Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Growth, dry matter production, phenotypic plasticity, and nutritive value of three natural populations of Dactylis glomerata L. under various shading treatments

  • Published:
Agroforestry Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Dactylis glomerata L. is a widespread perennial grass species, which has been reported to be adapted to shaded conditions. Its populations thrive in a variety of environments. However, little information is available concerning the comparative response of its natural populations from contrasting environments under the reduced light intensity conditions that exist in silvopastoral systems. The objective of the present study was to estimate the comparative ability of three populations of D. glomerata from northern, central and southern Greece to grow under full sun, 60 % shade and 90 % shade in terms of their growth characteristics, phenotypic plasticity, dry matter production and nutritive value. Shade reduced tillering and dry matter production, increased tiller height and modified leaf characteristics. Under shade fewer leaves were grown simultaneously on the same tiller, but these were longer and thinner compared to full sun. Differentiation in response to shade among the populations examined of D. glomerata was observed mainly for leaf characteristics. The population from Pertouli (central Greece) responded better, particularly to moderate shade as it had a higher leaf area, longer leaf and higher dry matter production, compared to the others. Evidence for adaptive phenotypic plasticity to moderate shade was suggested only for this population. Additionally, Pertouli had higher nutritive value compared to Taxiarchis (northern Greece) and Crete (southern Greece) under shade. The divergent responses of natural populations of D. glomerata could justify breeding germplasm with enhanced shade tolerance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alpert P, Simms EL (2002) The relative advantages of plasticity and fixity in different environments: when is it good for a plant to adjust? Evol Ecol 16:285–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • AOAC (1990) Official methods of analysis, 15th edn. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Arlington

    Google Scholar 

  • Avramov S, Pemac D, Tucić B (2007) Phenotypic plasticity in response to an irradiance gradient in Iris pumila: adaptive value and evolutionary constraints. Plant Ecol 190:275–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balaguer L, Martínez-Ferri E, Valladares F, Pérez-Corona ME, Baquedano FJ, Castillo FJ, Manrique E (2001) Population divergence in the plasticity of the response of Quercus coccifera to the light environment. Funct Ecol 15:124–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belesky DP (2005) Growth of Dactylis glomerata along a light gradient in the central Appalachian region of the eastern USA: II. Mechanisms of leaf dry matter production for plants establishing in spring or late summer. Agrofor Syst 65:91–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belesky DP, Neel JP, Chatterton NJ (2006) Dactylis glomerata growing along a light gradient in the Central Appalachian Region of the Eastern USA: III. Nonstructural carbohydrates and nutritive value. Agrofor Syst 67:51–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell DL, Galloway LF (2008) Population differentiation for plasticity to light in an annual herb. Adaptation and cost. Am J Bot 95:59–65

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blair RM, Alcaniz R, Harrell A (1983) Shade intensity influences the nutrient quality and digestibility of southern deer browse leaves. J Range Manag 36:257–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buergler AL, Fike JH, Burger JA, Feldhake CM, McKenna JR, Teutsch CD (2006) Forage nutritive value in an emulated silvopasture. Agron J 98:1265–1273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burner DM (2003) Influence of alley crop environment on Orchardgrass and Tall Fescue herbage. Agron. J 95:1163–1171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burner DM, Belesky DP (2004) Diurnal effects on nutritive value of alley-cropped Orchardgrass herbage. Crop Sci 44:1776–1780

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burner DM, Belesky DP (2008) Relative effects of irrigation and intense shade on productivity of alley-cropped tall fescue herbage. Agrofor Syst 73:127–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burner DM, Brauer DK (2003) Herbage response to spacing of loblolly pine trees in a minimal management silvopasture in southeastern USA. Agrofor Syst 57:69–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ciavarella TA, Simpson RJ, Dove H, Leury BJ, Sims IM (2000a) Diurnal changes in the concentration of watersoluble carbohydrates in Phalaris aquatica L. pasture in spring, and the effect of short-term shading. Aust J Agric Res 51:749–756

