Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Do we Still Need Eligibility Criteria to Recommend PrEP? Impact of National Prescribing Requirements on Retention in Care and Sexually Transmitted Infections Acquisition

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
AIDS and Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Italian guidelines recommend HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) only upon satisfying strict eligibility criteria. The objective of this study is to evaluate if PrEP candidates attending a community-based service comply with these criteria and whether these prescribing conditions affect retention in care and sexually transmitted infections (STIs) acquisition. A retrospective analysis was performed on PrEP candidates evaluated from January 2019 to June 2022. Data were collected from self-administered questionnaires and clinical files. The population was divided in subjects with 0/1 (0/1 C) and ≥ 2 (≥ 2 C) criteria. Descriptive statistics and non-parametric tests were employed to describe study population. Incidence of PrEP discontinuation and of STIs was estimated per 100 persons-year of follow up (PYFU), and incidence rate ratio (IRR) was calculated. Univariate and multivariable Cox regression analyses were used to evaluate the association strength between PrEP drop out and other variables. The analyses enrolled 659 individuals: 422 individuals were included in 0/1 C, 237 in ≥ 2 C group, respectively. Inconsistent condom use was the most reported prescribing criteria (399 individuals, 60.6%), followed by a previous STI (186 individuals, 28.2%). 0/1 C exhibited lower STIs incidence. PrEP discontinuation was 29% in 0/1 C and 38% in ≥ 2 C (p = 0.031). Cox model revealed that inconsistent condom use was the only prescribing criteria associated to PrEP persistence. The majority of PrEP candidate did not comply with prescribing conditions. Eligibility criteria failed to identify individuals with better retention in care. Our results suggest that Italian guidelines should be updated removing barriers to prescription.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The data that support findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Collaborators GBD2019HIV. Global, regional, and national sex-specific burden and control of the HIV epidemic, 1990–2019, for 204 countries and territories: the global burden of diseases Study 2019. Lancet HIV. Oct. 2021;8(10):e633–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2352-3018(21)00152-1.

  2. Adams JL, Shelley K, Nicol MR. Review of Real-World Implementation Data on Emtricitabine-Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate as HIV Pre-exposure Prophylaxis in the United States, Pharmacotherapy, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 486–500, Apr. 2019, https://doi.org/10.1002/phar.2240.

  3. ECDC. Country case studies: ECDC operational guidance on Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) in the EU/EEA and the UK. Stockholm: ECDC 2021. Accessed: Aug. 02, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/publications-data/country-case-studies-ecdc-operational-guidance-prep.

  4. SIMIT. Linee guida italiane sull’utilizzo della terapia antiretrovirale e la gestione diagnostico-clinica delle persone con infezione da HIV-1 — Edizione 2017. Accessed: Aug. 02, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.salute.gov.it/imgs/C_17_pubblicazioni_2696_allegato.pdf.

  5. Rossotti R et al. Dec., Impact of COVID Pandemic on Sexual Habits and Pre-exposure Prophylaxis Retention in Care in a Community-Based Service, Sex. Res. Soc. Policy, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 1592–1598, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-023-00849-5.

  6. Huang Y-LA, Tao G, Smith DK, Hoover KW. Persistence With Human Immunodeficiency Virus Pre-exposure Prophylaxis in the United States, 2012–2017, Clin. Infect. Dis. Off. Publ. Infect. Dis. Soc. Am, vol. 72, no. 3, pp. 379–385, Feb. 2021, https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciaa037.

  7. Chapin-Bardales J et al. HIV Pre-exposure Prophylaxis Persistence and Adherence Among Men Who Have Sex With Men in Four US Cities, J. Acquir. Immune Defic. Syndr 1999, vol. 93, no. 1, pp. 34–41, May 2023, https://doi.org/10.1097/QAI.0000000000003160.

  8. Reiriz M, Rodríguez-Expósito B, Jiménez-García AJ, Uceda S, Arias N. Pre-exposure Prophylaxis, anxiety, depression and sexual SatisfactionAmong men who have sex with men. Psicothema. May 2023;35(2):159–69. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2022.230.

  9. Foster JM, Sanderman R, van der Molen T, Mueller T, van Sonderen E. Personality influences the reporting of side effects of inhaled corticosteroids in asthma patients, J. Asthma Off. J. Assoc. Care Asthma, vol. 45, no. 8, pp. 664–669, Oct. 2008, https://doi.org/10.1080/02770900802127022.

  10. Schnarrs PW et al. Sexual Subcultures and HIV Prevention Methods: An Assessment of Condom Use, PrEP, and TasP Among Gay, Bisexual, and Other Men Who Have Sex with Men Using a Social and Sexual Networking Smartphone Application, Arch. Sex. Behav, vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 1781–1792, May 2021, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-020-01784-x.

  11. Grant RM, Koester KA. What people want from sex and preexposure prophylaxis. Curr Opin HIV AIDS. Jan. 2016;11(1):3–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/COH.0000000000000216.

  12. and the California Collaborative Treatment Group (CCTG) et al. et al. Greater Levels of Self-Reported Adherence to Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) are Associated with Increased Condomless Sex Among Men Who Have Sex with Men, AIDS Behav, vol. 24, no. 11, pp. 3192–3204, Nov. 2020, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-020-02881-7.

  13. Curley CM, Rosen AO, Mistler CB, Eaton LA. Pleasure and PrEP: A Systematic Review of Studies Examining Pleasure, Sexual Satisfaction, and PrEP, J. Sex Res, vol. 59, no. 7, pp. 848–861, Sep. 2022, https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2021.2012638.

  14. Mabire X, et al. Pleasure and PrEP: pleasure-seeking plays a role in Prevention choices and could lead to PrEP initiation. Am J Mens Health. 2019;13(1):1557988319827396. https://doi.org/10.1177/1557988319827396.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Burns PA, Hall CDX, Poteat T, Mena LA, Wong FY. Living While Black, Gay, and Poor: The Association of Race, Neighborhood Structural Disadvantage, and PrEP Utilization Among a Sample of Black Men Who Have Sex With Men in the Deep South, AIDS Educ. Prev. Off. Publ. Int. Soc. AIDS Educ, vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 395–410, Oct. 2021, https://doi.org/10.1521/aeap.2021.33.5.395.

  16. Sullivan PS, et al. National trends in HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis awareness, willingness and use among United States men who have sex with men recruited online, 2013 through 2017. J Int AIDS Soc. Mar. 2020;23(3):e25461. https://doi.org/10.1002/jia2.25461.

  17. Organization WH. Guidance on oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for serodiscordant couples, men and transgender women who have sex with men at high risk of HIV: recommendations for use in the context of demonstration projects. 2012. Jul. 01, 2012. Accessed: Aug. 05, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241503884.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank all subjects who agreed to participate to this study. Preliminary results have been presented at the 14th Italian Conference on AIDS and antiviral Research (ICAR), June 14–16, 2022, Bergamo, Italy (Abstract #OC01).

Funding

No specific funding support was planned for study design, data collection and analysis, and manuscript writing of this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

RR did the literature search and data analysis, conceived the study, and wrote the original draft of the manuscript. AT collected and performed data statistical analyses. DC and EC supervised data collection and analysis and regulatory procedures. RR, ADB, CM, DM, AS, SB, GL, and MC were treating physicians. AdAM made intellectual contributions to the concept of the study, supervised the study, validated, and edited the first draft. All authors had full access to all the data in the study and had final responsibility for the decision to submit for publication. All authors attest they meet the ICMJE criteria for authorship.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roberto Rossotti.

Ethics declarations

Ethics Approval

The study was conducted in accordance with the ethical standards of the current revision of the Helsinki Declaration. All subjects starting PrEP at Milano Checkpoint ETS provided written informed consent allowing the analysis of their anonymized aggregated data for scientific purposes. Approval by Ethics Committee was deemed unnecessary according to the Italian law (art. 6 and art. 9, leg. decree 211/2003).

Conflict of Interest

none of the Authors has conflicts of interests to declare.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rossotti, R., Tavelli, A., Calzavara, D. et al. Do we Still Need Eligibility Criteria to Recommend PrEP? Impact of National Prescribing Requirements on Retention in Care and Sexually Transmitted Infections Acquisition. AIDS Behav (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-024-04320-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-024-04320-3

Keywords

Navigation