Advertisement

Advances in Computational Mathematics

, Volume 45, Issue 3, pp 1329–1368 | Cite as

Convergent tangent plane integrators for the simulation of chiral magnetic skyrmion dynamics

  • Gino Hrkac
  • Carl-Martin Pfeiler
  • Dirk Praetorius
  • Michele RuggeriEmail author
  • Antonio Segatti
  • Bernhard Stiftner
Open Access
Article

Abstract

We consider the numerical approximation of the Landau–Lifshitz–Gilbert equation, which describes the dynamics of the magnetization in ferromagnetic materials. In addition to the classical micromagnetic contributions, the energy comprises the Dzyaloshinskii–Moriya interaction, which is the most important ingredient for the enucleation and the stabilization of chiral magnetic skyrmions. We propose and analyze three tangent plane integrators, for which we prove (unconditional) convergence of the finite element solutions towards a weak solution of the problem. The analysis is constructive and also establishes existence of weak solutions. Numerical experiments demonstrate the applicability of the methods for the simulation of practically relevant problem sizes.

Keywords

Dzyaloshinskii–Moriya interaction Finite element method Landau–Lifshitz–Gilbert equation Magnetic skyrmions Micromagnetics 

Mathematics Subject Classification (2010)

35K55 65M12 65M60 65Z05 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Open access funding provided by Austrian Science Fund (FWF). The authors thank S. Komineas (University of Crete, Heraklion, Greece) for an informal and stimulating discussion on the topic of this work.

Funding information

This research has been supported by the Vienna Science and Technology Fund (WWTF) through the project Thermally controlled magnetization dynamics (grant MA14-44), by the Austrian Science Fund (FWF) through the doctoral school Dissipation and dispersion in nonlinear PDEs (grant W1245) and the special research program Taming complexity in partial differential systems (grant SFB F65), and by the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) through the projects Picosecond dynamics of magnetic exchange springs (grant EP/P02047X/1) and Coherent spin waves for emerging nanoscale magnonic logic architectures (grant EP/L019876/1).

References

  1. 1.
    Commics – A Python module for Computational Micromagnetics. https://gitlab.asc.tuwien.ac.at/cpfeiler/commics
  2. 2.
    Netgen/NGSolve Finite Element Library. https://ngsolve.org/
  3. 3.
    Abert, C., Hrkac, G., Page, M., Praetorius, D., Ruggeri, M., Suess, D.: Spin-polarized transport in ferromagnetic multilayers: an unconditionally convergent FEM integrator. Comput. Math. Appl. 68(6), 639–654 (2014)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ahrens, J., Geveci, B., Law, C.: ParaView: an end-user tool for large-data visualization. In: Hansen, C.D., Johnson, C.R. (eds.) Visualization handbook, pp 717–731, Elsevier (2005)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Alouges, F.: A new finite element scheme for Landau–Lifchitz equations. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser. S 1(2), 187–196 (2008)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Alouges, F., Jaisson, P.: Convergence of a finite element discretization for the Landau–Lifshitz equation in micromagnetism. Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci. 16 (2), 299–316 (2006)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Alouges, F., Kritsikis, E., Steiner, J., Toussaint, J.C.: A convergent and precise finite element scheme for Landau–Lifschitz–Gilbert equation. Numer. Math. 128(3), 407–430 (2014)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Alouges, F., Kritsikis, E., Toussaint, J.C.: A convergent finite element approximation for Landau–Lifschitz–Gilbert equation. Physica B 407(9), 1345–1349 (2012)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Alouges, F., Soyeur, A.: On global weak solutions for Landau–Lifshitz equations: existence and nonuniqueness. Nonlinear Anal. 18(11), 1071–1084 (1992)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Banas, L., Page, M., Praetorius, D.: A convergent linear finite element scheme for the Maxwell–Landau–Lifshitz–Gilbert equations. Electron. Trans. Numer. Anal. 44, 250–270 (2015)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Banas, L., Page, M., Praetorius, D., Rochat, J.: A decoupled and unconditionally convergent linear FEM integrator for the Landau–Lifshitz–Gilbert equation with magnetostriction. IMA. J. Numer. Anal. 34(4), 1361–1385 (2014)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bartels, S.: Stability and convergence of finite-element approximation schemes for harmonic maps. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 43(1), 220–238 (2005)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bartels, S.: Projection-free approximation of geometrically constrained partial differential equations. Math. Comp. 85(299), 1033–1049 (2016)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bartels, S., Ko, J., Prohl, A.: Numerical analysis of an explicit approximation scheme for the Landau–Lifshitz–Gilbert equation. Math. Comp. 77(262), 773–788 (2008)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bartels, S., Prohl, A.: Convergence of an implicit finite element method for the Landau–Lifshitz–Gilbert equation. SIAM. J. Numer. Anal. 44(4), 1405–1419 (2006)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Beg, M., Albert, M., Bisotti, M.A., Cortés-Ortuño, D., Wang, W., Carey, R., Vousden, M., Hovorka, O., Ciccarelli, C., Spencer, C.S., Marrows, C.H., Fangohr, H.: Dynamics of skyrmionic states in confined helimagnetic nanostructures. Phys. Rev. B 95(1), 014433 (2017)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bergh, J., Löfström, J.: Interpolation Space: an Introduction, Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften, vol. 223 Springer (1976)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Boffi, D., Brezzi, F., Fortin, M.: Mixed Finite Element Methods and Applications, Springer Series in Computational Mathematics, vol. 44 Springer (2013)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bogdanov, A., Hubert, A.: Thermodynamically stable magnetic vortex states in magnetic crystals. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 138(3), 255–269 (1994)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bogdanov, A., Yablonskii, D.A.: Thermodynamically stable “vortices” in magnetically ordered crystals. The mixed state of magnets. J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 68 (1), 101–103 (1989)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bogdanov, A.N., Rößler, U.K.: Chiral symmetry breaking in magnetic thin films and multilayers. Phys. Rev. Lett. 87(3), 037203 (2001)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bruckner, F., Feischl, M., Führer, T., Goldenits, P., Page, M., Praetorius, D., Ruggeri, M., Suess, D.: Multiscale modeling in micromagnetics: existence of solutions and numerical integration. Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci. 24(13), 2627–2662 (2014)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Crépieux, A., Lacroix, C.: Dzyaloshinsky–Moriya interactions induced by symmetry breaking at a surface. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 182(3), 341–349 (1998)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Di Fratta, G., Pfeiler, C.M., Praetorius, D., Ruggeri, M., Stiftner, B.: Linear second order IMEX-type integrator for the (eddy current) Landau–Lifshitz–Gilbert equation (2017). Submitted for publication. arXiv:1711.10715
  25. 25.
    Döring, L., Melcher, C.: Compactness results for static and dynamic chiral skyrmions near the conformal limit. Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations 56, 60 (2017)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Dzyaloshinskii, I.: A thermodynamic theory of ‘weak’ ferromagnetism of antiferromagnetics. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 4(4), 241–255 (1958)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Evans, L.C.: Partial Differential Equations, Graduate Studies in Mathematics, vol. 19, second edn American Mathematical Society (2010)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Feischl, M., Tran, T.: The Eddy Current–LLG equations: FEM-BEM coupling and a priori error estimates. SIAM. J. Numer. Anal. 55(4), 1786–1819 (2017)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Fert, A., Cros, V., Sampaio, J.: Skyrmions on the track. Nat. Nanotechnol. 8(3), 152–156 (2013)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Finocchio, G., Büttner, F., Tomasello, R., Carpentieri, M., Kläui, M.: Magnetic skyrmions: from fundamental to applications. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 49 (42), 423001 (2016)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Fredkin, D.R., Koehler, T.R.: Hybrid method for computing demagnetization fields. IEEE Trans. Magn. 26(2), 415–417 (1990)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    García-Cervera, C.J.: Numerical micromagnetics: a review. Bol. Soc. Esp. Mat. Apl. SeMA 39, 103–135 (2007)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Gilbert, T.L.: A Lagrangian formulation of the gyromagnetic equation of the magnetization fields. Phys. Rev. 100, 1243 (1955). Abstract onlyGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Han, D.S., Kim, N.H., Kim, J.S., Yin, Y., Koo, J.W., Cho, J., Lee, S., Kläui, M., Swagten, H.J.M., Koopmans, B., You, C.Y.: Asymmetric hysteresis for probing Dzyaloshinskii–Moriya interaction. Nano Lett. 16 (7), 4438–4446 (2016)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Heinze, S., von Bergmann, K., Menzel, M., Brede, J., Kubetzka, A., Wiesendanger, R., Bihlmayer, G., Blugel, S.: Spontaneous atomic-scale magnetic skyrmion lattice in two dimensions. Nat. Phys. 7(9), 713–718 (2011)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Hrkac, G., Keatley, P.S., Bryan, M.T., Butler, K.: Magnetic vortex oscillators. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 48(45), 453001 (2015)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Keatley, P.S., Sani, S.R., Hrkac, G., Mohseni, S.M., Dürrenfeld, P., Åkerman, J., Hicken, R.J.: Imaging magnetisation dynamics in nano-contact spin-torque vortex oscillators exhibiting gyrotropic mode splitting. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 50(16), 164003 (2017)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Keatley, P.S., Sani, S.R., Hrkac, G., Mohseni, S.M., Dürrenfeld, P., Loughran, T.H.J., Åkerman, J., Hicken, R.J.: Direct observation of magnetization dynamics generated by nanocontact spin-torque vortex oscillators. Phys. Rev. B 94(R), 060402 (2016)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Kim, E., Wilkening, J.: Convergence of a mass-lumped finite element method for the Landau–Lifshitz equation. Quart. Appl. Math. 76(2), 383–405 (2018)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Komineas, S., Papanicolaou, N.: Skyrmion dynamics in chiral ferromagnets. Phys. Rev. B 92(6), 064412 (2015)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Kružík, M., Prohl, A.: Recent developments in the modeling, analysis, and numerics of ferromagnetism. SIAM Rev. 48(3), 439–483 (2006)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Landau, L., Lifshitz, E.: On the theory of the dispersion of magnetic permeability in ferromagnetic bodies. Phys. Zeitsch. der Sow. 8, 153–168 (1935)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Le, K.N., Page, M., Praetorius, D., Tran, T.: On a decoupled linear FEM integrator for eddy-current-LLG. Appl. Anal. 94(5), 1051–1067 (2015)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Le, K.N., Tran, T.: A convergent finite element approximation for the quasi-static Maxwell–Landau–Lifshitz–Gilbert equations. Comput. Math. Appl. 66(8), 1389–1402 (2013)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Melcher, C.: Chiral skyrmions in the plane. Proc. R. Soc A 470(2172) (2014)Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Moriya, T.: Anisotropic superexchange interaction and weak ferromagnetism. Phys. Rev. 120(91), 91 (1960)Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Mühlbauer, S., Binz, B., Jonietz, F., Pfleiderer, C., Rosch, A., Neubauer, A., Georgii, R., Böni, P.: Skyrmion lattice in a chiral magnet. Science 323(5916), 915–919 (2009)Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Muratov, C.B., Slastikov, V.V.: Domain structure of ultrathin ferromagnetic elements in the presence of Dzyaloshinskii–Moriya interaction. Proc. R. Soc A 473(2197) (2017)Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Nagaosa, N., Tokura, Y.: Topological properties and dynamics of magnetic skyrmions. Nat. Nanotechnol. 8(12), 899–911 (2013)Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Parkin, S. S. P., Hayashi, M., Thomas, L.: Magnetic domain-wall racetrack memory. Science 320(5873), 190–194 (2008)Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Pfeiler, C.M., Ruggeri, M., Stiftner, B., Exl, L., Hochsteger, M., Hrkac, G., Schöberl, J., Mauser, N.J., Praetorius, D.: Computational micromagnetics with Commics. arXiv:1812.05931 (2018)
  52. 52.
    Praetorius, D., Ruggeri, M., Stiftner, B.: Convergence of an implicit-explicit midpoint scheme for computational micromagnetics. Comput.Math.Appl 75(5) (2018)Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Prohl, A.: Computational micromagnetism. Advances in numerical mathematics. B. G Teubner (2001)Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Romming, N., Hanneken, C., Menzel, M., Bickel, J. E., Wolter, B., von Bergmann, K., Kubetzka, A., Wiesendanger, R.: Writing and deleting single magnetic skyrmions. Science 341(6146), 636–639 (2013)Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Rößler, U.K., Bogdanov, A.N., Pfleiderer, C.: Spontaneous skyrmion ground states in magnetic metals. Nature 442(7104), 797–801 (2006)Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Ruggeri, M.: Coupling and numerical integration of the Landau–Lifshitz–Gilbert equation. Ph.D. thesis, TU Wien (2016)Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Sampaio, J., Cros, V., Rohart, S., Thiaville, A., Fert, A.: Nucleation, stability and current-induced motion of isolated magnetic skyrmions in nanostructures. Nat. Nanotechnol. 8(11), 839–844 (2013)Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Schöberl, J.: NETGEN An advancing front 2D/3D-mesh generator based on abstract rules. Comput. Vis. Sci. 1(1), 41–52 (1997)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Śmigaj, W., Betcke, T., Arridge, S., Phillips, J., Schweiger, M.: Solving boundary integral problems with BEM++. ACM Trans. Math. Softw. 41(2), 6:1–6:40 (2015)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Tomasello, R., Martinez, E., Zivieri, R., Torres, L., Carpentieri, M., Finocchio, G.: A strategy for the design of skyrmion racetrack memories. Sci. Rep. 4, 6784 (2014)Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Wiesendanger, R.: Nanoscale magnetic skyrmions in metallic films and multilayers: a new twist for spintronics. Nat. Rev. Mater. 1, 16044 (2016)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

OpenAccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Engineering, Mathematics and Physical SciencesUniversity of ExeterExeterUK
  2. 2.Institute for Analysis and Scientific ComputingTU WienViennaAustria
  3. 3.Faculty of MathematicsUniversity of ViennaViennaAustria
  4. 4.Dipartimento di Matematica “F. Casorati”Università di PaviaPaviaItaly

Personalised recommendations