Accuracy and Reproducibility of Patient-Specific Hemodynamic Models of Stented Intracranial Aneurysms: Report on the Virtual Intracranial Stenting Challenge 2011
- 519 Downloads
Validation studies are prerequisites for computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations to be accepted as part of clinical decision-making. This paper reports on the 2011 edition of the Virtual Intracranial Stenting Challenge. The challenge aimed to assess the reproducibility with which research groups can simulate the velocity field in an intracranial aneurysm, both untreated and treated with five different configurations of high-porosity stents. Particle imaging velocimetry (PIV) measurements were obtained to validate the untreated velocity field. Six participants, totaling three CFD solvers, were provided with surface meshes of the vascular geometry and the deployed stent geometries, and flow rate boundary conditions for all inlets and outlets. As output, they were invited to submit an abstract to the 8th International Interdisciplinary Cerebrovascular Symposium 2011 (ICS’11), outlining their methods and giving their interpretation of the performance of each stent configuration. After the challenge, all CFD solutions were collected and analyzed. To quantitatively analyze the data, we calculated the root-mean-square error (RMSE) over uniformly distributed nodes on a plane slicing the main flow jet along its axis and normalized it with the maximum velocity on the slice of the untreated case (NRMSE). Good agreement was found between CFD and PIV with a NRMSE of 7.28%. Excellent agreement was found between CFD solutions, both untreated and treated. The maximum difference between any two groups (along a line perpendicular to the main flow jet) was 4.0 mm/s, i.e. 4.1% of the maximum velocity of the untreated case, and the average NRMSE was 0.47% (range 0.28–1.03%). In conclusion, given geometry and flow rates, research groups can accurately simulate the velocity field inside an intracranial aneurysm—as assessed by comparison with in vitro measurements—and find excellent agreement on the hemodynamic effect of different stent configurations.
KeywordsIntracranial aneurysm Stents Computational fluid dynamics Particle imaging velocimetry Challenge
S. Cito, J. Pallares and A. Vernet received funding from projects DPI2010-17212 and CTQ2013-46799-C2-1-P of the Spanish Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad, S. Cito, A.J. Geers and A.F. Frangi received funding through the Spanish project cvREMOD (CEN-20091044, funded by the CENIT programme of the Industrial and Technological Development Center) and A. Qiao received funding through the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81171107).
Conflict of interest
None of the authors in this work has conflict of interests with other people and organizations.
- 10.Cito, S., A. J. Geers, M. P. Arroyo, J. Pallares, A. Vernet, V. R. Palero, J. Lobera, J. Blasco, L. San-Roman, and A. F. Frangi. Virtual Intracranial Stenting Challenge 2011. 8th International Interdisciplinary Cerebrovascular Symposium, Shanghai, China, 2011.Google Scholar
- 13.Geers, A. J., I. Larrabide, A. G. Radaelli, H. Bogunović, M. Kim, H. A. F. Gratama van Andel, C. B. Majoie, E. VanBavel, and A. F. Frangi. Patient-specific computational hemodynamics of intracranial aneurysms from 3D rotational angiography and CT angiography: an in vivo reproducibility study. Am. J. Neuroradiol. 32(3):581–586, 2011.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 27.McGah, P. M., M. R. Levitt, M. C. Barbour, R. P. Morton, J. D. Nerva, P. D. Mourad, B. V. Ghodke, D. K.Hallam, L. N. Sekhar, L. J. Kim, and A. Aliseda. Accuracy of computational cerebral aneurysm hemodynamics using patient-specific endovascular measurements. Am. J. Neuroradiol. 42(3):503–514, 2014.Google Scholar
- 30.Nealen, A., T. Igarashi, O. Sorkine, and M. Alexa. Laplacian mesh optimization. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques in Australasia and Southeast Asia (GRAPHITE), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 2006, pp. 381–389.Google Scholar
- 32.Radaelli, A. G., L. Augsburger, J. R. Cebral, M. Ohta, D. A. Rüfenacht, R. Balossino, G. Benndorf, D. R. Hose, A. Marzo, R. W. Metcalfe, P. Mortier, F. Mut, P. Reymond, L. Socci, B. Verhegghe, and A. F. Frangi. Reproducibility of haemodynamical simulations in a subject-specific stented aneurysm model: a report on the Virtual Intracranial Stenting Challenge 2007. J. Biomech. 41(10):2069–2081, 2008.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 33.Raffel, M., C. E. Willert, S. T. Wereley, and J. Kompenhans. Particle image velocimetry: a practical guide, 2nd ed. Berlin: Springer, 2007.Google Scholar
- 35.Schneiders, J. J., H. A. Marquering, L. Antiga, R. Van den Berg, E. VanBavel, and C. B. Majoie. Intracranial aneurysm neck size overestimation with 3D rotational angiography: the impact on intra-aneurysmal hemodynamics simulated with computational fluid dynamics. Am. J. Neuroradiol. 34(1):121–128, 2013.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 38.Steinman, D. A., Y. Hoi, P. Fahy, L. Morris, M. T. Walsh, N. Aristokleous, A. S. Anayiotos, Y. Papaharilaou, A. Arzani, S. C. Shadden, P. Berg, G. Janiga, J. Bols, P. Segers, N. W. Bressloff, M. Cibis, F. H. Gijsen, S. Cito, J. Pallareacutes, L. D. Browne, J. A. Costelloe, A. G. Lynch, J. Degroote, J. Vierendeels, W. Fu, A. Qiao, S. Hodis, D. F. Kallmes, H. Kalsi, Q. Long, V. O. Kheyfets, E. A. Finol, K. Kono, A. M. Malek, A. Lauric, P. G. Menon, K. Pekkan, M. Esmaily Moghadam, A. L. Marsden, M. Oshima, K. Katagiri, V. Peiffer, Y. Mohamied, S. J. Sherwin, J. Schaller, L. Goubergrits, G. Usera, M. Mendina, K. Valen-Sendstad, D. F. Habets, J. Xiang, H. Meng, Y. Yu, G. E. Karniadakis, N. Shaffer, and F. Loth. Variability of computational fluid dynamics solutions for pressure and flow in a giant aneurysm: the ASME 2012 Summer Bioengineering Conference CFD challenge. J. Biomech. Eng. 135(2):021016, 2013.Google Scholar
- 41.Ugron, Á., M. Farinas, L. Kiss, and G. Paál. Unsteady velocity measurements in a realistic intracranial aneurysm model. Exp. Fluids 52(1):37–52, 2011.Google Scholar
- 43.van Ooij, P., A. Guédon, C. Poelma, J. Schneiders, M. C. M. Rutten, H. A. Marquering, C. B. Majoie, E. VanBavel, and A. J. Nederveen. Complex flow patterns in a real-size intracranial aneurysm phantom: phase contrast MRI compared with particle image velocimetry and computational fluid dynamics. NMR Biomed. 25(1):14–26, 2012.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 45.Zenteno, M. A., J. A. Santos-Franco, J. M. Freitas-Modenesi, C. Gómez, L. Murillo-Bonilla, Y. Aburto-Murrieta, R. Díaz-Romero, E. Nathal, S. Gómez-Llata, and A. Lee. Use of the sole stenting technique for the management of aneurysms in the posterior circulation in a prospective series of 20 patients. J. Neurosurg. 108(6):1104–18, 2008.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar