Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Using the Folstein Mini Mental State Exam (MMSE) to explore methodological issues in cognitive aging research

  • Commentary
  • Published:
European Journal of Ageing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cognitive scales are used frequently in geriatric research and practice. These instruments are constructed with underlying assumptions that are a part of their validation process. A common measurement scale used in older adults is the Folstein Mini Mental State Exam (MMSE). The MMSE was designed to screen for cognitive impairment and is used often in geriatric research. This paper has three aims. Aim one was to explore four potential threats to validity in the use of the MMSE: (1) administering the exam without meeting the underlying assumptions, (2) not reporting that the underlying assumptions were assessed prior to test administration, (3) use of variable and inconsistent cut-off scores for the determination of presence of cognitive impairment, and (4) failure to adjust the scores based on the demographic characteristics of the tested subject. Aim two was to conduct a literature search to determine if the assumptions of (1) education level assessment, (2) sensory assessment, and (3) language fluency were being met and clearly reported in published research using the MMSE. Aim three was to provide recommendations to minimalize threats to validity in research studies that use cognitive scales, such as the MMSE. We found inconsistencies in published work in reporting whether or not subjects meet the assumptions that underlie a reliable and valid MMSE score. These inconsistencies can pose threats to the reliability of exam results. Fourteen of the 50 studies reviewed reported inclusion of all three of these assumptions. Inconsistencies in reporting the inclusion of the underlying assumptions for a reliable score could mean that subjects were not appropriate to be tested by use of the MMSE or that an appropriate test administration of the MMSE was not clearly reported. Thus, the research literature could have threats to both validity and reliability based on misuse of or improper reported use of the MMSE. Six recommendations are provided to minimalize these threats in future research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alzheimer’s Association (2008) What is Alzheimer’s. http://www.alz.org/alzheimers_disease_what_is_alzheimers.asp?type=homepageflash. Accessed 27 Nov 2008

  • Bauco C, Borriello C, Cinti AM, Martella S, Zannino G, Rossetti C, Cacciafesta M, Marigliano V (1998) Correlation between MMSE performance, age and education in centenarians. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 26(Suppl 6):23–26. doi:10.1016/s0167-4943(98)80004-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barbarotto R, Cerri M, Acerbi C, Molinari S, Capitani E (2000) Is SIB or BNP better than MMSE in discriminating the cognitive performance of severely impaired elderly patients? Arch Clin Neuropsychol 15(1):21–29. doi:10.1093/arclin/15.1.21

    Google Scholar 

  • Brugnolo A, Nobili F, Barbieri MP, Dessi B, Ferro A, Girtler N, Palummeri E, Partinico D, Raiteri U, Regesta G, Servetto G, Tanganelli P, Uva V, Mazzei D, Donadio S, De Carli F, Colazzo G, Serrati C, Rodriguez G (2009) The factorial structure of the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) in Alzheimer’s disease. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 49(1):180–185. doi:10.1016/j.archger.2008.07.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carcaillon L, Amieva H, Auriacombe S, Helmer C, Dartigues J (2009) A subtest of the MMSE as a valid test of episodic memory? Comparison with the free and cued reminding test. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 27(5):429–438. doi:10.1159/000214632

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cazzaniga R, Francescani A, Saetti C, Spinnler H (2003) How to calculate an MMSE score from a MODA score (and vice versa) in patients with Alzheimer’s disease. Neurol Sci 24(4):261–267. doi:10.1007/s10072-003-0151-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chopra A, Cavalieri TA, Libon DJ (2007) Dementia screening tolls for the primary care physician. Clin Geriatr 15(1):38–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Chopra M, Sullivan J, Feldman Z, Landes R, Beck C (2008) Self-, collateral-and clinical assessment of depression in persons with cognitive impairment. Aging Ment Health 12(6):675–683

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chow TW, Hynan LS, Lipton AM (2006a) MMSE scores decline at a greater rate in frontotemporal degeneration than in AD. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 22(3):194–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chow TW, Hynan LS, Lipton AM (2006b) MMSE scores decline at a greater rate in frontotemporal degeneration than in AD. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 22:194–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crum RM, Anthony JC, Bassett SS, Folstein MF (1993) Population-based norms for the mini-mental state examination by age and educational level. JAMA 269(18):2386–2391. doi:10.1001/jama.1993.03500180078038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cullen B, Fahy S, Cunningham CJ, Coen RF, Bruce I, Greene E, Coakley D, Walsh JB, Lawlor BA (2005) Screening for dementia in an Irish community sample using MMSE: a comparison of norm-adjusted versus fixed cut-points. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 20(4):371–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Alessandro R, Pandolfo G, Azzimondi G, Feruglio FS (1996) Prevalence of dementia among elderly people in Troina, Sicily. Eur J Epidemiol 12(6):595–599

