Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Growth and development of ‘Illini Hardy’ blackberry (Rubus subgenus Eubatus Focke) under shaded systems

  • Published:
Agroforestry Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Blackberries (Rubus subgenus Eubatus Focke) of the Eastern United States commonly grow along forest edges and in disturbed sites, though the potential for introducing improved cultivars into managed forest systems has been little explored in agroforestry literature. Bare root ‘Illini Hardy’ blackberry plants were grown under three neutral shade cloth levels (20, 50, and 70 % irradiance relative to full sunlight) and a full sun control in an orchard system over one growing season. The plants were then excavated from the shade plots and the floricanes forced to fruit in a heated greenhouse after receiving a chilling treatment consistent with data published about the cultivar. Potential yield reflected by primocane yield components was only marginally affected by the light treatments, with no significant differences in primocane counts, cane length, or the numbers of nodes. Cane diameter and attributes of primocane architecture were significant, affecting crown geometries and resulting in the highest percent light interception among plants grown at 70 % relative irradiance. Maximum net photosynthesis rates increased at higher irradiance levels with little increase above 70 % full sunlight, although no differences were observed in whole plant biomass or biomass allocation. Flowering and harvest periods were more concentrated from plants receiving 70–100 % relative irradiance during flower initiation. These results suggest that vegetative phases of ‘Illini Hardy’ blackberry may benefit from partial shading with an optimum light intensity approximating 70 % of full sunlight, but that floral bud differentiation is delayed or incomplete at lower irradiance levels produced by whole canopy or intracane shading.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alice LA, Campbell CS (1999) Phylogeny of Rubus (Rosaceae) based on nuclear ribosomal DNA internal transcribed spacer region sequences. Am J Bot 86:81–97

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bailey LH (1945) Species Batorum: the genus Rubus in North America. The Bailey Hortorium, Ithaca

    Google Scholar 

  • Balandier P, Marquier A, Casella E, Kiewitt A, Coll L, Wehrlen L, Harmer R (2013) Architecture, cover and light interception by bramble (Rubus fruticosus): a common understorey weed in temperate forests. Forestry 86:39–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baret S, Nicolini E, Humeau L, Le Bourgeois T, Strasberg D (2003a) Use of architectural and morphometric analysis to predict the flowering pattern of the invasive Rubus on Reunion Island (Indian Ocean). Can J Bot 81:1293–1301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baret S, Nicolini E, Le Bourgeois T, Strasberg D (2003b) Developmental patterns of the invasive bramble (Rubus alceifolius Poiret, Rosaceae) in Reunion Island: an architectural and morphometric analysis. Ann Bot London 91:39–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck T, Quigley MF (2002) Forest Gardening in Ohio. Extension Fact Sheet HYG-1256-02: 1-5

  • Bell N, Strik BC (1993) Effect of primocane renovation on yield components of ‘Marion’ Blackberry. Acta Hortic 352:29–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell NC, Strik BC, Martin LW (1995) Effect of primocane suppression date on ‘Marion’ trailing blackberry. I. yield components. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 120:21–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Braun JW, Garth KL (1984) Intracane compensation in the red raspberry. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 109:526–530

    Google Scholar 

  • Bushway L, Pritts M, Handley D (2005) Bramble production guide for the Northeast, Midwest, and Eastern Canada (Peer Review Draft). Natural Resource, Agriculture, and Engineering Service (NRAES), Ithaca, p 260

    Google Scholar 

  • Canham CD (1988) Growth and canopy architecture of shade-tolerant trees: response to canopy gaps. Ecology 69:786–795

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carew JG, Gillespie T, White J, Wainwright H, Brennan R, Battey NH (2000) The control of the annual growth cycle in raspberry. J Hortic Sci Biotech 75:495–503

    Google Scholar 

  • Carew JG, Mahmood K, Darby J, Hadley P, Battey NH (2001) The effects of low temperatures on the vegetative growth and flowering of the primocane fruiting raspberry ‘Autumn Bliss’. J Hortic Sci Biotech 76:264–270

    Google Scholar 

  • Carew JG, Mahmood K, Darby J, Hadley P, Battey NH (2003) The effect of temperature, photosynthetic photon flux density, and photoperiod on the vegetative growth and flowering of ‘Autumn Bliss’ raspberry. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 128:291–296