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ciavarella TA, Dove H, Leary BJ, Simpson RJ (2000b) Diet selection by sheep grazing Phalaris aquatica L. pastures of differing water-soluble carbohydrate content. Aust J Agric Res 51:757–764

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Devkota NR, Kemp PD (1999) Morphological aspects of pasture species in the shade in relation to various management practices under silvopastoral systems. J Inst Agric Anim Sci 19–20:1–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Devkota NR, Kemp PD, Valentine I, Hodgson J (1998) Performance of perennial ryegrass and cocksfoot cultivars under tree shade. Proc Agron Soc NZ 28:129–135

    Google Scholar 

  • Devkota NR, Kemp PD, Valentine I, Hodgson J (2000) Shade tolerance of pasture species in relation to deciduous tree, temperate silvopastoral systems. Agron NZ 30:101–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Devkota NR, Kemp PD, Hodgson J, Valentine I, Jaya IKD (2009) Relationship between tree canopy height and the production of pasture species in a silvopastoral system based on alder trees. Agrofor Syst 76:363–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dodd MB, McGowan AW, Power IL, Thorrold BS (2005) Effects of variation in shade level, shade duration and light quality on perennial pastures. NZ J Agric Res 48:531–543

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donohue K, Messiqua D, Hammond Pyle E, Heschel SM, Schmitt J (2000) Evidence of adaptive divergence in plasticity: density- and site-dependent selection on shade avoidance responses in Impatiens capensis. Evolution 54:1956–1968

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Donohue K, Hammond Pyle E, Messiqua D, Heschel SM, Schmitt J (2001) Adaptive divergence in plasticity in natural populations of Impatiens capensis and its consequences for performance in novel habitats. Evolution 55:692–702

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dorn LA, Pyle EH, Schmitt J (2000) Plasticity to light cues and resources in Arabidopsis thaliana: testing for adaptive value and costs. Evolution 54:1982–1994

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Douglas GB, Walcroft AS, Wills BJ, Hurst SE, Foote AG, Trainor KD, Fung LE (2001) Resident pasture growth and the micro-environment beneath young, wide-spaced poplars in New Zealand. Proc NZ Grassl Assoc 63:131–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Dudley SA, Schmitt J (1995) Genetic differentiation in morphological responses to simulated foliage shade between populations of Impatiens capensis from open and woodland sites. Funct Ecol 9:655–666

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emberger L (1942) Un projet d’une classification des climats du point de vue phytogéographique. Bull Soc Hist Nat Toulouse 77:97–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldhake CM, Belesky DP (2005) Photosynthetically active radiation use efficiency of Dactylis glomerata in a hardwood silvopasture. North American Agroforestry Conference, CD-ROM, June 2005

  • Gebrehiwot L (1994) Productivity and Forage Quality of Selected Annual Legumes and Perennial Grasses in the Highlands of Ethiopia. PhD Dissertation, University of Missouri, Columbia

  • Gianoli E, Gonzalez-Teuber M (2005) Environmental heterogeneity and population differentiation in plasticity to drought in Convolvulus chilensis (Convolvulaceae). Evol Ecol 19:603–613

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoover WH, Stokes SR (1990) Balancing carbohydrates and proteins for optimum rumen microbial yield. J Dairy Sci 36:36–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Iason GR, Hester AJ (1993) The response of heather (Calluna vulgaris) to shade and nutrients–predictions of the carbon-nutrient balance hypothesis. J Ecol 81:75–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joshi MR, Lucas RJ, Sedcole JR, Pollock KM, Moot DJ, Mead DJ (1999) Shading effects of Pinus radiata on productivity and feeding value of orchardgrass pasture. Agrofor Forum 9:17–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Kephart KD, Buxton DR, Taylor SE (1992) Growth of C3 and C4 perennial grasses to shade. Crop Sci 32:1033–1038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kilcher MR (1981) Plant development, stage of maturity and nutrient composition. J Range Manag 34:363–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koukoura Z, Kyriazopoulos AP (2007) Adaptation of herbaceous plant species in the understorey of Pinus brutia. Agrofor Syst 70:11–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koukoura Z, Nastis AS (1989) Effect of shade on production and forage quality of herbaceous species. Geotech Sci Issues 1:17–25 (in Greek, English summary)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kyriazopoulos AP, Abraham EM, Parissi ZM, Koukoura Z, Nastis AS (2013) Forage production and nutritive value of Dactylis glomerata and Trifolium subterraneum mixtures under different shading treatments. Grass Forage Sci 68:72–82

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lambers H, Poorter H (1992) Inherent variation in growth rate between higher plants: a search for physiological causes and ecological consequences. Adv Ecol Res 23:187–261

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lemaire G, Agnusdei M (2000) Leaf tissue turnover and efficiency of herbage utilization. In: Lemaire G, Hodgson J, de Moraes A, Nabinger C, de F Carvalho PC (eds) Grassland ecophysiology and grazing ecology. CAB International, Wallingford, pp 265–287

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lemaire G, Dasilva SC, Agnusdei M, Wade M, Hodgson J (2009) Interactions between leaf lifespan and defoliation frequency in temperate and tropical pastures: a review. Grass Forage Sci 64:341–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin CH, McGraw RL, George MF, Garrett HE (1999) Shade effects on forage crops with potential in temperate agroforestry practices. Agrofor Syst 44:109–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin CH, McGraw RL, George MF, Garrett HE (2001) Nutritive quality and morphological development under partial shade of some forage species with agroforestry potential. Agrofor Syst 53:269–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madesis P, Abraham EM, Kalivas A, Ganopoulos I, Tsaftaris A (2013) Genetic diversity and structure of natural Dactylis glomerata L. populations revealed by morphological and microsatellite-based (SSR/ISSR) markers, Genet Mol Res (under publication)

  • Monaco TA, Briske DD (2001) Contrasting shade avoidance responses in two perennial grasses: a field investigation in simulated sparse and dense canopies. Plant Ecol 156:173–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munoz AE, Weaver RW (1999) Competition between subterranean clover and ryegrass for uptake of 15 N-labelled fertilizer. Plant Soil 211:173–178

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Norman JM, Campbell JS (1991) Canopy structure. In: Pearcy RW et al (eds) Plant physiological ecology. Field methods and instrumentation. Chapman and Hall, London, pp 301–325

    Google Scholar 

  • Parissi ZM, Koukoura Z (2009) Effect of fertilization and artificial shading on N and various mineral content of herbaceous species. Options Mediterr 85:159–164

    Google Scholar 

  • Parissi ZM, Abraham EM, Karameri E, Kexagia A, Karatassiou M (2007) Comparable study of the nutritive value in Greek populations of Dactylis glomerata L. growing in contrasting environments in association to maturity. Grassland Sci Eur 12:371–374

    Google Scholar 

  • Peri PL, Varella AC, Lucas RJ, Moot DJ (2001) Dactylis glomerata and lucerne productivity in a Pinus radiata silvopastoral system: a grazed comparison. Proc NZ Grassl Assoc 63:139–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Peri PL, Lucas RJ, Moot DJ (2004) Dry matter production and nutritive value of Dactylis glomerata (Dactylis glomerata L.) grown under different light regimes. In: Mosquera-Losada MR, Mc Adam J, Rigueiro-Rodriguez A (eds) Silvopastoralism and sustainable land management. CABI Publishing, Oxford Shire, pp 172–173

    Google Scholar 

  • Peri PL, Lucas RJ, Moot DJ (2007) Dry matter production, morphology and nutritive value of Dactylis glomerata growing under different light regimes. Agrofor Syst 70:63–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petit C, Thompson JD (1997) Variation in phenotypic response to light availability between diploid and tetraploid populations of the perennial grass Arrhenatherum elatius from open and woodland sites. J Ecol 85:657–667

