Skip to main content
Log in

Graphical approach for complex PSA cycle scheduling

  • Published:
Adsorption Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A simple graphical approach for complex pressure swing adsorption (PSA) cycle scheduling has been developed. This new methodology involves a priori specifying the cycle steps, their sequence, and the number of beds, and then following a systematic procedure that requires filling in a 2-D grid based on a few simple rules, some heuristics and some experience. The outcome or solution is a grid comprised of columns that represent the total cycle time, rows that represent the total number of beds, and cells that represent the duration of each cycle step, i.e., the complete cycle schedule. This new approach has been tested successfully against several cycle schedules taken from the literature, including a two-bed four-step Skarstrom cycle, a four-bed nine-step process with two equalization steps, a nine-bed eleven-step process with three pressure equalization steps, and a six-bed thirteen-step process with four pressure equalization steps and four idle steps. This approach also revealed the existence of numerous cycle schedules for each bed and cycle step combination examined. Although it cannot identify the total number of permutations or which one is better, it does provide a very straightforward way to determine some of the possible cycle schedules of virtually any PSA process that can be conceived.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Cassidy, R.T., Holmes, E.S.: Twenty-five years of progress in adiabatic adsorption processes. AIChE Symp. Ser. 80(233), 68 (1984)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chiang, A.S.T.: Arithmetic of PSA process scheduling. AIChE J. 34, 1910–1912 (1988)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dinsmore, H.L., Young, J.W. Jr.: Process and apparatus for removing hydrocarbons from air-hydrocarbon vapor mixtures. US Patent 4,462,811 (1984)

  • Fuderer, A., Rudelstorfer, E.: Selective adsorption process. US Patent 3,986,849 (1976)

  • Reynolds, S.P., Mehrotra, A., Ebner, A.D., Ritter, J.A.: Heavy reflux PSA cycles for CO2 recovery from flue gas: part I. Performance evaluation. Adsorption 14, 399–413 (2008)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ruthven, D.M., Farooq, S., Knaebel, K.S.: Pressure Swing Adsorption. VCH, New York (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  • Skarstrom, C.W.: Method and apparatus for fractionating gaseous mixtures by adsorption. US Patent 3,082,166 (1960)

  • Smith, O.J. IV; Westerberg, A.W.: Mixed-integer programming for pressure swing adsorption cycle scheduling. Chem. Eng. Sci. 45, 2833–2842 (1990)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, J., Weist, L.E. Jr.: Six bed pressure swing adsorption process with four steps of pressure equalization. US Patent 6,454,838 (2002)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James A. Ritter.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ebner, A.D., Mehrotra, A. & Ritter, J.A. Graphical approach for complex PSA cycle scheduling. Adsorption 15, 406–421 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10450-009-9188-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10450-009-9188-3

Keywords

Navigation