, NY: VERA Institute of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aquilino, W., & Supple, A. (2001). Long-term effects of parenting practices during adolescence on well-being outcomes in young adulthood. Journal of Family Issues, 22(3), 289–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, B., Mackey, E. R., & Streisand, R. (2011). Parenting behavior, child functioning, and health behaviors in preadolescents with type 1 diabetes. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 36(9), 1052–1061. doi:10.1093/jpepsy/jsr039.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), 216–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arya, N. (2013). Family comes first: A workbook to transform the justice system by partnering with families. Washington, DC: Campaign for Youth Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayres, I., & Braithwaite, J. (1992). Responsive regulation: Transcending the deregulation debate. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrows, S. J. (1904). Children’s courts in the United States: Their origin, development, and results-reports prepared for the International Penal and Prison Commission. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borduin, C. M. (1999). Multisystemic treatment of criminality and violence in adolescents. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 38(3), 242–249.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brauer, J. R., & De Coster, S. (2015). Social relationships and delinquency. Youth and Society, 47(3), 374–394. doi:10.1177/0044118X12467655.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brody, G. H., Dorsey, S., Forehand, R., & Armistead, L. (2002). Unique and protective contributions of parenting and classroom processes to the adjustment of African-American children living in single-parent families. Child Development, 73(1), 274–286.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bruns, E. J., Sather, A., Pullmann, M. D., & Stambaugh, L. F. (2011). National trends in implementing wraparound: Results from the state wraparound survey. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 20(6), 726–735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Building Bridges (2012). Finding and engaging families for youth receiving residential services: Key issues, tips and strategies for residential leaders. A Building Bridges Initiative Guide. Retrieved from http://www.buildingbridges4youth.org. Accessed 22 Sept 2015.

  • Burke, J. D., Mulvey, E. P., Schubert, C. A., & Garbin, S. R. (2014). The challenge and opportunity of parental involvement in juvenile justice services. Children and Youth Services Review, 39, 39–47.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cauffman, E., Piquero, A. R., Broidy, L., Espelage, D. L., & Mazerolle, P. (2004). Heterogeneity in the association between social-emotional adjustment profiles and deviant behavior among male and female serious juvenile offenders. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 48(2), 235–252.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Children's Bureau. (2010). Family involvement in the Improving Child Welfare Outcomes Through Systems of Care initiative. Administration on Children, Youth and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

  • Child Welfare Information Gateway. (2010). Family engagement. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Children's Bureau.

  • Child Welfare Policy and Practice Group (2008). Adopting a child welfare practice framework. Child Welfare Policy and Practice Group. Retrieved from http://www.childwelfaregroup.org. Acessed 22 Sept 2015.

  • Cook, A. K., & Gordon, J. A. (2012). Get him out of my house: Parental competencies of juvenile probationers. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 10, 205–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coombs, R., & Landsverk, J. (1988). Parenting styles and substance use during childhood and adolescence. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 50(2), 473–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, P. B., & Henggeler, S. C. (1999). Engaging multiproblem families in treatment: Lessons learned throughout the development of multisystemic therapy. Family Process, 38(3), 265–286.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dorsey, S., Pullmann, M. D., Berliner, L., Koschmann, E., McKay, M., & Deblinger, E. (2014). Engaging foster parents in treatment: A randomized trial of supplementing trauma-focused cognitive behavioral therapy with evidence-based engagement strategies. Child Abuse and Neglect, 38(9), 1508–1520.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eliot, C. C., Hall, B., Hurley, T. D., Lindsey, B. B., Mayer, J. M., Murphy, T., et al. (1904). Children’s courts in the United States: Their origin, development, and results. Washington, DC: Prepared for the International Prison Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, J. L., & Sheldon, S. B. (2006). Moving forward: Ideas for research on school, family, and community partnerships. In C. F. Conrad & R. C. Serlin (Eds.), Handbook for research in education: Engaging ideas and enriching inquiry (pp. 117–138). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, J. L., Sanders, M. G., Simon, B. S., Salinas, K. C., Jansorn, N. R., & Van Voorhis, F. L. (2002). School, family, and community partnerships: Your handbook for action (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erlandson, D. A., Harris, E. L., Skipper, B. L., & Allen, S. D. (1993). Doing naturalistic inquiry: A guide to methods. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fagan, A. A., Van Horn, M. L., Antaramian, S., & Hawkins, J. D. (2011). How do families matter? age and gender differences in family influences on delinquency and drug use. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 9(2), 150–170. doi:10.1177/1541204010377748.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Friesen, B. J., & Koroloff, N. M. (1990). Family-centered services: Implications for mental health administration and research. Journal of Mental Health Administration, 17(1), 13–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Friesen, B. J., Pullmann, M. D., Koroloff, N. M., & Rea, T. (2005). Multiple perspectives on family outcomes in children’s mental health. In M. H. Epstein, K. Kutash, & A. J. Duchnowski (Eds.), Outcomes for children and youth with emotional and behavioral disorders (pp. 101–123). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfinkel, L., Jordan, D., & Goldberg, P. (1997). Unique challenges, hopeful responses: A handbook for professionals working with youth with disabilities in the juvenile justice system. Minneapolis, MN: Pacer Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geurts, E. M. W., Boddy, J., Noom, M. J., & Knorth, E. J. (2012). Family-centered residential care: The new reality? Child and Family Social Work, 17(2), 170–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, M., & Cui, M. (2015). Positive parenting during adolescence and career success in young adulthood. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 24(3), 762–771. doi:10.1007/s10826-013-9887-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grisso, T., Steinberg, L., Woolard, J., Cauffman, E., Scott, E., Graham, S., et al. (2003). Juveniles’ competence to stand trial: A comparison of adolescents’ and adults’ capacities as trial defendants. Law and Human Behavior, 27(4), 333–363.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Haight, W. L., Bidwell, L. N., Marshall, J. M., & Khatiwoda, P. (2014). Implementing the crossover youth practice model in diverse contexts: Child welfare and juvenile justice professionals’ experiences of multisystem collaborations. Children and Youth Services Review, 39, 91–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvell, S., Rodas, B., & Hendey, L. (2004). Parental involvement in juvenile justice: Prospects and possibilities. The Center for Research on Children in the U.S. (CROCUS) Georgetown Public Policy Institute. (pp. 1–15). The Georgetown University Department of Psychology.

  • Henggeler, S. W., Cunningham, P. B., Pickrel, S. G., Schoenwald, S. K., & Brondino, M. J. (1996). Multisystemic therapy: An effective violence prevention approach for serious juvenile offenders. Journal of Adolescence, 19(1), 47–61. doi:10.1006/jado.1996.0005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, C. E., Knox, S., Thompson, B. J., Williams, E. N., Hess, S. A., & Ladany, N. (2005). Consensual qualitative research: An update. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52(2), 196–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoagwood, K. E., Green, E., Kelleher, K., Schoenwald, S., Rolls-Reutz, J., Landsverk, J., et al. (2008). Family advocacy, support and education in children’s mental health: Results of a national survey. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 35(1–2), 73–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hoover-Dempsey, K. V., & Sandler, H. M. (1997). Why do parents become involved in their children’s education? Review of Educational Research, 67(1), 3–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horwitz, S. M., Chamberlain, P., Landsverk, J., & Mullican, C. (2010). Improving the mental health of children in child welfare through the implementation of evidence-based parenting interventions. Administration and Policy In Mental Health, 37(1), 27–39.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Houtenville, A. J., & Conway, K. S. (2008). Parental effort, school resources, and student achievement. Journal of Human Resources, 43(2), 437–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsieh, H. F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hurd, N. M., & Zimmerman, M. A. (2014). An analysis of natural mentoring relationship profiles and associations with mentees’ mental health: Considering links via support from important others. American Journal of Community Psychology, 53, 25–36.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Justice for Families (2012). Families unlocking futures: Solutions to the crisis in juvenile justice. Report retrieved from http://www.njjn.org/uploads/digital-library/Fam_Unlock_Future_EXEC_SUMNOEMBARGO.pdf.

  • Kutash, K., Duchnowski, A. J., Green, A. L., & Ferron, J. M. (2011). Supporting parents who have youth with emotional disturbances through a parent-to-parent support program: A proof of concept study using random assignment. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 38, 412–427.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, R. A. (2005). Family group conferencing: A realistic option for juvenile justice? American Humane FGDM Issues in Brief.

  • Luke, G., & Lind, B. (2002). Reducing juvenile crime: Conferencing versus court. Sydney: New South Wales Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research. Retrieved from http://www.bocsar.nsw.gov.au/bocsar/bocsar_index.html.

  • MacKinnon-Lewis, C., Kaufman, M. C., & Frabutt, J. M. (2002). Juvenile justice and mental health: Youth and families in the middle. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 7(4), 353–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mancini, M. J. (1996). One dies, get another: Convict leasing in the American south. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCammon, S. L., Spencer, S. A., & Friesen, B. J. (2001). Promoting family empowerment through multiple roles. In D. A. Dosser Jr, D. Handron, S. McCammon, & J. Y. Powell (Eds.), Child mental health: Exploring systems of care in the new millennium (pp. 1–24). New York, NY US: Haworth Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, S., & Lambert, J. (2014). The long arm of mentoring: A counterfactual analysis of natural youth mentoring and employment outcomes in early careers. American Journal of Community Psychology, 54, 262–273.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McGarrell, E. F., & Hipple, N. K. (2007). Family group conferencing and re-offending among first-time juvenile offenders: The Indianapolis experiment. Justice Quarterly, 24(2), 221–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKay, M. M., Pennington, J., Lynn, C. J., & McCadam, K. (2001). Understanding urban child mental health service use: Two studies of child, family, and environmental correlates. Journal of Behavioral Health Services and Research, 28(4), 475–483.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McWayne, C., Hampton, V., Fantuzzo, J., Cohen, H. L., & Sekino, Y. (2004). A multivariate examination of parent involvement and the social and academic competencies of urban kindergarten children. Psychology in the Schools, 41(3), 363–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Models for Change. (2009). Family involvement in Pennsylvania’s juvenile justice system. Family Involvement Subcommittee of the Mental Health/Juvenile Justice Workgroup for Models for Change-Pennsylvania and Family Involvement Workgroup of the Pennsylvania Council of Chief Juvenile Probation Officer’s Balanced and Restorative Justice Implementation Committee.

  • Munson, S., & Freundlich, M. (2008). Families gaining their seat at the table: Family engagement strategies in the first round of child and family services reviews and program improvement plans. Denver, CO: American Humane Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • New Freedom Commission on Mental Health. (2003). Achieving the promise: Transforming mental health care in America. Rockville, MD: Department of Health and Human Services, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration.

    Google Scholar 

  • OJJDP. (2013). Family listening sessions: Executive summary. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice.

  • Osher, T. W., & Hunt, P. (2002). Involving families of youth who are in contact with the juvenile justice system. Retreived from http://www.ncmhjj.com/pdfs/publications/Family.pdf.

  • Osher, T. W., & Osher, D. M. (2002). The paradigm shift to true collaboration with families. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 11(1), 47–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osher, T. W., & Shufelt, J. L. (2006). What families think of the juvenile justice system: Findings from a multi-state prevalence study. Focal point: The research and training center on family support and children’s mental health.

  • Osher, T. W., Penn, M., & Spencer, S. A. (2008). Partnerships with families for family-driven systems of care. In B. A. Stroul & G. M. Blau (Eds.), The system of care handbook: Transforming mental health services for children, youth, and families (pp. 249–273). Baltimore, MD US: Paul H Brookes Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, S., & Holloway, S. D. (2013). No parent left behind: Predicting parental involvement in adolescents’ education within a sociodemographically diverse population. Journal of Educational Research, 106(2), 105–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pennell, J., Shapiro, C., & Spigner, C. (2011). Safety, fairness, stability: Repositioning juvenile justice and child welfare to engage families and communities. Georgetown University: Center for Juvenile Justice Reform.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pew Research Center. (2013). King’s dream remains an elusive goal; many Americans see racial disparities (pp. 1–46). Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Platt, A. M. (2009). The child savers: The invention of delinquency (2nd ed). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Platt, D. (2012). Understanding parental engagement in child welfare services: An integrated model. Child and Family Social Work, 17, 138–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pullmann, M. D. (2009). Participatory research in systems of care for children’s mental health. American Journal of Community Psychology, 44(1), 43–53.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pullmann, M. D., Ague, S., Walker, S. C., Negrete, A., Quick, H. F., & Trupin, E. (2013). Washington state disproportionate minority contact assessment. Seattle, WA: University of Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravoira, L., Patino Lydia, V., Graziano, J., Glesmann, C., & Baker, P. (2012). Voices from the field: Findings from the NGI listening sessions. Jacksonville, FL: NCCD Center for Girls and Young Women.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, V., Johnston, J., Barnett, H., Hobstetter, W., Kutash, K., Duchnowski, A., & Annis, S. (2008). Parent to parent: A synthesis of the emerging literature. Tampa, FL: University of South Florida, The Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute, Department of Child and Family Studies.

  • Ryan, J. P., & Yang, H. (2005). Family contact and recidivism: A longitudinal study of adjudicated delinquents in residential care. Social Work Research, 29, 31–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salzer, M. S., Schwenk, E., & Brusilovskiy, E. (2010). Certified peer specialist roles and activities: Results from a national survey. Psychiatric Services, 61(5), 520–523.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S. E., Rhodes, J. E., Spencer, R., & Grossman, J. B. (2013). Youth initiated mentoring: Investigating a new approach to working with vulnerable adolescents. American Journal of Community Psychology, 52, 155–169.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sexton, T. L., Alexander, J. F., & United States. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency, P. (2000). Functional family therapy. [Washington, DC]: U.S. Dept. of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.

  • Shanahan, R. (2010). Integrating family-focused approaches in juvenile justice reform. Child Welfare League of America, 8(1), 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheldon, S. B. (2007). Improving student attendance with school, family, and community partnerships. Journal of Educational Research, 100(5), 267–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spera, C. (2005). A review of the relationship among parenting practices, parenting styles, and adolescent school achievement. Educational Psychology Review, 17(2), 120–146. doi:10.1007/s10648-005-3950-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg, L., Lamborn, S. D., Dornbusch, S. M., & Darling, N. (1992). Impact of parenting practices on adolescent achievement: Authoritative parenting, school involvement, and encouragement to succeed. Child Development, 63(5), 1266–1281.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sterrett, E. M., Jones, D. J., McKee, L. G., & Kincaid, C. (2011). Supportive non-parental adults and adolescent psychosocial functioning: Using social support as a theoretical framework. American Journal of Community Psychology, 48, 284–295.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stith, K., & Cabranes, J. A. (1998). Fear of judging: Sentencing guidelines in the federal courts. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stroul, B. A., & Blau, G. M. (2010). Defining the system of care concept and philosophy: To update or not to update. Evaluation and Program Planning, 33, 59–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Suter, J. C., & Bruns, E. J. (2009). Effectiveness of the wraparound process for children with emotional and behavioral disorders: A meta-analysis. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 12, 336–351.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Trupin, E. W., Turner, A. P., Stewart, D., & Wood, P. (2004). Transition planning and recidivism among mentally ill juvenile offenders. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 22, 599–610.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Trupin, E. J., Kerns, S. E., Walker, S. C., DeRobertis, M. T., & Stewart, D. G. (2011). Family integrated transitions: A promising program for juvenile offenders with co-occuring disorders. Journal of Child and Adolescent Substance Abuse, 20(5), 421–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • VanderStoep, A., Green, L., Jones, R. A., & Huffine, C. (2001). A family empowerment model of change. In M. Hernandez & S. Hodges (Eds.), Developing outcome strategies in children’s mental health (pp. 41–59). Baltimore, MD US: Paul H Brookes Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vincent, R. F. (1977). Expanding the neglected role of the parent in the juvenile court. Pepperdine Law Review, 4(3), 523–541.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, S. C., Bishop, A. S., Trayler, K., Jaeger, R., Gustaveson, S., & Guthrie, A. C. (2015). Impact of peer partner support on self efficacy for justice-involved parents: A controlled study of juvenile justice 101. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 24, 443–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, H. B., & Stephen, N. C. (2009). From periphery to center: A new vision and strategy for family, school, and community partnerships. In S. L. Christenson & A. L. Reschly (Eds.), Handbook of school–family partnerships (pp. 448–472), New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, E., & Gray, A. (2011). New roles for families in child welfare: Strategies for expanding family involvement beyond the case level. Children and Youth Services Review, 33(7), 1212–1216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wisdom, J. P., Olin, S., Shorter, P., Burton, G., & Hoagwood, K. (2011). Family peer advocates: A pilot study of the content and process of service provision. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 20(6), 833–843.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • WSIPP & EBPI. (2013). Updated inventory of evidence-based, research-based, and promising practices for prevention and intervention services for children and juveniles in the child welfare, juvenile justice, and mental health systems. Washington State Institue for Public Policy and University of Washington’s Evidence-Based Practice Institute.

  • Yatchmenoff, D. K. (2005). Measuring client engagement from the client’s perspective in nonvoluntary child protective services. Research on Social Work Practice, 15(2), 84–96. doi:10.1177/1049731504271605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmer-Gembeck, M. J., Thomas, R., Hendrickson, K., Avdagic, E., Webb, H., & McGregor, L. (2013). Maternal emotional distress, abuse risk, and children’s symptoms: Child gender as a moderator of parent sensitivity as a mediator. Infant and Child Development, 22(5), 480–500. doi:10.1002/icd.1804.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sarah Cusworth Walker.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Walker, S.C., S. Bishop, A., D. Pullmann, M. et al. A Research Framework for Understanding the Practical Impact of Family Involvement in the Juvenile Justice System: The Juvenile Justice Family Involvement Model. Am J Community Psychol 56, 408–421 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-015-9755-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-015-9755-6

Keywords

Navigation