Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Seasons of Risk: Anticipated Behavior on Vacation and Interest in Episodic Antiretroviral Pre-exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) Among a Large National Sample of U.S. Men Who have Sex with Men (MSM)

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
AIDS and Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The current analysis evaluates interest in and acceptability of daily PrEP during short episodes of anticipated increased risk (i.e. Epi-PrEP). In 2013, U.S. members of an internet-based MSM sexual networking site were invited to complete a survey about HIV prevention practices in the context of vacationing. 7305 MSM responded to the survey. Of respondents who had vacationed in the past year, 25.6 % reported condomless anal sex (CAS) with new male sex partners while vacationing. Most (92.6 %) respondents agreed that having to use PrEP every day was a barrier to PrEP use and 74.3 % indicated they would take PrEP if they knew it would be helpful for short periods of anticipated increased risk. MSM who reported increased CAS while on vacation in the past year were more likely to indicate that they would take PrEP if it were helpful when used for short periods than respondents who did not (aOR = 2.02, 95 % CI 1.59–2.56, p < 0.001). Studies designed to evaluate uptake, adherence, and protective benefit of short PrEP courses are warranted.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. CDC. Estimates of new HIV infections in the United States, 2006–2009, in CDC Fact Sheet. Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Prejean J, Song R, Hernandez A, Ziebell R, Green T, Walker F, et al. Estimated HIV incidence in the United States, 2006–2009. PLoS One. 2011;6(8):e17502.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Grant RM, Anderson PL, McMahan V, Liu A, Amico KR, Mehrotra M, et al. Uptake of pre-exposure prophylaxis, sexual practices, and HIV incidence in men and transgender women who have sex with men: a cohort study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2014;14(9):820–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Grant RM, Lama JR, Anderson PL, McMahan V, Liu AY, Vargas L, et al. Preexposure chemoprophylaxis for HIV prevention in men who have sex with men. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(27):2587–99.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. McCormack S, Dunn D, editors. Pragmatic open-label randomised trial of preexposure prophylaxis: the PROUD study. In: Conference on retroviruses and opportunistic infections (CROI) 2015. Seattle, Washington; 2015 (Oral Abstract).