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans BC, Crogan NL, Greenberg E (2008) Lessons learned in clinical research: using the mmse with older mexican american nursing home residents. J Am Psychiatr Nurs Assoc 14:373–378. doi:10.1177/1078390308325197

    Google Scholar 

  • de Jager CA, Schrijnemaekers AC, Honey TE, Budge MM (2009) Detection of MCI in the clinic: evaluation of the sensitivity and specificity of a computerised test battery, the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test and the MMSE. Age Ageing 38(4):455–460. doi:10.1093/ageing/afp068

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dong Y, Sharma VK, Chan BP-L, Venketasubramanian N, Teoh HL, Seet RCS, Tanicala S, Chan YH, Chen C (2010) The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) is superior to the mini-mental state examination (MMSE) for the detection of vascular cognitive impairment after acute stroke. J Neurol Sci 299(1–2):15–18. doi:10.1016/j.jns.2010.08.051

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dufouil C, Clayton D, Brayne C, Chi LY, Dening TR, Paykel ES, O’Connor DW, Ahmed A, McGee MA, Huppert FA (2000) Population norms for the MMSE in the very old: estimates based on longitudinal data. Neurology 55(11):1609–1613

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Escobar JIMD, Burnam APD, Karno MMD, Forsythe APD, Landsverk JPD, Golding JMPD (1986) Use of the mini-mental state examination (MMSE) in a community population of mixed ethnicity: cultural and linguistic artifacts. J Nerv Ment Dis 174(10):607–614

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Espino DV, Lichtenstein MJ, Palmer RF, Hazuda HP (2001) Ethnic differences in mini-mental state examination (MMSE) scores: where you live makes a difference. J Am Geriatr Soc 49(5):538–548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esther CA (2004) Assessing cognitive impairment in older people: the Watson clock drawing test. Br J Community Nurs 9(8):350–355

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrell BA, Stein WM, Beck JC (2000) The geriatric pain measure: validity, reliability and factor analysis. J Am Geriatr Soc 48:1669–1673

    Google Scholar 

  • Folstein M, Folsten S, McHugh P (1975) Mini-mental state: a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatry Res 12:189–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foreman MD, Fletcher K, Mion LC, Simon L, Niche F (1996) Assessing cognitive function: the complexities of assessment of an individual’s cognitive status are important in making an accurate and comprehensive evaluation. Geriatr Nur (Lond) 17(5):228–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guerrero-Berroa E, Luo X, Schmeidler J, Rapp MA, Dahlman K, Grossman HT, Haroutunian V, Beeri MS (2009) The MMSE orientation for time domain is a strong predictor of subsequent cognitive decline in the elderly. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 24(12):1429–1437. doi:10.1002/gps.2282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Han C, Jo SA, Jo I, Kim E, Park MH, Kang Y (2008) An adaptation of the Korean mini-mental state examination (K-MMSE) in elderly Koreans: demographic influence and population-based norms (the AGE study). Arch Gerontol Geriatr 47(3):302–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartmaier SL, Sloane PD, Guess HA, Koch GG, Mitchell CM, Phillips CD (1995) Validation of the minimum data set cognitive performance scale: agreement with the mini-mental state examination. J Gerontol 50:M128–M133

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinik J, Solomesh I, Berkman P (2004) Correlation between the CAMCOG, the MMSE, and three clock drawing tests in a specialized outpatient psychogeriatric service. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 38(1):77–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huppert FA, Cabelli ST, Matthews FE (2005) Brief cognitive assessment in a UK population sample—distributional properties and the relationship between the MMSE and an extended mental state examination. BMC Geriatr 5:7. doi:10.1186/1471-2318-5-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jervis L, Fickenscher A, Beals J, Cullum C (2010) Predictors on the performance on the MMSE and the DRS-2 among American Indian elders. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci 22(4):417–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaasalainen S (2007) Pain assessment in older adults with dementia: using behavioral observation methods in clinical practice. J Gerontol Nurs 33(6):6–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaasalainen S, Middleton J, Knezacek S, Hartley T, Stewart R, Ife C, Robinson L (1998) Pain and cognitive status in the institutionalized elderly: perceptions and interventions. J Gerontol Nurs: 24–31

