Abstract
The production of functional particle systems is becoming increasingly important in many industries. In the early development of such products, there is often not a sufficient amount of educts available or the educts are expensive and/or toxic. For this purpose, lab-scale processes are used which often differ from the later production processes. Unfortunately, the processes have a direct impact on the product properties. That makes a subsequent transfer from the unconventional lab methods to the actual fabrication process necessary, which is often associated with problems. To avoid complex additional efforts in the development of new functional particle systems and, thus, shorten the time to market, a modular microfluidic spray dryer was developed. With our new microfluidic spray dryer made from glass, it is possible to produce droplet sizes and, thus, particle sizes similar to those of conventional spray dryers in the lab or even in the production but using only smallest quantities of starting materials (product volume flow rates down to 0.03 ml/min). During the development of the micro spray dryer, process and formulation parameters as well as various microchannel geometries were investigated to determine their influence on droplet formation and, thus, on product formation. The developed micro spray dryer can be operated with various formulations and material compositions, as the micro system is made of chemically inert material, is easy to clean, pressure-resistant and can be used in a wide range of pH values.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amstad E, Gopinadhan M, Holtze C, Osuji CO, Brenner MP, Spaepen F, Weitz DA (2015) Production of amorphous nanoparticles by supersonic spray-drying with a microfluidic nebulator. Science 349:956–960. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac9582
Amstad E, Spaepen F, Brenner MP, Weitz DA (2017) The microfluidic nebulator: production of sub-micrometer sized airborne drops. Lab Chip 17:1475–1480. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6lc01455k
Anna SL, Bontoux N, Stone HA (2003) Formation of dispersions using “flow focusing” in microchannels. Appl Phys Lett 82:364–366. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1537519
Arkles B (2006) Hydrophobicity, hydrophilicity and silanes. Paint and coatings industry 22:114–135
Cal K, Sollohub K (2010) Spray drying technique. I: hardware and process parameters. J Pharm Sci 99:575–586. https://doi.org/10.1002/jps.21886
Cox JD, Curry MS, Skirboll SK, Gourley PL, Sasaki DY (2002) Surface passivation of a microfluidic device to glial cell adhesion: a comparison of hydrophobic and hydrophilic SAM coatings. Biomaterials 23:929–935. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0142-9612(01)00205-8
de Boer MJ, Tjerkstra RW, Berenschot JW, Jansen HV, Burger GJ, Gardeniers JGE, Elwenspoek M, van den Berg A (2000) Micromachining of buried micro channels in silicon. J Microelectromech Syst 9:94–103. https://doi.org/10.1109/84.825783
Demming S, Llobera A, Wilke R, Büttgenbach S (2009) Single and multiple internal reflection poly(dimethylsiloxane) absorbance-based biosensors. Sens Actuators B 139:166–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2008.10.059
Dey T, Naughton D (2016) Cleaning and anti-reflective (AR) hydrophobic coating of glass surface: a review from materials science perspective. J Sol–Gel Sci Technol 77:1–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10971-015-3879-x
Eggersdorfer ML, Koren V, Stolovicki E, Amstad E, Weitz DA (2017) Rapid production of submicron drug substance particles by supersonic spray drying. Cryst Growth Des 17:2046–2053. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.cgd.7b00033
Erfle P, Riewe J, Bunjes H, Dietzel A (2017) Optically monitored segmented flow for controlled ultra-fast mixing and nanoparticle precipitation. Microfluid Nanofluid 21:179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10404-017-2016-2
Erfle P, Riewe J, Bunjes H, Dietzel A (2019) Stabilized Production of Lipid Nanoparticles of Tunable Size in Taylor Flow Glass Devices with High-Surface-Quality 3D Microchannels. Micromachines (Basel). https://doi.org/10.3390/mi10040220
Friend J, Yeo L (2010) Fabrication of microfluidic devices using polydimethylsiloxane. Biomicrofluidics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3259624
Göke K, Lorenz T, Repanas A, Schneider F, Steiner D, Baumann K, Bunjes H, Dietzel A, Finke JH, Glasmacher B, Kwade A (2018) Novel strategies for the formulation and processing of poorly water-soluble drugs. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 126:40–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpb.2017.05.008
He F, Cheng Y, Xu Z, Liao Y, Xu J, Sun H, Wang C, Zhou Z, Sugioka K, Midorikawa K, Xu Y, Chen X (2010) Direct fabrication of homogeneous microfluidic channels embedded in fused silica using a femtosecond laser. Opt Lett 35:282–284. https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.35.000282
Hede PD, Bach P, Jensen AD (2008) Two-fluid spray atomisation and pneumatic nozzles for fluid bed coating/agglomeration purposes: a review. Chem Eng Sci 63:3821–3842. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2008.04.014
Kim S, Kim J, Joung Y-H, Choi J, Koo C (2018) Bonding strength of a glass microfluidic device fabricated by femtosecond laser micromachining and direct welding. Micromachines (Basel). https://doi.org/10.3390/mi9120639
