Abstract
Litter decomposition plays a pivotal role in the functioning of various ecosystems in the form of recycling nutrients. Comprehensive studies on nutrient cycling are a vital concern in the context of increasing anthropogenic imprints on biogeochemical cycles. Present study was conducted for one year (2017–2018) under 13 years old broad leaf mahogany plantation in the sub-Himalayan region of West Bengal, India. The standard litterbag technique was used to study the decomposition and nutrient release pattern of litter. Results indicated that leaf litter had higher nutrients concentration than rachis litter except C and lignin. After one year of decomposition, an average weight of 4.33 g (21.64%) and 5.01 g (25.05%) remained in leaf litter and rachis litter, respectively. Decomposition was accelerated by warm temperature, high humidity, and enriched litter nutrient status. From the mineralization kinetics, it was noted that the decomposition rate constant (k) of leaf litter was higher than that of rachis litter. The recorded k for the first month’s decomposition of leaf litter was 0.372 month−1 and 0.114 month−1 for rachis litter. Half-life (T0.50) value for leaf litter was 1.868 months and 6.075 months for rachis litter. Nutrient release of nitrogen (N), phosphorous (P) and potassium (K) were observed to be 20.91 and 20.48 kg N ha−1 ton−1; 1.46 and 0.95 kg P ha−1 ton−1; 14.50 and 7.69 kg K ha−1 ton−1 from leaf and rachis, respectively. The average soil pH, EC, and bulk density (BD) values indicated significant variations with increasing depth as well as comparing plantation to non-plantation sites. The plantation site almost displayed higher mean total organic carbon (TOC), N, P, and K values than non-plantation sites. The present findings can serve as baseline information for future tree-based interventions in diverse land use systems management.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Data will be made available on request.
References
Ahirwal J, Saha P, Nath A, Nath AJ, Deb S, Sahoo UK (2021) Forests litter dynamics and environmental patterns in the Indian Himalayan region. For Ecol Manag 499:119612. https://doi.org/10.1016/jforeco2021119612
Anderson JM, Ingram JS (1993) Tropical soil biology and fertility: a handbook of methods. CAB International, Wallingford
Anjali Kumari N (2016) Studies on growth nitrogen fixing tree species and use of leaf as a green manure MSc thesis submitted to Uttar Banga Krishi Viswavidyalaya Cooch Behar West Bengal India
Bahar N, Kapoor KS, Jain AK (2001) Litter production pattern of Eucalyptus tereticornis plantation in protected and unprotected areas of upper Gangetic plain. Indian For 127(7):814–820
Becker J, Pabst H, Manyonga J, Kuzyakov Y (2015) Annual litterfall dynamics and nutrient deposition depending on elevation and land use at Mt Kilimanjaro. Biogeosciences 12(19):5635–5646. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-5635-2015
Binkley DAN, Giardina C (1998) Why do tree species affect soils? The warp and woof of tree-soil interactions. In: Plant-induced soil changes: processes and feedbacks. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 89–106. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2691-7_5
Boulton AJ, Boon PI (1991) A review of methodology used to measure leaf litter decomposition in lotic environments: time to turn over an old leaf? Mar Freshw 42(1):1–43. https://doi.org/10.1071/MF9910001
Butenschoen O, Krashevski V, Maraun M, Marian F, Sandmann D, Scheu S (2014) Litter mixture effects on decomposition in tropical montane rainforests vary strongly with time and turn negative at later stages of decay. Soil Biol Biochem 77:121–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/jsoilbio201406019
Chaturvedi OP, Singh JS (1987) The structure and function of pine forest in Central Himalayas. I. Dry matter dynamics. Ann Bot 60(3):237–252. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournalsaoba087442
Chopra SL, Kanwar JS (1978) Analytical agricultural chemistry. Kalyani Publisher, Ludhiana
Dey T, Dinesha S, Singh M, Arshad A, Tamang M, Shahina NN, Nath AJ, Shukla G, Chakravarty S (2023) Prioritizing tree-based systems for optimizing carbon sink in the Indian sub-Himalayan region. Land 12(6):1155. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12061155
Dhanya B, Viswanath S, Purushothaman S (2013) Decomposition and nutrient release dynamics of Ficus benghalensis L litter in traditional agroforestry systems of Karnataka Southern India. ISRN For 2013:7. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/524679
Dinesha S, Dey AN, Vineeta DS, Debnath MK (2020) Litterfall pattern and nutrient dynamics of Swietenia macrophylla (King) plantation in Terai region West Bengal India. Indian For 146(1):7–12. https://doi.org/10.36808/if/2020/v146i1/144390
Dinesha S, Panda MR, Pradhan D, Rakesh S, Dey AN, Bhat JA, Pandey AN (2023) Ecosystem carbon budgeting under Swietenia macrophylla King plantation in sub humid foothills of Eastern Himalayans of India. Environ Dev Sustain. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-022-02902-6
