Skip to main content
Log in

Value structures determining community supported agriculture: insights from Germany

  • Published:
Agriculture and Human Values Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In recent years Community Supported Agriculture (CSA), an innovative grassroots movement connecting consumers with a local farm, has rapidly spread across Germany and other industrialized countries. An increasing number of consumers who are dissatisfied with conventional food supply chains have signed up to receive fresh produce, support a local community and protect the environment. So far little is known, though, about the underlying value structures of CSA. Nevertheless, identifying factors influencing consumers’ interest in CSA is regarded as a major aim of contemporary CSA research. This research aims to provide insights into CSA members’ value structures, and delineates CSA members by comparing their value structures to those of the German population in general. Schwartz’s Portrait Value Questionnaire was used in a standardized online survey of CSA members to mirror the dataset which is available to the German public via the European Social Survey. A total sample of 205 CSA members was used to examine common value structures by comparing them with the German public. This study’s findings strongly indicate that a CSA membership goes along with a characteristic value pattern: CSA members highly appreciate self-transcendence and openness to change, but tend to reject conservation and self-enhancement values. Addressing members’ preference for openness to change and self-transcendence may help CSAs to reduce fluctuation rates. It might also enhance CSA marketing strategy by addressing potential members’ interests more precisely. Therefore, identifying and communicating common values of a CSA might be a key factor in determining its long-term success and stability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

CSA:

Community supported agriculture

ESS:

European social survey

MDS:

Multidimensional scaling

PVQ:

Portrait value questionnaire

References

  • Allen IV, J.E., J. Rossi, T. Woods, and A.F. Davis. 2017. Do Community Supported Agriculture Programmes Encourage Change to Food Lifestyle Behaviours and Health Outcomes? New Evidence from Shareholders. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability 15 (1): 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, K., A. Bonein, and D. Bougherara. 2016. Risk and Fairness Preferences in Community Supported Agriculture. Selected Paper Prepared for Presentation at the 2016 Agricultural & Applied Economics Association Annual Meeting. Boston.

  • Bilsky, W. 2008. Value Structure: On the Use of Weakly Constrained Confirmatory MDS. Paper Presented at the 19th International Congress of the International Association for Cross-Cultural Psychology 27. Bremen.

  • Bilsky, W., M. Janik, and S.H. Schwartz. 2010. The Structural Organization of Human Values: Evidence from Three Rounds of the European Social Survey (ESS). Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 42 (5): 759–776.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blättel-Mink, B., M. Boddenberg, L. Gunkel, S. Schmitz, and F. Vaessen. 2017. Beyond the Market: New Practices of Supply in Times of Crisis. The Example Community-Supported Agriculture. International Journal of Consumer Studies. 41 (4): 415–421.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloemmen, M., R. Bobulescu, T.N. Le, and C. Vitari. 2015. Microeconomic Degrowth: The Case of Community Supported Agriculture. Ecological Economics 112: 110–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borg, I., P.J.F. Groenen, and P. Mair. 2013. Applied Multidimensional Scaling. Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bougherara, D., G. Grolleau, and N. Mzoughi. 2009. Buy Local, Pollute Less: What Drives Households to Join a Community Supported Farm? Ecological Economics 68: 1488–1495.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourne, H., M. Jenkins, and E. Parry. 2017. Mapping Espoused Organizational Values. Journal of Business Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3734-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brehm, J.M., and B.W. Eisenhauer. 2008. Motivations for Participating in Community Supported Agriculture and Their Relationship with Community Attachment and Social Capital. Southern Rural Sociology 23 (1): 94–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, C., and S. Miller. 2008. The Impacts of Local Markets: A Review of Research on Farmers Markets and Community Supported Agriculture (CSA). American Journal of Agricultural Economics 90 (5): 1296–1302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carolan, M. 2017. More-than-Active Food Citizens: A Longitudinal and Comparative Study of Alternative and Conventional Eaters. Rural Sociology 82 (2): 197–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. 1992. A Power Primer. Psychological Bulletin 112 (1): 155–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connolly, C., and H.A. Klaiber. 2014. Does Organic Command a Premium when the Food is Already Local? American Journal of Agricultural Economics 96 (4): 1102–1116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooley, J.P., and D.A. Lass. 1998. Consumer Benefits from Community Supported Agriculture Membership. Review of Agricultural Economics 20 (1): 227–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, R., L. Holloway, L. Venn, L. Dowler, J. Ricketts Hein, M. Kneafsey, and H. Tuomainen. 2008. Common Ground? Motivations for Participation in a Community Supported Agriculture Scheme. The International Journal of Justice and Sustainability 13 (3): 203–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidov, E., P. Schmidt, and S.H. Schwartz. 2008. Bringing Values Back in the Adequacy of the European Social Survey to Measure Values in 20 Countries. Public Opinion Quarterly 73 (3): 420–445.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Mooij, M. 2015. Cross-cultural Research in International Marketing: Clearing Up Some of the Confusion. International Marketing Review 32 (6): 646–662.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dempsey, N., G. Bramley, S. Power, and C. Brown. 2009. The Social Dimension of Sustainable Development: Defining Urban Social Sustainability. Sustainable Development 19 (5): 289–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubussion-Quellier, S., C. Lamine, and R. Le Vellyl. 2011. Citizenship and Cconsumption: Mobilisation in Alternative Food Systems in France. Sociologia Ruralis 51 (3): 304–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Social Survey (ESS) (2017): Germany. Documents and data Files. Ess Round 7—2014. http://www.europeansocialsurvey.org.

