Abstract
Watershed planning has typically been approached as a technical problem in which water quality and quantity as influenced by the hydrology, topography, soil composition, and land use of a watershed are the significant variables. However, it is the human uses of land and water as resources that stimulate governments to seek planning. For the past decade or more, many efforts have been made to create democratic planning processes, which, it is hoped, will be viewed as legitimate by those the plans regulate. This article uses a case study of the Cache River watershed in southernmost Illinois to analyze the complicated historical and political economic context of a specific watershed planning process that occurred from 1993 through 1995. This article assesses the claims made about the democratic, grass-roots, deliberative nature of the planning process and casts doubt on the legitimacy of its outcomes. It also proposes an alternative form of governance that would be both democratic and capable of generating outcomes viewed as legitimate by most affected parties.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
J. Adams (1994) The Transformation of Rural Life: Southern Illinois 1890–1990 University of North Carolina Press Chapel Hill, North Carolina
Beck, R. J., K. S. Harris, S. E. Kraft, and M. J. Wagner (1990). Potential Economic Impacts of the Proposed Cypress Creek National Wildlife Refuge. Final Report Submitted to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the Illinois Field Office of The Nature Conservancy. Carbondale, Illinois: Department of Agribusiness Economics, Southern Illinois University.
R. G. Bennett (1996) ArticleTitleChallenges in Norwegian coastal zone planning GeoJournal 39 IssueID2 153–165 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00172697
CWAP (1998). “Clean water action plan.” Accessed on February 16, 2005 at http://water.usgs.gov/owq/cleanwater/ action/toc.html. PDF available at http://water.usgs.gov/ owq/cleanwater/action/cwap.pdf.
R. E. Deyle (1995) ArticleTitleIntegrated water management: Contending with garbage can decision making in organized anarchies Water Resources Bulletin 31 IssueID3 387–398
J. Dryzek (1996) Democracy in Capitalist Times: Ideals, Limits, and Struggles Oxford University Press New York
J. Dryzek (2000) Deliberative Democracy and Beyond: Liberals, Critics and Contestations Oxford University Press New York
Environmental Working Group (n.d.). Farm Subsidy Database. Accessed on February 16, 2005 at www.ewg.org/farm/.
W. Firey (1960) Man, Mind, and Land: A Theory of Resource Use Free Press Glencoe, Illinois
W. Firey (1963) Conditions for the realization of values remote in time E. A. Tiryakain (Eds) Sociological Theory, Values, and Sociocultural Change: Essays in Honor of Pitirim A. Sorokin Free Press Glencoe, Illinois 147–159
Geostat Center (n.d.). Historical Census Browser. Historical, Demographic, Economic and Social Data: The United States, 1790–1970, U.S. Bureau of the Census Data Sets. Available online at http://fisher.lib.virginia.edu/collections/stats/histcensus/. Data retrieved on disk 2001 and accessed directly at various times.
J. Gilbert (2000) ArticleTitleEastern urban liberals and midwestern agrarian intellectuals: Two group portraits of progressives in the New Deal Department of Agriculture Agricultural History 74 IssueID2 162–80
J. Gilbert (2001) Agrarian intellectuals in a democratizing state: A collective biography of USDA leaders in the intended New Deal C. McNicol Stock R. Johnston (Eds) The Countryside in the Age of the Modern State: Essays on the Political History of Rural America Cornell University Press Ithaca, New York 213–239
J. Gilbert (2003) Low modernism and the agrarian New Deal: A different kind of state J. Adams (Eds) Fighting for the Farm: Rural America Transformed University of Pennsylvania Press Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 129–146
L. Goodwyn (1978) The Populist Movement: A Short History of the Agrarian Revolt in America Oxford University Press New York
A. Gutmann D. Thompson (1996) Democracy and Disagreement The Belknap Press of Harvard University Cambridge, Massachusetts
A. Hatcher S. Jaffry O. Thébaud E. Bennett (2000) ArticleTitleNormative and social influences affecting compliance with fishery regulation Land Economics 76 IssueID3 448–461
P. Healey (1998) ArticleTitleBuilding institutional capacity through collaborative approaches to urban planning Environment and Planning 30 1531–1546
D. Held (1987) Models of Democracy Sanford University Press Sanford
M. D. Hutchison (1984) Lower Cache Preservation Plan Prepared for The Nature Conservancy, Illinois Field Office The Natural Land Institute Rockford, Illinois
K. Kuperan J. G. Sutinen (1998) ArticleTitleBlue water crime: Deterrence, legitimacy, and compliance in fisheries Law and Society Review 32 IssueID2 309–337
Kraft, S. and J. Penberthy (2000). “Conservation policy for the future: What lessons have we learned from watershed planning and research.” Journal of Soil and Water Conservation. Third Quarter: 327–333.
