Skip to main content
Log in

Negative effects of ghost nets on Mediterranean biodiversity

  • Published:
Aquatic Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Abandoned, lost or otherwise discarded fishing nets (i.e., ghost nets) strongly affect biodiversity in marine ecosystems of numerous localities around the world. Based on videos posted by different people in YouTube™, we accessed the negative effects of these gears in the Mediterranean Sea. We identified 86 species, from 12 groups, in 12 countries within the Mediterranean region (including in the Africa, Europe, and Asia). Of the species entangled in ghost nets, 10 are considered threatened with extinction according to the International Union for Conservation of Nature. Fishes and macrocrustaceans were the most recorded groups entangled in ghost nets. We also identified algae, other invertebrates (i.e., cnidarians, echinoderms, molluscs, poriferans, tunicates) and vertebrates (i.e., turtles and mammals). The larger number of ghost fishing events were recorded in Italy and Turkey. This is the most complete study showing the negative effects of ghost nets on marine biodiversity worldwide, based on data retrieved from digital media. With the available literature, our data are important to implement measures against ghost fishing nets in the Mediterranean Sea.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Donald C. Taphorn for suggestions on the manuscript.

Funding

JFP was supported by São Paulo Research Foundation—FAPESP [grant number 2019/01308–5]. TG was supported by National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq # 311078/2019–2).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

JFP: Writing—original draft, Writing—review & editing, Data curation, Formal analysis. TG: Formal analysis, Writing—review & editing. EA: Formal analysis, Writing—review & editing. JLRF: Writing—review & editing. CVS: Writing—review & editing. MSA: Formal analysis, Writing—review & editing. VMAS: Conceptualization, Methodology, Formal analysis, Writing—original draft, Writing—review & editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Valter M. Azevedo-Santos.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None.

Additional information

Handling editor: Lorena Silva do Nascimento.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 88 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Perroca, J.F., Giarrizzo, T., Azzurro, E. et al. Negative effects of ghost nets on Mediterranean biodiversity. Aquat Ecol 58, 131–137 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10452-022-09985-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10452-022-09985-3

Keywords

Navigation