Abstract
Ventricular Assist Devices (VADs) provide continuous mechanical circulatory support during in- and out-of-hospital care. However, limitations of the external wearable components influence patient quality of life. There is insufficient understanding of the issues with such components that combines a holistic viewpoint from both human factors and user (including patient and caregiver) experience perspectives. This paper comprehensively details the issues with VAD wearable systems and proposes a way for human-centered design to bridge the gap, addressing such issues synergistically. Through the review the authors investigated: the user issues caused by wearable components of VADs, and how human factors issues correlate to the VAD user experience. A Boolean search (“ventricular assist” AND “human factors” AND “experience”) for peer-reviewed studies published between 2008 and 2018 returned 338 titles, with 35 relevant studies selected using a PRISMA process for inclusion in cross-study analysis and synthesis. This paper provides design recommendations for the issues found in the literature. Four key focus areas to inform the future design of VAD wearable components were identified—‘Power Supply’, ‘Wearability and Travel Freedom’, ‘The Female Experience’ and ‘Intuitive Handling’. Using design to drive innovation could result in VAD wearable components which better meet or exceed users’ quality of life goals.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abbate, A. J., and E. J. Bass. A formal methods approach to semiotic engineering. Int. J. Hum Comput Stud. 115:20–39, 2018.
Abbate, A. J., and E. J. Bass. A formal approach to connectibility affordances. IEEE Trans. Hum. Mach. Syst. 99:1–11, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1109/thms.2018.2886265.
Abbate, A. J., A. L. Throckmorton, and E. J. Bass. A formal task-analytic approach to medical device alarm troubleshooting instructions. IEEE Trans. Hum. Mach. Syst. 46:53–65, 2016.
Abshire, M., R. Prichard, M. Cajita, M. DiGiacomo, and C. D. Himmelfarb. Adaptation and coping in patients living with an LVAD: a metasynthesis. Hear. Lung J. Acute Crit. Care 45:397–405, 2016.
American National Standards Institute and the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation. ANSI/AAMI HE75:2009/(R)2018 Human factors engineering—design of medical devices, 2018.
Antaki, J. F. Insanity of left ventricular assist therapy: doing the same thing and expecting different results. Circ. Heart Fail. 4:680–681, 2011.
Barber, J., and G. Leslie. A simple education tool for ventricular assist device patients and their caregivers. J. Cardiovasc. Nurs. 30:E1–E10, 2015.
Barg, F. K., K. Kellom, T. Ziv, S. C. Hull, S. Suhail-Sindhu, and J. N. Kirkpatrick. LVAD-DT: culture of rescue and liminal experience in the treatment of heart failure. Am. J. Bioeth. 17:3–11, 2017.
Bartoli, C. R., and R. D. Dowling. The future of adult cardiac assist devices: novel systems and mechanical circulatory support strategies. Cardiol. Clin. 29:559–582, 2011.
Belden, J. L., R. Grayson, and J. Barnes. Defining and Testing EMR Usability: Principles and Proposed Methods of EMR Usability Evaluation and Rating. Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society (HIMSS), 2009.
Bolton, M. L. Automatic validation and failure diagnosis of human-device interfaces using task analytic models and model checking. Comput. Math. Organ. Theory 19:288–312, 2013.
Braun, V., and V. Clarke. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual. Res. Psychol. 3:77–101, 2006.
Brouwers, C., K. Caliskan, N. de Jonge, D. A. J. M. Theuns, A. Constantinescu, Q.-R. Young, C. Cannon, J. Denollet, and S. S. Pedersen. A comparison of the health status and psychological distress of partners of patients with a left ventricular assist device versus an implantable cardioverter defibrillator: a preliminary study. Hear. Lung J. Acute Crit. Care 44:27–32, 2015.
Brown, T. Design thinking. Harv. Bus. Rev. 86:84, 2008.
Brown, T. Change by Design: How Design Thinking Transforms Organizations and Inspires Innovation. New York: Harper Business, 2009.
Buck, H. G., K. Harkness, R. Wion, S. L. Carroll, T. Cosman, S. Kaasalainen, J. Kryworuchko, M. McGillion, S. O’Keefe-McCarthy, D. Sherifali, P. H. Strachan, and H. M. Arthur. Caregivers’ contributions to heart failure self-care: a systematic review. Eur. J. Cardiovasc. Nurs. 14:79–89, 2015.
Bunzel, B., K. Laederach-Hofmann, G. M. Wieselthaler, W. Roethy, and G. Drees. Posttraumatic stress disorder after implantation of a mechanical assist device followed by heart transplantation: evaluation of patients and partners. Transplant. Proc. 37:1365–1368, 2005.
Bunzel, B., K. Laederach-Hofmann, G. Wieselthaler, W. Roethy, and E. Wolner. Mechanical circulatory support as a bridge to heart transplantation: what remains? Long-term emotional sequelae in patients and spouses. J. Hear. Lung Transplant. 26:384–389, 2007.
Caro, M. A., J. L. Rosenthal, K. Kendall, L. Pozuelo, and M. C. Funk. What the psychiatrist needs to know about ventricular assist devices: a comprehensive review. Psychosomatics 57:229–237, 2016.
Casida, J. The lived experience of spouses of patients with a left ventricular assist device before heart transplantation. Am. J. Crit. Care 14:145–151, 2005.
Casida, J. M., L. Marcuccilli, R. M. Peters, and S. Wright. Lifestyle adjustments of adults with long-term implantable left ventricular assist devices: a phenomenologic inquiry. Hear. Lung J. Acute Crit. Care 40:511–520, 2011.
Chapman, E., J. Parameshwar, D. Jenkins, S. Large, and S. Tsui. Psychosocial issues for patients with ventricular assist devices: a qualitative pilot study. Am. J. Crit. Care 16:72–81, 2007.
Christensen, D. M., C. VanderPluym, J. Conway, A. Lorts, H. Buchholz, T. Schlöglhofer, J. Viericke, A. Stepanenko, F. Kauffman, and G. Sorenson. Outpatient Management: The Role of the VAD Coordinator and Remote Monitoring. Mechanical Circulatory Support in End-Stage Heart Failure, Cham: Springer, 2017, pp. 445–465. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43383-7_44.
Daly, S. R., C. M. Seifert, S. Yilmaz, and R. Gonzalez. Comparing ideation techniques for beginning designers. J. Mech. Des. 138:101108, 2016.
De Bono, E. Lateral Thinking : A Textbook of Creativity. London: Penguin Books, 1990.
Department of Defense. Department of Defense Handbook for Human Engineering Guidelines, 1995. https://doi.org/10.1093/milmed/147.11.943.
Department of Defense. MIL-STD-1472G Department of Defense Design Criteria Standard-Human Engineering, 2012. http://www.product-lifecycle-management.com/download/mil-std-1472f.pdf.
Dew, M. A., R. L. Kormos, S. Winowich, E. A. Stanford, L. Carozza, H. S. Borovetz, and B. P. Griffith. Human factors issues in ventricular assist device recipients and their family caregivers. ASAIO J. 46:367–373, 2000.
Feldmann, C., A. Chatterjee, A. Haverich, and J. D. Schmitto. Left Ventricular Assist Devices: A State of the Art Review. Cham: Springer, pp. 287–294, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/5584_2018_145.
U.S. Food & Drug Administration. Applying human factors and usability engineering to medical devices, 2016. https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/applying-human-factors-and-usability-engineering-medical-devices.
U.S. Food & Drug Administration. Human factors (medical devices): human factors considerations, 2017. https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/deviceregulationandguidance/humanfactors/ucm124829.htm.
U.S. Food & Drug Administration. Human Factors and Medical Devices, 2018. https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/deviceregulationandguidance/humanfactors/.
Friedman, E., and M. McMahon. TO VAD OR NOT TO VAD: that is the question. improving the experience of receiving a ventricular assist device (VAD). Proc. Int. Symp. Hum. Factors Ergon. Heal. Care 3:238–245, 2014.
Geidl, L., Z. Deckert, P. Zrunek, R. Gottardi, F. Sterz, G. Wieselthaler, and H. Schima. Intuitive use and usability of ventricular assist device peripheral components in simulated emergency conditions. Artif. Organs 35:773–780, 2011.
Geidl, L., P. Zrunek, Z. Deckert, D. Zimpfer, S. Sandner, G. Wieselthaler, and H. Schima. Usability and safety of ventricular assist devices: human factors and design aspects. Artif. Organs 33:691–695, 2009.
Gemperle, F., C. Kasabach, J. Stivoric, M. Bauer, and R. Martin. Design for wearability. Int. Symp. Wearable Comput. Dig. Pap. 116–122:1998, 1998.
Giacomin, J. What is human centred design? Des. J. 17:606–623, 2014.
Hanke, J. S., J. Riebandt, M. Wahabzada, F. Nur, A. Wahabzada, G. Dogan, C. Feldmann, A. Haverich, A.-F. Popov, D. Zimpfer, and J. D. Schmitto. Driving after left ventricular assist device implantation. Artif. Organs 42:695–699, 2018.
Hasanain, B., A. D. Boyd, J. Edworthy, and M. L. Bolton. A formal approach to discovering simultaneous additive masking between auditory medical alarms. Appl. Ergon. 58:500–514, 2017.
Hong, Q. N., P. Pluye, M. Bujold, and M. Wassef. Convergent and sequential synthesis designs: implications for conducting and reporting systematic reviews of qualitative and quantitative evidence. Syst. Rev. 6:61, 2017.
Hwang, B., M. L. Luttik, K. Dracup, and T. Jaarsma. Family caregiving for patients with heart failure: types of care provided and gender differences. J. Card. Fail. 16:398–403, 2010.
International Electrotechnical Commission. IEC 60601-1-6:2010 Medical electrical equipment-Part 1-6: General requirements for basic safety and essential performance-collateral standard: usability, 2010.
International Organization for Standardization. ISO 9241-210:2010-Ergonomics of human-system interaction—Part 210: Human-centred design for interactive systems. Switzerland, 2010.
International Organization for Standardization. IEC 62366-1:2015-medical devices—Part 1: Application of usability engineering to medical device, 2015.
International Organization for Standardization. IEC/TR 62366-2:2016-Medical devices—Part 2: Guidance on the application of usability engineering to medical devices, 2016.
International Organization for Standardization. ISO 9241-11:2018 Ergonomics of human–system interaction—Part 11: Usability: definitions and concepts, 2018.
Jarvik, R. Infection resistant power cable system for medically implanted electric motors. Patent: US5904646, 1997.
Jarvik Heart, I. Post-auricular cable. Jarvik Heart Inc., 2018. https://www.jarvikheart.com/products/post-auricular-cable/.
Kato, N., T. Jaarsma, and T. Ben Gal. Learning self-care after left ventricular assist device implantation. Curr. Heart Fail. Rep. 11:290–298, 2014.
Kato, N. P., I. Okada, Y. Kagami, M. Endo, M. Hatano, M. Ono, T. Jaarsma, and K. Kinugawa. Quality of life of family caregivers of patients with a left ventricular assist device in Japan. J. Cardiol. 71:81–87, 2018.
Kimchi, J., B. Polivka, and J. S. Stevenson. Triangulation: Operational definitions. Nurs. Res. 40(6):364–366, 1991.
Kirklin, J. K., F. D. Pagani, R. L. Kormos, L. W. Stevenson, E. D. Blume, S. L. Myers, M. A. Miller, J. T. Baldwin, J. B. Young, and D. C. Naftel. Eighth annual INTERMACS report: special focus on framing the impact of adverse events. J. Hear. Lung Transplant. 36:1080–1086, 2017.
Klack, L., T. Schmitz-Rode, W. Wilkowska, K. Kasugai, F. Heidrich, and M. Ziefle. Integrated home monitoring and compliance optimization for patients with mechanical circulatory support devices. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 39:2911–2921, 2011.
Kormos, R. L., M. McCall, A. Althouse, L. Lagazzi, R. Schaub, M. A. Kormos, J. A. Zaldonis, C. Sciortino, K. Lockard, N. Kuntz, E. Dunn, and J. J. Teuteberg. Left ventricular assist device malfunctions: it is more than just the pump. Circulation 136:1714–1725, 2017.
Kouprie, M., and F. S. Visser. A framework for empathy in design: stepping into and out of the user’s life. J. Eng. Des. 20:437–448, 2009.
Krippendorff, K. Intrinsic motivation and human-centred design. Theor. Issues Ergon. Sci. 5:43–72, 2004.
Kugler, C., D. Malehsa, E. Schrader, U. Tegtbur, E. Guetzlaff, A. Haverich, and M. Strueber. A multi-modal intervention in management of left ventricular assist device outpatients: dietary counselling, controlled exercise and psychosocial support. Eur. J. Cardio-Thoracic Surg. 42:1026–1032, 2012.
Lalonde, S. D., A. C. Alba, A. Rigobon, H. J. Ross, D. H. Delgado, F. Billia, M. Mcdonald, R. J. Cusimano, T. M. Yau, and V. Rao. Clinical differences between continuous flow ventricular assist devices: a comparison between HeartMate II and HeartWare HVAD 2013. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocs.12158.
Liberati, A., D. G. Altman, J. Tetzlaff, C. Mulrow, P. C. Gøtzsche, J. P. A. Ioannidis, M. Clarke, P. J. Devereaux, J. Kleijnen, and D. Moher. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 62:e1–e34, 2009.
MacIver, J., and H. J. Ross. Quality of life and left ventricular assist device support. Circulation 126:866–874, 2012.
Magnussen, C., A. M. Bernhardt, F. M. Ojeda, F. M. Wagner, J. Gummert, T. M. M. H. de By, T. Krabatsch, P. Mohacsi, M. Rybczynski, D. Knappe, B. Sill, T. Deuse, S. Blankenberg, R. B. Schnabel, and H. Reichenspurner. Gender differences and outcomes in left ventricular assist device support: the European Registry for patients with mechanical circulatory support. J. Hear. Lung Transplant. 37:61–70, 2018.
Marcuccilli, L., and J. M. Casida. From insiders’ perspectives: adjusting to caregiving for patients with left ventricular assist devices. Prog. Transplant. 21:137–143, 2011.
Marcuccilli, L., and J. Casida. Overcoming alterations in body image imposed by the left ventricular assist device: a case report. Prog. Transplant. 22:212–216, 2012.
Marcuccilli, L., J. Casida, T. Bakas, and F. D. Pagani. Family caregivers’ inside perspectives: caring for an adult with a left ventricular assist device as a destination therapy. Prog. Transplant. 24:332–340, 2014.
Marcuccilli, L., J. Casida, and R. M. Peters. Modification of self-concept in patients with a left-ventricular assist device: an initial exploration. J. Clin. Nurs. 22:2456–2464, 2013.
Marcuccilli, L., J. Casida, R. M. Peters, and S. Wright. Sex and intimacy among patients with implantable left-ventricular assist devices. J. Cardiovasc. Nurs. 26:504–511, 2011.
Masci, P., Y. Zhang, P. Jones, P. Curzon, and H. Thimbleby. Formal verification of medical device user interfaces using PVS. In: Fundamental Approaches to Software Engineering. FASE 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 8411, edited by S. Gnesi, and A. Rensink. Berlin: Springer, 2014, pp. 200–214. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-54804-8_14.
Meyer, A. L., C. Kugler, D. Malehsa, A. Haverich, and M. Strueber. Patient satisfaction with the external equipment of implantable left ventricular assist devices. Artif. Organs 34:721–725, 2010.
Mirnig, A. G., A. Meschtscherjakov, D. Wurhofer, T. Meneweger, and M. Tscheligi. A Formal Analysis of the ISO 9241-210 Definition of User Experience. New York: ACM, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702613.2732511.
Moher, D., A. Liberati, J. Tetzlaff, D. G. Altman, and PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ 339:b2535, 2009.
Overgaard, D., H. G. Kjeldgaard, and I. Egerod. Life in transition A qualitative study of the illness experience and vocational adjustment of patients with left ventricular assist device. J. Cardiovasc. Nurs. 27:394–402, 2012.
Pae, W. E., et al. Bethesda Conference: Conference for the Design of Clinical Trials to Study Circulatory Support Devices for Chronic Heart Failure. New York: Elsevier, 1998.
Pagani, F. D., K. D. Aaronson, R. Kormos, D. L. Mann, C. Spino, N. Jeffries, W. C. Taddei-Peters, D. M. Mancini, D. M. Mcnamara, K. L. Grady, J. Gorcsan, R. Petrucci, A. S. Anderson, H. A. Glick, M. A. Acker, J. E. Rame, D. J. Goldstein, S. V. Pamboukian, M. A. Miller, and J. T. Baldwin. The NHLBI REVIVE-IT study: understanding its discontinuation in the context of current left ventricular assist device therapy. J Hear. Lung Transpl. 35:1277–1283, 2016.
Pérez-García, A. M., S. Oliván, and R. Bover. Subjective well-being in heart failure patients: influence of coping and depressive symptoms. Int. J. Behav. Med. 21:258–265, 2014.
Petty, M., and L. Bauman. Psychosocial issues in ventricular assist device implantation and management. J. Thorac. Dis. 7:2181–2187, 2015.
Prinzing, A., U. Herold, A. Berkefeld, M. Krane, R. Lange, and B. Voss. Left ventricular assist devices-current state and perspectives. J. Thorac. Dis. 8:E660–E666, 2016.
Raymond, A. L., A. G. Kfoury, C. J. Bishop, E. S. Davis, K. M. Goebel, S. Stoker, C. H. Selzman, S. E. Clayson, H. Smith, C. G. Cowley, R. Alharethi, D. Budge, and B. B. Reid. Obesity and left ventricular assist device driveline exit site infection. ASAIO J. 56:57–60, 2010.
Sahle, B. W., A. J. Owen, M. P. Mutowo, H. Krum, and C. M. Reid. Prevalence of heart failure in Australia: a systematic review. BMC Cardiovasc. Disord. 16:32, 2016.
Saunders, M. M. The patient’s informal caregiver. Psychological, emotional, social and cognitive aspects of implantable cardiac devices, Cham: Springer, 2017, pp. 231–242. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55721-2_14.
Savarese, G., and L. H. Lund. Global public health burden of heart failure. Card. Fail. Rev. 3:7–11, 2017.
Schima, H., T. Schlöglhofer, Z. Hartner, J. Horvat, and D. Zimpfer. Importance of linguistic details in alarm messages of ventricular assist devices. Int. J. Artif. Organs 36:1–4, 2013.
Schima, H., T. Schlöglhofer, R. zu Dohna, T. Drews, M. Morshuis, D. Roefe, J. D. Schmitto, M. Strüber, and D. Zimpfer. Usability of ventricular assist devices in daily experience: a multicenter study. Artif. Organs 38:751–760, 2014.
Schlöglhofer, T., and H. Schima. Wearable systems. In: Mechanical circulatory and respiratory support, edited by S. D. Gregory, M. C. Stevens, and J. F. Fraser. New York: Elsevier, 2018, pp. 691–721. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-810491-0.00022-9.
Siegenthaler, M. P., J. Martin, K. Pernice, T. Doenst, S. Sorg, G. Trummer, O. Friesewinkel, and F. Beyersdorf. The Jarvik 2000 is associated with less infections than the HeartMate left ventricular assist device. Eur. J. Cardio-Thoracic Surg. 23:748–755, 2003.
Slaughter, M. S., J. G. Rogers, C. A. Milano, S. D. Russell, J. V. Conte, D. Feldman, B. Sun, A. J. Tatooles, R. M. Delgado, J. W. Long, T. C. Wozniak, W. Ghumman, D. J. Farrar, and O. H. Frazier. Advanced heart failure treated with continuous-flow left ventricular assist device. N. Engl. J. Med. 361:2241–2251, 2009.
Standing, H. C., T. Rapley, G. A. MacGowan, and C. Exley. ‘Being’ a ventricular assist device recipient: a liminal existence. Soc. Sci. Med. 190:141–148, 2017.
Starling, R. C. Improved quantity and quality of life: a winning combination to treat advanced heart failure. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 55:1835–1836, 2010.
Swetz, K. M., A. H. Kamal, D. D. Matlock, A. M. Dose, L. S. Borkenhagen, A. K. Kimeu, S. M. Dunlay, and M. A. Feely. Preparedness planning before mechanical circulatory support: a “How-To” guide for palliative medicine clinicians. J. Pain Symptom Manage. 47:926–935.e6, 2014.
The World Health Organization (WHO), and Organización Nacional de Trasplantes (ONT). Organ Donation and Transplantation Activities, 2015 Report, 2015. http://www.transplant-observatory.org/.
Throckmorton, A. L., S. M. Patel-Raman, C. S. Fox, and E. J. Bass. Beyond the VAD: human factors engineering for mechanically assisted circulation in the 21st century. Artif. Organs 40:539–548, 2016.
Tigges-Limmer, K., Y. Brocks, Y. Winkler, S. S. Gissendanner, M. Morshuis, and J. F. Gummert. Mental health interventions during ventricular assist device therapy: a scoping review. Interact. Cardiovasc. Thorac. Surg. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivy125.
Vos, T., et al. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 310 diseases and injuries, 1990–2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Lancet 388:1545–1602, 2016.
Waters, B., A. Sample, J. Smith, and P. Bonde. Toward total implantability using free-range resonant electrical energy delivery system: achieving untethered ventricular assist device operation over large distances. Cardiol. Clin. 29:609–625, 2011.
Waters, B., J. Smith, and P. Bonde. Totally implantable LVAD: progress on portable wireless power delivery system and results of in-vivo testing. The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation 33(4):S3, 2014.
Wells, C. L. Physical therapist management of patients with ventricular assist devices: key considerations for the acute care physical therapist. Phys. Ther. 93:266–278, 2013.
Westaby, S., R. Jarvik, A. Freeland, D. Pigott, D. Robson, S. Saito, P. Catarino, and O. H. Frazier. Postauricular percutaneous power delivery for permanent mechanical circulatory support. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 123:977–983, 2002.
Zahabi, M., D. B. Kaber, and M. Swangnetr. Usability and safety in electronic medical records interface design. Hum Factors J Hum Factors Ergon Soc 57:805–834, 2015.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to recognize the financial assistance provided by The Prince Charles Hospital Foundation (TM2017-04), the National Health and Medical Research Council Centre for Research Excellence (APP1079421/GNT1079421), The University of Sydney and Monash University. Shaun D. Gregory was supported by a Future Leader Fellowship (102062) from the National Heart Foundation of Australia. The authors would also like to acknowledge the assistance of Keum Hee (Kimmi) Ko.
Author Contributions
JLD, concept, draft, and data collection; EN, critical revision, approval of article; KS, critical revision, approval of article; SG, critical revision, approval of article; CW, critical revision, approval of article.
Conflict of interest
None of the authors has a financial relationship with a commercial entity that as an interest in the subject of the presented manuscript or other conflicts of interest to disclose.
Funding
The authors would like to recognize the financial assistance provided by the National Health and Medical Research Council Centre for Research Excellence (APP1079421/GNT1079421).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Associate Editor Joel Stitzel oversaw the review of this article.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendices
Appendix A: Comprehensive list of human factors issues found in the literature arranged alphabetically by component including user experience (if present) pertaining to the wearable components of VADs, with corresponding human-centered design opportunities
VAD component | Human factors issue | User experience | Device | Sources | Human-centered design opportunity |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Alarms | Acoustic alarming during routine battery exchange | Not specified | Buffer batteries; both within controller and implanted e.g. near skin on chest or abdomen area, with method to test working function of both | ||
Alarm failure (e.g. power supply disconnected from controller and no alarm sounded, or inappropriate alarming resulting in controller failure) | Jarvik 2000 | Design for best practice alarm testing protocols | |||
Alarm signals too quiet to interrupt sleep | Not specified | Motion sensor, ramping up to much higher volumes, vibration with ramping up | |||
Alarms don’t meet the needs of users with physical, vision or hearing impairments | Not specified | Design for the ability to turn alarms up louder for hearing impaired users, or louder ramping if quieter alarms are not heard or actioned yet, design alarm with speech outputs and verbal prompts for vision impaired users83 | |||
Audio alarms with speech output and verbal prompts desired | Not specified | Design alarms with speech outputs and verbal prompts | |||
Frequent alarms | Fear, Anxiety | Not specified | Design to avoid alarm fatigue | ||
Linguistic nuances in the translation of device alarm messaging can lead to misunderstandings with consequences for usability and safety | Not specified | Employ professional translators and conduct usability testing for understanding especially in languages other than English.83 The article “Importance of Linguistic Details in Alarm Messages of Ventricular Assist Devices” by Schima et al.81 addresses this important issue.81 | |||
Noise and vibrations (Alarm ramping desired, with increase of frequency and volume over time rather than sudden onset) | Irritating, Frightening | Not specified | More ‘friendly’ alarm sound design e.g. ramping, that still conveys urgency | ||
Noise irritating, especially when trying to sleep | Mixed feelings, Irritation, Bothered, Upset | Not specified | Reduce unnecessary intrusive noise or sudden noise | ||
Patient is not able to recognize the meaning of the alarm from the acoustic signal, misinterpretation of alarms, unable to differentiate between routine and critical alarms | Confusing | Not specified, Thoratec | Involve a user experience designer from the early stages of VAD product development, spoken language alarms in combination with noises | ||
Training required: Ability to recognize and interpret alerts and alarm and take appropriate action e.g. knowing when to contact VAD coordinator | Not specified | Better UI/UX design of alarms, simplify training with digital learning or training app | |||
Troubleshooting and handling of alarms (need time to become proficient at handling alarm states) | Confronting, Worry | Not specified | Streamline alarm handling processes based on natural user behavior, make intuitive, better UI/UX of alarms | ||
Batteries | Activities such as contact sports, water sports and swimming, immersion in water and taking a bath prohibited | Difficult to accept | Not specified, HeartMate III, Heartware HVAD | Adopt postauricular percutaneous power delivery technology that avoids abdominal area and allows whole body (not head) to be submerged, remove the percutaneous driveline entirely using TETS technology | |
Alters patient balance (problematic when exercising) | Not specified | Design a weight-balancing carrying system that can be worn in different ways depending on type of exercise; reduce size and weight of batteries | |||
Batteries limit comfortable sleeping positions | Not specified | Adopt postauricular percutaneous power delivery technology that avoids abdominal area and removes obstruction to comfortable sleeping position | |||
Batteries worn in holster are hard enough to break a rib if patient falls onto them | Not specified | Soft or impact-protecting e.g. D3O padding or casing of hard parts | |||
Battery charger failure | Heartmate II, HVAD, not specified | Ensure protocol is implemented so that working charger replacement is available at all times | |||
Battery clips failure, requiring whole battery replacement | Heartmate II | Repairable or replaceable clips | |||
Battery packs very heavy, especially older models | Not specified | Modular design (i.e. at driveline) that allows for updating of external peripheral components with older implanted VADs | |||
Caregiver must handle battery issues and ensure backup batteries are charged | Not specified | Design an ambient battery status solution that’s as stress-free as using a watch or wall clock for checking the time—that can be hidden if necessary, e.g. at night | |||
Completely dependent on batteries, strict requirements for managing reserve power—patients test limits of equipment | Not specified | Buffer batteries; both within controller and implanted e.g. near skin on chest or abdomen area, with method to test working function of both | |||
Constantly checking battery status and function | Stressful, Fear, Worry | Not specified | Design an ambient battery status solution that’s as stress-free as using a watch or wall clock for checking the time—that can be made less prominent, e.g. at night | ||
Failure of battery connections requiring replacement | Heartmate II | More durable connections e.g. remove pins, magnetic assistance, connections may be cleaned | |||
Failure or defect, e.g. failure to recharge, requiring battery replacement | HVAD, not specified | Design for best practice battery testing protocols | |||
Forgetting to bring extra batteries, must carry a set of backup batteries as a failed battery can lead to death. Need for battery power during outings and must carry additional batteries and charger for travel and long trips, concern for battery life impacts sense of normalcy | Fear, Dissatisfaction, Restriction | Not specified | For day trips, a simple reminder solution for bringing extra components e.g. carry bag with recesses, special pockets or “shadow board” design to be filled by needed components daily; for travel, design a more portable charger solution and backup kit. Implantable backup battery and/or extra backup battery in the controller. | ||
Frequency of battery change | Not specified | Supply batteries that last longer (e.g. minimum 8 h) | |||
Gets in the way during sexual intimacy | Anxiety, Awkward, Self-conscious | Not specified | Design more ergonomic batteries with a suitable holding system for more vigorous physical activity, adopt postauricular percutaneous power delivery technology that avoids abdominal area | ||
Insufficient battery capacity (8 h capacity of HeartMate GoGear considered ideal) | Dissatisfaction | Not specified | Increase battery capacity | ||
Learning procedures for changing batteries and manipulating battery pack | Not specified | Design battery exchange procedure to be as seamless as changing the battery on a consumer product e.g. digital camera | |||
Learning procedures for estimating charge levels during battery operation | Not specified | Always show the state of batteries with an ambient battery status solution that’s as stress-free as using a watch or wall clock for checking the time—that can be hidden if necessary, e.g. at night | |||
Must be checked for damage, including Routine Outpatient Evaluation: Visual inspection of batteries for damage to casing and connectors, and tested for lifetime and charging cycles | Not specified | Simplify or standardise inspection protocol, simplify training with digital learning or training app | |||
Not all controllers contain buffer batteries (like the HeartMate III), putting patients at risk of pump support interruption if batteries are mishandled | HVAD | Controller should contain buffer battery, consider implanted buffer battery | |||
Patients with the HeartMate II must mark the batteries after every exchange, because the system does not show the state of the batteries | Heartmate II | Always show the state of batteries with an ambient battery status solution that’s as stress-free as using a watch or wall clock for checking the time—that can be hidden if necessary, e.g. at night | |||
Premature failure with more rapid recharge cycles needed, premature battery end of life (failure of the battery to perform to stated specifications of expected life) | Vexation | Not specified | Increase battery durability and cycle life | ||
Values trade-off between longer support duration with larger/heavier batteries or lighter/smaller batteries with shorter duration | Not specified | Offer both options if battery cannot be both small and offer a long (8 h+) duration | |||
Women specifically find batteries too large and heavy, desire a reduction in size and weight | Not specified | Reduce size, weight and bulk of batteries | |||
Cables | Cable replacement due to e.g. broken connector, gradual degradation, or mistakes in use | Not specified | Increase durability, ensure protocol is implemented so that working cable replacement is available at all times | ||
Cord not long enough: Cord must be sufficiently long so that patient can get into the bathroom at night, otherwise they must e.g. disconnect from the machine and put the batteries back on, reconfigure bedroom layout so power cable can reach the bathroom at night without power interruption, or even remove walls in the house so power cable can reach the bathroom at night without power interruption | Not specified | Provide a longer cord option, retractable cable solution like a vacuum cleaner, make longer and shorter cables so that patients have options | |||
Gets in the way during sexual intimacy | Anxiety, Awkward, Encumbered, Deeper intimacy, Adjustment | Not specified | Cord and cable management solution, adopt postauricular percutaneous power delivery technology that avoids abdominal area and removes obstruction to sexual intimacy, remove the percutaneous driveline entirely using TETS technology | ||
Hooks in the bathroom ceiling for cable management | Not specified | Design a stand-alone caddy or specific cable management solution | |||
Insufficient cable‐strain relief e.g. cable caught on doorknobs or chair armrests causing sudden blockade, desire for more gradual strain-relief (such as helical, spring-like segment) | Not specified | Design a system with both controller and implanted buffer batteries so that power is not lost with cables that disconnect at a certain force and/or insert helical spring-like segments or retractable component in cable design | |||
Long cords | Not specified | Provide a range of longer and shorter cords, different lengths depending on user need, or retractable cable solution like a vacuum cleaner | |||
Making sure cords are untangled | Adjustment | Not specified | Cord and cable management solution | ||
Monitor cable failure | Heartmate II, HVAD | Increase durability, ensure protocol is implemented so that working cable replacement is available at all times | |||
Must be checked for damage | Not specified | Simplify or standardise inspection protocol, simplify training with digital learning or training app | |||
Patient cable failure (connecting power module to controller) | Heartmate II, not specified | Increase durability, ensure protocol is implemented so that working cable replacement is available at all times | |||
Sleep without plugging the device into the charging station at night to avoid contending with cords | Not specified | Adopt postauricular percutaneous power delivery technology that avoids abdominal area and removes obstruction to comfortable sleeping position, remove the percutaneous driveline entirely using TETS technology | |||
Carry bag | Bag used to carry additional paraphernalia e.g. wallet, medical documents, cell phone, or glasses; additional pockets desired to carry extra belongings | Not specified | Design the bag for the way that it is used, not in opposition to it; provide pockets for extra belongings | ||
Discomfort | Not specified | Design investigation to determine cause of discomfort | |||
Dust or dirt getting into bag | Not specified | Design bag to be dust/dirt-resistant with integrated weatherproof cover e.g. like a high-end camera bag, design with easily washable materials | |||
Female patients regard the bag as too heavy | Not specified | Reduce overall weight of components, reduce weight of bag fabric | |||
Hard to wear an all-in-one bag plus a handbag/purse | Not specified | Inner-bag solution to be used with patient-preferred bag, provide feminine bag solution with multiple strap options, design a convertible shoulder-bag to backpack | |||
Hook for the equipment bag needed in bathroom | Not specified | Design a stand-alone equipment stand or caddy | |||
Identification of the VAD (on the bag exterior) desired | Not specified | Identification on bag interior e.g. with brightly colored lining, which can be opened and displayed when desired | |||
Large transportation bags impede life quality and increase the risk of dropping | Impedance | Not specified | Reduce size and bulk of bags, find solution to reduce accidental dropping | ||
No extra space provided to carry extra batteries or controllers despite this being recommended, patients using additional shoulder bags, backpacks or plastic bags to carry extra batteries or spare controllers | Not specified | Provide expandable compartments or two-piece bag system | |||
Nowhere to put bag when sitting in task chairs (e.g. office) | Not specified | Design bag to be comfortably worn while sitting | |||
Optional brace system desired | Not specified | Provide various strap/brace options | |||
Ordinary handbag/purse used in lieu of carry bag for social event; more inconspicuous than manufacturer-provided bag but need continually alternate sides worn due to weight | Not specified | Inner-bag solution to be used with patient-preferred bag, provide feminine bag solution with multiple strap options | |||
Overheating of the controller (partially due to the protective bag) | Not specified | Use heat dispersing materials and mesh sections that can be opened up optionally to disperse heat | |||
Problems with carabiner and ring strap attachment to the bag—carabiner opened or cables/other parts becoming tangled | Not specified | Design alternative attachment methods for carry strap that don’t interfere with VAD components | |||
Shoulder strap rubs on abdominal region skin when using bag belts | Not specified | Design well-fitting bag straps and configurations with non-abrasive materials | |||
Sleeping by hugging the bag all night | Not specified | Adopt postauricular percutaneous power delivery technology that avoids abdominal area and removes obstruction to comfortable sleeping position, pillow-like padded bag for sleeping with33 for batteries and controller connected to abdominal driveline | |||
Strap painful to carry/causing pain | Not specified | Padded strap design, balance weight with multiple straps, reduce overall weight of components | |||
Tab holding the ring confused with a short loop of cable coming out of the bag | Not specified | Design a textured tab or zipper pull that cannot be confused with other components | |||
Too large, females in particular desire a reduction in size | Not specified | Reduce size of all external components | |||
Unilateral strap does not allow weight balancing of components, need to alternate shoulders | Not specified | Design a backpack, or shoulder bag that converts into a backpack, or inner-bag solution to be used with patient-preferred bag | |||
Unintentionally dropped (causes sudden jerking on the driveline) | Not specified | More stable and secure luggage solution, design a system with both controller and implanted buffer batteries so that power is not lost with cables that disconnect at a certain force and/or insert helical spring-like segments or retractable component in driveline design | |||
Unintentionally dropped bag during changing clothes | Not specified | Adopt protocol for changing clothes using bed or chair to rest bag on, adopt postauricular percutaneous power delivery technology that avoids abdominal area and removes obstruction and complexity when changing clothes | |||
Unsafe or unstable | Not specified | Design investigation to determine cause of instability or insecurity | |||
Using alternative bags other than that provided by the manufacturer | Not specified | Design a light inner-bag solution that can be placed inside a bag of patient’s preference | |||
Water getting into bag | Not specified | Design bag to be weather-resistant with integrated waterproof cover e.g. like a high-end camera bag | |||
Connectors | Afraid of device becoming unplugged if cables are pulled on public transport | Afraid | Not specified | Connector system with guard or two-step disconnection process to reduce accidental disconnection by force only (with consideration for override option in case of emergency) | |
Color‐coded connection system desired, standardisation of color-coding of connectors between different VAD manufacturers desired | Not specified | Implement color-coding and shape-coding (for color-blind users) of connection system, investigate feasibility of standardized color-coding between manufacturers or common replacement parts | |||
Connectors become less firm | Not specified | Increase durability, ensure protocol is implemented so that working cable replacement is available at all times | |||
Connectors difficult to reconnect | Thoratec, Heartware | Improve usability and human factors, ensure guides slide smoothly with adequate tolerances, magnetic assistance | |||
Degradation of connector housings and connection mechanisms | Not specified | Increase durability | |||
Dropping the controller can cause pins to recess out of the connector block, which can cause pump to stop | Heartware | Design for connection without pins, or more robust connection with larger prongs, implant a buffer battery so that patient has time to replace controller | |||
Exposure to water or other fluids | Not specified | Connectors must be splash proof with waterproof seal | |||
Failure due to inappropriate connection while connector pins are in a misaligned position | Not specified | Design for connection without pins, or more robust connection with larger prongs, use guides with longer lead-in, shaped connectors (not round) and/or magnetic assistance | |||
Failure of the protective O-ring at the power port or the monitor port of the controller due to repeated stress | Not specified | Increase durability and O-ring lifetime | |||
Faulty connectors (including the connectors for the driveline), may result in controller failure | Not specified | Increase durability, ensure protocol is implemented so that working cable replacement is available at all times | |||
Jamming during plug insertion | Not specified | Ensure guides slide smoothly with adequate tolerances, magnetic assistance, remove pins | |||
Lock and release-style significantly reduces unintentional disconnection of driveline but could cause exit site injury (e.g. if the carry bag is dropped) vs. unlocked driveline connectors that decouple at a certain force reduce exit site trauma/infection but also causes pump to immediately stop upon unintentional disconnection | Heartmate II | Use a Design Innovation approach to determine user preferences from the following: (1) Design a system with both controller and implanted buffer batteries so that power is not lost with cables that disconnect at a certain force and/or (2) insert helical spring-like segments83 or retractable component in driveline design and/or (3) provide a connector system with guard or two-step disconnection process to reduce accidental disconnection by force only | |||
Making sure the connections are right; Clear “snap-in” connector feature desired by patients | Adjustment | Not specified | Obvious, audible & tactile “click-in” feature, snap-in feature, with magnetic assistance | ||
Matching arrows that line up at the respective end of the cable and its connector pair desired | Not specified | Implement matching arrows, along with guides, color-coding and matching shapes for connection system—so there is no way to get it wrong | |||
Must be checked for damage, including Routine Outpatient Evaluation: Visual inspection of connectors as they are fragile and easily damaged, visible wear can indicate future problems | Not specified | Simplify or standardize inspection protocol, simplify training with digital learning or training app | |||
Unintentional disconnection of either the VAD, cables, or both power supplies e.g. during changing clothes, in the bathroom, or during driving; may lead to pump stop | Feeling unsafe, Fear | Not specified, Heartware HVAD, HeartMate II, DuraHeart | Use a Design Innovation approach to determine user preferences from the following: (1) Design a system with both controller and implanted buffer batteries so that power is not lost with cables that disconnect at a certain force and/or (2) insert helical spring-like segments83 or retractable component in driveline design and/or (3) provide a connector system with guard or two-step disconnection process to reduce accidental disconnection by force only | ||
Controller | Cell battery in the controller failure | Heartmate II | Ensure protocol is implemented so that working cell battery replacement is available at all times | ||
Controller limits comfortable sleeping positions | Not specified | Adopt postauricular percutaneous power delivery technology that avoids abdominal area and removes obstruction to comfortable sleeping position, pillow-like padded bag for sleeping with33 for batteries and controller connected to abdominal driveline | |||
Difficult to find comfortable clothing that conceals the controller | Not specified | Design wearable options for patients who wish to wear system both underneath clothing e.g. in a vest, t-shirt, or wrap, or discreet carry system on top of clothing e.g. in a bag or belt | |||
Dropping controller causing damage (e.g. dropping on the floor can cause electrical fault in pump or implanted driveline, requiring pump replacement | Heartware | Design controller with impact-resistant drop-proof housing, or soft impact-protecting material e.g. D3O padding or additional casing of hard parts | |||
Exposure to water or biological fluids | Not specified | Make resistant to water and biological fluids | |||
Faults, defects and failure, requiring controller replacement | Not specified | Increase reliability, | |||
Heat discharge problematic as controllers are made from synthetic materials with poor thermal conductivity, overheating of the controller (partially due to the protective bag) | Not specified | Use newer heat dispersing materials for controller housing, ensure adequate ventilation around controller, or return to using superior magnesium housing material83 | |||
Monitoring, maintaining and managing device function | Confronting, Anxiety, Fear, Stress | Not specified | Friendly user interface with intuitive processes, digital training program or virtual assistant | ||
More control elements and other forms of displaying an error desired | Thoratec, Heartware | Allow for different layers of information to be displayed at different times i.e. essential device and peripherals information for displaying ambient status or critical emergency instructions, more detailed information upon request for specific diagnostics (e.g. pump parameters), make simplified clinical menu available via controller | |||
Must be checked for damage, including Routine Outpatient Evaluation: Visual inspection of controller for physical damage (e.g. broken housing) | Not specified | Simplify or standardize inspection protocol, simplify training with digital learning or training app | |||
Patients with the HeartMate II only have access to view parameters including speed, flow, wattage, and alarms data when the system display and power base unit are connected | Heartmate II | Make speed, flow, wattage, and alarms data visible on controller when requested, show the state of device with an ambient display solution that’s as stress-free as using a watch or wall clock for checking the time—that can be hidden if necessary, e.g. at night | |||
Pressing a wrong button on the controller | Fear | Not specified | Friendly user interface with intuitive processes, training program, or AI virtual assistant | ||
Software issue or abnormality | Not specified | Increase software reliability | |||
Users with limited manual dexterity due to e.g. osteoarthritis, may find controller changes challenging | Adaptation | Not specified | Implement usability and human-factors to design simpler, easier controller exchange procedure | ||
Women desire a reduction of size and weight of controllers, too large and heavy for women | Not specified | Reduce size and weight of controller | |||
Driveline | Afraid that the driveline would be pulled out from abdomen during sexual intimacy, causing injury | Fear, Concern, Vigilance, Worry | Not specified | Immobilize the driveline to prevent trauma & injury, with a suitable driveline management system for more vigorous physical activity, adopt postauricular percutaneous power delivery technology, remove the percutaneous driveline entirely using TETS technology | |
Anchor or fixing system required: Driveline must be secured, immobilized and protected from trauma, because movement will disrupt the delicate tissue in-growth in the velour lining of the driveline, resulting in much higher infection risk | Not specified | Adopt postauricular percutaneous power delivery technology which removes need for driveline anchor | |||
Avoid kinking, bending, twisting or tugging driveline when putting on heavy clothing, coats or jackets | Not specified | Adopt postauricular percutaneous power delivery technology that avoids abdominal area and removes interference with clothing, ensure sufficient strain-relief, increase flexibility and robustness including kink-resistance for example with a protective coil within the outer sheath, implantable buffer battery in patient to give time in case of driveline damage | |||
Cleaning around the driveline | Care-dependency | Not specified | Adopt postauricular percutaneous power delivery technology, remove the percutaneous driveline entirely using TETS technology, improve infection control procedures and self-care adherence that may be performed by patient themselves if preferred | ||
Damage to the driveline bend relief (located at the controller end) | Thoratec | Modular cable connection near the driveline exit site (as with HeartMate III and Jarvik 2000 postauricular cables) | |||
Difficult to find comfortable clothing that conceals the driveline | Not specified | Driveline cover, design a method for patients to modify their choice of clothing to accommodate and conceal abdominal driveline, adopt postauricular percutaneous power delivery technology that avoids abdominal area and removes interference with clothing | |||
Difficulties finding comfortable clothes for special occasions, that concealed the external components of the VAD system | Not specified | Design a method for patients to modify their choice of clothing to accommodate and conceal abdominal driveline, adopt postauricular percutaneous power delivery technology that avoids abdominal area and removes interference with clothing | |||
Difficulties finding practical, comfortable and natural-looking clothing (that accommodates rather than accentuates the VAD equipment) | Coping | Not specified | Adopt postauricular percutaneous power delivery technology, more ergonomic and discreet VAD equipment and carrying system that fits seamlessly with natural-looking clothing. Design clothing patterns for VAD patients | ||
Difficulties selecting and wearing clothes to protect the integrity of the VAD system and the patient’s perceived body image | Not specified | Adopt postauricular percutaneous power delivery technology paired with smaller, lighter external components | |||
Discomfort associated with the exit site of the driveline | Not specified | Adopt postauricular percutaneous power delivery technology, remove the percutaneous driveline entirely using TETS technology | |||
Driveline as a tube with 4 small wires inside looks fragile—damage may require major operation and implant replacement | Concern, Scary, Uncertainty | Not specified | Design the driveline to be robust without compromising flexibility and function, reduce number or diameter of wires required within the driveline to power device, design for driveline replacement without device replacement, modular driveline | ||
Driveline exposed if external components are carried in a conventional backpack, increasing risk of infections | Not specified | Design a washable driveline cover | |||
Driveline forms a highway between outside world and bloodstream | Not specified | Postauricular percutaneous power delivery technology has a lower rate of infection due to better tissue integration,84,96 remove the percutaneous driveline entirely using TETS technology | |||
Driveline fracture, damage, or breakage causing life-threatening pump failure, requiring pump replacement or urgent heart transplantation, or death | Heartmate II, HVAD, not specified | Separate cable reliability from pump reliability with a sealed modular system (as with HeartMate III), adopt postauricular percutaneous power delivery technology | |||
Driveline limits comfortable sleeping positions, disturbed sleep due to new sleeping position on the opposite site to equipment, and underlying discomfort from the driveline, inability to lie on the side of driveline exit site, preferred sleeping positions include lying on the side (propped with a pillow) opposite to the driveline and lying on the back, inability to lie on the side of driveline exit site | Not specified | Adopt postauricular percutaneous power delivery technology that avoids abdominal area and removes obstruction to comfortable sleeping position | |||
Driveline limits movement, due to pulling | Not specified | Ensure sufficient strain relief | |||
Driveline rubbing against parts of the body | Not specified | Adopt postauricular percutaneous power delivery technology that avoids abdominal area and eliminates irritation to the skin | |||
Electrical failure | Not specified | Increase durability and reliability | |||
Females can’t wear one-piece dresses, driveline comes out from left lower quadrant of the abdomen to external equipment | Not specified | Design a dress with a feature that allows patient to easily pass driveline and other components through, design a method for patients to modify their choice of clothing to accommodate abdominal driveline, adopt postauricular percutaneous power delivery technology that avoids abdominal area and removes obstruction to clothing | |||
Finding a high-rise toilet seat to promote comfort and keep the driveline stable | Adjustment, Unexpected, Stressful | Not specified | Adopt postauricular percutaneous power delivery technology, improve stability and immobilize the driveline to prevent trauma & injury | ||
Gets in the way during sexual intimacy, position of the driveline during intercourse | Self-conscious, Concern, Encumbered, Deeper intimacy, Adjustment | Not specified | Adopt postauricular percutaneous power delivery technology, design a suitable driveline management system for more vigorous physical activity | ||
Having a driveline exit through the skin causing change in self-image | Adaptation | Not specified | Acceptance therapy delivered via digital wellbeing tool/app, remove the percutaneous driveline entirely using TETS technology | ||
Holes in external sheath/insulation of driveline caused by constant mechanical stress or rubbing on clothes—able to be fixed with tape or self-fusing tape | Not specified | Increase abrasion resistance and durability, modular driveline so that worn segments can be replaced | |||
Infection: exit site infection and device-related infection (relating to the percutaneous lead), which often leads to increased readmission rates, prolonged hospital stays, increased healthcare costs, pump infection, increased risk of thrombosis or sepsis and consequently may result in removal from the transplant active waiting list, VAD removal, and death | Fear, Distrust, Worry, Caution, Helplessness, Irony, Distress, Difficulty coping, Exposed, Vulnerable, Unsafe, Concern | Not specified | Adopt postauricular percutaneous power delivery technology, remove the percutaneous driveline entirely using TETS technology, improve and simplify infection control procedures and self-care adherence, chemical or physical infection barriers, accelerated skin healing, coatings or covers, immobilize the driveline to prevent trauma & injury | ||
LVAD partners expressed fear of making driveline-related mistakes | Fear | Not specified | Improve and simplify infection control procedures and self-care adherence, training program or virtual assistant | ||
Must be visually inspected daily | Not specified | Simplify or standardize inspection protocol, simplify training with digital learning or training app | |||
Need to avoid contact sports or strenuous activities that could damage the driveline site | Not specified | Acceptance therapy delivered via digital wellbeing app (Removing or moving driveline will not resolve this as implanted components could also be damaged by these activities) | |||
Need to integrate the VAD so that it feels like a natural part of body and body image | Not specified | Prioritize good industrial design to integrate VAD in a more “natural”, seamless way with the body | |||
Pants need to have a waistband lower than the natural waistline and not tight fitting to accommodate driveline | Not specified | Adopt postauricular percutaneous power delivery technology that avoids abdominal area and allows patient to wear normal clothes | |||
Physical limitations | Not specified | Adopt postauricular percutaneous power delivery technology, remove the percutaneous driveline entirely using TETS technology | |||
Preferred sleeping positions include lying on the side (propped with a pillow) opposite to the driveline and lying on the back, inability to lie on the side of driveline exit site | Not specified | Adopt postauricular percutaneous power delivery technology that avoids abdominal area and removes obstruction to comfortable sleeping position | |||
Rare intentional cutting or disconnection of driveline to discontinue VAD support | Not specified | Mental health support for at-risk patients, digital wellbeing tool/app | |||
Rare reports exist of patients cutting the integral pump driveline with successful repair | Not specified | Modular driveline to aid replacement of damaged segment | |||
Routine Outpatient Evaluation involves visual and tactile driveline inspection for breaches in the silicone sleeve or insulation, plus x-ray (if needed to see internal wires) | Not specified | Simplify or standardize inspection protocol, simplify training with digital learning or training app | |||
Skin irritation resulting from friction from the abdominal binder used to immobilize the driveline and to promote wound healing (wearing a camisole under abdominal binder may prevent driveline from rubbing) | Not specified | Use softer, more skin-friendly materials for VAD wearable components and accessories, adopt postauricular percutaneous power delivery technology to prevent interference with clothing and sensitive skin | |||
Skin irritation resulting from friction from the driveline | Not specified | Adopt postauricular percutaneous power delivery technology that avoids abdominal area and thus eliminates irritation | |||
Stretching, bending or twisting beyond the limits of robustness causing damage to internal ground shielding and inner power and controller leads, failure because of fracture of the internal ground shielding in the integral pump driveline resulting in pump stoppage and/or device replacement—“Short to shield” | Heartmate II | Increase flexibility and robustness including kink-resistance for example with a protective coil within the outer sheath, implant buffer battery in patient to give time in case of driveline failure | |||
Tape used to repair driveline not designed for direct skin contact, could cause irritation | Not specified | Modular cable connection near the driveline exit site (as with HeartMate III and Jarvik 2000 postauricular cables) | |||
Unintentional damage e.g. during household/environmental accidents, or by coming in contact with sharp object | Not specified | Increase robustness and durability, including crush resistance by using e.g. Kevlar thread | |||
Driveline dressing | Caregivers must have materials ready for dressing changes | Not specified | Digital training tool/app to promote habit forming around driveline hygiene, subscription and delivery service for dressing materials | ||
Changing the dressing, afraid of breaking sterile technique with dressing change | Flustered, Nervous, Nerve-wracking, Care-dependency, Maintaining independence, Sick, Disabled, Fear | Not specified | Improve and simplify infection control procedures and self-care adherence, training program or virtual assistant, adopt postauricular percutaneous power delivery technology to remove need for dressing | ||
Dressing rubbing against parts of the body | Not specified | Adopt postauricular percutaneous power delivery technology to prevent interference between dressing and sensitive skin | |||
Exit site wound management, according to protocol, gentle to avoid tissue trauma | Not specified | Postauricular percutaneous power delivery technology has better tissue integration,84,96 thus once wound is healed, no longer needs dressing48 | |||
Increased frequency of dressing changes and more stringent immobilization during infection episodes | Not specified | Ensure best practice hygiene protocol is implemented, digital training tool/app to promote habit forming around driveline hygiene | |||
Learning methods for dressing, nursing staff require training for changing the dressing | Not specified | Ensure best practice hygiene protocol is implemented, digital training tool/app to promote habit forming around driveline hygiene | |||
Regular hand-washing for those who handle the dressing | Not specified | Ensure best practice hygiene protocol is implemented, digital training tool/app to promote habit forming around driveline hygiene and hand washing | |||
Sterile dressing procedure still required even after wound has healed, to protect against infection and minor injury | Not specified | Postauricular percutaneous power delivery technology has better tissue integration,84,96 thus once wound is healed, no longer needs dressing48 | |||
Holster/Vest/Harness | Batteries swing in the holsters on either side of torso | Not specified | Make holsters adjustable or multi-size | ||
Excess webbing strap dangles out | Not specified | Add simple elastic loop to hold excess webbing, design for closed adjustment with no excess strap | |||
Extra spandex layers needed to keep holster from bouncing when running for exercise | Not specified | Design an exercise-specific carry solution | |||
Hip-based design an improvement | Not specified | Distribute weight onto hips | |||
Ill-fitting on women as designed to fit the male torso | Frustration | Not specified | Design a holster/vest to fit women’s bodies | ||
Need to alternate between holster vest and modular belt to alleviate skin irritation from driveline and abdominal binder | Not specified | Adopt postauricular percutaneous power delivery technology that avoids abdominal area and eliminates abdominal binder, thus allowing more freedom to wear holster or vest over or under clothing as preferred | |||
No chest strap to secure | Not specified | Add securing strap if needed or other securing solution | |||
Patients make modifications as provided holster/vest doesn’t meet needs | Not specified | Research patient modifications and determine if patient hacks can be incorporated into a design that fits the needs of various users | |||
Pressure and soreness | Not specified | Determine location and cause of pressure and soreness | |||
Tightening webbing strap does not stabilize batteries | Not specified | Provide adequate stabilizing solution | |||
Unclear how it should be worn | Not specified | Make putting on and taking off as intuitive as possible, with e.g. textured tabs, logical design | |||
Vest provides little cushioning from the batteries especially for thin patients | Not specified | Incorporate padded sections e.g. foam or spacer fabric, design components with soft padded shell or gel exterior on patient-facing surfaces and edges | |||
Vests to hold batteries provided by the manufacturer make the neck/shoulders sore | Not specified | Reduce weight of batteries and redesign vest for optimal weight distribution | |||
Weight of heavy equipment causes digging into shoulders | Not specified | Reduce weight of all components, add padding or shaping to optimize weight distribution | |||
Weight of the batteries located at the bottom of the vest pull down on neck | Not specified | Redesign vest for optimal weight distribution | |||
Modular Belt/Waist Bag | Directly in the way of food or drink spillage | Not specified | Make washable or wipe-clean surface | ||
Hard to access controller to disable alarm | Not specified | Redesign for quick access and troubleshooting | |||
Interacts with the abdominal binder and irritates the skin requiring wearing a camisole or longer shirt in between | Not specified | Use softer, more skin-friendly materials for VAD wearable components and accessories, adopt postauricular percutaneous power delivery technology to prevent interaction with clothing and sensitive skin | |||
Need to alternate between modular belt and holster vest to alleviate skin irritation from driveline and abdominal binder | Not specified | Adopt postauricular percutaneous power delivery technology that avoids abdominal area and eliminates abdominal binder, thus allowing more freedom to wear holster or vest over or under clothing as preferred | |||
Pants need to have a loose-fitting elasticated waistband lower than the natural waistline so that they can be easily pulled on and off to use the toilet | Not specified | Adopt postauricular percutaneous power delivery technology that avoids abdominal area and removes interference with clothing, allowing patient to wear normal clothing of their own preference | |||
Straps dig into back and cause shirt to ride up | Embarrassment | Not specified | Redesign waist bag to prevent clothing from riding up | ||
Velcro difficult to open quickly | Not specified | Add a tab loop or quick-release feature | |||
Power supply | Being plugged into the wall | Freaked out | Not specified | Hide the standard electrical power cable behind the power base unit, with a smaller cord to the controller, optimize battery capacity so being plugged into the wall is for emergencies only, explore alternative renewable power options | |
Daily morning routine of disconnecting from a 15-foot power cord to connect to a 12-hour battery pack, using proper procedures | Awkward, Dependency, Vulnerability | Not specified | Simplify procedure for switching from battery to mains and vice-versa, make intuitive and seamless | ||
Defective | Not specified | Increase reliability | |||
Device may fail acutely due to electrical or power issues | Not specified | Implanted buffer battery with sufficient charge to allow patient to access nearest hospital | |||
If a family with financial issues was unable to pay their electric bill and the electricity was cut off, the patient would be unable to plug in the device and charge batteries, with dire consequence | Not specified | Determine financial and environmental factors as part of a social support plan as this can impact treatment | |||
Maintaining adequate constant power supply via batteries or being in close proximity to a mains electricity, otherwise pump may stop with serious consequences | Boundedness, Being stuck, Dependence | Not specified | Increase battery capacity and durability, explore alternative renewable power options, implanted back-up buffer battery and controller buffer battery to give patient extra time if a power mistake is made | ||
Major changes to bedtime routine to accommodate safety procedures—including switching from battery to tethered mains power via the PBU, ensure adequate charge of battery backup, and that an emergency power pack is charged and available in case of power failure | Not specified | Simplify bedtime routine and procedure for switching from battery to mains and vice-versa, make intuitive and seamless, make power supply backup habits stick by training with user-friendly checklist on digital app | |||
Managing power supply by either changing from mains power to batteries or vice versa according to preference, prior to sexual intimacy (generally, men preferred the flexibility of batteries, women felt more comfortable on mains power) | Anxiety, Awkward, Encumbered, Deeper intimacy, Adjustment | Not specified | Simplify procedure for switching from battery to mains and vice-versa, make intuitive and seamless | ||
Need for an extracorporeal energy supply | Not specified | Design a backup battery procedure that’s easy to make habitual, explore alternative renewable power options | |||
Power configurations have the ability to tolerate just one single fault in power handling—not more | Heartware HVAD, HeartMate II and HeartMate III | Design for two faults in power handling—discharge batteries consecutively not in parallel, ensure controller has a buffer battery and power base unit for AC operation has a backup battery, consider implanted buffer battery | |||
Power outage | Fear | Not specified | Design a backup battery procedure that’s easy to make habitual, explore alternative renewable power options | ||
To prepare for prolonged power disruption, patients must always keep the backup controller, charged spare batteries, battery clips with cables, and emergency ID card with them constantly | Not specified | Ensure protocol is implemented so that working component back-ups and replacements are available and ready at all times, implanted buffer battery with sufficient charge to allow patient to access nearest hospital | |||
Shower bag | Elastic and Velcro arrangement for securing the controller and batteries difficult to work out | Not specified | Make intuitive e.g. with colored grab-tags | ||
Feels like showering with a briefcase that can’t be put down | Not specified | Simplify bathing procedure through user-centered design of procedure and accessories that may allow a patient to shower independently, adopt postauricular percutaneous power delivery technology that enables showering | |||
Hard to dry oneself, must hold equipment while holding towel with one hand | Not specified | Simplify bathing procedure through user-centered design of procedure and accessories that may allow a patient to shower independently, adopt postauricular percutaneous power delivery technology that enables showering | |||
Hard to tell if water is entering bag or device through hole for driveline | Not specified | Provide clear window to bag interior | |||
Manufacturer-provided waterproof shower bag cumbersome, too large and not practical | Not specified | Reduce size and bulk of bag | |||
Required a lot of force to push batteries into elastic bands | Not specified | Reduce elastic tightness | |||
Unclear which order to place components | Not specified | Printed diagram on bag interior with placement order 1,2,3 etc | |||
Velcro hard to pull undone | Not specified | Reduce Velcro force | |||
Visual interface | A separate ‘disconnected’ symbol and a respective ‘reconnected’ light that would indicate a successful reconnection immediately after a previous driveline disconnect desired | Not specified | Design and test with users to ensure usability is improved | ||
Alphanumeric displays are preferred and provide more/better information than indicator lights alone | Not specified | Improve graphical user interface (GUI) by involving user interface/user experience (UI/UX) designer and considering product semiotics and semantics | |||
Backlight insufficiently bright | Not specified | Allow the ability to increase and decrease screen brightness | |||
Difficulties reading messages or codes easily, for example regarding battery status | Not specified | Use bigger screen and larger font | |||
Display reading “not connected” when one of 2 cables is disconnected from controller, causing confusion, pump stoppage, and inability to resolve error without emergency services | HeartMate II | Use clear language, unambiguous information specific to individual parts e.g. “cable connector to battery 1” and prioritize user interface design to reduce risk of misinterpretation and carefully consider product semiotics and semantics | |||
For devices with text displays, font size too small and text not clearly visible, especially for older persons | Not specified | Use bigger screen and larger font | |||
Information structured as advice (e.g. “reconnect the blue cable with the blue connector”) may be more easily understood than status information (e.g. “error: driveline disconnect”), unless there are multiple possible reasons for an error to occur | Not specified | Design and test with users to ensure usability and understanding is effective with linguistic and semantic improvements | |||
Large display preferred, while still achieving small and lightweight peripherals | Not specified | Specify bigger screen/large display | |||
Misinterpreting LVAD parameters or messages, confusing display | Fear | Not specified | Prioritize user interface design to reduce risk of misinterpretation and carefully consider product semiotics and semantics. The article “Importance of Linguistic Details in Alarm Messages of Ventricular Assist Devices” by Schima et al.81 addresses this important issue.81 | ||
Monitor/display handling issues | Not specified | Improve usability by involving user interface/user experience (UI/UX) designer | |||
Need for different layers of information to be displayed at different times i.e. essential device and peripherals information for displaying ambient status or critical emergency instructions, more detailed information upon request for specific diagnostics (e.g. pump parameters) | Not specified | Allow for different layers of information to be displayed at different times i.e. essential device and peripherals information for displaying ambient status or critical emergency instructions, more detailed information upon request for specific diagnostics (e.g. pump parameters) | |||
Older patients had more problems with visual controller interface | Not specified | Use bigger screen, larger font and ability to increase screen brightness, plus optional audible cues | |||
Pictograms (HMII) and text displays (HVAD) are preferable to the display of alarm codes (Incor) | Incor | Improve usability by involving user interface/user experience (UI/UX) designer and considering product semiotics and semantics | |||
Poor design can cause unintended errors, difficulty in learning and using | Dissatisfaction | Not specified | Prioritize user interface design to reduce risk of misinterpretation and carefully consider product semiotics and semantics | ||
Screen too bright at night | Not specified | Allow ability to turn down or turn off screen at night | |||
User must be able to recognize the signs of pump malfunction by interpreting information on the controller screen (e.g. low flow, high power) | Not specified | Prioritize user interface design to reduce risk of misinterpretation and carefully consider product semiotics and semantics | |||
Whole system / Not Specified | Ability to execute skills required to maintain the functionality of the device and troubleshoot the system when technical problems occur | Doubt, Distress, Anxiety, Fear, Stress | Not specified | Design for intuitive, confident use of the system, training program or virtual assistant | |
Alteration of body image; change in self-image due to carrying external components; Physical appearance of the machine causing change in self-image | Distress, Adaptation, Insecurity, Concern, Fear of rejection | Not specified | Digital learning tool or training app to help with acceptance therapy, holistic wellbeing; Improved industrial design of VAD for discreet wear—less like a serious medical device and more like a friendly wearable fitness device, design the VAD like it is an integral part of the human body, as opposed to a machine adhered to the edges of it | ||
Aspects of device use may be inconsistent with the user’s expectations or intuition | Not specified | Design the user experience to harmonize with the user’s expectations or intuition | |||
Avoid exposure to electrostatic discharge e.g. from computer or TV monitors | Not specified | Computers, TVs and mobile devices are ingrained in daily life—design of VAD system must be compatible with common consumer products in everyday living | |||
Avoid prolonged exposure to cold or heat | Not specified | Design device to be compatible with extreme environments found in warmer or colder climates e.g. Australia or Canada | |||
Being away from clinicians and caregivers | Fear | Not specified | Better connectivity with both clinicians and caregivers | ||
Caregiving role and routine (including bathing, help with getting dressed and bedtime routine, sterile dressing changes, monitoring device function, managing equipment, day-to-day care, handle battery issues and docking system, ensuring adequate constant power supply, 24-hour supervision), and family support | Time, Discomfort, Overwhelmed, Adjustment, Adaptation, Care dependency | Not specified | Simplify bathing procedure through user-centered design of procedure and accessories that may allow a patient to shower independently, adopt postauricular percutaneous power delivery technology that enables showering, design an ambient solution for monitoring device function, respite care for caregivers | ||
Careless or clumsy use of system components | Not specified | Make the use of the system and procedures intuitive and seamless especially in times of urgency | |||
Certainty of death (whether by interrupted power supply, driveline infection, mechanical malfunction, or turning the device off, etc.) | Concern | Not specified | Better human factors and usability to reduce risk of death, digital training tool or app to help with acceptance therapy, preparedness planning and holistic wellbeing | ||
Complications | Worry | Not specified | Improve device usability and reliability | ||
Components are conspicuous to the general public during daily life | Not specified | Design for discretion of wearability | |||
Confidence in safe use of the system decreased significantly with age, from 80% at age 20–30 years to 33% at 70–80 years | Lack of confidence | Not specified | Design for the optimum safe usability for a person aged 70-80, not a 20-30 year old. Different wearable equipment models to suit different users | ||
Confusing labels, better, clearer component labelling desired | Not specified | Standardize nomenclature of labels, make clearer | |||
Constantly checking that the VAD system is always working | Stressful, Fear, Worry | Not specified | Design an ambient device status solution that’s as stress-free as using a watch or wall clock for checking the time | ||
Cumbersome, bulky equipment (both internal and external components) | Not specified | Make components smaller, lighter, slimmer or flexible | |||
Currently no VAD components made that take the curvature of the female body or optimal distribution of weight for females into account | Not specified | Design components with 3-dimensional curvature (not just curvature on a single plane) to take into account female ergonomics, create flexible components or components with a soft foam or gel backing that conform to individual body curvature, design components for optimal weight distribution | |||
Demands associated with use of the device exceed the user’s capabilities | Not specified | Design for users with an assumption that they are tired, overwhelmed, with physical and mental impairment, which will improve usability for all | |||
Device helps patients survive, but is also unpredictable and not truly their own | Foreign object, Dependence | Not specified | Improve usability, durability and reliability, digital training tool or app to help with acceptance therapy, preparedness planning and holistic wellbeing | ||
Difficulty readjusting the VAD components in public places: a chair is necessary for readjusting the cables, driveline, controller, and batteries after using restaurant or public toilet restrooms | Not specified | Design a carry system that can be worn multiple ways or adjusted easily over clothes, adopt postauricular percutaneous power delivery technology that avoids abdominal area and removes obstruction to clothing | |||
Driving: Some patients restricted in their agility to drive by device equipment, some patients instructed not to drive by clinician | Not specified | Design for components to be placed comfortably and appropriately when either travelling in a car or driving | |||
Emergency: Caregiver must prepare for emergency situations, responding to emergency situations, error-prone emergency procedures, emergency card too complex, needs clear labelling of instructions for VAD emergency procedures | Not specified, HeartMate II | Reduce complexity of emergency procedures, simplify training for emergency scenarios with digital learning or training app, user-friendly emergency scenario preparedness checklist and periodic scenario-based skills-test | |||
Emergency: Standardisation of emergency protocols between different VAD manufacturers desired | Not specified | Investigate feasibility of standardized best-practice emergency protocols | |||
Equipment difficult to hide | Not specified | Reduces size and profile of all components | |||
Exercising: Inconvenient when exercising, accessories not designed to match activity level and limit movement as well as cause stability issues, conventional backpack worn on front at the gym, so patient could do sit-ups | Not specified | Design an exercise-specific carrying solution, reduce size and weight of components, design a carrying solution specific for more rigorous activity levels | |||
External equipment must be placed to prevent damage during mobility | Not specified | Design a carrying system that reduces susceptibility to damage | |||
Forgetting extra batteries or other necessary accessories | Fear | Not specified | Simple reminder solution for bringing extra components e.g. carry bag with recesses, special pockets or “shadow board” design to be filled by needed components daily | ||
Gender differences between male and female bodies not taken into consideration | Not specified | Design for female users—the benefit will be seen by all patients | |||
General confusion in how to handle the system | Not specified | Involve user experience designer from the early end of VAD product development process | |||
Get in the way of activities such as golf, exercise and being intimate | Not specified | Investigate different configurations of components and wearables for various activities, adopt postauricular percutaneous power delivery technology | |||
Getting used to the physical properties of the VAD | Adjustment | Not specified | Design the VAD like it is an integral part of the human body, as opposed to a machine adhered to the edges of it | ||
Heavy, weight of the complete system too high | Not specified | Prioritize weight reduction of system | |||
Joining of the body to a mechanical object—a machine becomes a part of the body | Foreign object | Not specified | Design the VAD like it is an integral part of the human body, as opposed to a machine adhered to the edges of it | ||
Lack of a heart rhythm | Distressing | Not specified | Introduce pulsatility (like HeartMate 3) with a natural rhythm to continuous flow devices, lighting on controller that gently pulses or fades in and out (rather than flashing) to indicate function, like an Apple computer on-light that appears to ‘breathe’ | ||
Lack of robustness in normal patient lifestyle conditions, use environment may be harmful to the device | Not specified | Increase component and system robustness for actual, everyday use | |||
Learning complex device management and maintenance | Overwhelming, Concern, Scary, Anxiety, Fear, Stress | Not specified | Simplify training with digital learning tool or training app | ||
Learning to use supportive gear for wearing the device | Not specified | Make carry system intuitive | |||
Life-saving comes with trade-offs | Loss of autonomy, Powerlessness, Lack of freedom, Adjustment | Not specified | Design the VAD like it is an integral part of the human body, as opposed to a machine adhered to the edges of it | ||
Limitation: physical and structural, having a VAD prevents patient from doing certain things | Upset, Adaption, Annoyance, Awkward, Acceptance | Not specified | Design the VAD like it is an integral part of the human body, as opposed to a machine adhered to the edges of it, adopt postauricular percutaneous power delivery technology that enables swimming and showering, accessory designs that allow for certain currently-forbidden activities, e.g. waterproof suit and device cover for swimming, leakproof/waterproof immersion cover for taking baths or boating, external component padding to protect hard components or body from impact | ||
Living with a VAD | Difficulty coping, Exposed, Vulnerable | Not specified | Digital learning tool or training app to help with acceptance therapy, holistic wellbeing | ||
Male patients may show keen interest in the technical aspects of their device | Not specified | Make non-clinical technical aspects of the device available to those who wish to know or learn about it | |||
Malfunction | Worry, Difficulty coping, Exposed, Vulnerable, Unsafe | Not specified | Improve device usability and reliability | ||
Monitoring device during sex, watching the flow and rate of the VAD, afraid of too much exertion | Afraid | Not specified | Show the flow and speed of VAD with an ambient status solution that’s as stress-free as using a watch or wall clock for checking the time | ||
More difficult than caring for a transplant | Not specified | Design for intuitive use and seamless integration into normal daily activities, like a consumer product | |||
Morning-time routine, getting up with the equipment | Time-burden, Patience, Living, Being alive | Not specified | Simplify morning procedure through user-centered design | ||
Necessity of complying to a complex technical regimen—responding under pressure to warning signals by changing batteries or transition from battery to power base unit mode | Psychological distress | Not specified | Improve and simplify device procedures, design a power management procedure that’s easy to make habitual, training program or virtual assistant | ||
Need for a more formal solution to wearing a VAD in a corporate environment (for a businessman) | Not specified | Design an inner-bag to be carried with patient-preferred bag, or a system to carry components more discretely against body | |||
Need for a solution to allow women to dress up in eveningwear | Not specified | Adopt postauricular percutaneous power delivery technology so that abdomen area is not inconvenienced and so that driveline does not obstruct clothing, design a method for patients to modify their choice of clothing to accommodate abdominal driveline | |||
Need for a solution to allow women to wear form-fitting clothing | Not specified | Adopt postauricular percutaneous power delivery technology so that abdomen area is not inconvenienced and so that driveline does not obstruct clothing, design a method for patients to modify their choice of clothing to accommodate abdominal driveline | |||
Need to carry 2 controllers and 2 batteries (for backup) | Not specified | Expandable carry bag section for spare components, or 2-bag system; for day trips, a simple reminder solution for bringing extra components e.g. carry bag with recesses, special pockets or “shadow board” design to be filled by needed components daily | |||
Night-time routine, going to bed with the equipment | Time-burden, Adjustment, Struggle, Patience, Living, Being alive | Not specified | Simplify bedtime procedure through user-centered design of procedure and sleep accessories | ||
Nursing staff require training for handling VAD systems/components and identifying malfunctioning or complications | Not specified | Simplify training with digital learning or training app | |||
Out in public, the VAD attracts attention, people often stare and ask questions | Embarrassed | Not specified | Design for discretion of wearability | ||
Overcoming fear and anxiety to master self-care and safety behavior | Fear, Anxiety, Acceptance, Self-confidence | Not specified | Design a self-care procedure that’s easy to make habitual, improve and simplify self-care procedures to improve adherence, training program or virtual assistant | ||
Pain | Not specified | Research causes of pain in order to address specific issues | |||
Parts that rub on the body | Not specified | Design wearables so that interaction of parts with body does not cause rubbing | |||
Patients have holders for equipment custom-made to suit them | Not specified | Conduct design research to catalogue custom solutions and determine whether the ideas can be implemented in a manufacturer-supplied mass-produced holder | |||
Patients ignore advice to avoid activities such as boating | Not specified | Add a patient values assessment to tools that determine patient quality of life—as (especially for destination therapy patients) there may exist a risk vs. values trade-off where physical restrictions are deemed to make life not worth living | |||
Patients seeing own reflection in the mirror | Awe, Dismay, Mixed feelings, Overwhelmed, Doubtful, Amazed, Foreign object, Being alive | Not specified | Improved industrial design of VAD—less like a serious medical device and more like a friendly wearable fitness device | ||
Patients wish to discreetly carry the VAD accessories | Not specified | Design a discreet carry solution | |||
Physical activities forbidden that may result in damage to the device e.g. go-karting, paintballing, rugby, American football, rough play with children | Unfamiliar, Unhomelike, Nervous, Compromised, “New normal”, Loss | Not specified | Soft-shell or flexible components, or sufficient protective armor/padding for the device to be used in certain circumstances | ||
Physicality of the device and necessity of protecting it | Limited, Vulnerable, Dependence | Not specified | Soft-shell or flexible components, or sufficient protective armor/padding for the device to be used in certain circumstances | ||
Poor usability | Unsafe, Dissatisfaction | Not specified | Involve user experience designer from the early end of VAD product development process | ||
Problems with component contamination | Not specified | Make components easy to clean with no dust/dirt traps | |||
Regular hand-washing for those who handle the equipment | Not specified | Ensure best practice hygiene protocol is implemented, digital training tool/app to promote habit forming around hand washing and cleanliness | |||
Routine Outpatient Evaluation involves a technical check, review of device function, and comprehensive visual inspection to exclude damage | Not specified | Simplify or standardize inspection protocol, simplify training with digital learning or training app | |||
Securing and protecting the external components of the VAD (i.e. driveline and controller) for sexual intimacy (e.g. by using abdominal binders to prevent driveline pulling and trauma to the driveline) | Caution, Uncertainty, Careful, Adjustment, Concern, Vigilance, Awkward, Encumbered, Deeper intimacy, Adjustment | Not specified | Design a more ergonomic system and suitable driveline management solution with sufficient stabilizing for more vigorous physical activity, cord and cable management solution | ||
Seeing, hearing and feeling the device for the first time | Shock | Industrial design with a friendly and simple aesthetic similar to a consumer product | |||
Showering and hygiene: Cannot get wet—getting ready to shower can take 45 min, learning methods for bathing, change of bathing ritual—wearing a waterproof bag around neck, wrapping device with cling wrap, or taking sponge baths. Taking a shower with the external VAD components, with specific steps, precautions, and rituals to keep the dressing, batteries and controller dry | Procrastination, Lament, Confronting, Challenging, Frightening, Care-dependency | Not specified | Adopt postauricular percutaneous power delivery technology that enables uncomplicated showering, simplify bathing procedure through user-centered design of procedure and bathing accessories, simplify bathing procedure through user-centered design of procedure and bathing accessories | ||
Some manufacturers advise to keep cell phones a minimum of 0.5 m (20 in.) away from the controller | Heartware HVAD | Computers, TVs and mobile devices are ingrained in daily life—design of VAD system must be compatible with common consumer products in everyday living | |||
Starting intimate relationships with a new partner | Insecurity, Fear of rejection, Unattractive “turn off” | Not specified | Improved industrial design of VAD—less like a serious medical device and more like a friendly wearable fitness device | ||
Taking more time to load and unload the VAD equipment and the patient in and out of cars | Unexpected, Adjustment, Stressful, Time-burden, Struggle | Not specified | Packing and travel solution for VAD equipment | ||
Travel: A lot of hardware, so much ‘stuff’ to take when travelling, almost not worth it | Not specified | Smaller, lighter components with logical packing solution, design a more portable charger/power base unit solution and backup kit | |||
Travel: Healthcare practitioner should be made aware of any travel via train, ship or airplane, additional security procedures when travelling | Not specified | App-based travel notification tool with database of VAD-aware hospitals and practitioners worldwide for shared care, design a more portable charger/power base unit solution and backup kit, smaller, lighter components with logical packing solution, packing and travel solution for VAD equipment | |||
Use of fishing vests and waist bags instead of manufacturer-provided bag | Not specified | Design carrying solutions to suit lifestyle and comfort, more like a consumer product rather than a medical product | |||
Used in inappropriate but foreseeable ways, without adequate controls on such actions | Not specified | Design affordances and controls into the user experience to discourage using the system in ways other than the intended use | |||
Used in unexpected ways | Not specified | Design affordances and controls into the user experience to discourage using the system in ways other than the intended use | |||
Using a conventional backpack to carry components, weight of equipment in backpack caused backache | Not specified | Reduce weight of all components, design inner-bag insert that balances weight | |||
Vacuum equipment to remove dust | Not specified | Ensure cleaning protocol is explained in training, design for ease of cleaning and maintenance to avoid dust and dirt traps | |||
VAD partners afraid of making device-related mistakes | Fear | Not specified | Improve and simplify device procedures, training program or virtual assistant | ||
Vital component of a patient’s body and life, “part of you” | Acceptance, Adjustment | Not specified | Design the VAD like it is an integral part of the human body, as opposed to a machine adhered to the edges of it | ||
Women may seek emotional acceptance by giving their device a personal nickname | Not specified | Industrial design of device to be like a friendly companion, not a hard machine | |||
Women opt to carry equipment in their handbag or purse; uneven distribution of weight may cause discomfort or injury | Not specified | Design a more feminine carry solution rather than a “unisex” (i.e. casual masculine) aesthetic, design a shoulder bag that converts into a backpack |
Appendix B: Quantitative studies
Year | Title | Authors | Location | No. Participants | Research Method/s | Key findings on VAD wearables |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2009 | Advanced Heart Failure Treated with Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device | Slaughter et al.85 | 38 centers, USA | 200 patients—134 continuous-flow devices (108 male, 26 female) and 66 pulsatile-flow devices (61 male, 5 female) | Randomized clinical trial—patients followed for 2 years or until death, transplantation or device explantation | 10 of 13 pump replacements in a cohort of 133 patients was a result of breakage of the percutaneous lead, with one additional patient requiring device explantation for the same reason. Redesigning the modular components as well as the driveline may reduce this need for replacement |
2010 | Patient Satisfaction with the External Equipment of Implantable Left Ventricular Assist Devices | Meyer et al.68 | Hannover, Germany | 27 patients—HVAD (10 male), Heartmate II (14 male, 3 female) | 9-question questionnaire for patient satisfaction of external components of VAD, and SF-36 for health-related QoL assessment | HVAD patients were dissatisfied with the length of the driveline (62 cm), but this was upgraded in 2010. Heartmate patients were dissatisfied with the volume of the battery charger/power base unit which caused limitations. HVAD patients were able to view pump parameters including speed, flow, wattage and alarms on the controller display at any time, but Heartmate II patients could only access this data when the system display, and power base unit were connected. Heartmate II patients also had to mark batteries after every exchange, whereas the HVAD shows the charge level of a battery at all times, hindering the possibility of exchanging a full battery with an empty one |
2012 | A multi-modal intervention in management of left ventricular assist device outpatients: dietary counselling, controlled exercise and psychosocial support | Kugler et al.57 | Hannover, Germany | 70 patients—34 intervention group (85.4% male), 36 control group (87.5% male) | Non-randomized intervention study, tested at 6 weeks (baseline), and at 6, 12 and 18 months while being on VAD support | According to Raymond et al.77 there is an association between driveline exit site infections and obesity. When compared to those without driveline exit site infections, VAD recipients who developed infections had a significantly higher BMI. Complying to a complex technical regime including responding to alarm signals by transitioning from battery to powerbase unit or changing batteries may contribute to psychological distress.77 |
2014 | Usability of ventricular assist devices in daily experience: a multicenter study | Schima et al.82 | 4 centers (Bad Oeynhausen, Berlin, and Hannover, Germany; Vienna, Austria) | 279 patients, then 73 patients for follow-up study | 352 questionnaires (279 first inquiries + 73 s inquiries, recorded 6 months later), with Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) and WHO State of Health Index | Problems include unintentional dropping of the transportation bag, unintentional disconnection of cables to either the VAD or power supply sometimes resulting in pump stop (this was higher in the older cohort and female patients), disconnection during a change of clothes, wear discomfort of the bag (especially painful shoulder strap), heavy weight of the system, defective external components e.g. controller faults, handling of alarms, and having a confident fail-safe action in emergency situations. Elderly participants had more problems with the visual controller interface, including readability and backlighting. Heartmate II—GoGear has a 5 h mean battery discharge time (this, or more, was considered ideal) |
2015 | A comparison of the health status and psychological distress of partners of patients with a left ventricular assist device vs. an implantable cardioverter defibrillator: A preliminary study | Brouwers et al.13 | Utrecht and Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Vancouver, Canada | 33 LVAD partners (27% male) compared with 414 ICD partners (22% male) | Multi-center prospective observational study—standardized and validated set of questionnaires at baseline (when VAD patients were given training just prior to hospital discharge), and at 3- and 6-months follow-up | Caregivers of VAD patients are responsible for sterile dressing changes, monitoring device function, troubleshooting alarms and responding to emergencies. Caregivers fear making mistakes with the driveline or device (e.g. misinterpreting VAD parameters, pressing a wrong controller button, or breaking sterile technique while changing the exit site dressing) |
2017 | Left Ventricular Assist Device Malfunctions: It Is More Than Just the Pump | Kormos et al.54 | Pittsburgh, PA, USA | 213 patients—108 HM II axial flow device (16 female) and 105 HVAD centrifugal flow device (21 female) | Prospectively collected registry data for all LVAD device malfunctions (DMs) of all components, occurring in rotary LVADs implanted at a single center | Only 13% of device malfunctions were because of the pump itself, with controller failure (30%), battery failure (19%), patient cable failure (14%) or miscellaneous peripheral component failure (24%) much more common. Controllers are prone to faulty connections made by patients or caregivers, damage from dropping, and exposure to water or biological fluids. Device malfunctions and failure of the driveline were more common in the Heartmate II. General patient compliance did not appear to affect the rate or incidence of device component failure |
2018 | Driving After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation | Hanke et al.38 | Worldwide, multi-center study | 390 patients | 16-question survey, with multi-method design including online, face-to-face and phone-based | Device-related alarms did occur in six cases (2.1%) of VAD patients driving. The majority being low battery alarms (5 of 6). One patient disconnected a battery cable by mistake (0.35%) |
Appendix C: Qualitative studies
Year | Title | Authors | Location | No. participants | Research method/s | Key findings on VAD wearables |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2011 | From insiders’ perspectives: adjusting to caregiving for patients with left ventricular assist devices | Marcuccilli and Casida62 | Detroit, Michigan, USA | 5 caregivers (all female) | Semi-structured interviews, hermeneutic phenomenology (van Manen, 1990) | Caregiver tasks are initially overwhelming and stressful, with the task regime including changing sterile dressings, monitoring VAD function, troubleshooting alarms, and responding to emergency situations. Extra time and attention were needed to complete everyday tasks, for example bathing, dressing changes, night time routine, and loading and unloading the car (patient plus VAD equipment e.g. backup components/external power charging units) |
2011 | Lifestyle adjustments of adults with long-term implantable left ventricular assist devices: a phenomenologic inquiry | Casida et al.21 | Detroit, Michigan, USA | 9 patients (7 male, 2 female) | Semi-structured interviews, hermeneutic phenomenology (van Manen, 1990) | Patients felt a combination of awe and dismay when they looked at themselves in the mirror supported by a foreign object. Typically, a patient was connected to batteries during the day, and the power base unit at bedtime. Preparing for bed required major changes to routine due to management of the VAD external components, which also caused discomfort during sleep. Taking a shower was challenging and frightening and successful completion of this routine task required caregiver assistance for 3-6 months and took up to 1 h to complete. Finding clothing that both provided comfort and concealed the driveline and controller, yet fitted with a patient’s sense of style, was challenging, and resolved through trial and error. Female patients could not wear dresses. Patients eventually adjusted to a new normal, as they integrated VAD maintenance routines into their lifestyle and adjusted to living with the constant presence of equipment |
2011 | Sex and Intimacy Among Patients With Implantable Left-Ventricular Assist Devices | Marcuccilli et al.66 | Detroit, Michigan, USA | 9 patients (7 male, 2 female) | Semi-structured interviews, hermeneutic phenomenology (van Manen, 1990) | Patients demonstrated their own preferences for either hooking up to the batteries or the power base unit during sex. Some felt that the batteries got in the way, preferring the power cable, conversely others thought the opposite. The driveline was of particular concern. Abdominal binders were used to protect the external components such as the driveline and controller from becoming damaged or disconnected. Some single patients had insecurities about how a new partner would be turned off by the VAD, and a fear of rejection. However, these feelings were overcome by acceptance of the VAD by the patient’s partner |
2012 | Overcoming alterations in body image imposed by the left ventricular assist device: a case report | Marcuccilli and Casida63 | Detroit, Michigan, USA | 1 patient | Case report | A female VAD patient experienced difficulties finding practical and comfortable clothing to accommodate the VAD wearable external components. A waist-worn bag and belt with battery holsters was found to be most comfortable for this patient but was switched out occasionally with a vest due to skin irritation and rubbing from the driveline and abdominal binder. However, the company-provided vest design caused shoulder and neck pain. Challenges were experienced seasonally with winter coats, and difficulties were experienced readjusting the VAD wearables with clothing, especially after using the toilet outside the home. Women are unable to wear one-piece dresses. Apparel needs to be practical, comfortable, natural i.e. it must not accentuate the presence of the device and equipment |
2012 | Life in transition: a qualitative study of the illness experience and vocational adjustment of patients with left ventricular assist device | Overgaard et al.71 | Copenhagen, Denmark | 10 patients (6 male, 4 female) | Semi-structured interviews | In the 14-24 years age bracket, wearing the equipment in a conventional backpack left the driveline exposed and at increased risk of infection and driveline damage (fixed with tape), as well as backache. Patients could not easily hide their equipment, nor go swimming or do water sports. Some patients pushed the device to the very limits of battery power. In the 25-44 years age bracket, one patient’s husband put up hooks in the bathroom ceiling for wires, and a hook for the equipment bag. She wanted to toss the device away due to annoyance from the noises it made, but of course it was a part of her. A patient in middle to late adulthood didn’t like to take public transportation in rush hour due to being afraid of somebody disconnecting the driveline |
2014 | Family caregivers’ inside perspectives: caring for an adult with a left ventricular assist device as a destination therapy | Marcuccilli et al.64 | Indianapolis, Indiana, USA | 7 caregivers (1 male, 6 female) | Semi-structured interviews, hermeneutic phenomenology (van Manen, 1990) | Caregivers assist with daily dressing changes, device maintenance and respond to emergencies. For family caregivers, learning how to maintain the device is overwhelming and scary, but eventually becomes routine. Constant vigilance to ensure the VAD is always working and monitoring battery status creates pervasive stress for caregivers. However, the condition of worry and stress is perceived as an inevitable consequence of VAD patient care, and life in general |
2017 | ‘Being’ a ventricular assist device recipient: a liminal existence | Standing et al.86 | Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK | 20 patients, 11 partners | Semi-structured interviews, interpretive phenomenological approach (Heidegger, 1962 and van Manen, 1984) | VAD implantation is a major disruption to the body, and day-to-day care involves maintaining a constant power supply, and cleaning/dressing the driveline exit wound. The physicality of the VAD and the need to protect it serves as a reminder of a patient’s vulnerability. One patient had to adapt to watching contact sports rather than playing, as he could no longer participate. Another could no longer rough-play with their young child. The need to maintain a constant power supply via battery or mains may contribute to a sense of ‘boundedness’ |
2017 | LVAD-DT: Culture of Rescue and Liminal Experience in the Treatment of Heart Failure | Barg et al.8 | New Haven, CT; Philadelphia, PA (3 sites); Oak Lawn, IL; Cleveland, OH, USA | 39 patients (32 male, 7 female), 42 caregivers | Multi-site (six hospitals), semi-structured interviews, | Patients have high expectations of VADs when given the ultimatum of “LVAD or death”. However, expectations don’t meet reality with frequent driveline infections, multiple rehospitalizations, an uphill battle to recovery, heavy battery packs, long cords, fear of power outages, and coming to terms with a machine as a part of one’s body. A transplant is seen as preferable to rid oneself of the hardware and batteries. Travel is almost not worth the bother, with the amount of extra gear to take, fear of forgetting batteries or other components. The 15-foot power cord used at night initially creates terror about being plugged into the wall, but also perceived as a lifeline. The driveline, containing 4 cables, is seen is fragile, which creates a feeling of vulnerability. VAD is viewed as an ‘ironic’ technology, since it solves one problem, but creates a host of others. For patients who have no reserves in their heart, an accidental disconnection leads to immediate collapse and puts the patient in grave danger |
Appendix D: Mixed and other method studies
Year | Title | Authors | Location | No. participants | Research method/s | Key findings on VAD wearables |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2009 | Usability and safety of ventricular assist devices: Human factors and design aspects | Geidl et al.35 | Vienna, Austria | 16 patients (14 male, 2 female) | Mixed: Qualitative interviews, standardized self-assessment questionnaire, manual skill test, and pilot study | 38% of patients unintentionally disconnected parts of their system at least once with all of them blaming their own carelessness. Other usability problems included—cable damage requiring replacement (38%), rubbing of the parts on the body (38%), using another bag or carry system apart from the provided one (63%), overall noise emission too loud from pump, ventilators and alarms (56%), however, alarm too quiet to awaken from sleep (32%). Features desired included additional cable strain relief, a clear “snap-in” connector characteristic, and improved options and designs for carry solutions. The study found there was no correlation between the skill of the user and adverse events, despite users’ perception of their own fault. There is much potential for improvement in VAD usability since a considerable percentage of patients experienced potentially hazardous incidents that could be easily resolved by design |
2011 | Toward Total Implantability Using Free-Range Resonant Electrical Energy Delivery System: Achieving Untethered Ventricular Assist Device Operation Over Large Distances | Waters et al.94 | Seattle, Washington, USA | n/a | Other: Literature review and VAD power system engineering experiment report | Infections continue to occur despite improved technology development of smaller, more durable implanted pumps; full advantage of such design improvements has not been achieved because external VAD peripherals remain essentially unchanged, including the driveline for data retrieval and power supply. There’s a relationship between exit site infections occurring as often as 70% after one year, repeat infections, and subsequent internal infection and sepsis. Exit site infections are the main cause of first hospital readmissions, and patients who developed exit site infections had 10 times as many readmissions as well as reduced survival compared to those who didn’t |
2011 | Intuitive use and usability of ventricular assist device peripheral components in simulated emergency conditions | Geidl et al.34 | Vienna, Austria | 96 paramedics (92 male, 4 female) | Other: Human Factors Engineering test, dummy test scenario, post-test evaluation questionnaire, video recording and analysis | 71% of participants solved the staged emergency scenario, most by using the provided emergency card. Only 4% of participants could solve the test without the card. Participants recommended better, self-explanatory, unambiguous component labelling (e.g. displays, control elements, connectors) and a color-coded connection system. Intuitive operation and ease-of-use of the system for both basic handling and emergency procedures is crucial for all users, both trained and untrained |
2014 | TO VAD OR NOT TO VAD: That is the question. Improving the experience of receiving a Ventricular Assist Device (VAD) | Friedman and McMahon33 | Rochester, Minnesota, USA | 13 patients, 11 caregivers | Mixed: Observations (shadowing patients), stakeholder interviews, designer immersion | There remains much to improve on the user experience of the wearable component of VADs, including the need to consider body differences due to patient gender; the size, weight distribution, obtrusiveness and inconvenience of the VAD accessories especially during exercise or intimacy, the need for discretion and adaptability to personal style especially for work, the inability to get the batteries and controller wet during showering requiring a time-consuming routine, waterproof bag too big and cumbersome to be functional, limited sleeping positions due to external components and cord management, uncomfortable battery holster, dropping the all-in-one bag, Patient hacks included a modified carrying vest, carrying the VAD in a handbag purse, and wrapping the device in plastic cling wrap for showering, taking sponge baths |
2015 | A Simple Education Tool for Ventricular Assist Device Patients and Their Caregivers | Barber and Leslie7 | Perth, WA, Australia | 10 patients, 7 caregivers | Mixed: Literature review, development of booklet with key recommendations of driveline care, design development including peer and internal review, patient and caregiver evaluation, limited publication run | The importance of preventing trauma to the driveline site by immobilizing the line is an important finding in reducing infection in long-term VAD patients, the most common complication in this patient group. Early identification and reporting of driveline exit site infection have been shown to reduce morbidity and mortality |
Appendix E: Review and overview studies
Year | Title | Authors | Location | Research method/s | Key findings on VAD wearables |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2010 | Improved Quantity and Quality of Life: A Winning Combination to Treat Advanced Heart Failure* | Starling87 | Cleveland, Ohio, USA | Overview (Editorial comment) | Due to the percutaneous driveline and external power supplies of current devices, swimming and taking baths is prohibited and physical activities are restricted. Infection and malfunctions can be devastating. Design refinements will improve patient acceptance and quality of life |
2011 | The Future of Adult Cardiac Assist Devices: Novel Systems and Mechanical Circulatory Support Strategies | Bartoli and Dowling9 | Louisville, KY, USA | Review: Technology review of novel left VAD, right VAD, biventricular VAD and TAH (total artificial heart) systems available, under trial or under development by various manufacturers | In the case of driveline failure, the cable of the HeartMate III can be replaced without having to replace the entire implanted pump itself due to a new modular design. This feature could also allow VAD upgrade to a TET power source if a totally implantable device is released |
2012 | Quality of Life and Left Ventricular Assist Device Support | MacIver and Ross60 | Toronto, Ontario, Canada | Review: How QoL, physical function, and emotional health for VAD patients is measured, followed by an in-depth review of QoL results in VAD patients | Lower rates of device failure, driveline infection, and fewer complications requiring hospital readmission improves QoL levels. Managing day-to-day care and handling alarm states takes time to develop proficiency. Older patients also learn to adapt over time despite manual dexterity challenges. The position of the driveline was of concern to patients during sexual intimacy |
2013 | Physical Therapist Management of Patients with Ventricular Assist Devices: Key Considerations for the Acute Care Physical Therapist | Wells95 | Baltimore, MD, USA | Overview (Book chapter) | Driveline infection rates are high; infections may lead to removal from the transplant waiting list, device explantation, plus carry a high risk of mortality. Education is key to ensure protocol is maintained for securing and protecting the driveline and dressing changes. A physical therapist secures the driveline and shows a patient how to modify physical movement and where to place external equipment to prevent damage during mobility |
2014 | Learning self-care after left ventricular assist device implantation | Kato et al.49 | Sweden, Tokyo, Japan, Israel | Review: Current summary of self-care in VAD patients and caregivers, including VAD maintenance, lifestyle, monitoring, coping, adjustment and education | The need for a power supply external to the body is one of the main drawbacks of VADs. System maintenance, secure constant power supply, driveline care and preventing infection, driveline immobilization and daily inspection, maintaining hygiene and personal care, exit site wound management, restriction from certain activities, dealing with equipment during sexual intimacy, getting sufficient rest and sleep, handling alarms, responding to emergency situations, modification of self-concept and self-image, and dealing with stressors such as anxiety and fear of the complexity of device maintenance, are all themes surrounding the self-care practices of VAD patients and their caregivers |
2014 | Preparedness planning before mechanical circulatory support: a “how-to” guide for palliative medicine clinicians | Swetz et al.88 | Rochester, MN, USA | Review: Exploring the role of a palliative medicine approach to help VAD patients plan to live as well as they can, for as long as they can, while still accomplishing their overall goals of care during both use and approaching end-of-life | To considerately prepare a patient for possible death while being treated on VAD, a palliative medicine approach would ask whether: (1) In the event of power issues or device failure, the patient would want heroic measures to save their life, or just to be kept comfortable and let things go; and (2) In the event of severe infection and where antibiotic treatment impacts quality of life, they wish for such treatment to be limited |
2015 | Psychosocial issues in ventricular assist device implantation and management | Petty and Bauman75 | Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA | Review: Elements of the psychosocial assessment for prospective VAD patients, including the accepted model for evaluation, discharge planning strategies, post-discharge support to patients and their caregivers, and strategies for when the post-discharge period doesn’t go as planned | Caring for a VAD is more difficult than caring for a transplant due to not being completely implantable, the need for constant electrical power supply, and frequent dressing changes. Financial strain can lead to death, if a family can’t afford to pay their electricity bill and their power is cut off |
2016 | Beyond the VAD: Human Factors Engineering for Mechanically Assisted Circulation in the 21st Century | Throckmorton et al.90 | Philadelphia, PA and McLean, VA, USA | Review: Relevant literature on Ovid MEDLINE and PubMed regarding human factors and VADs; findings include usability studies, clinical decision support tools, patient-centered therapy including QoL and satisfaction studies, human-device interaction and knowledge gaps | There is a need for more attention to user-centered design approaches that include both qualitative and quantitative assessments of human-device interactions to mitigate risk and failure. There are many cases where a combination of machine failure and human error has resulted in death. Issues include self-reported careless usage of auxiliary components, general confusion in how to handle the system, and a need to design clear emergency cards for use in emergency scenarios, as well as quality of life impact from wearable components |
2016 | What the psychiatrist needs to know about ventricular assist devices: a comprehensive review | Caro et al.19 | Cleveland, Ohio, USA | Review: Literature review to identify key issues relevant to the practice of consultation-liaison psychiatrists | VAD recipients and their caregivers must adapt to many changes in their lifestyle, body image, and sexual life. Small studies have described changes in self-image after VAD implantation due to the driveline exiting through the skin and having to carry the external components of the VAD. Patients are able to adapt to changes in self- and body- image by accepting the fact that the VAD allows them to continue to be alive. Large studies assessing psychologic adaptations to these changes are lacking, and current literature limits the ability of these results to be generalized |
2016 | Adaptation and coping in patients living with an LVAD: A metasynthesis | Abshire et al.4 | Baltimore, MD, USA and Sydney, Australia | Review: Qualitative meta-synthesis of 7 studies using Lazarus and Folkmans’ Transactional Model of stress and coping, to enhance understanding of living with a VAD, for the purpose of designing and delivering services to support VAD patients | Stressful aspects of living with a VAD include alteration of patient body image, managing the device, limitation of activities such as bathing and swimming, driving restrictions, issues for intimacy, and difficulty in adjustment. Some patients can’t accept limitations e.g. ignoring advice and going boating. Patients cope by developing routines and systems to manage the device e.g. for showering and carrying the device comfortably and safely. Coping is difficult when, despite best efforts, driveline infection or VAD malfunction occurs anyway. Concern for battery life impacts patients’ sense of return to normalcy and life satisfaction |
2017 | The Patient’s Informal Caregiver | Saunders79 | Detroit, Michigan, USA | Overview (Book chapter) | Caregivers assist with getting dressed, bathing, bedtime routine, perform sterile dressing changes, handle battery issues and the docking system, monitor VAD function and alarms, prepare back up batteries charged and dressing materials, prepare for emergencies. They adapt over time but feel overwhelmed. Caregiver spouses watch the flow and rate of the VAD during sex |
2017 | Outpatient Management: The Role of the VAD Coordinator and Remote Monitoring | Christensen et al.23 | USA, Canada, Austria, Germany, Norway | Overview (Book chapter) | Ongoing care of VAD outpatients includes maintaining the driveline exit site and dressing. Routine Outpatient Evaluation includes technical check and comprehensive visual inspection of external components to rule out physical damage, visual and tactile (and X-ray if needed) driveline check, review of device function and preventative maintenance |
2018 | Wearable systems | Schlöglhofer and Schima83 | Vienna, Austria | Overview (Book chapter) | Technical complications such as driveline damage and safety flaws in power supply systems or connector designs still occur. Eliminating the driveline for external power supply could eliminate adverse events related to this component including infection and reduce the number of daily-life restrictions on patients. Until such TETS technology is available, battery technology improvement will enable smaller, lighter, and more durable batteries with larger capacities. A user-centered design approach, where human factors engineering and human behavior are considered, could potentially help improve Quality of Life for VAD patients, decrease limitations on certain activities, minimize caregiver burden and reduce emotional distress |
2018 | Left Ventricular Assist Devices–A State of the Art Review | Feldmann et al.29 | Hannover, Germany | Review: Current implantable left ventricular assist devices, different design concepts and implantation techniques | VAD driveline may exit on either upper right or left quadrant of abdomen. Advancements in batteries and microprocessors have made VAD systems smaller and lighter. One VAD manufacturer provides an additional remote monitoring system. Male patients often show great interest in the technical aspects of their device, and women more typically seek other paths to emotional acceptance, for example, giving their device a personal nickname |
2018 | Mental health interventions during ventricular assist device therapy: a scoping review | Tigges-Limmer et al.91 | Bad Oeynhausen and Göttingen, Germany | Review: Scoping review (Levac et al. 2010) regarding what is known about mental health intervention carried out in VAD teams as patients progress through VAD treatment stages. Recommendations for conducting interventions are synthesized from reports of single-center experiences | Daily, patients need to integrate the device so that it feels like a natural part of their body and body image. Worry over alarms and malfunction may be correlated with sleep disruption, lower quality of life, and mental health issues |
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dunn, J.L., Nusem, E., Straker, K. et al. Human Factors and User Experience Issues with Ventricular Assist Device Wearable Components: A Systematic Review. Ann Biomed Eng 47, 2431–2488 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-019-02303-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-019-02303-3