Kraft, S. E., C. L. Lant, J. Adams, J. Beaulieu, D. Bennett, L. Duram, and J. B. Ruhl (1999). Understanding the Social Context for Ecological Restoration in Multiple-owned Watersheds: The Case of the Cache River, Illinois. U.S. Department of Agriculture, NSF/EPA/USDA Water and Watersheds Program, CSREES project number: ILLZ-99E-0151. 1999–2002.
LiPuma, E. and S. K. Meltzoff (1997). “The crosscurrents of ethnicity and class in the construction of public policy.” American Ethnologist 24 (Feb): 114–131.
D. T. Massey (1983-84) ArticleTitleLand use regulatory power of conservation districts in the Midwestern states for controlling nonpoint source pollutants Drake Law Review 33 35–111
Mississippi River/Gulf of Mexico Watershed Nutrient Task Force (2001). Action Plan for Reducing, Mitigating, and Controlling Hypoxia in the Northern Gulf of Mexico. Washington DC: Environmental Protection Agency. Accessed on February 16, 2005 at www.epa.gov/msbasin/ actionplan.htm.
Moore, R. (2002). “The Sugar Creek project: Tapping subwatershed TMDL potential in the headwaters of the Ohio River.” Proceedings, Environment, Resources, and Sustain ability: Policy Issues for the 21st Century. Athens, Georgia, September 7–8. CD.
Perrin, W. H. (ed.) (1990 [1883]). History of Alexander, Union and Pulaski Counties, Illinois. Utica, Kentucky: McDowell Publications.
A. Phillips (1995) Dealing with difference: A politics of ideas, or a politics of presence? S. Benhabib (Eds) Democracy and Difference Pennsylvania State University Press University Park, Pennsylvania 139–152
R. D. Putnam R. Leonardi R. Y. Nanetti (1994) Making Democracy Work Princeton University Press Princeton, New Jersey
RAMSAR. The Ramsar Convention on Wetlands. The Annotated Ramsar List: United States of America. Gland, Switzerland. Acessed on February 16, 2005 at http://www.ramsar.org/profiles_usa.htm.
RPC (Cache River Watershed Resource Planning Committee) (1995). Resource Plan for the Cache River Watershed: Union, Johnson, Massac, Alexander and Pulaski Counties, Illinois. Cache River Joint Venture Cypress Creek National Wildlife Refuge, Ullin, Illinois.
P. P. Rogers (1993) America's Water Role: Federal Roles and Responsibilities MIT Press Cambridge, Massachusetts
B. Rothstein (1998) Just Institutions Matter: The Moral and Political Logic of the Universal Welfare State Cambridge University Press Cambridge, Massachusetts
J. B. Ruhl (2001) ArticleTitleThe environmental law of farms: 30 years of making a mole hill out of a mountain Environmental Law Reporter 2–2001 10203–10223
J. B. Ruhl C. Lant S. Kraft J. Adams L. Duram T. Loftus (2003) ArticleTitleProposal for a model state watershed management act Environmental Law 33 IssueID4 929–948
S. Salamon R. L. Farnsworth J. A. Rendziak (1998) ArticleTitleIs locally led conservation planning working? A farm town case study Rural Sociology 63 IssueID2 214–234
L. E. Swanson (2001) ArticleTitleRural policy and direct local participation: Democracy, inclusiveness, collective agency, and locality-based policy Rural Sociology 66 IssueID1 1–21
USGS (United States Geological Survey) (2005). Hypoxia in the Gulf of Mexico and related USGS activities. Accessed on February 16, 2005 at www.toxics.usgs.gov/hypoxia/.
J. M. Valadez (2001) Deliberative Democracy, Political Legitimacy, and Self-Determination in Multicultural Societies Westview Press Boulder, Colorado
W. Viessman (1990) ArticleTitleWater management: Challenge and opportunity Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management 116 IssueID2 155–169
E. P. Weber (2000) ArticleTitleA new vanguard for the environment: Grass-roots ecosystem management as the new environmental movement Society and Natural Resources 13 237–259 Occurrence Handle10.1080/089419200279081
M. Wells (2003) The contingent creation of interest groups J. Adams (Eds) Fighting for the Farm: Rural America Transformed Pennsylvania University Press Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 96–112
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
An earlier version of this paper was given at the conference, Environment, Resources, and Sustainability: Policy Issues for the 21st Century. Sponsored by the Culture & Agriculture Section of AAA, Anthropology and Environment Section of AAA, and American Anthropological Association Public Policy Committee. Hosted by the University of Georgia Department of Anthropology, Athens, Georgia, September 7–8, 2002.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Adams, J., Kraft, S., Ruhl, J.B. et al. Watershed Planning: Pseudo-democracy and its Alternatives – The Case of the Cache River Watershed, Illinois. Agric Hum Values 22, 327–338 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-005-6049-x
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-005-6049-x