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen JM, Black TA (1991) Measuring leaf area index of plant canopies with branch architecture. Agr Forest Meteorol 57:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornelissen JHC (1993) Aboveground morphology of shade-tolerant Castanopsis fargesii saplings in response to light environment. Int J Plant Sci 154:481–495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crandall PC (1995) Bramble production: the management and marketing of raspberries and blackberries. Food Products Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Crandall PC, Chamberlain JD (1972) Effects of water stress, cane size, and growth regulators on floral primordia development in red raspberries. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 97:418–419

    Google Scholar 

  • Crandall PC, Daubeney HA (1990) Raspberry Management. In: Galletta GJ, Himelrick DG (eds) Small Fruit Crop Management. Prentice-Hall, Prentice, pp 156–213

    Google Scholar 

  • Crandall PC, Allmendinger DF, Chamberlain JD, Biderbost KA (1974) Influence of cane number and diameter, irrigation, and carbohydrate reserves on the fruit number of red raspberries. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 99:524–526

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Crawford M (1998a) Rubus spp. (Blackberries). Agroforest News 7(1):11

  • Crawford M (1998b) Rubus spp. (Raspberries). Agroforest News 7(3):23

  • Dale A (1986) Some effects of the environment on red raspberry cultivars. Acta Hortic 183:155–161

    Google Scholar 

  • Dale A, Blom TJ (2004) Far-red light alters primocane morphology of red raspberry. HortScience 39:973–974

    Google Scholar 

  • Decagon Devices (1991) Sunfleck PAR ceptometer operator’s manual. Decagon Devices, Pullman

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis MA, Converse RH, Williams RN, Williamson B (1991) Compendium of raspberry and blackberry insects and diseases. The American Phytopathological Society, St. Paul

    Google Scholar 

  • Fear C, Myer M-DL (1993) Breeding and variation in Rubus germplasm for low winter chill requirement. Acta Hortic 352:295–303

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldhake CM (2002) Beneficial spectral characteristics of red and black raspberry plants (Rubus idaeus and Rubus occidentalis). J Sustain Agr 19:65–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez GE, Pritts MP (1993) Growth and source-sink relationships in ‘Titan’ red raspberry. Acta Hortic 352:151–477

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez GE, Pritts MP (1994) Growth, carbon acquisition, and source-sink relationships in `Titan’ red raspberry. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 119:1163–1168

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez GE, Pritts MP (1996) Carbon supply reduction has a minimal influence on current year’s red raspberry (Rubus idaeus L.) fruit production. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 121:473–477

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman JA, Daubeney HA, Dale A (1989) Primocane removal enhances yield components of raspberries. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 114:6–9

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gazda A, Szwagrzyk J, Nybom H, Werlemark G (2007) Morphological and genetic variability of Rubus hirtus (Waldst. & Kitt.) plants under partly open forest canopy. Pol J Ecol 55:49–55

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Givnish TJ (1988) Adaptation to sun and shade a whole-plant perspective. Aust J Plant Physiol 15:63–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gleason HA, Cronquist A (1991) Manual of vascular plants of Northeastern United States and adjacent Canada. New York Botanical Garden, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomes FP, Oliva MA, Mielke MS, de Almeida AAF, Leite HG (2006) Photosynthetic irradiance-response in leaves of dwarf coconut palm (Cocos nucifera L. ‘nana’, Arecaceae): comparison of three models. Scientia Hortic 109:101–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goulart BL, Demchak K (1993) Physiological responses of ‘T’, ‘V’, and hedgerow trained red and black raspberries (Rubus ideaus L. and R. occidentalis L.). Acta Hortic 352:159–165

    Google Scholar 

  • Gustafsson A (1943) The genesis of the European blackberry flora. Lunds University, Lund

    Google Scholar 

  • Harmer R, Kiewitt A, Morgan G (2012) Can overstorey retention be used to control bramble (Rubus fruticosus L. agg.) during regeneration of forests? Forestry 85:135–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart R (1999) Forest Gardening. Chelsea Green Publishing Company, White River Junction

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirose T (2005) Development of the Monsi–Saeki theory on canopy structure and function. Ann Bot-London 95:483–494

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hudson JP (1959) Effects of environment on Rubus ideaus L., I. Morphology and development of the raspberry plant. J Hortic Sci 34:163–169

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyatt L, Casper B-B (2000) Seed bank formation during early secondary succession in a temperate deciduous forest. J Ecol 88:516–527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacke D, Toensmeier E (2005) Edible Forest Gardens. Chelsea Green Publishing Company, White River Junction

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson JE, Palmer JW (1979) A simple model of light transmission and interception by discontinuous canopies. Ann Bot-London 44:381–383

    Google Scholar 

  • Jennings DL (1964) Some evidence of population differentiation in Rubus ideaus L. New Phytol 63:153–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jennings DL, Dale A (1982) Variation in the growth habit of red raspberries with particular reference to cane height and node production. J Hortic Sci 57:197–204

    Google Scholar 

  • Jobidon R (1993) Nitrate fertilization stimulates emergence of red raspberry (Rubus idaeus L.) under forest canopy. Fertilizer Res 36:91–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiniry JR, Bean B, Xie Y, Chen P-y (2004) Maize yield potential: critical processes and simulation modeling in a high-yielding environment. Agr Syst 82:45–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koester K, Pritts MP (2003) Greenhouse Raspberry Production Department of HorticultureGuide. Cornell University, Ithaca

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuepper GL, Born H, Bachmann J (2003) Organic Culture of Bramble Fruits. appropriate technology transfer for rural areas. National Center for Appropriate Technology, Fayettesville, pp 1–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Lautenschlager RA (1999) Environmental resource interactions affect red raspberry growth and its competition with white spruce. Can J Forest Res 29:906–916

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewers KS, Wang SY, Vinyard BT (2010) Evaluation of blackberry cultivars and breeding selections for fruit quality traits and flowering and fruiting dates. Crop Sci 50:2475–2491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacDaniels LH (1922) Fruit bud formation in Rubus and Ribes. P Am Soc Hortic Sci 19:194–200

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall B, Biscoe PV (1980) A model for C3 leaves describing the dependence of net photosynthesis on irradiance. J Exp Bot 31:29–39

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McDowell SCL (2002) Photosynthetic characteristics of invasive and noninvasive species of Rubus (Rosaceae). Am J Bot 89:1431–1438

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moore JN, Skirvin RM (1990) Blackberry Management. In: Galletta GJ, Himelrick DG (eds) Small Fruit Crop Management. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, pp 214–244

    Google Scholar 

  • Neeley JA, Giddings EB, Pearson CS (1965) Soil survey of Tompkins Country, New York. Soil Conservation Service, United States Department Agriculture; in cooperation with Cornell University Agriculture Experiment Station. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Nehrbas SR, Pritts MP (1988) Effect of training system on performance of hand-harvested summer-bearing raspberries. HortScience 23:126–127

    Google Scholar 

  • Northeast Regional Climate Center (2006) Ithaca Climate Page. NYS IPM Network for Environment and Weather (NEWA). Available via. http://newa.nysaes.cornell.edu/public/default.htm. Accessed 2007

  • Palmer JW, Jackson GE, Ferree DC (1987) Light interception and distribution in horizontal and vertical canopies of red raspberry. J Hortic Sci 62:493–499

    Google Scholar 

  • Pancer-Koteja E, Szwagrzyk J, Bodziarczyk J (1998) Small-scale spatial pattern and size structure of Rubus hirtus in a canopy gap. J Veg Sci 9:755–762

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poorter L (1999) Growth responses of 15 rain-forest tree species to a light gradient: the relative importance of morphological and physiological traits. Funct Ecol 13:396–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pritts MP (1991) Introduction. In: Ellis MA, Converse RH, Williams RN, Williamson B (eds) Compendium of raspberry and blackberry insects and diseases. The American Phytopathological Society, St. Paul, p 100

    Google Scholar 

  • Pritts MP (2002) From plant to plate: how can we redesign Rubus production systems to meet future expectations? Acta Hortic 585:537–543

    Google Scholar 

  • Privé J-P, Sullivan JA, Proctor JTA, Allen OB (1993) Climate influences vegetative and reproductive components of primocane-fruiting red raspberry cultivars. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 118:393–399

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricard J-P, Messier C (1996) Abundance, growth and allometry of red raspberry (Rubus idaeus L.) along a natural light gradient in a northern hardwood forest. Forest Ecol Manag 81:153–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott R, Sullivan WC (2007) A review of suitable companion crops for black walnut. Agroforest Syst 71:185–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skirvin RM, Otterbacher AG (1993) Blackberry plant named ‘Illini Hardy’ U.S. Patent Document. Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois, Urbana, IL, pp 1–5

  • Stafne ET, Clark JR (2004) Genetic relatedness among eastern North American blackberry cultivars based on pedigree analysis. Euphytica 139:95–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strik B, Clark JR, Finn CE, Banados MP (2007) Worldwide blackberry production. HortTechnology 17:205–213

    Google Scholar 

  • Suzuki W (1987) Comparative ecology of Rubus species (Rosaceae) I. ecological distribution and life history characteristics of three species, R. palmatus var. coptophyllus, R. microphyllus and R. crataegifolius. Plant Species Biol 2:85–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swartz HJ, Gray SE, Douglass LW, Durner E, Walsh C, Galletta GJ (1984) The effect of a divided canopy trellis design on thornless blackberry. HortScience 19:533–535