  6. Kellerman SE, Hutchinson AB, Begley EB, Boyett BC, Clark HA, Sullivan P. Knowledge and use of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis among attendees of minority gay pride events, 2004. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2006;43(3):376–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Liu AY, Kittredge PV, Vittinghoff E, Raymond HF, Ahrens K, Matheson T, et al. Limited knowledge and use of HIV post- and pre-exposure prophylaxis among gay and bisexual men. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2008;47(2):241–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Mimiaga MJ, Case P, Johnson CV, Safren SA, Mayer KH. Preexposure antiretroviral prophylaxis attitudes in high-risk Boston area men who report having sex with men: limited knowledge and experience but potential for increased utilization after education. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2009;50(1):77–83.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Mansergh G, Koblin B, Colfax GN, Flores SA, Hudson SM. Team PMIXS. ‘Less education’ is associated with use and sharing of antiretroviral medications for prophylaxis of HIV infection by US men who have sex with men. Sex Transm Infect. 2011;87(6):510.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Golub SA, Kowalczyk W, Weinberger CL, Parsons JT. Preexposure prophylaxis and predicted condom use among high-risk men who have sex with men. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2010;54(5):548–55.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Krakower DS, Mimiaga MJ, Rosenberger JG, Novak DS, Mitty JA, White JM, et al. Limited awareness and low immediate uptake of pre-exposure prophylaxis among men who have sex with men using an internet social networking site. PLoS One. 2012;7(3):e33119.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Wilton J, Senn H, Sharma M, Tan DH. Pre-exposure prophylaxis for sexually-acquired HIV risk management: a review. HIV AIDS (Auckl). 2015;7:125–36.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Eaton LA, Driffin DD, Bauermeister J, Smith H, Conway-Washington C. Minimal awareness and stalled uptake of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) among at risk, hiv-negative, black men who have sex with men. AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2015;29(8):423–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Mayer KH, Hosek S, Cohen S, Liu A, Pickett J, Warren M, et al. Antiretroviral pre-exposure prophylaxis implementation in the United States: a work in progress. J Int AIDS Soc. 2015;18(4 Suppl 3):19980.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Brooks RA, Kaplan RL, Lieber E, Landovitz RJ, Lee S-J, Leibowitz AA. Motivators, concerns, and barriers to adoption of preexposure prophylaxis for HIV prevention among gay and bisexual men in HIV-serodiscordant male relationships. AIDS Care. 2011;23(9):1136–45.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Krakower D, Ware N, Mitty JA, Maloney K, Mayer KH. HIV providers’ perceived barriers and facilitators to implementing pre-exposure prophylaxis in care settings: a qualitative study. AIDS Behav. 2014;18(9):1712–21.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Taylor SW, Mayer KH, Elsesser SM, Mimiaga MJ, O’Cleirigh C, Safren SA. Optimizing content for pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) counseling for men who have sex with men: perspectives of PrEP users and high-risk PrEP Naïve men. AIDS Behav. 2014;18(5):871–9.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Seifert SM, Glidden DV, Meditz AL, Castillo-Mancilla JR, Gardner EM, Predhomme JA, et al. Dose response for starting and stopping HIV preexposure prophylaxis for men who have sex with men. Clin Infect Dis. 2015;60(5):804–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Molina J-M, Capitant C, Charreau I, Meyer L, Spire B, Pialoux G, et al. On demand PrEP with oral TDF-FTC in MSM: results of the ANRS ipergay trial. In: Conference on retroviruses and opportunistic infections (CROI) 2015. Seattle, Washington; 2015.

  20. HIV Prevention Trials Network [updated 2015/04/27/16:45:40]. http://www.hptn.org/research_studies/hptn067.asp.

  21. Stall R, Ekstrand M, Pollack L, McKusick L, Coates TJ. Relapse from safer sex: the next challenge for AIDS prevention efforts. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 1990;3(12):1181–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Benotsch EG, Mikytuck JJ, Ragsdale K, Pinkerton SD. Sexual risk and HIV acquisition among men who have sex with men travelers to Key West, Florida: a mathematical modeling analysis. AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2006;20(8):549–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Colfax GN, Mansergh G, Guzman R, Vittinghoff E, Marks G, Rader M, et al. Drug use and sexual risk behavior among gay and bisexual men who attend circuit parties: a venue-based comparison. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2001;28(4):373–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Mansergh G, Colfax GN, Marks G, Rader M, Guzman R, Buchbinder S. The Circuit Party Men’s Health Survey: findings and implications for gay and bisexual men. Am J Public Health. 2001;91(6):953–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Oldenburg CE, Perez-Brumer AG, Hatzenbuehler ML, Krakower D, Novak DS, Mimiaga MJ, et al. State-level structural sexual stigma and HIV prevention in a national online sample of HIV-uninfected MSM in the United States. AIDS. 2015;29(7):837–45.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Vorobjovas-Pinta O, Hardy A. Rethinking gay tourism: a review of literature. CAUTHE 2014: tourism and hospitality in the contemporary world: trends, changes and complexity. Brisbane: School of Tourism, The University of Queensland; 2014. p. 635–44.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Monterrubio JC. Identity and sex: concurent aspects of gay tourism. TOURISMOS. 2008;4(2):155–67.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Pritchard A, Morgan NJ, Sedgley D, Khan E, Jenkins A. Sexuality and holiday choices: conversations with gay and lesbian tourists. Leis Stud. 2000;19(4):267–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Johnson WD, Diaz RM, Flanders WD, Goodman M, Hill AN, Holtgrave D, et al. Behavioral interventions to reduce risk for sexual transmission of HIV among men who have sex with men. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008;3:CD001230.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Millett GA, Peterson JL, Flores SA, Hart TA, Jeffries WL, Wilson PA, et al. Comparisons of disparities and risks of HIV infection in black and other men who have sex with men in Canada, UK, and USA: a meta-analysis. Lancet. 2012;380(9839):341–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Meyer IH, Schwartz S, Frost DM. Social patterning of stress and coping: does disadvantaged social statuses confer more stress and fewer coping resources? Soc Sci Med. 2008;67(3):368–79.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Holcomb B, Luongo M. Gay tourism in the United States. Ann Tour Res. 1996;23(3):711–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Saberi P, Gamarel KE, Neilands TB, Comfort M, Sheon N, Darbes LA, et al. Ambiguity, ambivalence, and apprehensions of taking HIV-1 pre-exposure prophylaxis among male couples in San Francisco: a mixed methods study. PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e50061.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Biello KB, Rosenberger JG, Novak DS, Robertson AM, Mayer KH, Mimiaga MJ. Epidemiology of sexual health in the virtual environment: a multinational online survey of Spanish- and Portuguese-speaking men who use an internet sexual networking site. AIDS Behav. 2014;18(9):1675–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Galindo GR, Walker JNJ, Hazelton P, Lane T, Steward WT, Morin SF, et al. Community member perspectives from transgender women and men who have sex with men on pre-exposure prophylaxis as an HIV prevention strategy: implications for implementation. Implement Sci. 2012;7:116.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Mayer KH. Do ask, do tell: clinicians and the U.S. National AIDS strategy. AIDS. 2014;28(8):1233–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Eisingerich AB, Wheelock A, Gomez GB, Garnett GP, Dybul MR, Piot PK. Attitudes and acceptance of oral and parenteral HIV preexposure prophylaxis among potential user groups: a multinational study. PLoS One. 2012;7(1):e28238.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Van der Elst EM, Mbogua J, Operario D, Mutua G, Kuo C, Mugo P, et al. High acceptability of hiv pre-exposure prophylaxis but challenges in adherence and use: qualitative Insights from a Phase I trial of intermittent and daily PrEP in at-risk populations in Kenya. AIDS Behav. 2012;17(6):2162–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Kibengo FM, Ruzagira E, Katende D, Bwanika AN, Bahemuka U, Haberer JE, et al. Safety, adherence and acceptability of intermittent tenofovir/emtricitabine as HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) among HIV-uninfected ugandan volunteers living in HIV-serodiscordant relationships: a randomized, clinical trial. PLoS One. 2013;8(9):e74314.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Roberts ST, Heffron R, Ngure K, Celum C, Kurth A, Curran K, et al. Preferences for daily or intermittent pre-exposure prophylaxis regimens and ability to anticipate sex among HIV uninfected members of Kenyan HIV serodiscordant couples. AIDS Behav. 2014;18(9):1701–11.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Mutua G, Sanders E, Mugo P, Anzala O, Haberer JE, Bangsberg D, et al. Safety and adherence to intermittent pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for HIV-1 in African men who have sex with men and female sex workers. PLoS One. 2012;7(4):e33103.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Van der Elst EM, Mbogua J, Operario D, Mutua G, Kuo C, Mugo P, et al. High acceptability of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis but challenges in adherence and use: qualitative insights from a phase I trial of intermittent and daily PrEP in at-risk populations in Kenya. AIDS Behav. 2013;17(6):2162–72.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was funded by an unrestricted research grant from Gilead Sciences.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kenneth H. Mayer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Elsesser, S.A., Oldenburg, C.E., Biello, K.B. et al. Seasons of Risk: Anticipated Behavior on Vacation and Interest in Episodic Antiretroviral Pre-exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) Among a Large National Sample of U.S. Men Who have Sex with Men (MSM). AIDS Behav 20, 1400–1407 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-015-1238-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-015-1238-0

Keywords

Navigation