Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Watershed Planning: Pseudo-democracy and its Alternatives – The Case of the Cache River Watershed, Illinois

  • Published:
Agriculture and Human Values Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Watershed planning has typically been approached as a technical problem in which water quality and quantity as influenced by the hydrology, topography, soil composition, and land use of a watershed are the significant variables. However, it is the human uses of land and water as resources that stimulate governments to seek planning. For the past decade or more, many efforts have been made to create democratic planning processes, which, it is hoped, will be viewed as legitimate by those the plans regulate. This article uses a case study of the Cache River watershed in southernmost Illinois to analyze the complicated historical and political economic context of a specific watershed planning process that occurred from 1993 through 1995. This article assesses the claims made about the democratic, grass-roots, deliberative nature of the planning process and casts doubt on the legitimacy of its outcomes. It also proposes an alternative form of governance that would be both democratic and capable of generating outcomes viewed as legitimate by most affected parties.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • J. Adams (1994) The Transformation of Rural Life: Southern Illinois 1890–1990 University of North Carolina Press Chapel Hill, North Carolina

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, R. J., K. S. Harris, S. E. Kraft, and M. J. Wagner (1990). Potential Economic Impacts of the Proposed Cypress Creek National Wildlife Refuge. Final Report Submitted to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the Illinois Field Office of The Nature Conservancy. Carbondale, Illinois: Department of Agribusiness Economics, Southern Illinois University.

  • R. G. Bennett (1996) ArticleTitleChallenges in Norwegian coastal zone planning GeoJournal 39 IssueID2 153–165 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00172697

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CWAP (1998). “Clean water action plan.” Accessed on February 16, 2005 at http://water.usgs.gov/owq/cleanwater/ action/toc.html. PDF available at http://water.usgs.gov/ owq/cleanwater/action/cwap.pdf.

  • R. E. Deyle (1995) ArticleTitleIntegrated water management: Contending with garbage can decision making in organized anarchies Water Resources Bulletin 31 IssueID3 387–398

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Dryzek (1996) Democracy in Capitalist Times: Ideals, Limits, and Struggles Oxford University Press New York

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Dryzek (2000) Deliberative Democracy and Beyond: Liberals, Critics and Contestations Oxford University Press New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Environmental Working Group (n.d.). Farm Subsidy Database. Accessed on February 16, 2005 at www.ewg.org/farm/.

  • W. Firey (1960) Man, Mind, and Land: A Theory of Resource Use Free Press Glencoe, Illinois

    Google Scholar 

  • W. Firey (1963) Conditions for the realization of values remote in time E. A. Tiryakain (Eds) Sociological Theory, Values, and Sociocultural Change: Essays in Honor of Pitirim A. Sorokin Free Press Glencoe, Illinois 147–159

    Google Scholar 

  • Geostat Center (n.d.). Historical Census Browser. Historical, Demographic, Economic and Social Data: The United States, 17901970, U.S. Bureau of the Census Data Sets. Available online at http://fisher.lib.virginia.edu/collections/stats/histcensus/. Data retrieved on disk 2001 and accessed directly at various times.

  • J. Gilbert (2000) ArticleTitleEastern urban liberals and midwestern agrarian intellectuals: Two group portraits of progressives in the New Deal Department of Agriculture Agricultural History 74 IssueID2 162–80

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Gilbert (2001) Agrarian intellectuals in a democratizing state: A collective biography of USDA leaders in the intended New Deal C. McNicol Stock R. Johnston (Eds) The Countryside in the Age of the Modern State: Essays on the Political History of Rural America Cornell University Press Ithaca, New York 213–239

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Gilbert (2003) Low modernism and the agrarian New Deal: A different kind of state J. Adams (Eds) Fighting for the Farm: Rural America Transformed University of Pennsylvania Press Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 129–146

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Goodwyn (1978) The Populist Movement: A Short History of the Agrarian Revolt in America Oxford University Press New York

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Gutmann D. Thompson (1996) Democracy and Disagreement The Belknap Press of Harvard University Cambridge, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Hatcher S. Jaffry O. Thébaud E. Bennett (2000) ArticleTitleNormative and social influences affecting compliance with fishery regulation Land Economics 76 IssueID3 448–461

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Healey (1998) ArticleTitleBuilding institutional capacity through collaborative approaches to urban planning Environment and Planning 30 1531–1546

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Held (1987) Models of Democracy Sanford University Press Sanford

    Google Scholar 

  • M. D. Hutchison (1984) Lower Cache Preservation Plan Prepared for The Nature Conservancy, Illinois Field Office The Natural Land Institute Rockford, Illinois

    Google Scholar 

  • K. Kuperan J. G. Sutinen (1998) ArticleTitleBlue water crime: Deterrence, legitimacy, and compliance in fisheries Law and Society Review 32 IssueID2 309–337

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraft, S. and J. Penberthy (2000). “Conservation policy for the future: What lessons have we learned from watershed planning and research.” Journal of Soil and Water Conservation. Third Quarter: 327–333.

  • Kraft, S. E., C. L. Lant, J. Adams, J. Beaulieu, D. Bennett, L. Duram, and J. B. Ruhl (1999). Understanding the Social Context for Ecological Restoration in Multiple-owned Watersheds: The Case of the Cache River, Illinois. U.S. Department of Agriculture, NSF/EPA/USDA Water and Watersheds Program, CSREES project number: ILLZ-99E-0151. 1999–2002.

  • LiPuma, E. and S. K. Meltzoff (1997). “The crosscurrents of ethnicity and class in the construction of public policy.” American Ethnologist 24 (Feb): 114–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • D. T. Massey (1983-84) ArticleTitleLand use regulatory power of conservation districts in the Midwestern states for controlling nonpoint source pollutants Drake Law Review 33 35–111

    Google Scholar 

  • Mississippi River/Gulf of Mexico Watershed Nutrient Task Force (2001). Action Plan for Reducing, Mitigating, and Controlling Hypoxia in the Northern Gulf of Mexico. Washington DC: Environmental Protection Agency. Accessed on February 16, 2005 at www.epa.gov/msbasin/ actionplan.htm.

  • Moore, R. (2002). “The Sugar Creek project: Tapping subwatershed TMDL potential in the headwaters of the Ohio River.” Proceedings, Environment, Resources, and Sustain ability: Policy Issues for the 21st Century. Athens, Georgia, September 7–8. CD.

  • Perrin, W. H. (ed.) (1990 [1883]). History of Alexander, Union and Pulaski Counties, Illinois. Utica, Kentucky: McDowell Publications.

  • A. Phillips (1995) Dealing with difference: A politics of ideas, or a politics of presence? S. Benhabib (Eds) Democracy and Difference Pennsylvania State University Press University Park, Pennsylvania 139–152

    Google Scholar 

  • R. D. Putnam R. Leonardi R. Y. Nanetti (1994) Making Democracy Work Princeton University Press Princeton, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • RAMSAR. The Ramsar Convention on Wetlands. The Annotated Ramsar List: United States of America. Gland, Switzerland. Acessed on February 16, 2005 at http://www.ramsar.org/profiles_usa.htm.

  • RPC (Cache River Watershed Resource Planning Committee) (1995). Resource Plan for the Cache River Watershed: Union, Johnson, Massac, Alexander and Pulaski Counties, Illinois. Cache River Joint Venture Cypress Creek National Wildlife Refuge, Ullin, Illinois.

  • P. P. Rogers (1993) America's Water Role: Federal Roles and Responsibilities MIT Press Cambridge, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  • B. Rothstein (1998) Just Institutions Matter: The Moral and Political Logic of the Universal Welfare State Cambridge University Press Cambridge, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  • J. B. Ruhl (2001) ArticleTitleThe environmental law of farms: 30 years of making a mole hill out of a mountain Environmental Law Reporter 2–2001 10203–10223

    Google Scholar 

  • J. B. Ruhl C. Lant S. Kraft J. Adams L. Duram T. Loftus (2003) ArticleTitleProposal for a model state watershed management act Environmental Law 33 IssueID4 929–948

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Salamon R. L. Farnsworth J. A. Rendziak (1998) ArticleTitleIs locally led conservation planning working? A farm town case study Rural Sociology 63 IssueID2 214–234

    Google Scholar 

  • L. E. Swanson (2001) ArticleTitleRural policy and direct local participation: Democracy, inclusiveness, collective agency, and locality-based policy Rural Sociology 66 IssueID1 1–21

    Google Scholar 

  • USGS (United States Geological Survey) (2005). Hypoxia in the Gulf of Mexico and related USGS activities. Accessed on February 16, 2005 at www.toxics.usgs.gov/hypoxia/.

  • J. M. Valadez (2001) Deliberative Democracy, Political Legitimacy, and Self-Determination in Multicultural Societies Westview Press Boulder, Colorado

    Google Scholar 

  • W. Viessman (1990) ArticleTitleWater management: Challenge and opportunity Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management 116 IssueID2 155–169

    Google Scholar 

  • E. P. Weber (2000) ArticleTitleA new vanguard for the environment: Grass-roots ecosystem management as the new environmental movement Society and Natural Resources 13 237–259 Occurrence Handle10.1080/089419200279081

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. Wells (2003) The contingent creation of interest groups J. Adams (Eds) Fighting for the Farm: Rural America Transformed Pennsylvania University Press Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 96–112

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jane Adams.

Additional information

An earlier version of this paper was given at the conference, Environment, Resources, and Sustainability: Policy Issues for the 21st Century. Sponsored by the Culture & Agriculture Section of AAA, Anthropology and Environment Section of AAA, and American Anthropological Association Public Policy Committee. Hosted by the University of Georgia Department of Anthropology, Athens, Georgia, September 7–8, 2002.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Adams, J., Kraft, S., Ruhl, J.B. et al. Watershed Planning: Pseudo-democracy and its Alternatives – The Case of the Cache River Watershed, Illinois. Agric Hum Values 22, 327–338 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-005-6049-x

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-005-6049-x

Key words

Navigation