    Google Scholar 

  • Takeda F (2002) Winter pruning affects yield components of ‘Black Satin’ Eastern thornless blackberry. HortScience 37:101–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Takeda F, Wisniewski M (1989) Organogenesis and patterns of floral bud development in two Eastern thornless blackberry cultivars. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 114:528–531

    Google Scholar 

  • Takeda F, Strik BC, Peacock D, Clark JR (2002) Cultivar differences and effect of winter temperature on flower bud development in blackberry. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 127:495–501

    Google Scholar 

  • Takeda F, Hummel AK, Peterson DL (2003a) Effects of cane number on yield components in ‘Chester Thornless’ blackberry on the rotatable cross-arm trellis. HortScience 38:377–380

    Google Scholar 

  • Takeda F, Strik BC, Peacock D, Clark JR (2003b) Patterns of floral bud development in canes of erect and trailing blackberries. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 128:3–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Varella AC, Moot DJ, Pollock KM, Peri PL, Lucas RJ (2013) Do light and alfalfa responses to cloth and slatted shade represent those measured under an agroforestry system? Agrofor Syst 81:157–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warmund MR, Byers PL (2002) Rest completion in seven blackberry (Rubus sp.) cultivars. Acta Hortic 585:693–696

    Google Scholar 

  • Warmund MR, Wijayaratne I, Skirvin RM, Otterbacher AG (1993) Freezing survival of ‘Illini Hardy’ blackberry floral tissues before and after budbreak. Fruit Varieties J 47:146–152

    Google Scholar 

  • Westoby M, Falster DS, Moles AT, Vesk PA, Wright IJ (2002) Plant ecological strategies: some leading dimensions of variation between species. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 33:125–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitefield P (1988) How to Make a Forest Garden. Permanent Publications, Hampshire

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitney GG (1982) The productivity and carbohydrate economy of a developing stand of Rubus idaeus. Can J Bot 60:2697–2703

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitney GG (1986) A demographic analysis of Rubus idaeus and Rubus pubescens. Can J Bot 64:2916–2921

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams IH (1959a) Effects of environment on Rubus idaeus L. II. Field observations on the variety ‘Malling Promise’. J Hortic Sci 34:170–175

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams IH (1959b) Effects of environment on Rubus idaeus L. III. Growth and dormancy of young shoots. J Hortic Sci 34:210–218

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson JW (1960) Inclined Point Quadrats. New Phytol 59:1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson JW (1963) Estimation of foliage denseness and foliage angle by inclined point quadrats. Aust J Bot 11:95–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson JW (1981) Analysis of light interception by single plants. Ann Bot-London 48:501–505

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson AD, Shure DJ (1993) Plant competition and nutrient limitation during early succession in the Southern Appalachian mountains. Am Midl Nat 129:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Workman SW, Allen SC (2004) The practice and potential of agroforestry in the Southeastern United States. IFAS Extension CIR-1446: 1–49

  • Wright CJ, Waister PD (1984) Light interception and fruiting cane architecture in the red raspberry grown under annual and biennial management systems. J Hortic Sci 59:395–402

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright CJ, Waister PD (1986) Canopy structure and light interception in the red raspberry. Acta Hortic 183:273–283

    Google Scholar 

  • Young RE, McMahon MJ, Rajapakse NC, Decoteau DR (1994) Spectral filtering for plant production. In: Tibbitts TW (ed) International lighting in controlled environments workshop. NASA-CP-95-3309, pp 337–349

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Graduate School of Geography, Clark University, 950 Main Street, Worcester, MA, 01609, USA

    Emily J. Gallagher

  2. School of Integrative Plant Science, Horticulture Section, Cornell University, Plant Science Building, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA

    Kenneth W. Mudge & Marvin P. Pritts

  3. School of Integrative Plant Science, Crop and Soil Sciences Section, Cornell University, Bradfield Hall, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA

    Stephen D. DeGloria

Authors
  1. Emily J. Gallagher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kenneth W. Mudge
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Marvin P. Pritts
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Stephen D. DeGloria
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emily J. Gallagher.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gallagher, E.J., Mudge, K.W., Pritts, M.P. et al. Growth and development of ‘Illini Hardy’ blackberry (Rubus subgenus Eubatus Focke) under shaded systems. Agroforest Syst 89, 1–17 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-014-9738-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-014-9738-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation