Skip to main content
Log in

Conflict Transformation, Stigma, and HIV-Preventive Structural Change

  • Original Article
  • Published:
American Journal of Community Psychology

Abstract

Over the prior decade, structural change efforts have become an important component of community-based HIV prevention initiatives. However, these efforts may not succeed when structural change initiatives encounter political resistance or invoke conflicting values, which may be likely when changes are intended to benefit a stigmatized population. The current study sought to examine the impact of target population stigma on the ability of 13 community coalitions to achieve structural change objectives. Results indicated that coalitions working on behalf of highly stigmatized populations had to abandon objectives more often than did coalitions working for less stigmatized populations because of external opposition to coalition objectives and resultant internal conflict over goals. Those coalitions that were most successful in meeting external challenges used opposition and conflict as transformative occasions by targeting conflicts directly and attempting to neutralize oppositional groups or turn them into strategic allies; less successful coalitions working on behalf of stigmatized groups struggled to determine an appropriate response to opposition. The role of conflict transformation as a success strategy for working on behalf of stigmatized groups is discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The difference in completion time between high stigma and low stigma coalitions became more dramatic and attained statistical significance in an Analysis of Variance with Welch’s correction when we reclassified the low stigma coalition that reported symbolic stigma was a significant barrier to their work. With it reclassified as a high stigma coalition, the low stigma coalitions completed objectives in an average of 6 months (SD = 5.65). Moreover, when this coalition was reclassified, Games-Howell post-hoc analyses indicated a significant difference between high stigma, low-success coalitions and low stigma, low-success coalitions in how long it took to complete objectives. The high stigma low success coalitions took 7.5 months to complete objectives compared with 4 months for the low stigma low success coalitions.

  2. When the low-stigma coalition reporting symbolic stigma was reclassified, no universal objectives were completed by low stigma low success coalitions.

  3. Reclassification of the coalition reporting symbolic stigma to the high stigma group increases references to stigma barriers among the high stigma coalitions to 80% and decreases references to stigma barriers among the low stigma coalitions to 20%. Close examination of this coalition suggested it represents the most extreme experiences of symbolic AIDS stigma among the low stigma sites, though it is the only coalition in this group to have its work so dramatically impeded by symbolic AIDS stigma.

References

  • Allen, N. E., Watt, K. A., & Zess, J. Z. (2008). A qualitative study of activities and outcomes of domestic violence coordinating councils. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41, 63–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Almeida, J., Johnson, R. M., Corliss, H. L., Molnar, B. E., & Azrael, D. (2009). Emotional distress among LGBT youth: The influence of perceived discrimination based on sexual orientation. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 38, 1001–1014.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Balsam, K. F., Rothblum, E. D., & Beauchaine, T. P. (2005). Victimization over the life span: A comparison of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and heterosexual siblings. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73, 477–487.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bartunek, J. M., & Moch, M. K. (1987). First-order, second-order, and third order change and organizational development interventions: A cognitive approach. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 23, 483–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berlan, E. D., Corliss, H. L., Field, A. E., Goodman, E., & Austin, S. B. (2010). Sexual orientation and bullying among adolescents in the Growing Up Today Study. Journal of Adolescent Health, 46, 366–371.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blankenship, K. S., Bray, S. J., & Merson, M. H. (2000). Structural interventions in public health. AIDS, 14, S11–S21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blankenship, K. S., Friedman, S. R., Dworkin, S., & Mantell, J. E. (2006). Structural interventions: Concepts, challenges and opportunities for research. Journal of Urban Health, 83, 59–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bloor, M. J. (1978). On the analysis of observational data: A discussion of worth and uses of inductive techniques and respondent validation. Sociology, 12, 545–552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butterfoss, F. D. (2006). Process evaluation for community participation. Annual Review of Public Health, 27, 323–340.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chavis, D. M. (2001). The paradoxes and promise of community coalitions. American Journal of Community Psychology, 29, 309–320.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cheadle, A., Senter, S., Solomon, L., Beery, W. L., & Schwartz, P. M. (2005). A qualitative exploration of alternative strategies for building community-health partnerships: Collaboration- versus issue-oriented approaches. Journal of Urban Health, 82, 638–652.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Collie-Akers, V. L., Fawcett, S. B., Schultz, J. A., Carson, V., Cyprus, J., & Pierle, J. E. (2007). Analyzing a community-based coalition’s efforts to reduce health disparities and the risk for chronic disease in Kansas City, Missouri. Preventing Chronic Disease, 4. Available from http://www.cdc.gov/pcd/issues/2007/jul/06_0101.htm.

  • Community Tool Box. (2003). Part D, Chapter 8, Section 1: An overview of strategic planning or “VMOSA” (Vision, Mission, Objectives, Strategies, and Action Plans). Lawrence, KS: University of Kansas. Available from http://ctb.ku.edu/en/tablecontents/section_1085.aspx. Accessed on 3 April 2011.

  • Crowley, K. M., Yu, P., & Kaftarian, S. J. (2000). Prevention actions and activities make a difference: a structural equation model of coalition building. Evaluation and Program Planning, 23, 381–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Augelli, A. R., Pilkington, N. W., & Hershberger, S. L. (2002). Incidence and mental health impact of sexual orientation victimization of lesbian, gay, and bisexual youths in high school. School Psychology Quarterly, 17, 148–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drucker, P. F. (1954). The practice of management. New York: Harper & Row Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, F. (1986). Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 119–161). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fawcett, S. B., Francisco, V. T., Hyra, D., Paine-Andrews, A., Schultz, J. A., Roussos, S., et al. (2000a). Building healthy communities. In A. Tarlov & R. St. Peter (Eds.), The Society and population health reader: A state and community perspective (pp. 75–93). New York: New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fawcett, S. B., Francisco, V. T., Paine-Andrews, A., & Schultz, J. A. (2000b). Working together for healthier communities: A research-based memorandum of collaboration. Public Health Reports, 115, 174–179.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Flom, P. L., Friedman, S. R., Kottiri, B. J., Neaigus, A., Curtis, R., Des Jarlais, D. C., et al. (2001). Stigmatized drug use, sexual partner concurrency, and other sex risk network and behavior characteristic of 18- to 24-year-old youth in a high-risk neighborhood. Sexually Transmitted Diseases, 28, 598–607.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Florin, P., Mitchell, R., Stevenson, J., & Klein, I. (2000). Predicting intermediate outcomes for prevention coalitions: A developmental perspective. Evaluation and Program Planning, 23, 341–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Francisco, V. T., Fawcett, S. B., Schultz, J. S., & Paine-Andrews, A. (2000). A model of health promotion and community development. In F. B. Balcazar, M. Montero, & J. R. Newbrough (Eds.), Health promotion in the Americas: Theory and practice (pp. 17–34). Washington, DC: Pan American Health Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frieden, T. R. (2010). A framework for public health action: The health impact pyramid. American Journal of Public Health, 100, 590–595.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma: Notes on the management of a spoiled identity. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, R. S. (1983). An operational classification of disease prevention. Public Health Reports, 98, 107–109.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, G. R., Parkhurst, J. O., Ogden, J. A., Aggleton, P., & Mahal, A. (2008). Structural approaches to HIV prevention. Lancet, 372, 764–775.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Henkel, K. E., Brown, K., & Kalichman, S. C. (2008). AIDS-related stigma in individuals with other stigmatized identities in the USA: A review of layered stigmas. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2, 1586–1599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herek, G. M. (1999). AIDS and stigma. American Behavioral Scientist, 42, 1106–1116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herek, G. M., & Capitanio, J. P. (1999). AIDS stigma and sexual prejudice. American Behavioral Scientist, 42, 1126–1143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holtgrave, D. R., McGuire, J. F., & Milan, J. (2007). The magnitude of key HIV prevention challenges in the United States: Implications for a new national HIV prevention plan. American Journal of Public Health, 97, 1163–1167.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kadushin, C., Lindholm, M., Ryan, D., Brodsky, A., & Saxe, L. (2005). Why is it so difficult to form effective community coalitions? City and Community, 4, 255–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Link, B. G., & Phelan, J. C. (2001). Conceptualizing stigma. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 363–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahajan, A. P., Sayles, J. N., Patel, V. A., Remien, R. H., Ortiz, D., Szekeres, G., et al. (2008). Stigma in the HIV/AIDS epidemic: A review of the literature and recommendations for the way forward. AIDS, 22(suppl. 2), S67–S79.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marmot, M. (2005). Social determinants of health inequalities. The Lancet, 365, 1099–1104.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLeroy, K. R., Bibeau, D., Steckler, A., & Glanz, K. (1988). An ecological perspective on health promotion programs. Health Education Quarterly, 15, 351–378.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, R. L., Reed, S. J., & Francisco, V. T. (2011). Accomplishing structural change: Identifying intermediate indicators of success. Unpublished manuscript.

  • Mizrahi, T., & Rosenthal, B. B. (2001). Complexities of coalition building: Leaders’ successes, strategies, struggles and solutions. Social Work, 46, 63–78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ogusky, J., & Tenner, A. (2010). Advocating for schools to provide effective HIV and sexuality education: A case study in how social service organizations working in coalition can (and should) affect sustained policy change. Health Promotion Practice, 11(suppl. 1), S34–S41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker, R., & Aggleton, P. (2003). HIV and AIDS-related stigma and discrimination: A conceptual framework and implications for action. Social Science and Medicine, 57, 13–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Piven, F. F., & Cloward, R. A. (1979). Poor people’s movements: Why they succeed, how they fail. New York, NY: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • QSR International (2008). NVivo 8 [computer software]. Melbourne: Australia.

  • Reed, S. J., Miller, R. L., Francisco, V. T., & The Adolescent Medicine Trials Network for HIV/AIDS Interventions. (in press). Programmatic capacity and HIV structural change interventions: Influences on coalitions’ success and efficiency in accomplishing intermediate outcomes. Journal of Prevention and Intervention in the Community, in press.

  • Reed, S. J., Miller, R. L., & The Adolescent Medicine Trials Network for HIV/AIDS Interventions. (2011). The benefits of youth engagement in HIV-preventive structural change interventions. Unpublished manuscript.

  • Robinson, W. S. (1951). The logical structure of analytic induction. American Sociological Review, 16, 812–818.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rockwell, R., Des Jarlais, D. C., Friedman, S. R., Perlis, T. E., & Paone, D. (1999). Geographic proximity, policy and utilization of syringe exchange programmes. AIDS Care, 11, 437–442.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rosario, M., Schrimshaw, E. W., Hunter, J., & Gwadz, M. (2002). Gay-related stress and emotional distress among gay, lesbian and bisexual youths: A longitudinal examination. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 70, 967–975.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rosser, B. S. R., & Horvath, K. J. (2008). Predictors of success in implementing HIV prevention in rural America: A state-level structural factor analysis of HIV prevention targeting men who have sex with men. AIDS and Behavior, 12, 159–168.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roussos, S. T., & Fawcett, S. B. (2000). A review of collaborative partnerships as a strategy for improving community health. Annual Review of Public Health, 21, 369–402.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, S. T., Franz, B. T., & Driscoll, A. K. (2001). Same-sex romantic attraction and experiences of violence in adolescence. American Journal of Public Health, 91, 903–906.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sabatier, P. A., & Jenkins-Smith, H. C. (1999). The advocacy coalition framework: An assessment. In P. A. Sabatier (Ed.), Theories of the policy process (pp. 117–166). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. L. (1997). Mixing and matching: methods and models. In J. C. Greene & V. J. Caracelli (Eds.), Advances in mixed-method evaluation: The challenges and benefits of integrating diverse paradigms, new directions for evaluation (pp. 73–85). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Straub, D. M., Deeds, B. G., Willard, N., Castor, J., Peralta, L., Francisco, V. T., et al. (2007). Partnership selection and formation: A case study of developing adolescent health community-researcher partnerships in 15 US communities. Journal of Adolescent Health, 40, 489–498.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sumartojo, E. (2000). Structural factors in HIV prevention: Concepts, examples, and implications for research. AIDS, 14, S3–S10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Taywaditep, K. J. (2001). Marginalization among the marginalized: Gay men’s anti-effeminacy attitudes. Journal of Homosexuality, 42, 1–28.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tempalski, B., Flom, P. L., Friedman, S. R., Des Jarlais, D. C., Friedman, J. J., McKnight, C., et al. (2007). Social and political factors predicting the presence of syringe exchange programs in 96 US metropolitan areas. American Journal of Public Health, 97, 437–447.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Valente, T. W., Chou, C. P., & Pentz, M. A. (2007). Community coalitions as a system: Effects of network change on adoption of evidence-based substance abuse prevention. American Journal of Public Health, 97, 880–886.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Watson-Thompson, J., Fawcett, S. B., & Schultz, S. A. (2008). Differential effects of strategic planning on community change in two urban neighborhood coalitions. American Journal of Community Psychology, 42, 25–38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Watzlawick, P., Weakland, J., & Fisch, R. (1974). Change: Principles of problem formation and problem resolution. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Well, R., Ford, E. W., Holt, M. L., McClure, J. A., & Ward, A. (2004). Tracing the evolution of pluralism in community-based coalitions. Health Care Management Review, 29, 329–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willard, N., Chutuape, K., Stines, S., & Ellen, J. (in press). Bridging the gap between individual level risk for HIV and structural determinants: Using root cause analysis in strategic planning. Journal of Prevention and Intervention in the Community, in press.

  • Williams, T., Connolly, J., Pepler, D., & Craig, W. (2003). Questioning and sexual minority adolescents: High school experiences of bullying, sexual harassment and physical abuse. Canadian Journal of Community Mental Health, 22, 47–58.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wolff, T. (2001). A practitioner’s guide to successful coalitions. American Journal of Community Psychology, 29, 173–191.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ziff, M., Harper, G., Chutuape, K., Deeds, B. G., Futterman, D., Ellen, J., et al. (2006). Laying the foundation for Connect to Protect®: A multi-site community mobilization intervention to reduce HIV/AIDS incidence and prevalence among urban youth. Journal of Urban Health, 83, 506–522.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The Adolescent Medicine Trials Network for HIV/AIDS Interventions (ATN) is funded by Grant No. 2 U01 HD040533 from the National Institutes of Health through the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (B. Kapogiannis, MD), with supplemental funding from the National Institute on Drug Abuse (N. Borek, PhD), National Institute on Mental Health (P. Brouwers, PhD), and National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (K Bryant, PhD). The study was scientifically reviewed by the ATN’s Community and Prevention Leadership Group. Network scientific and logistical support was provide by the ATN Coordinating Center (C. Wilson, C. Partlow), at the University of Alabama at Birmingham. The ATN 079 Protocol Team members are Vincent Francisco (University of North Carolina-Greensboro), Robin Lin Miller (Michigan State University), Jonathan Ellen (Johns Hopkins University), Peter Freeman (Children’s Memorial Hospital), Lawrence B. Friedman (University of Miami School of Medicine), Grisel-Robles Schrader (University of California-San Francisco), Jessica Roy (Children’s Diagnostic and Treatment Center), Nancy Willard (Johns Hopkins University), and Jennifer Huang (Westat, Inc.). Research assistantship was provided by Sarah J. Reed (Michigan State University), Ella Dolan (Michigan State University), and Greer Cook (University of North Carolina-Greensboro). The authors thank Miles McNall and five anonymous reviewers for their insightful feedback on prior versions of this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robin Lin Miller.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Miller, R.L., Reed, S.J., Francisco, V.T. et al. Conflict Transformation, Stigma, and HIV-Preventive Structural Change. Am J Community Psychol 49, 378–392 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-011-9465-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-011-9465-7

Keywords

Navigation