  • Kittner SJ, White LR, Farmer ME, Wolz M, Kaplan E, Moes E, Brody JA, Feinleib M (1986) Methodological issues in screening for dementia: the problem of education adjustment. J Chronic Dis 39(3):163–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kliegel M, Sliwinski M (2004) MMSE cross-domain variability predicts cognitive decline in centenarians. Gerontology 50(1):39–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koch HJ, Gurtler K, Szecsey A (2005) Correlation of mini-mental-state-examination (MMSE), Syndrom–Kurztest (SKT) and Clock test (CT) scores in patients with cognitive impairment assessed by means of multiple regression and response surface analysis. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 40(1):7–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kovacevic S, Rafii MS, Brewer JB (2009) High-throughout, fully automated volumetry prediction of MMSE and CDR decline in MCI. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 23(2):139–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krulewitch H, London MR, Skakel VJ, Lundstedt GJ, Thomason H, Brummel-Smith K (2000) Assessment of pain in cognitively impaired older adults: a comparison of pain assessment tools and their use by nonprofessional caregivers. J Am Geriatr Soc 48:1607–1611

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurlowicz L, Wallace M (1999) The mini-mental state examination (MMSE). J Gerontol Nurs 25(5):8–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Leveille SG, Guralnik JM, Ferrucci L, Corti MC, Kasper J, Fried LP (1998) Black/white differences in the relationship between MMSE scores and disability: the Women’s Health and Aging Study. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 53B(3):P201–P208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maki N, Ikeda M, Hokoishi K, Nebu A, Komori K, Hirono N, Tanabe H (2000) The validity of the MMSE and SMQ as screening tests for dementia in the elderly general population—a study of one rural community in Japan. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 11(4):193–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mamikonyan E, Moberg PJ, Siderowf A, Duda JE, Have TT, Hurtig HI, Stern MB, Weintraub D (2009) Mild cognitive impairment is common in Parkinson’s disease patients with normal mini-mental state examination (MMSE) scores. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 15(3):226–231. doi:10.1016/j.parkreldis.2008.05.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manos PJ (1999) Ten-point clock test sensitivity for Alzheimer’s disease in patients with MMSE scores greater than 23. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 14(6):454–458. doi:10.1002/(sici)1099-1166(199906)14:6<454:aid-gps951>3.0.co;2-n

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathuranath PS, Hodges JR, Mathew R, Cherian PJ, George A, Bak TH (2004) Adaptation of the ACE for a Malayalam speaking population in southern India. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 19(12):1188–1194. doi:10.1002/gps.1239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgado J, Rocha CS, Maruta C, Guerreiro M, Martins IP (2010) Cut-off scores in MMSE: a moving target? Eur J Neurol 17(5):692–695. doi:10.1111/j.1468-1331.2009.02907.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris J, Brant E, Fries D, Mehr C, Phillips C, Mor V, Lipsitz L (1994) MDS cognitive performance scale. J Gerontol 49(4):m174–m182

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris J, Storandt M, McKeel D, Rubin E, Price J, Grant E, Berg L (2010) Cerebral amyloid deposition and diffuse plaques in “normal”: aging: evidence for presymptomatic and very mild Alzheimer’s disease. Neurology 46(3):707–719

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mungas D, Marshall SC, Weldon M, Haan M, Reed BR (1996) Age and education correction of mini-mental state examination for English- and Spanish-speaking elderly. Neurology 46(3):700–706

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mystakidou K, Tsilika E, Parpa E, Galanos A, Vlahos L (2007) Brief cognitive assessment of cancer patients: evaluation of the mini-mental state examination (MMSE) psychometric properties. Psychooncology 16(4):352–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nazem S, Siderowf AD, Duda JE, Ten Have T, Colcher A, Horn SS, Moberg PJ, Wilkinson JR, Hurtig HI, Stern MB, Weintraub D (2009) Montreal cognitive assessment performance in patients with Parkinson’s disease with “normal” global cognition according to mini-mental state examination score. J Am Geriatr Soc 57(2):304–308. doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2008.02096.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson PT, Kryscio RJ, Jicha GA, Abner EL, Schmitt FA, Xu LO, Cooper G, Smith CD, Markesbery WR (2009) Relative preservation of MMSE scores in autopsy-proven dementia with Lewy bodies. Neurology 73(14):1127–1133. doi:10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181bacf9e

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen H, Black S, Ray L, Espino D, Markides K (2002) Predictors of decline in MMSE scores among older Mexican Americans. J Gerontol 57(3):181–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niwa H, Koumoto C, Shiga T, Takeuchi J, Mishima S, Segawa T, Atsumi T, Shimizu C, Koike T, Yoshioka N (2006) Clinical analysis of cognitive function in diabetic patients by MMSE and SPECT. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 72(2):142–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noale M, Limongi F, Minicuci N (2006) Identification of factorial structure of MMSE based on elderly cognitive destiny: the Italian Longitudinal Study on Aging. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 21(4):233–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Bryant SE, Humphreys JD, Smith GE, Ivnik RJ, Graff-Radford NR, Petersen RC, Lucas JA (2008) Detecting dementia with the mini-mental state examination (MMSE) in highly educated individuals. Arch Neurol 65(7):963–967. doi:10.1001/archneur.65.7.963

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Onishi J, Suzuki Y, Umegaki H, Kawamura T, Imaizumi M, Iguchi A (2007) Which two questions of mini-mental state examination (MMSE) should we start from? Arch Gerontol Geriatr 44(1):43–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pachana NA, Alpass FM, Blakey JA, Long NR (2006) A comparison of the MMSE and the TICS-m in the hearing-impaired. Australas J Ageing 25(2):89–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pang J, Yu H, Pearson K, Lynch P, Fong C (2009) Comparison of the MMSE and RUDAS cognitive screening tools in an elderly inpatient population in everyday clinical use. Intern Med J 39(6):411–414. doi:10.1111/j.1445-5994.2009.01918.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paquay L, De Lepeleire J, Schoenmakers B, Ylieff M, Fontaine O, Buntinx F (2007) Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of the cognitive performance scale (minimum data set) and the mini-mental state exam for the detection of cognitive impairment in nursing home residents. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 22(4):286–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pezzotti P, Scalmana S, Mastromattei A, Di Lallo D (2008) The accuracy of the MMSE in detecting cognitive impairment when administered by general practitioners: a prospective observational study. BMC Fam Pract 9:29. doi:10.1186/1471-2296-9-29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radbruch L, Sabatowski R, Loick G, Jonen-Thielemannn J, Kapser M, Gondek B, Lehmann KA, Thielemann I (2000) Cognitive impairment and its influence on pain and symptom assessment in a palliative care unit: development of a minimal documentation system. Palliat Med 14:266–276

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajji TK, Miranda D, Mulsant BH, Lotz M, Houck P, Zmuda MD, Bensasi S, Reynolds CF, Butters MA (2009) The MMSE is not an adequate screening cognitive instrument in studies of late-life depression. J Psychiatr Res 43(4):464–470. doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2008.06.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramirez M, Teresi JA, Holmes D, Gurland B, Lantigua R (2006) Differential item functioning (DIF) and the mini-mental state examination (MMSE). Overview, sample, and issues of translation. Med Care 44(11):S95–S106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reisberg B (2007) Global measures: utility in defining and measuring treatment response in dementia. Int Psychogeriatr 19(3):421–456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryu HG, Kwon OD (2010) Apolipoprotein E epsilon 4 allele is not associated with age at onset or MMSE of Parkinson’s disease in a Korean study. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 16(9):615–617. doi:10.1016/j.parkreldis.2010.06.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salmon DP (2004) Inclusion of informant ratings of cognitive difficulties improves the accuracy of the MMSE in predicting Alzheimer’s disease. Evid Based Mental Health 7(1):8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scherder E, Bouma A (2000) Visual analogue scales for pain assessment in alzheimer's disease. Gerontology 46:47–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Schramm U, Berger G, Müller R, Kratzsch T, Peters J, Frölich L (2002) Psychometric properties of clock drawing test and MMSE or short performance test (SKT) in dementia screening in a memory clinic population. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 17(3):254–260. doi:10.1002/gps.585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shega JW, Rudy T, Keefe FJ, Perri LC, Mengin OT, Weiner DK (2008) Validity of pain behaviors in persons with mild to moderate cognitive impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc 56(9):1631–1637