Evans J, Turnbull JW (2004) Plantation forestry in the tropics: the role of silviculture and use of planted forests for industrial social, environmental and agroforestry purposes. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Fujii K, Morioka K, Hayakawa C, Inagaki Y, Hangs RD, Anderson DW, McConkey BG (2020) Litter decomposition and soil organic carbon stabilization in a Kastanozem of Saskatchewan Canada. Geoderma Reg 23:e00348. https://doi.org/10.1016/jgeodrs2020e00348
Goering HK, Vansoest PJ (1970) Forage fibre analysis (apparatus reagents procedures and some applications). In: USDA handbook 20 US Department of Agriculture. Agriculture Research Service, Washington, DC
Handa AK, Sirohi C, Arunachalam A, Chavan SB (2020) Agroforestry interventions for carbon sequestration and improving degraded lands. Clim Chang Environ Sustain 8(1):3–12. https://doi.org/10.5958/2320-642X2020000010
Isaac SR, Nair MA (2006) Litter dynamics of six multipurpose trees in home garden in southern Kerala India. Agrofor Syst 67(3):203–213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-005-1107-3
Jackson ML (1973) Soil chemical analysis. Prentice Hall Pvt Ltd, New Delhi
Lalremsang P, Gopichand B, Upadhyaya K, Singson L, Sahoo UK (2022) Leaf litter decomposition and nutrient release dynamics of Flemingia semialata Roxb-a potential woody perennial species for mountain agroforestry. J Sustain For 3:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/1054981120222045504
Menyailo OV, Hungate BA, Zech W (2002) The effect of a single tree species on soil microbial activity related to C and N cycling in the Siberian artificial afforestation experiment. Plant Soil 242:183–196. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016245619357
Mitch WJ, Gosselink JG (1993) Wetlands, 2nd edn. Van Nosirand Reinhold, New York, pp 205–240
Olson JS (1963) Energy storage and the balance of producers and decomposers in ecological systems. Ecology 44(2):322–331. https://doi.org/10.2307/1932179
Pande PK (2001) Litter nutrient dynamics of Shorea robusta Gaertn plantation at Doon Valley (Uttaranchal) India. Indian For 127(9):980–994. https://doi.org/10.36808/if/2001/v127i9/2972
Pandey CB, Rai RB, Singh L (2007) Seasonal dynamics of mineral N pools and N-mineralization in soils under homegardens trees in South Andaman India. Agrofor Syst 71(1):57–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-007-9073-6
Pandit BR, Thampan S (1988) Total concentration of P Ca Mg N & C in the soils of reserve forest near Bhavnagar Gujarat India. Indian J For 11(2):98–100
Peterson DL, Rolfe GL (1982) Nutrient dynamics and decomposition of litterfall in floodplain and upland forests of central Illinois. For Sci 28(4):667–681. https://doi.org/10.1093/forestscience/284667
Rakesh S, Sarkar D, Sinha AK, Shikha MP, Danish S, Fahad S, Datta R (2021) Carbon mineralization rates and kinetics of surface-applied and incorporated rice and maize residues in Entisol and Inceptisol soil types. Sustainability 13(13):7212. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13137212
Sariyildiz T (2003) Litter decomposition of Picea orientalis, Pinus sylvestris and Castanea sativa trees grown in Artvin in relation to their initial litter quality variables. Turk J Agric For 27(4):237–243
Semwal RL, Maikhuri RK, Rao KS, Sen KK, Saxena KG (2003) Leaf litter decomposition and nutrient release patterns of six multipurpose tree species of central Himalaya India. Biomass Bioenergy 24(1):3–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0961-9534(02)00087-9
Singh JS, Singh SP (1987) Forest vegetation of the Himalaya. Botanic Rev 53(1):80–192
SPSS (2010) SPSS Statistical package for windows. Release 170 Standard Version
Thimmaiah SK (1999) Standard methods of biochemical analysis. Kalyani Publishers, New Delhi
Wider RK, Lang GE (1982) A critique of the analytical methods used in examining decomposition data obtained from litterbags. Ecol 63(6):1636–1642. https://doi.org/10.2307/1940104
Yang YS, Guo JF, Chen GS, Xie JS, Cai LP, Lin P (2004) Litterfall nutrient return and leaf-litter decomposition in four plantations compared with a natural forest in subtropical China. Ann For Sci 61(5):465–476. https://doi.org/10.1051/forest:2004040
Funding
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceptualization and methodology, AND; formal analysis and original draft preparation, DS; editing and supervision, AND Both the authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare that there are no known competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Dinesha, S., Dey, A.N. Litter decomposition and nutrient release dynamics under Swietenia macrophylla King plantation in the Indian sub-Himalayan region. Agroforest Syst 98, 283–294 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-023-00907-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-023-00907-2