Determinants of food security in Tanzania: gendered dimensions of household headship and control of resources

Abstract

This paper examines heterogeneous impacts of gendered household headship and control of resources on food security in rural Tanzania (as measured by a World Food Programme score based on quantity and quality of food consumed in the household over a 7 day period). Analysis with minimal attention to heterogeneity in gender considerations indicates no differences in household food security between male and female-headed households. But with a more differentiated household headship variable (reflecting heterogeneity in household composition) and accounting for gendered differences in resource ownership, the results differ markedly. Using more gender-disaggregated variables, our results show significant differences between female-headed and male-headed households. In these results we find support for the claim that gender norms in the study villages often restrict women’s access to resources, resulting in more vulnerable female-headed households. Female-headed households with no male adults present are particularly vulnerable. The study also points to specific opportunities for enhanced food security with attention to female and joint ownership of livestock. These results represent a hopeful sign that efforts to enhance female livestock ownership could be a useful strategy to address lower levels of food consumption in these Tanzanian villages.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Boon, E.K., G.S. Ogato, and J. Subramani. 2009. Improving access to productive resources and agricultural services through gender empowerment: A case study of three rural communities in ambo district, Ethiopia. Journal of Human Ecology 27(2): 85–100.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Buvinic, M., and G. Gupta. 1997. Female-headed households and female-maintained families: Are they worth targeting to reduce poverty in developing countries? Economic Development and Cultural Change 45(2): 259–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Case, A., and A. Deaton. 1998. Large cash transfers to the elderly in South Africa. Economic Journal 108(450): 1330–1361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chant, S. 2006. Female household headship, privation, and power: Challenging the “feminization of poverty” thesis. In Out of the shadows: Political action and the informal economy in Latin America, ed. P. Fernandez-Kelly and Jon Shefner, 125–164. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.

  5. CIA (Central Intelligence Agency). 2012. World fact book: Tanzania. Washington, DC. https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/tz.html. (Accessed 1 Mar 2014, 10 Dec 2012).

  6. Coulson, A. 1982. Tanzania: A political economy. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dassanayake, W. 2012. An empirical investigation into the relationship between household headship and income. Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Resource Economics and Environmental Sociology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB.

  8. Deininger, K., and S. Jin. 2006. Tenure security and land-related investment: Evidence from Ethiopia. European Economic Review 50(5): 1245–1277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Doss, C. 2011. If women hold up half the sky, how much of the world’s food do they produce? ESA Working Paper No. 11–04. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.

  10. Duflo, E. 2003. Grandmothers and granddaughters: Old-age pensions and intrahousehold allocation in South Africa. The World Bank Economic Review 17(1): 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Fafchamps, M., and A.R. Quisumbing. 2008. Household formation and marriage markets in rural areas. Handbook of Development Economics 4: 3187–3247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations). 2011. The state of food and agriculture: Women in agriculture. Closing the gender gap for development. Rome: FAO.

  13. Handa, S. 1996. The determinants of female headship in Jamaica: Results from a structural model. Economic Development and Cultural Change 44(4): 793–815.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Horrell, S., and P. Krishnan. 2007. Poverty and productivity in female-headed households in Zimbabwe. The Journal of Development Studies 43(8): 1351–1380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hyden, G. 1980. Beyond Ujamaa in Tanzania: Underdevelopment and an uncaptured peasantry. London: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Jennings, M. 2008. Surrogates of the state: NGOs, development, and Ujamaa in Tanzania. Bloomfield, CT: Kumarian Press.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Joshi, S. 2004. Female household-headship in rural Bangladesh: Incidence, determinants, and impact on children’s schooling. Economic Growth Center, Yale University, Center Discussion Paper No. 894. New Haven, CT.

  18. Maddox, G. 1991. Famine, impoverishment, and the creation of a labor reserve in Central Tanzania. Disasters 15(1): 35–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Meinzen-Dick, R., N. Johnson, A. Quisumbing, J. Njuki, J. Behrman, D. Rubin, A. Peterman, and E. Waithanji. 2011. Gender, assets, and agricultural development programs: A conceptual framework. CGIAR Systemwide Program on Collective Action and Poverty Rights, CAPRi Working Paper No. 99, Washington, DC.

  20. Nelson, V., and T. Stathers. 2009. Resilience, power, culture, and climate: A case study from semi-arid Tanzania, and new research directions. Gender and Development 17(1): 81–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Njuki, J., J. Poole, N. Johnson, I. Baltenweck, P. Pali, Z. Lokman, and S. Mburu. 2011. Gender, livestock, and livelihood indicators. Version 2. International Livestock Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya.

  22. O’Laughlin, B. 1995. Myth of the African family in the world of development. In Women wielding the hoe: Lessons from rural Africa for feminist theory and development practice, ed. D. Bryceson, 63–92. Oxford: Berg Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Olumakaiye, M., and A. Ajayi. 2006. Women’s empowerment for household food security: The place of education. Journal of Human Ecology 19(1): 51–55.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Pant, M. 2000. Intra-household allocation patterns: A study in female autonomy. Indian Journal of Gender Studies 7(1): 93–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Peters, P. 1995. Uses and abuses of the concept of “female-headed households” in research on agrarian transformation and policy. In Women wielding the hoe: Lessons from rural Africa for feminist theory and development practice, ed. D. Bryceson, 93–108. Oxford: Berg Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Safriel, U., and Z. Adeel. 2005. Dryland systems (Chapter 22). In Ecosystems and human well-being. Vol. 5. Washington, DC: Island Press. http://www.maweb.org/documents/document.291.aspx.pdf. Accessed 1 March 2014.

  27. Seebens, H. 2010. Intra-household bargaining, gender roles in agriculture, and how to promote welfare enhancing changes. ESA Working Paper No. 10–11. Agricultural Development Economics Division, FAO. Rome: FAO.

  28. World Bank, Food and Agriculture Organization, and International Fund for Agricultural Development. 2009. Gender in agriculture sourcebook. Washington, DC: The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  29. World Food Programme. 2008. Food consumption analysis: Calculation and the use of the food consumption score in food security analysis. World Food Program, Vulnerability Analysis and Mapping Branch, Rome: Italy.

  30. Valdivia, C., and J. Gilles. 2001. Gender and resource management: Households and groups, strategies and transitions. Agriculture and Human Values 18(1): 5–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research is undertaken with the financial support of the Canadian International Food Security Research Fund (CIFSRF) through the International Development Research Center (IDRC), and the Government of Canada, provided through Foreign Affairs, Trade, and Development Canada (DFATD). We are grateful to our colleagues at Sokoine University of Agriculture (Faustin Lekule, Sebastian Chenyambuga, and Deo Gratias Shayo) and the International Livestock Research Institute (Jemimah Njuki and Pamela Pali) for their assistance in the design and implementation of the household survey that was used in this paper.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John R. Parkins.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mason, R., Ndlovu, P., Parkins, J.R. et al. Determinants of food security in Tanzania: gendered dimensions of household headship and control of resources. Agric Hum Values 32, 539–549 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-014-9568-5

Download citation

Keywords

  • Household headship
  • Food security
  • Livelihoods
  • Socioeconomic status
  • Household survey
  • Gender
  • Ownership