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pigliucci M (2001) Phenotypic plasticity: beyond nature and nurture. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  • Poulton J, Winn AA (2002) Costs of canalization and plasticity in response to neighbors in Brassica rapa. Plant Species Biol 17:109–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quinn GP, Keough MJ (2002) Experimental design and data analysis for biologists. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rao MR, Nair PKR, Ong CK (1997) Biophysical interactions in tropical agroforestry systems. Agrofor Syst 38:3–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robson MJ, Ryle GJA, Woledge J (1988) The grass plant—its form and function. In: Jones MB, Lazenby A (eds) The grass crop. The physiological basis for production. Chapman and Hall, London, pp 22–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt J (1997) Is photomorphogenic shade avoidance adaptive? Perspectives from population biology. Plant Cell Environ 20:826–830

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt J, McCormac AC, Smith H (1995) A test of the adaptive plasticity hypothesis using transgenic and mutant plants disabled in phytochrome-mediated elongation responses to neighbours. Am Nat 146:937–953

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steel RGD, Torrie JH (1980) Principles and procedures of statistics, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sultan SE (1995) Phenotypic plasticity and plant adaptation. Acta Bot Neerl 44:363–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valladares F, Sanchez-Gomez D, Zavala MA (2006) Quantitative estimation of phenotypic plasticity: bridging the gap between the evolutionary concept and its ecological applications. J Ecol 94:1103–1116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Kleunen M, Fischer M, Schmid B (2000) Clonal integration in Ranunculus reptans: by-product or adaptation? J Evol Biol 13:237–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Soest PJ, Robertson JB, Lewis BA (1991) Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J Dairy Sci 74:3583–3597

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wahl S, Ryser P, Edwards PJ (2001) Phenotypic plasticity of grass root anatomy in response to light intensity and nutrient supply. Ann Bot 88:1071–1078

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weinig C (2000) Plasticity versus canalization: population differences in the timing of shade-avoidance responses. Evolution 54:441–451

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wherley BG, Gardner DS, Metzger JD (2005) Tall fescue photomorphogenesis as influenced by changes in the spectral composition and light intensity. Crop Sci 45:562–568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson JR, Ludlow MM (1991) The environment and potential growth of herbage under plantations. In: Shelton HM, Stur WW (eds) Forages for plantation crops. ACIAR, Canberra, pp 10–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson JR, Hill K, Cameron DM, Shelton HM (1990) The growth of Paspalum notatum under the shade of a Eucalyptus grandis plantation canopy or in full sun. Trop Grassl 24:24–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Winn AA, Evans AS (1991) Variation among populations of Prunella vulgaris L. in plastic responses to light. Funct Ecol 5:562–571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhai T, Mohtar RH, Gillespie AR, von Kiparski GR, Johnson KD, Neary M (2006) Modeling forage growth in a Midwest USA silvopastoral system. Agrofor Syst 67:243–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Laboratory of Range Science (236), School of Forestry and Natural Environment, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124, Thessaloniki, Greece

    E. M. Abraham, Z. M. Parissi, P. Kostopoulou, M. Karatassiou, K. Anjalanidou & C. Katsouta

  2. Department of Forestry and Management of the Environment and Natural Resources, Democritus University of Thrace, Pantazidou 193, 68200, Orestiada, Greece

    A. P. Kyriazopoulos

Authors
  1. E. M. Abraham
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A. P. Kyriazopoulos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Z. M. Parissi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. P. Kostopoulou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. M. Karatassiou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. K. Anjalanidou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. C. Katsouta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. M. Abraham.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Abraham, E.M., Kyriazopoulos, A.P., Parissi, Z.M. et al. Growth, dry matter production, phenotypic plasticity, and nutritive value of three natural populations of Dactylis glomerata L. under various shading treatments. Agroforest Syst 88, 287–299 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-014-9682-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-014-9682-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation