Skip to main content
Log in

Relationships of overstory trees and shrubs with forage species portray ecosystem service interactions in smallholder fallows

  • Published:
Agroforestry Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Interactions among ecosystem services are increasingly perceived as important to ecosystem service delivery. Synergies and trade-offs among ecosystem services arise through direct ecological interactions or indirectly through correlated responses to other factors. To investigate whether and how interactions of overstory trees and shrubs with livestock forage species growing beneath generate ecosystem service interactions, overstory and forage species were examined in smallholder fallows in western Kenya. In 18 grazed and 21 improved fallows, we estimated biomass and quantified soil properties. We assessed whether the overstory reduces forage biomass and quality through competition, and whether overstory niche complementarity ameliorates competition or enhances facilitation. In improved fallows, forage biomass declined with overstory biomass, indicating competition and a wood-forage trade-off. In grazed fallows, biomass of higher quality forage species increased with overstory biomass, indicating a synergy, likely indirect. Niche complementarity, quantified as taxonomic and functional diversity, did not appear influential. Forage quality was not associated with overstory characteristics, but declined with grazing intensity. The contrasting relationships between overstory and forage species among fallow types appear ultimately attributable to the presence and intensity of grazing and the dense overstory in improved fallows.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

CP:

Crude protein

ESP:

Ecosystem service provider

FD:

Functional diversity

NIRS:

Near infrared reflectance spectroscopy

SOC:

Soil organic carbon

References

  • Ackerly DD, Cornwell WK (2007) A trait-based approach to community assembly: partitioning of species trait values into within- and among-community components. Ecol Lett 10:135–145

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Aerts R, Chapin FSI (2000) The mineral nutrition of wild plants revisited: a re-evaluation of processes and patterns. Adv Ecol Res 30:1–67

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett EM, Peterson GD, Gordon LJ (2009) Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services. Ecol Lett 12:1394–1404

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bronick CJ, Lal R (2005) Soil structure and management: a review. Geoderma 124:3–22

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brooker RW, Maestre FT, Callaway RM, Lortie CL, Cavieres LA, Kunstler G, Liancourt P, Tielbörger K, Travis JMJ, Anthelme F, Armas C, Coll L, Corcket E, Delzon S, Forey E, Kikvidze Z, Olofsson J, Pugnaire F, Quiroz CL, Saccone P (2008) Facilitation in plant communities: the past, the present, and the future. J Ecol 96:18–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callaway RM, Brooker RW, Choler P, Kikvidze Z, Lortie CJ, Michalet R, Paolini L, Pugnaire FI, Newingham B, Aschehoug ET, Armas C, Kikodze D, Cook BJ (2002) Positive interactions among alpine plants increase with stress. Nat 417:844–848

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Díaz S, Lavorel S, McIntyre S, Falczuk V, Casanoves F, Milchunas D, Skarpe C, Rusch G, Sternberg M, Imanuel N-M, Landsberg J, Zhang W, Clark H, Campbell BD (2007) Plant trait responses to grazing—a global synthesis. Glob Chang Biol 13:313–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Díaz S, Wardle DA, Hector A (2009) Incorporating biodiversity in climate change mitigation initiatives. In: Naeem S, Bunker DE, Hector A, Loreau M, Perrings C (eds) Biodiversity, ecosystem functioning, and human wellbeing—an ecological and economic perspective. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 149–166

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dupraz C, Newman SM (1997) Temperate agroforestry systems. In: Gordon AM, Newman SM (eds) Temperate agroforestry: the European way. CAB International, Wallingford, pp 181–236

    Google Scholar 

  • Genin D, Quiroz R (1993) MIAMH, a predictive model of range ruminant diets in patchy environments. Agric Syst 43:381–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gentile R, Vanlauwe B, van Kessel C, Six J (2009) Managing N availability and losses by combining fertilizer-N with different quality residues in Kenya. Agric Ecosyst Environ 131:308–314

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • González-Hernández MP, Lorenzo MJR (2008) Pasture production and tree growth in agroforestry systems of northwest Spain. In: Batish DR, Kohli RK, Jose S, Singh HP (eds) Ecological basis of agroforestry. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 361–375

    Google Scholar 

  • Graff P, Aguiar MR, Chaneton EJ (2007) Shifts in positive and negative plant interactions along a grazing intensity gradient. Ecol 88:188–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grassland species profiles: grassland index (2011) Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. http://www.fao.org/ag/AGP/AGPC/doc/GBASE/mainmenu.htm. Accessed 15 Mar 2011

  • Jung HG, Allen MS (1995) Characteristics of plant cell walls affecting intake and digestibility of forages by ruminants. J Anim Sci 9:2774–2790

    Google Scholar 

  • Kho R (2008) Approaches to tree-environment-crop interactions. In: Batish DR, Kohli RK, Jose S, Singh HP (eds) Ecological basis of agroforestry. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 51–72

    Google Scholar 

  • King JGC, Heath GW (1968) The chemical analysis of small samples of leaf material and the relationship between the disappearance and composition of leaves. Pedobiologia 7:192–197

    Google Scholar 

  • Kremen C (2005) Managing ecosystem services: What do we need to know about their ecology? Ecol Lett 8:468–479

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mason NWH, Mouillot D, Lee WG, Wilson JB (2005) Functional richness, functional evenness and functional divergence: the primary components of functional diversity. Oikos 111:112–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore KJ, Jung H-JG (2001) Lignin and fiber digestion. J Range Manage 54:420–430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oelmann Y, Wilcke W, Temperton VM, Buchmann N, Roscher C, Schumacher J, Schulze ED, Weisser WW (2007) Soil and plant nitrogen pools as related to plant diversity in an experimental grassland. Soil Sci Soc Am J 71:720–729

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ong CK, Wilson J, Deans JD, Mulayta J, Raussen T, Wajja-Musukwe N (2002) Tree–crop interactions: manipulation of water use and root function. Agric Water Manage 53:171–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palm CA, Gachengo CN, Delve RJ, Cadisch G, Giller KE (2001) Organic inputs for soil fertility management in tropical agroecosystems: application of an organic resource database. Agric Ecosyst Environ 83:27–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parkinson A, Allen SE (1975) A wet oxidation procedure suitable for determination of nitrogen and mineral nutrients in biological materials. Comm Soil Sci Plant Anal 6:1–11

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Petchey OL, Gaston KJ (2002) Functional diversity (FD), species richness and community composition. Ecol Lett 5:402–411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petchey OL, Gaston KJ (2006) Functional diversity: back to basics and looking forward. Ecol Lett 9:741–758

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ponce-Hernandez R (2004) Assessing carbon stocks and modelling win–win scenarios of carbon sequestration through land-use changes. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Power AG (2010) Ecosystem services and agriculture: tradeoffs and synergies. Phil Trans R Soc B 365:2959–2971

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Quétier F, Thebault A, Lavorel S (2007) Plant traits in a state and transition framework as markers of ecosystem response to land-use change. Ecol Monogr 77:33–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team (2008) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  • Regional climatologies—Africa (2012) International Research Institute for Climate and Society, Earth Institute, Columbia University. http://iridl.ldeo.columbia.edu/. Accessed 2 Aug 2012

  • Sanchez P (1995) Science in agroforestry. Agrofor Syst 30:5–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez P, Palm C, Sachs J, Denning G, Flor R, Harawa R, Jama B, Kiflemariam T, Konecky B, Kozar R, Lelerai E, Malik A, Modi V, Mutuo P, Niang A, Okoth H, Place F, Sachs S, Said A, Siriri D, Teklehaimanot A, Wang K, Wangila J, Zamba C (2007) The African millennium villages. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 104:16775–16780

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Scherr SJ (1995) Economic factors in farmer adoption of agroforestry: patterns observed in Western Kenya. World Dev 23:787–804

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shepherd KD, Walsh MG (2002) Development of reflectance spectral libraries for characterization of soil properties. Soil Sci Soc Am J 66:988–998

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shepherd KD, Walsh MG (2007) Infrared spectroscopy—enabling an evidence-based diagnostic surveillance approach to agricultural and environmental management in developing countries. J Near Infared Spectrosc 15:1–19

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shepherd G, Buresh RJ, Gregory PJ (2000) Land use affects the distribution of soil inorganic nitrogen in smallholder production systems in Kenya. Biol Fert Soils 31:348–355

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shepherd KD, Palm CA, Gachengo CN, Vanlauwe B (2003) Rapid characterization of organic resource quality for soil and livestock management in tropical agroecosystems using near-infrared spectroscopy. Agron J 95:1314–1322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smit C, Vandenberghe C, den Ouden J, Müller-Schärer H (2007) Nurse plants, tree saplings and grazing pressure: changes in facilitation along a biotic environmental gradient. Oecologia 152:265–273

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tittonell P, Vanlauwe B, Leffelaar PA, Shepherd KD, Giller KE (2005) Exploring diversity in soil fertility management of smallholder farms in western Kenya-I. Heterogeneity at region and farm scale. Agric Ecosyst Environ 110:149–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Eekeren N, van Liere D, de Vries F, Rutgers M, de Goede R, Brussaard L (2009) A mixture of grass and clover combines the positive effects of both plant species on selected soil biota. Appl Soil Ecol 42:254–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Soest PJ, Wine RHJ (1968) Determination of lignin and cellulose in acid-detergent fiber with permanganate. J Assoc Offic Anal Chem 51:780–785

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanlauwe B, Gachengo C, Shepherd K, Barrios E, Cadisch G, Palm CA (2005) Laboratory validation of a resource quality-based conceptual framework for organic matter management. Soil Sci Soc Am J 69:1135–1145

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh M, Vagen T (2006) The land degradation surveillance framework: guide to field sampling and measurement procedures. World Agroforestry Centre, Nairobi

    Google Scholar 

  • Wossink A, Swinton SM (2007) Jointness in production and farmers’ willingness to supply non-marketed ecosystem services. Ecol Econ 64:297–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright IJ, Reich PB, Westoby M, Ackerly DD, Baruch Z, Bongers F, Cavender-Bares J, Chapin FS, Cornelissen JHC, Diemer M, Flexas J, Garnier E, Groom PK, Gulias J, Hikosaka K, Lamont BB, Lee T, LeeW., Lusk C, Midgley JJ, Navas M-L, Niinemets Ü, Oleksyn J, Osada N, Poorter H, Poot P, Prior L, Pyankov VI, Roumet C, Thomas SC, Tjoelker MG, Veneklaas EJ, Villar R (2004) The worldwide leaf economics spectrum. Nat 428:821–827

  • Zech W, Senesi N, Guggenberger G, Kaiser K, Lehmann J, Miano TM, Miltner A, Schroth G (1997) Factors controlling humification and mineralization of soil organic matter in the tropics. Geoderma 79:117–161

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This publication is made possible by the generous support of the American people through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID), under the terms of the TransLinks Leader with Associates Cooperative Agreement No. EPP-A-00-06-00014-00 to The Wildlife Conservation Society. TransLinks is a partnership of The Wildlife Conservation Society, The Earth Institute, EnterpriseWorks/VITA, Forest Trends and The Land Tenure Center. The contents are the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the United States Government. The authors thank Patrick Mutuo and the Millennium Villages Project for facilitating completion of the research, Victor Omollo, Chris Ekise, Herine Okoth, Steve Okulo, Carlos Onyalo, and George Baison for field assistance, and Keith Shepherd and Elvis Weullow of ICRAF-Nairobi for assistance with soil analyses. Thanks are also due to Cheryl Palm and Maria Uriarte for helpful suggestions and comments on earlier drafts.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jason Sircely.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PDF 78 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sircely, J., Naeem, S. Relationships of overstory trees and shrubs with forage species portray ecosystem service interactions in smallholder fallows. Agroforest Syst 87, 451–464 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-012-9566-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-012-9566-9

Keywords

Navigation