Skip to main content
Log in

A Heuristic Framework for Understanding the Role of Participatory Decision Making in Community-Based Non-Profits

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
American Journal of Community Psychology

Abstract

This paper explores the role of member participation in decision-making (PDM) from an organizational learning (OL) perspective. Community-based organizations (CBOs) serve as mediators between the individual and the local community, often providing the means for community member participation and benefiting organizationally from members’ input. Community psychologists have recognized these benefits; however, the field has paid less attention to the role participation plays in increasing CBOs’ capacity to meet community needs. We present a framework for exploring how CBO contextual factors influence the use of participatory decision-making structures and practices, and how these affect OL. We then use the framework to examine PDM in qualitative case study analysis of four CBOs: a youth development organization, a faith-based social action coalition, a low-income neighborhood organization, and a large human service agency. We found that organizational form, energy, and culture each had a differential impact on participation in decision making within CBOs. We highlight how OL is constrained in CBOs and document how civic aims and voluntary membership enhanced participation and learning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. In this paper we have focused on internal influences but recognize and have included in our model external influences, which we are addressing in a separate paper.

  2. Here redundancy does not imply inefficiency but rather suggests that when organizations have a systemic practice of bringing differing perspectives to challenges and opportunities that arise, they are more likely to generate novel solutions.

References

  • Alinsky, S. (1971). Rules for radicals. New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyris, C., & Schön, D. A. (1996). Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, J. S., & Gregersen, H. B. (1997). Participative decision-making: An integration of multiple dimensions. Human Relations, 50(7), 859–879.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, N., & Angelique, H. (2002). Rekindling the discourse: Organization studies in community psychology. Journal of Community Psychology, 30(4), 325–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, N., & Angelique, H. (2007). Resuming the dialogue on organization studies and community psychology: An introduction to the special issue. Journal of Community Psychology, 35(3), 281–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (1991). Organizational learning and communities-of-practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation. Organization Science, 2(1), 40–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruch, H., & Ghoshal, S. (2003). Unleashing organizational energy. MIT Sloan Management Review, 45(1), 45–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryan, K. S., Klein, D. A., & Elias, M. J. (2007). Applying organizational theories to action research in community settings: A case study in urban schools. Journal of Community Psychology, 35(3), 383–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cotton, J. L., Vollrath, D. A., Froggatt, K. L., Lengnick-Hall, M. L., & Jennings, K. R. (1988). Employee participation: Diverse forms and different outcomes. Academy of Management Review, 13(1), 8–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daft, R. L., & Steers, R. M. (1986). Organizations: A micro/macro approach. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniels, K., & Bailey, A. (1999). Strategy development processes and participation in decision-making: Predictors of role stressors and job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Management Studies, 8(1), 27–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denton, M., & Zeytinoglu, U. (1993). Perceived participation in decision making in a university setting: The impact of gender. Industrial and Labour Relations Review, 46(2), 320–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, N. M. (1994). The organizational learning cycle: How we can learn collectively. Maiden-head: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, R. B. (1972). Toward an operant model of organizational learning: Adaptation to environmental uncertainty. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(3), 313–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easterby-Smith, M., Snell, R., & Gherardi, S. (1998). Organizational learning: Diverging communities of practice? Management Learning, 29(3), 259–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ebrahim, A. (2005). Accountability myopia: Losing sight of organizational learning. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 34(1), 56–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ebrahim, A., & Ortolano, L. (2001). Learning processes in development planning: A theoretical overview and case study. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 20(4), 448–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, V. J., Lipshitz, R., & Overmeer, W. (2001). Creating conditions for organizational learning. In M. Dierkes, A. B. Antal, J. Child, & I. Nonaka (Eds.), Handbook of organizational learning and knowledge (pp. 757–774). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, V. J., Lipshitz, R., & Popper, M. (2005). The mystification of organizational learning. Journal of Management Inquiry, 14(1), 19–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gephart, M., Marsick, V. J., Van Buren, M. E., & Spiro, M. (1996). Learning organizations: Come alive. Training and Development, 50(12), 34–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guba, G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasenfeld, Y. (2000). Organizational forms as moral practices: The case of welfare departments. Social Service Review, 74, 329–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huber, G. (1991). Organizational learning: The contributing processes and the literature. Organizational Science, 2(1), 88–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. (1978). The social psychology of organizations (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keys, C. B., & Frank, S. (1987). Community psychology and the study of organizations: A reciprocal relationship. American Journal of Community Psychology, 15(3), 239–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latham, G. P., Winters, D. C., & Locke, E. A. (1994). Cognitive and motivational effects of participation: A mediator study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15(1), 49–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levine, M., Perkins, D. D., & Perkins, D. V. (2005). Principles of community psychology: Perspectives and applications (3rd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lines, R. (2005). How do accounts and participation during change affect organizational learning? Journal of Workplace Learning, 17(3), 157–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipshitz, R., Popper, M., & Friedman, V. J. (2002). A multifacet model of organizational learning. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 38(1), 78–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lopez, S. P., Peón, J. M., & Ordás, C. J. (2006). Human resource management as a determining factor in organizational learning. Management Learning, 37(2), 215–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsick, V. J. (2000). Learning organizations. In V. J. Marsick, J. Bitterman, & R. van der Veen (Eds.), From the learning organization to learning communities toward a learning society. ERIC Document Reproduction Service Information Series No. 382.

  • Marsick, V. J., & Watkins, K. E. (2003). Demonstrating the value of an organization’s learning culture: The dimensions of the learning organization questionnaire. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 5(2), 132–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McHargue, S. K. (2003). Learning for performance in non-profit organizations. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 5(2), 196–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, G. (1997). Images of organization. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pawlowsky, P. (2001). The treatment of organizational learning in management science. In M. Dierkes, A. B. Antal, J. Child, & I. Nonaka (Eds.), Handbook of organizational learning and knowledge. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perkins, D. D., Bess, K., Cooper, D. G., Jones, D. L., Armstead, T., & Speer, P. W. (2007). Community organizational learning: Case studies illustrating a three-dimensional model of levels and orders of change. Journal of Community Psychology, 35(3), 303–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, N., & Zimmerman, M. A. (2004). Beyond the individual: Toward a nomological network of organizational empowerment. American Journal of Community Psychology, 34, 129–145.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Scott-Ladd, B., & Chan, C. A. (2004). Emotional Intelligence and participation in decision-making: Strategies for promoting organizational learning and change. Strategic Change, 13, 95–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Senge, P. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. Chatham: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shinn, M., & Perkins, D. N. T. (2000). Contributions from organizational psychology. In J. Rappaport & E. Seidman (Eds.), Handbook of community psychology (pp. 615–641). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shrivastava, P. (1983). A typology of organizational learning systems. Journal of Management Studies, 20(1), 7–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watkins, K. E., & Marsick, V. J. (1993). Sculpting the learning organization. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watkins, K. E., & Marsick, V. J. (1996). In action: Creating the learning organization. Alexandria, VA: American Society for Training and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisbrod, B. A. (Ed.). (1998). To profit or not to profit? The commercial transformation of the nonprofit sector. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, A. P. (2001). A belief-focused process model of learning. Journal of Management Studies, 38(1), 67–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their extremely helpful comments, particularly related to the framing of our discussion.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kimberly D. Bess.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bess, K.D., Perkins, D.D., Cooper, D.G. et al. A Heuristic Framework for Understanding the Role of Participatory Decision Making in Community-Based Non-Profits. Am J Community Psychol 47, 236–252 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-010-9396-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-010-9396-8

Keywords

Navigation