Littringer EM, Mescher A, Schroettner H, Achelis L, Walzel P, Urbanetz NA (2012) Spray dried mannitol carrier particles with tailored surface properties–the influence of carrier surface roughness and shape. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 82:194–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpb.2012.05.001
Lorenz T, Bojko S, Bunjes H, Dietzel A (2018) An inert 3D emulsification device for individual precipitation and concentration of amorphous drug nanoparticles. Lab Chip 18:627–638. https://doi.org/10.1039/c7lc01313b
Mandato S, Rondet E, Delaplace G, Barkouti A, Galet L, Accart P, Ruiz T, Cuq B (2012) Liquids’ atomization with two different nozzles: modeling of the effects of some processing and formulation conditions by dimensional analysis. Powder Technol 224:323–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2012.03.014
Mayer P, Vaes WHJ, Hermens JLM (2000) Absorption of hydrophobic compounds into the poly(dimethylsiloxane) coating of solid-phase microextraction fibers: high partition coefficients and fluorescence microscopy images. Anal Chem 72:459–464. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac990948f
Melzig S, Niedbalka D, Schilde C, Kwade A (2018) Spray drying of amorphous ibuprofen nanoparticles for the production of granules with enhanced drug release. Colloids Surf A 536:133–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2017.07.028
Melzig S, Finke JH, Schilde C, Vierheller A, Dietzel A, Kwade A (2019) Fluid mechanics and process design of high-pressure antisolvent precipitation of fenofibrate nanoparticles using a customized microsystem. Chem Eng J 371:554–564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2019.04.051
Mondragón R, Juliá JE, Barba A, Jarque JC (2013) Influence of the particle size on the microstructure and mechanical properties of grains containing mixtures of nanoparticles and microparticles: levitator tests and pilot-scaled validation. J Eur Ceram Soc 33:1271–1280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2012.12.017
Oosterbroek RE, Hermes DC, Kakuta M, Benito-Lopez F, Gardeniers JGE, Verboom W, Reinhoudt DN, van Berg AD (2006) Fabrication and mechanical testing of glass chips for high-pressure synthetic or analytical chemistry. Microsyst Technol 12:450–454. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00542-005-0043-5
Schulze T, Mattern K, Früh E, Hecht L, Rustenbeck I, Dietzel A (2017) A 3D microfluidic perfusion system made from glass for multiparametric analysis of stimulus-secretioncoupling in pancreatic islets. Biomed Microdevices 19:47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10544-017-0186-z
Sima F, Sugioka K, Vázquez RM, Osellame R, Kelemen L, Ormos P (2018) Three-dimensional femtosecond laser processing for lab-on-a-chip applications. Nanophotonics 7:613–634. https://doi.org/10.1515/nanoph-2017-0097
Stöber W, Fink A, Bohn E (1968) Controlled growth of monodisperse silica spheres in the micron size range. J Colloid Interface Sci 26:62–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9797(68)90272-5
Thiele J, Windbergs M, Abate AR, Trebbin M, Shum HC, Förster S, Weitz DA (2011) Early development drug formulation on a chip: fabrication of nanoparticles using a microfluidic spray dryer. Lab Chip 11:2362–2368. https://doi.org/10.1039/c1lc20298g
Thies J-W, Kuhn P, Thürmann B, Dübel S, Dietzel A (2017) Microfluidic quartz-crystal-microbalance (QCM) sensors with specialized immunoassays for extended measurement range and improved reusability. Microelectron Eng 179:25–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mee.2017.04.023
Vehring R (2008) Pharmaceutical particle engineering via spray drying. Pharm Res 25:999–1022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11095-007-9475-1
Waheed S, Cabot JM, Macdonald NP, Lewis T, Guijt RM, Paull B, Breadmore MC (2016) 3D printed microfluidic devices: enablers and barriers. Lab Chip 16:1993–2013. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6lc00284f
Walzel P (2019) Spraying and atomizing of liquids. Ullmann’s Encycl Ind Chem. https://doi.org/10.1002/14356007.b02_06.pub3
Zellmer S, Garnweitner G, Breinlinger T, Kraft T, Schilde C (2015) Hierarchical structure formation of nanoparticulate spray-dried composite aggregates. ACS Nano 9:10749–10757. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.5b05220
Zellmer S, Lindenau M, Michel S, Garnweitner G, Schilde C (2016) Influence of surface modification on structure formation and micromechanical properties of spray-dried silica aggregates. J Colloid Interface Sci 464:183–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2015.11.028
Acknowledgements
The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support by the Lower Saxony Ministry of Science and Culture within the research program “Processing of poorly soluble drugs at small scale”. Furthermore, we thank Clara Sangrós and Bardiya Pourrahmati for their assistance during the studies.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Melzig, S., Purr, F., Lorenz, T. et al. Microfluidic spray drying device for process-oriented product development with low sample consumption. Microfluid Nanofluid 23, 128 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10404-019-2296-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10404-019-2296-9