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shigemori K, Ohgi S, Okuyama E, Shimura T, Schneider E (2010) The factorial structure of the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) in Japanese dementia patients. BMC Geriatr 10:36. doi:10.1186/1471-2318-10-36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Squitti R, Barbati G, Rossi L, Ventriglia M, Forno GD, Cesaretti S, Moffa F, Caridi I, Cassetta E, Pasqualetti P, Calabrese L, Lupoi D, Rossini PM (2006) Excess of nonceruloplasmin serum copper in AD correlates with MMSE, CSF beta-amyloid, and h-tau. Neurology 67(1):76–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Medical Research Council Cognitive Function Ageing Society (1998) Cognitive function and dementia in six areas of England and Wales: the distribution of MMSE and prevalence of GMS organicity level in the MRC CFA study. Psychol Med 28(2):319–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tierney MC, Szalai JP, Snow WG, Fisher RH, Dunn E (1997) Domain specificity of the subtests of the mini-mental state examination. Arch Neurol 54(6):713–716. doi:10.1001/archneur.1997.00550180035009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiwari SC, Tripathi RK, Kumar A (2009) Applicability of the mini-mental state examination (MMSE) and the Hindi mental state examination (HMSE) to the urban elderly in India: a pilot study. Int Psychogeriatr 21(1):123–128. doi:10.1017/s1041610208007916

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tombaugh TN (2005) Test-retest reliable coefficients and 5-year change scores for the MMSE and 3MS. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 20(4):485–503. doi:10.1016/j.acn.2004.11.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tombaugh T, McIntyre N (1992) The mini-mental state examination: a comprehensive review. J Am Geriatr Soc 40:922–935

    Google Scholar 

  • Tombaugh T, Hubly A, McDowell I, Kristjansson B (1996) Mini-mental state examination (mmse) and the modified mmse (3ms): a psychometric comparison and normative data. Am Psychol Assoc 8:48–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsai PF, Beck C, Richards KC, Phillips L, Roberson PK, Evans J (2008) The pain behaviors for osteoarthritis instrument for cognitively impaired elders (pboicie). Res Gerontol Nurs 1:116–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiig EH, Annas P, Basun H, Andreasen N, Lannfelt L, Zetterberg H, Blennow K, Minthon L (2010) The stability of AQT processing speed, ADAS-Cog and MMSE during acetylcholinesterase inhibitor treatment in Alzheimer’s disease. Acta Neurol Scand 121(3):186–193. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0404.2009.01160.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood RY, Giuliano KK, Bignell CU, Pritham WW (2006) Assessing cognitive ability in research: use of MMSE with minority populations and elderly adults with low education levels. J Gerontol Nurs 32(4):45–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Wouters H, van Gool WA, Schmand B, Zwinderman AH, Lindeboom R (2010) Three sides of the same coin: measuring global cognitive impairment with the MMSE, ADAS-cog and CAMCOG. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 25(8):770–779. doi:10.1002/gps.2402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamashita M, Kubota T, Fuchita E, Yokoyama K, Hayashi H, Okamoto S, Sano E, Matsuo A, Shimasue N, Watanabe T, Kawashima R, Sugimoto K (2007) A nursing tool validated as an effective measure over MMSE and FAB in dementia. Int Nurs Rev 54(2):179–182. doi:10.1111/j.1466-7657.2007.00541.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zlotogorski Z, Lurie L, Oppenheim G (1999) Memory verses intelligence in dementia screening—MMSE. Isr J Psychiatry Relat Sci 36(1):18–22

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge Gail Spake for her editorial refinement of this article. This work was funded by The Alma and Hal Reagan Cancer Research Fellowship, The University of Tennessee Health Science Center.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. John A. Hartford Foundation & Atlantic Philanthropies Claire M. Fagin Fellow, Vanderbilt University School of Nursing, 461 21st Avenue South, Nashville, TN, 37240, USA

    Todd Monroe

  2. The University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA

    Michael Carter

Authors
  1. Todd Monroe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Michael Carter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Todd Monroe or Michael Carter.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: D.J.H. Deeg.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Monroe, T., Carter, M. Using the Folstein Mini Mental State Exam (MMSE) to explore methodological issues in cognitive aging research. Eur J Ageing 9, 265–274 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10433-012-0234-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10433-012-0234-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation