Skip to main content
Log in

PrEP Uptake and Methamphetamine Use Patterns in a 4-Year U.S. National Prospective Cohort Study of Sexual and Gender Minority People, 2017–2022

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
AIDS and Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 05 May 2024

This article has been updated

Abstract

Methamphetamine use is on the rise among sexual and gender minority people who have sex with men (SGMSM), escalating their HIV risk. Despite pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) being an effective biomedical HIV prevention tool, its uptake in relation to methamphetamine use patterns in SGMSM has not been studied. In a U.S. cohort study from 2017 to 2022, 6,253 HIV-negative SGMSM indicated for but not using PrEP were followed for four years. Methamphetamine use was categorized (i.e., newly initiated, persistently used, never used, used but quit), and PrEP uptake assessed using generalized estimating equation (GEE), adjusted for attrition. Participants had a median age of 29, with 51.9% White, 11.1% Black, 24.5% Latinx, and 12.5% other races/ethnicities. Over the four years, PrEP use increased from 16.3 to 27.2%. GEE models identified risk factors including housing instability and food insecurity. In contrast, older age, health insurance, clinical indications, and prior PrEP use increased uptake. Notably, Latinx participants were more likely to use PrEP than Whites. Regarding methamphetamine use, those who newly initiated it were more likely to use PrEP compared to non-users. However, those who quit methamphetamine and those who persistently used it had PrEP usage rates comparable to those of non-users. Though PrEP uptake increased, it remained low in SGMSM. Methamphetamine use was associated with PrEP uptake. Healthcare providers should assess methamphetamine use for harm reduction. Prioritizing younger, uninsured SGMSM and addressing basic needs can enhance PrEP uptake and reduce HIV vulnerabilities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

References

  1. HIV.gov. U.S. Statistics [updated March 28., 2023. Available from: https://www.hiv.gov/hiv-basics/overview/data-and-trends/statistics/.

  2. CDC. HIV and All Gay and Bisexual Men. 2023 [updated February 16, 2023. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/group/msm/index.html.

  3. CDC. PrEP effectiveness 2022 [updated June 6, 2022July 19, 2023]. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/basics/prep/prep-effectiveness.html#:~:text=PrEP%20reduces%20the%20risk%20of,74%25%20when%20taken%20as%20prescribed.

  4. PrEPWatch. Country Overview: United States 2023 [updated March 29., 2023. Available from: https://www.prepwatch.org/countries/united-states/.

  5. Sarani EM, Ahmadi J, Oji B, Mahi-Birjand M, Bagheri N, Bazrafshan A, et al. Investigating the sequential patterns of methamphetamine use initiation in Iran. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2020;15(1):1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Carrico AW, Zepf R, Meanley S, Batchelder A, Stall R. When the party is over: a systematic review of behavioral interventions for substance-using men who have sex with men. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2016;73(3):299.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Compton WM, Jones CM. Substance use among men who have sex with men. N Engl J Med. 2021;385(4):352–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Pantalone DW, Bimbi DS, Holder CA, Golub SA, Parsons JT. Consistency and change in club drug use by sexual minority men in New York City, 2002 to 2007. Am J Public Health. 2010;100(10):1892–5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Knight R, Karamouzian M, Carson A, Edward J, Carrieri P, Shoveller J, et al. Interventions to address substance use and sexual risk among gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men who use methamphetamine: a systematic review. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2019;194:410–29.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hammoud MA, Jin F, Maher L, Bourne A, Haire B, Saxton P, et al. Biomedical HIV protection among gay and bisexual men who use crystal methamphetamine. AIDS Behav. 2020;24:1400–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Grov C, Westmoreland D, Morrison C, Carrico AW, Nash D. The crisis we are not talking about: one-in-three annual HIV seroconversions among sexual and gender minorities were persistent methamphetamine users. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2020;85(3):272.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhang J, Li C, Xu J, Hu Z, Rutstein SE, Tucker JD, et al. Discontinuation, suboptimal adherence, and reinitiation of oral HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis: a global systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet HIV. 2022;9(4):e254–e68.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Viamonte M, Ghanooni D, Reynolds JM, Grov C, Carrico AW. Running with scissors: a systematic review of substance use and the pre-exposure prophylaxis care continuum among sexual minority men. Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2022;19(4):235–50.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Setia MS. Methodology series module 1: cohort studies. Indian J Dermatology. 2016;61(1):21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Nash D, Stief M, MacCrate C, Mirzayi C, Patel VV, Hoover D, et al. A web-based study of HIV Prevention in the era of Pre-exposure Prophylaxis among Vulnerable HIV-Negative gay and bisexual men, Transmen, and Transwomen who have sex with men: protocol for an Observational Cohort Study. JMIR Res Protoc. 2019;8(9):e13715.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Grov C, Stief M, Westmoreland DA, MacCrate C, Mirzayi C, Nash D. Maximizing response rates to ads for free at-home HIV testing on a men-for-men geosocial sexual networking app: lessons learned and implications for researchers and providers. Health Educ Behav. 2020;47(1):5–13.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. CDC. Preexposure prophylaxis for the prevention of HIV infection in the United States—2021 Update: a clinical practice guideline. 2021 [cited March 28, 2023]. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/pdf/risk/prep/cdc-hiv-prep-guidelines-2021.pdf.

  18. USDA. U.S. Household Food Security Survey Module. Six-Item Short Form September 2012 [updated March 30, 2023cited March 28, 2023]. Available from: https://www.ers.usda.gov/media/8282/short2012.pdf.

  19. Leung DH, Wang Y-G, Zhu M. Efficient parameter estimation in longitudinal data analysis using a hybrid GEE method. Biostatistics. 2009;10(3):436–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Harrell FE. Regression modeling strategies: with applications to linear models, logistic regression, and survival analysis. Springer; 2001.

  21. Hernán MA, Brumback B, Robins JM. Marginal structural models to estimate the joint causal effect of nonrandomized treatments. J Am Stat Assoc. 2001;96(454):440–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Seaman SR, White IR. Review of inverse probability weighting for dealing with missing data. Stat Methods Med Res. 2013;22(3):278–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Grov C, Westmoreland DA, Carneiro PB, Stief M, MacCrate C, Mirzayi C, et al. Recruiting vulnerable populations to participate in HIV prevention research: findings from the together 5000 cohort study. Ann Epidemiol. 2019;35:4–11.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Sullivan Pepe M, Anderson GL. A cautionary note on inference for marginal regression models with longitudinal data and general correlated response data. Commun statistics-simulation Comput. 1994;23(4):939–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Hoover DR, Shi Q, Burstyn I, Anastos K. Repeated measures regression in laboratory, clinical and environmental research: common misconceptions in the matter of different within-and between-subject slopes. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(3):504.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Finlayson T, Cha S, Xia M, Trujillo L, Denson D, Prejean J, et al. Changes in HIV preexposure prophylaxis awareness and use among men who have sex with men—20 urban areas, 2014 and 2017. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2019;68(27):597.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Krakower D, Maloney KM, Powell VE, Levine K, Grasso C, Melbourne K, et al. Patterns and clinical consequences of discontinuing HIV preexposure prophylaxis during primary care. J Int AIDS Soc. 2019;22(2):e25250.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. HIV.gov. Ending the HIV Epidemic: A plan for America 2020 [Available from: https://www.hiv.gov/federal-response/ending-the-hiv-epidemic/overview.

  29. Pantalone DW, Nelson KM, Batchelder AW, Chiu C, Gunn HA, Horvath KJ. A systematic review and meta-analysis of combination behavioral interventions co-targeting psychosocial syndemics and HIV-related health behaviors for sexual minority men. J Sex Res. 2020;57(6):681–708.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Fitch C, Haberer JE, Serrano PA, Muñoz A, French AL, Hosek SG. Individual and structural-level correlates of Pre-exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) lifetime and current use in a nationwide sample of young sexual and gender minorities. AIDS Behav. 2022;26(10):3365–77.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Mayer KH, Agwu A, Malebranche D. Barriers to the wider use of pre-exposure prophylaxis in the United States: a narrative review. Adv Therapy. 2020;37:1778–811.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Serota DP, Rosenberg ES, Sullivan PS, Thorne AL, Rolle C-PM, Del Rio C, et al. Pre-exposure prophylaxis uptake and discontinuation among young black men who have sex with men in Atlanta, Georgia: a prospective cohort study. Clin Infect Dis. 2020;71(3):574–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Organization WH. Serving the needs of key populations: case examples of innovation and good practice on HIV prevention, diagnosis, treatment and care 2017 [Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/255610.

  34. Ready HIVgov, Set PEP. HIV.gov; 2022 [Available from: https://www.hiv.gov/federal-response/ending-the-hiv-epidemic/prep-program/.

  35. Directors NAoSTA. State PrEP Assistance Programs: NASTAD. 2023 [Available from: https://nastad.org/prepcost-resources/prep-assistance-programs.

  36. Andriano TM, Arnsten J, Patel VV. Social determinants of health and HIV Pre-exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) interest and use among young Black and Latinx sexual minority men. PLoS ONE. 2022;17(4):e0267031.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. CDC. HIV in the United States by Race and Ethnicity. PrEP Coverage 2023 [Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/group/racialethnic/other-races/prep-coverage.html.

  38. McCambridge J, Witton J, Elbourne DR. Systematic review of the Hawthorne effect: new concepts are needed to study research participation effects. J Clin Epidemiol. 2014;67(3):267–77.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Elsesser SA, Oldenburg CE, Biello KB, Mimiaga MJ, Safren SA, Egan JE, et al. Seasons of risk: anticipated behavior on vacation and interest in episodic antiretroviral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) among a large national sample of US men who have sex with men (MSM). AIDS Behav. 2016;20:1400–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Teague S, Youssef GJ, Macdonald JA, Sciberras E, Shatte A, Fuller-Tyszkiewicz M, et al. Retention strategies in longitudinal cohort studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018;18:1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Special thanks to additional members of the Together 5,000 (T5K) study team: Matthew Stief, Gregorio Millett, Sarah Kulkarni, Fatima Zohra, Javier Lopez-Rios, & Corey Morrison. Thank you to the program staff at NIH: Gerald Sharp, Sonia Lee, Lori Zimand, and Michael Stirratt. And thank you to the members of our Scientific Advisory Board: Michael Camacho, Demetre Daskalakis, Sabina Hirshfield, Claude Mellins, and Milo Santos. While the NIH financially supported this research, the content is the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily reflect official views of the NIH.

Funding

T5K was funded by the National Institutes of Health (UH3 AI 133675 - PI Grov). Other forms of support include the CUNY Institute for Implementation Science in Population Health, the Einstein, Rockefeller, CUNY Center for AIDS Research (ERC CFAR, P30 AI124414). D.A.W. was supported, in part, by a career development award (K01 AA 029047).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christian Grov.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Guo, Y., Westmoreland, D.A., D’Angelo, A.B. et al. PrEP Uptake and Methamphetamine Use Patterns in a 4-Year U.S. National Prospective Cohort Study of Sexual and Gender Minority People, 2017–2022. AIDS Behav (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-024-04306-1

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-024-04306-1

Keywords

Navigation