Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Agriculture, livelihoods, and globalization: The analysis of new trajectories (and avoidance of just-so stories) of human-environment change and conservation

  • Commentary
  • Published:
Agriculture and Human Values Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Globalization offers a mix of new trajectories for agriculture, livelihoods, resource use, and environmental conservation. The papers in this issue share elements that advance our understanding of these new trajectories. The shared elements suggest an approach that places stress on: (i) the common ground of theoretical concepts (local-global interactions), methodologies (case study design), and analytical frameworks (spatio-temporal emphasis); (ii) farm-level economic diversification and the dynamics of agricultural intensification-disintensification; (iii) the pervasive role of agricultural as well as environmental institutions, organizations, and governance issues; (iv) the ‹agency of nature’ that blends the roles of non-human organisms and the cultural and social practices of people both at the local scale and beyond; (v) the framing of sustainability initiatives and outcomes through the perspective of historical change; (vi)␣spatial environmental dynamics of the ‹new geographics of environmental conservation’ that impact agriculture, food production, and resource management; and (vii) successful and promising policies, projects, and developments mapping out possible spaces of hope for agricultural sustainability, aquitable development, and food security. The adoption and application of these elements is successful also in avoiding the tendency toward just-so accounts or overly simplified stories of agrarian and environment successes amid the often grim realities of globalization and its impacts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, W. M., R. Aveling, D. Brockington, B. Dickson, J.␣Elliott, J. Hutton, D. Roe, B. Vira, and W. Wolmer (2004). ``Biodiversity conservation and the eradication of poverty.'' Science 306(5699): 1146–1149

    Google Scholar 

  • Aggarwal R. M. (2006) Globalization, local ecosystems, and the rural poor. World Development 34(8):1405–1418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agrawal A. (2005) Environmentality: Technologies of Government and the Making of Subjects. Durham, Duke University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Appadurai A. (1996) Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization. Minneapolis, Minnesota, University of Minnesota Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Bardhan P. (2006) Globalization and rural poverty. World Development 34(8):1393–1404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basu K. (2006) Globalization, poverty, and inequality: What is the relationship? What can be done? World Development 34(8):1361–1373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bellon M. R., Adato M., Becerril J., Mindek D. (2006) Poor farmers’ perceived benefits from different types of maize germplasm: The case of creolization in lowland tropical Mexico. World Development 34(1):113–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brookfield H. C. (2001) Exploring Agrodiversity. New York, New York, Columbia University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Brookfield H. C., Padoch C., Parsons H., Stocking M. A. (2002) Cultivating Biodiversity: Understanding, Analysing and Using Agricultural Diversity. London, UK, UNEP

    Google Scholar 

  • Brush S. B. (2004) Farmers’ Bounty: Locating Crop Diversity in the Contemporary World. New Haven, Connecticut, Yale University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark J. R. A. (2005) The ‹New Associationalism’ in agriculture: Agro-food diversification and multifunctional production logics. Journal of Economic Geography 5(4):475–498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox K. R. (1997) Spaces of Globalization: Reasserting the Power of the Local. New York, New York, Guilford Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis F. (2000) Rural Livelihoods and Diversity in Developing Countries. London, UK, Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsyth T. (2003) Critical Political Ecology: The Politics of Environmental Science. London, UK, Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould S. J. (1992) The Panda’s Thumb: More Reflections in Natural History. New York, New York, Penguin

    Google Scholar 

  • Green R. E., Cornell S. J., Scharlemann J. P. W., Balmford. A. (2005) Farming and the fate of wild nature. Science 307(5709):550–555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harley J. B. (1992) Rereading the maps of the Columbian encounter. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 82:522–542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey D. (2000) Spaces of Hope. Berkeley, California, University of California Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Held D., McGrew A. (2000) The Global Transformations Reader: An Introduction to the Globalization Debate. Cambridge, UK, Blackwell

    Google Scholar 

  • Igoe J. (2004) Conservation and Globalization: A Study of National Parks and Indigenous Communities from East Africa to South Dakota. Belmont, California, Thomson/Wadsworth

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingold T. (2004) Culture on the ground – the world perceived through the feet. Journal of Material Culture 9:315–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambin E. F., Geist H. J., Lepers E. (2001a) Dynamics of land-use and land-cover change in tropical regions. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 28:205–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambin E. F., Turner B. L., Geist H. J., Agbola S. B., Angelsin A., Bruce J. W., Coomes O. T., Dirzo R., Fisher G., Folke C. (2001b) The causes of land-use and land-cover change: Moving beyond the myths. Global Environmental Change-Human and Policy Dimensions 11(4):261–269

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeely J. A., Scherr S. J. (2003) Ecoagriculture: Strategies to Feed the World and Save Biodiversity. Washington DC, Island Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Naughton-Treves L, M. B. Holland, and K. Brandon (2005). ``The role of protected areas in conserving biodiversity and sustaining local livelihoods.'' Annual Review of Environment and Resources 30: 219–252

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumann R. P. (2004) Nature-state-territory: Toward a critical theorization of conservation enclosures. In R. Peet M. Watts (eds.) Liberation Ecologies: Environment, Development, Social Movements, Second edition. London, UK, Routledge, pp. 195–217

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumann R. P. (2005) Making Political Ecology. London, UK, Arnold Publishers

    Google Scholar 

  • Orlove B. S., Brush S. B. (1996) Anthropology and the conservation of biodiversity. Annual Review of Anthropology 25:329–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Padoch C., Sears R. R. (2005) Conserving concepts: In praise of sustainability. Conservation Biology 19(1):39–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paulson, S. and L. L. Gezon (eds.) (2005). Political Ecology Across Spaces, Scales, and Social Groups. New Brunswick, New Jersey: Rutgers University Press

  • Reardon T., Berdegue J., Escobar G. (2001) Rural nonfarm employment and incomes in Latin America: Overview and policy implications. World Development 29(3):395–409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rigg J. (2006) Land, farming, livelihoods, and poverty: Rethinking the links in the Rural South. World Development 34(1):180–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robbins P. (2004) Political Ecology: A Critical Introduction. Oxford, UK, Blackwell Publishers

    Google Scholar 

  • Thrupp L. (2000) Linking agricultural biodiversity and food security: The valuable role of agrobiodiversity sustainable agriculture. International Affairs 76(2):265–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner B. L. II, Villar S. C., Forster D., Geoghegan J., Keys E., Klepeis P., Lawrence D., Mendoza P. M., Manson S., Ogneva-Himmelberger Y. (2001) Deforestation in the southern Yucatán peninsula: An integrative approach. Forest Ecology and Management 154:355–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veldkamp A., Lambin E. F. (2001) Predicting land-use change. Agriculture, Ecosystems, and Environment 85(1–3):1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whatmore S. (2002) Hybrid Geographies: Natures, Cultures, Spaces. Thousand Oaks, California, Sage

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood D., Lenné J. (2005) ‹Received wisdom’ in agricultural land use policy: 10 years on from Río. Land Use Policy 22:75–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zerner C. (2000) People, Plants, and Justice: The Politics of Nature Conservation. New York, New York, Columbia University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerer K. S. (2001) Geography and advances in the new ethnobiology: Links to a proposed ethno-landscape ecology. The Geographical Review 91(4):725–734

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerer K. S. (2003) Just small potatoes (and ulluco)? The use of seed-size variation in ‹native commercialized’ agriculture and agrobiodiversity conservation among Peruvian farmers. Agriculture and Human Values 20:107–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerer K. S. (2006a) Globalization and the New Geographies of Conservation. Chicago, Illinois, University of Chicago Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerer K. S. (2006b) Cultural ecology: At the interface with political ecology – the new geographies of environmental conservation and globalization. Progress in Human Geography 30:63–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author wishes to thank Valerie Imbruce for the invitation to contribute to this issue and to acknowledge the editorial inputs and expertise of Laura DeLind, the Editor of AHV. My research on the themes covered in this article was supported through fellowships of the John Simon Guggenheim Foundation (2002–2003) and the Agrarian Studies Program of Yale University (2004–2005).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karl S. Zimmerer.

Additional information

Karl Zimmerer is a geographer and environmental scientist researching and teaching on the topics of globalization and human-environment change (with emphasis on agriculture, conservation and rural livelihoods); the dynamics of agrobiodiversity in tropical mountains (currently focused on irrigation and the relations of new water resource management to agrobiodiversity change); and the development and experience of spatial-environmental models, environmental science, and conservation planning. Karl is the author of numerous articles and his books and monographs include four publications, most recently Globalization and New Geographies of Conservation (2006, University of Chicago). He is active in various organizations involved with agricultural, environmental, conservation, and globalization policies and also edits the Nature-Society section of the Annals of the Association of American Geographers.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zimmerer, K.S. Agriculture, livelihoods, and globalization: The analysis of new trajectories (and avoidance of just-so stories) of human-environment change and conservation. Agric Hum Values 24, 9–16 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-006-9028-y

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-006-9028-y

Keywords

Navigation