Skip to main content
Log in

Finite Element Modeling of Coupled Diffusion with Partitioning in Transdermal Drug Delivery

  • Published:
Annals of Biomedical Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The finite element method is employed to simulate two-dimensional (axisymmetric) drug diffusion from a finite drug reservoir into the skin. The numerical formulation is based on a general mathematical model for multicomponent nonlinear diffusion that takes into account the coupling effects between the different components. The presence of several diffusing components is crucial, as many transdermal drug delivery formulations contain one or more permeation enhancers in addition to the drug. The coupling between the drug and permeation enhancer(s) results in nonlinear diffusion with concentration-dependent diffusivities of the various components. The framework is suitable for modeling both linear and nonlinear, single- and multicomponent diffusions, however, as it reduces to the correct formulation simply by setting the relevant parameters to zero. In addition, we show that partitioning of the penetrants from the reservoir into the skin can be treated in a straightforward manner in this framework using the mixed method. Partitioning at interface boundaries poses some difficulty with the standard finite element method as it creates a discontinuity in the concentration variable at the interface. To our knowledge, nonlinear (concentration-dependent) partitioning in diffusion problems has not been treated numerically before, and we demonstrate that nonlinear partitioning may have an important role in the effect of permeation enhancers. The mixed method that we adopt includes the flux at the interface explicitly in the formulation, allowing the modeling of concentration-dependent partitioning of the permeants between the reservoir and the skin as well as constant (linear) partitioning. The result is a versatile finite element framework suitable for modeling both linear and nonlinear diffusions in heterogeneous media where the diffusivities and partition coefficients may vary in each subregion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alonso, A., N. C. Meirelles, and M. Tabak. Effect of hydration upon the fluidity of intercellular membranes of stratum corneum: An EPR study. Biochim. Biophy. Acta 1237:6–15, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Barry, B. W. Penetration enhancers. Pharmacol. Skin 1:121–137, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chandrasekaran, S. K., A. S. Michaels, P. S. Campbell, and J. E. Shaw. Scopolamine permeation through human skin in vitro. AIChE J. 22:828–832, 1976.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Collier, S. W., and R. L. Bronaugh. Receptor fluids. In: In Vitro Percutaneous Absorption: Principles, Fundamentals and Applications, edited by R. L. Bronaugh, and H. I. Maibach. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 1991, pp. 31–49.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Crank, J. The Mathematics of Diffusion, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1975, pp. 38–39.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Forslind, B. The skin: Upholder of physiological homeostasis. A physiological and (bio)physical study program. Thrombosis Res. 80:1–22, 1995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gummer, C. L., and H. I. Maibach. Diffusion cell design. In: In Vitro Percutaneous Absorption: Principles, Fundamentals and Applications, edited by R. L. Bronaugh, and H. I. Maibach. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 1991, pp. 8–16.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Guy, R. H., and J. Hadgraft. Physicochemical interpretation of the pharmacokinetics of percutaneous-absorption. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 11:189–203, 1983.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Guy, R. H., and J. Hadgraft. Transdermal drug delivery: A simplified pharmacokinetic approach. Int. J. Pharm. 24:267–274, 1985.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hadgraft, J. Passive enhancement strategies in topical and transdermal drug delivery. Int. J. Pharm. 184:1–6, 1999.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hughes, T. J. R. The Finite Element Method: Linear Static and Dynamic Finite Element Analysis. New York: Dover, 2000, pp. 195–196.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Huth, S., R. Neubert, L. Boltze, and A. Büge. Experimental determination and mathematical modelling of propylene glycol transport from semisolid vehicles. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 44:1263–1266, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kalia, Y. N., and R. H. Guy. Modeling transdermal drug release. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 48:159–172, 2001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kubota, K., and E. H. Twizell. A nonlinear numerical model of percutaneous drug absorption. Math. Biosci. 108:157–178, 1992.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lee, A. J., J. R. King, and T. G. Rogers. A multiple-pathway model for the diffusion of drugs in skin. IMA J. Math. Appl. Med. Biol. 13:127–150, 1996.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lee, A. J., J. R. King, and S. Hibbard. Mathematical modeling of the release of drugs from porous, nonswelling drug-delivery devices. IMA J. Math. Appl. Med. Biol. 15:135–163, 1998.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Manitz, R., W. Lucht, K. Strehmel, R. Weiner, and R. Neubert. On mathematical modeling of dermal and transdermal drug delivery. J. Pharm. Sci. 87:873–879, 1998.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Missel, P. J. Finite element modeling of diffusion and partitioning in biological systems: The infinite composite medium problem. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 28:1307–1317, 2000.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Moser, K., K. Kriwet, A. Naik, Y. N. Kalia, and R. H. Guy. Passive skin permeation enhancement and its quantification in vitro. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 52:103–112, 2001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Padmanabhan, R., B. Gale, B. Phipps, W. van Osdol, and W. Young. D-TRANS technology. In: Modified-release Drug Delivery Technology, edited by M. Rathbone, J. Hadgraft, and M. Roberts. New York: Marcel Dekker, 2003, pp. 481– 498.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Phipps, B., M. Cormier, B. Gale, W. van Osdol, J. Audett, R. Padmanabhan, and P. Daddona. Transdermal drug delivery. In: Encyclopedia of Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering, edited by G. Wnek. New York: Marcel Dekker, 2004, pp. 1677–1689.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Potts, R. O., and M. L. Francoeur. The influence of stratum corneum morphology on water permeability. J. Invest. Dermatol. 96:495–499, 1991.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Roy, S. D., and G. L. Flynn. Transdermal delivery of narcotic analgesics: pH, anatomical, and subject influences on cutaneous permeability of fentanyl and sufentanil. Pharm. Res. 7:842–847, 1990.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Schueckler, F., and G. Lee. Relating the concentration-dependent action of azone and dodecyl-L-pyroglutamate on the structure of excised human stratum corneum to changes in drug diffusivity, partition coefficient and flux. Int. J. Pharm. 80:81–89, 1992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Skelly, J. P., V. P. Shah, H. I. Maibach, R. H. Guy, R. H. Wester, G. L. Glynn, and A. Yacobi. FDA and AAPS report of workshop on principles and practices of in vitro percutaneous penetration studies: Relevance to bioavailability and bioequivalence. Pharm. Res. 4:265–267, 1987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Zienkiewicz, O. C., and R. L. Taylor. The Finite Element Method, 4th ed., Vol. 1, Singapore: McGraw-Hill, 1989, pp. 373–376.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jee E. Rim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rim, J.E., Pinsky, P.M. & van Osdol, W.W. Finite Element Modeling of Coupled Diffusion with Partitioning in Transdermal Drug Delivery. Ann Biomed Eng 33, 1422–1438 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-005-5788-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-005-5788-6

Keywords

Navigation