  • Fieldhouse, P. 1996. Community Shared Agriculture. Agriculture and Human Values 13 (3): 43–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, R., and S.H. Schwartz. 2010. Whence Differences in Value Priorities? Individual, Cultural, or Artifactual Sources. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 42 (7): 1127–1144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freedman, M.R., and J.K. King. 2016. Examining a New “Pay-as-you-go” Community-Supported Agriculture (CSA) Model: A Case Study. Journal of Hunger and Environmental Nutrition 11 (1): 122–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galt, R.E., K. Bradley, L. Christensen, C. Fake, K. Munden-Dixon, N. Simpson, R. Surls, and J. Van Soelen Kim. 2017. What Difference Does Income Make for Community Supported Agriculture (CSA) Members in California? Comparing Lower-Income and Higher-Income Households. Agriculture and Human Values 34 (2): 435.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giampietri, E., A. Finco, and T. Del Guidice. 2016. Exploring Consumer’s Behavior Towards Short Food Supply Chains. British Food Journal 118 (3): 618–631.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilg, A.W., and M. Battershill. 1998. Quality Farm Food in Europe: A Possible Alternative to the Industrialized Food Market and to Current Agri-environmental Policies: Lessons from France. Food Policy 23 (1): 25–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goland, C. 2002. Community Supported Agriculture, Food Consumption Patterns, and Member Commitment. Culture and Agriculture 24 (1): 14–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goren, P., H. Schoen, J. Reifler, T. Scotto, and W. Chittick. 2016. A Unified Theory of Value-Based Reasoning and U.S. Public Opinion. Political Behavior 38: 977–997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grebitus, C., B. Steiner, and M. Veeman. 2015. The Roles of Human Values and Generalized Trust on Stated Preferences when Food is Labeled with Environmental Footprints: Insights from Germany. Food Policy 52: 84–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helfrich, S., and D. Bollier. 2014. Commons als transformative Kraft: Zur Einführung. In Commons. Für eine Politik jenseits von Markt und Staat, ed. S. Helfrich, 15–23. Bielefeld: Transcript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hvitsand, C. 2016. Community Supported Agriculture (CSA) as a Transformational Act—Distinct Values and Multiple Motivations Among Farmers and Consumers. Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems 40 (4): 333–351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janssen, B. 2010. Local Food, Local Engagement: Community Supported Agriculture in Eastern Iowa. Culture and Agriculture 32 (1): 4–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keiding, N., and T.A. Louis. 2018. Web-Based Enrollment and Other Types of Self-selection in Surveys and Studies: Consequences for Generalizability. Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application 5 (9): 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kollmuss, A., and J. Agyeman. 2002. Mind the Gap: Why Do People Act Environmentally and What are the Barriers to Pro-environmental Behavior? Environmental Education Research 8 (3): 239–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruskal, J.B. 1964. Multidimensional Scaling by Optimizing Goodness of Fit to a Nonmetric Hypothesis. Psychometrika 29 (1): 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lang, K.B. 2005. Expanding our Understanding of Community Supported Agriculture (CSA): An Examination of Member Satisfaction. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 26 (2): 61–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lang, K.B. 2010. The Changing Face of Community-Supported Agriculture. Culture & Agriculture 32 (1): 17–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levene, H. 1960. Robust Tests for Equality of Variances. In Contributions to Probability and Statistics, ed. I. Olkin, 278–292. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magun, V., M. Rudnev, and P. Schmidt. 2016. Within- and Between-Country Value Diversity in Europe: A Typological Approach. European Sociological Review 32 (2): 189–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maslow, A.H. 1943. A Theory of Human Motivation. Psychological Review 50 (4): 370–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, A. 2015. The (Re)genesis of Values: Examining the Importance of Values for Action. American Sociological Review 80 (4): 680–704.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mowday, R.T., R.M. Steers, and L.W. Porter. 1979. The Measurement of Organizational Commitment. Journal of Vocational Behavior 14 (2): 224–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peng, S., S.K. Pandey, and S. Pandey. 2015. “Is There a Nonprofit Advantage? Examining the Impact of Institutional Context on Individual-Organizational Value Congruence. Public Administration Review 75 (4): 585–596.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, H.H., M.R. Taylor, and Q. Baudouin. 2015. Preferences of Locavores Favoring Community Supported Agriculture in the United States and France. Ecological Economics 119: 64–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pole, A., and M. Gray. 2013. Farming alone? What’s Up With the “C” in Community Supported Agriculture. Agriculture and Human Values 30 (1): 85–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pole, A., and A. Kumar. 2015. Segmenting CSA Members by Motivation: Anything but Two Peas in a Pod. British Food Journal 117 (5): 1488–1505.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renting, H., M. Schermer, and A. Rossi. 2012. Building Food Democracy: Exploring Civic Food Networks and Newly Emerging Forms of Food Citizenship. International Journal of Sociology of Agriculture and Food 19 (3): 289–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice, W.R. 1988. Analyizing Tables of Statistical Tests. Evolution 43 (1): 223–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robert-Demontrond, P., V. Beaudouin, and I. Dabadie. 2017. Diverse, Conflicting and Complementary Worldviews: An Anthropological Investigation of Consumption in CSA. Recherché et Applications en Marketing 32 (2): 32–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rokeach, M. 1973. The Nature of Human Values. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosnow, R.L., and R. Rosenthal. 1996. Computing Contrasts, Effect Sizes, and Counternulls on Other People’s Published Data: General Producers for Research Consumers. Psychological Methods 1 (4): 331–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossi, J., J.E. Allen IV, T.A. Woods, and A.F. Davis. 2017. CSA Shareholder Food Lifestyle Behaviors: A Comparison Across Consumer Groups. Agriculture and Human Values. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-017-9779-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russel, W.S., and L. Zepeda. 2008. The Adaptive Consumer: Shifting Attitudes, Behavior Change and CSA Membership Renewal. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 23 (2): 136–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sage, C. 2014. The Transition Movement and Food Sovereignty: From Local Resilience to Global Engagement in Food System Transformation. Journal of Consumer Culture 14 (2): 254–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanneh, N., L.J. Moffitt, and D.A. Lass. 2001. Stochastic Efficiency Analysis of Community-Supported Agriculture Core Management Options. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 26 (2): 417–430.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnaudt, C., M. Weinhardt, R. Fitzgerald, and S. Liebig. 2014. The European Social Surveys: Contents, Design, and Research Potential. Schmollers Jahrbuch 134: 487–506.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnell, S.M. 2007. Food with a Farmer’s Face: Community-Supported Agriculture in the United States. Geographic Review 97 (4): 550–564.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S.H. 1992. Universals in the Content and Structure of Values: Theoretical Advances and Empirical Tests in 20 Countries. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 25: 1–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S.H. 2003. A Proposal for Measuring Value Orientations Across Nations. Questionnaire Development Package of the European Social Survey. Chapter 7. www.Europeansocialsurvey.org.

  • Schwartz, S.H. 2005. Human Values. European Social Survey Education Net. http://essedunet.nsd.uib.no/cms/topics/1.

  • Schwartz, S.H. 2012. An Overview of the Schwartz Theory of Basic Values. Psychology and Culture 2 (1): 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S.H. 2017. The Refined Theory of Basic Values. In Values and Behavior, ed. S. Roccas and L. Sagicv. Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S.H., and W. Bilsky. 1987. Toward a Universal Psychological Structure of Human Values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 53 (3): 550–562.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S.H., and W. Bilsky. 1990. Toward a Theory of the Universal Content and Structure of Values: Extensions and Cross-cultural Replications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 53: 550–562.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S.H., and W. Bilsky. 1994. Values and Personality. European Journal of Personality 8: 163–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, R., and M. Jha. 2017. Values Influencing Sustainable Consumption Behavior: Exploring the Contextual Relationship. Journal of Business Research 76: 77–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solinger, O.N., W. van Olffen, and R.A. Roe. 2008. Beyond the Three-Component Model of Organizational Commitment. Journal of Applied Psychology 93 (1): 70–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steg, L. 2017. Values, Norms, and Intrinsic Motivation to Act Proenvironmentally. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 41: 277–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tavernier, J. 2012. Food Citizenship: Is There a Duty for Responsible Consumption? Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 25 (6): 895–907.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thøgersen, J., and F. Ölander. 2002. Human Values and the Emergence of Sustainable Consumption Pattern: A Panel Study. Journal of Economic Psychology 23: 605–630.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorsøe, M., and C. Kjeldsen. 2016. The Constitution of Trust: Function, Configuration and Generation of Trust in Alternative Food Networks. Sociologia Ruralis 56 (2): 175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vassalos, M., Z. Gao, and L. Zhang. 2016. Who are the CSA Consumers and How to Promote CSA to More Consumers? Selected Paper Prepared for Presentation at the 2016 Agricultural & Applied Economics Association Annual Meeting. Boston.

  • Vassalos, M., Z. Gao, and L. Zhang. 2017. Factors Affecting Current and Future CSA Partic-ipation. Sustainability 9 (3): 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vermeir, I., and W. Verbeke. 2008. Sustainable Food Consumption Among Young Adults in Belgium: Theory of Planned Behavior and the Role of Confidence and Values. Ecological Economics 64: 542–553.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wellner, M., and L. Theuvsen. 2017. Community Supported Agriculture in Deutschland. Berichte über Landwirtschaft 95 (3): 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woods, T.A., and D. Tropp. 2015. CSAs and the Battle for the Local Food Dollar. Journal of Food Distribution Research 46 (2): 17–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zenker, S., T. Gollan, and N. Van Quaquebeke. 2014. Using Polynomial Regression Analysis and Response Surface Methodology to Make a Stronger Case for Value Congruence in Place Marketing. Psychology and Marketing 31 (3): 184–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zepeda, L., A. Reznickova, W.S. Russell, and D. Hettenbach. 2014. A Case Study of the Symbolic Value of Community Supported Agriculture. Journal of Food Distribution Research 45 (2): 195–212.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The project was supported by funds of the Federal Ministry of Food and Agriculture (BMEL) based on a decision of the Parliament of the Federal Republic of Germany via the Federal Office for Agriculture and Food (BLE) under the innovation support program.

Funding

Funding was provided by Bundesministerium für Ernährung und Landwirtschaft.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marie Diekmann.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Diekmann, M., Theuvsen, L. Value structures determining community supported agriculture: insights from Germany. Agric Hum Values 36, 733–746 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-019-09950-1

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-019-09950-1

Keywords

Navigation