Abstract
We couple pseudo-particle modeling (PPM, Ge and Li in Chem Eng Sci 58(8):1565–1585, 2003), a variant of hard-particle molecular dynamics, with standard soft-particle molecular dynamics (MD) to study an idealized gas–liquid flow in nano-channels. The coupling helps to keep sharp contrast between gas and liquid behaviors and the simulations conducted provide a reference frame for exploring more complex and realistic gas–liquid nano-flows. The qualitative nature and general flow patterns of the flow under such extreme conditions are found to be consistent with its macro-scale counterpart.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
We have found no general drag coefficient for two-dimensional deformable moving object thus far, and we understand that, according to Huang and Feng (1995) and Chakraborty et al. (2004), the drag force on cylinder is also strongly influenced by the presence of confining walls; but, the drag coefficient for sphere consists with the circular cylinder to an acceptable accuracy in the Reynolds number range of 100 to 101. Therefore, this C D is used as a rough estimate.
Abbreviations
- Ca :
-
capillary number (−)
- F, F, f :
-
force (kg m s−2)
- g :
-
gravitational acceleration (m s−2)
- H :
-
height (m)
- k B :
-
Boltzmann constant (k B = 1.38 × 10−23 kg m2 s−2 K−1)
- L s :
-
slip length (m)
- m :
-
mass (kg)
- N :
-
number (−)
- n :
-
number density (m−dim*)
- P :
-
position (m)
- P :
-
pressure (kg m2−dim s−2)
- R :
-
radius (m)
- Re :
-
Reynolds number (−)
- r :
-
distance (m)
- s :
-
displacement (m)
- T :
-
temperature (K)
- t :
-
time (s)
- U, u, V, v :
-
velocity (m s−1)
- W :
-
width (m)
- w :
-
mass fraction (−)
- x :
-
coordinate, molar fraction (−)
- y :
-
coordinate
- Z :
-
compressibility factor (−)
- b:
-
bubble
- c:
-
critical
- ct:
-
control temperature
- D:
-
drag
- g:
-
gas phase
- l:
-
liquid phase
- m:
-
mean value
- s:
-
surface, interfacial
- w:
-
wall
- Δ:
-
increment
- δ :
-
Kronecker delta function
- ɛ, ϕ, Ψ s, ζ :
-
potential energy (kg m2 s−2)
- η :
-
packing fraction (−)
- ρ :
-
mass density (kg m−dim)
- μ :
-
dynamic viscosity (kg m2-dim s−1)
- ν :
-
kinematic viscosity (m2 s−1)
- τ :
-
shear stress (kg m2-dim s−2)
- τ l :
-
characteristic time of liquid molecule (s)
- *dim = 2 or 3:
-
the dimensionality of the simulated system, for the two- or three-dimensional system
References
Allen MP, Tildesley DJ (1989) Computer simulation of liquids. Oxford University Press, New York
Backer JA, Lowe CP, Hoefsloot HCJ, Iedema PD (2005) Poiseuille flow to measure the viscosity of particle model fluids. J Chem Phys 122(15):154503–154506
Barker JA, Henderson D, Abraham FF (1981) Phase diagram of the two-dimensional Lennard–Jones system: evidence for first-order transitions. Phys A Stat Theor Phys 106(1, 2):226–238
Chakraborty J, Verma N, Chhabra RP (2004) Wall effects in flow past a circular cylinder in a plane channel: a numerical study. Chem Eng Process 43(12):1529–1537
Chobana ER, Markoski LJ, Wieckowski A, Kenis PJA (2004) Microfluidic fuel cell based on laminar flow. J Power Sources 128:54–60
Denniston C, Robbins MO (2001) Molecular and continuum boundary conditions for a Miscible binary fluid. Phys Rev Lett 87(17):178302
Ellisab JS, Thompson M (2004) Slip and coupling phenomena at the liquid–solid interface. Phys Chem Chem Phys 6:4928–4938
Frenkel D, Smit B (1996) Understanding molecular simulation: from algorithms to applications. Academic Press, Orlando
Gad-el-Hak M (1999) The fluid mechanics of microdevices–the freeman scholar lecture. J Fluids Eng 121:5–33
Gad-el-Hak M (2005) Liquids: the holy grail of microfluidic modeling. Phys Fluids 17:100612
Ge W (1998) Multi-scale simulation of Fluidization. Heat Energy Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Ph.D., 125
Ge W, Li J (2003) Macro-scale phenomena reproduced in microscopic systems: pseudo-particle modeling of fluidization. Chem Eng Sci 58(8):1565–1585
Ge W, Ma J, Zhang J, Tang D, Chen F, Wang X, Guo L, Li J (2005) Particles methods for multi-scale simulaton of complex flows. Chin Sci Bull 50(11):1057–1069
Gogotsi Y, Libera JA, Guvenc-Yazicioglu A, Megaridis CM (2001) In situ multiphase fluid experiments in hydrothermal carbon nanotubes. Appl Phys Lett 79(7):1021–1023
Gogotsi Y, Naguib N, Libera JA (2002) In situ chemical experiments in carbon nanotubes. Chem Phys Lett 365:354–360
Hannon L, Lie GC, Clementi E (1986) Molecular dynamics simulation of channel flow. Phys Lett A 119(4):174–177
Ho C-M, Tai Y-C (1998) Micro-electro-mechanical-systems (MEMS) and fluid flows. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 30:579–612
Huang PY, Feng J (1995) Wall effects on the flow of viscoelastic fluids around a circular cylinder. J Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech 60(2):179–198
Jensen KF (1999) Microchemical systems: status, challenges, and opportunities. AIChE J 45(10):2051–2054
Kawaji M, Chung PM-Y (2004) Adiabatic gas–liquid flow in microchannels. Microscale Thermophys Eng 8:239–257
Kotsalis EM, Walther JH, Koumoutsakos P (2004) Multiphase water flow inside carbon nanotubes. Int J Multiphase Flow 30:995–1010
Lamb H (1932) Hydrodynamics. Dover, New York
Landau LD, Lifshitz EM (1987) Fluid Mechanics. Pergamon Press, Oxford
Liem SY, Brown D, Clarke JHR (1992) Investigation of the homogeneous-shear nonequilibrium-molecular-dynamics method. Phys Rev A 45(6):3706–3713
Marin M, Risso D, Cordero P (1993) Efficient algorithms for many-body hard particle molecular dynamics. J Comput Phys 109:306–317
Matsumoto M, Matsuura T (2004) Molecular dynamics simulation of a rising bubble. Mol Simul 30(13–15):853–859
Peters GH, Eggebrecht J (1995) Observation of droplet growth and coalescence in phase-separating Lennard–Jones fluids. J Phys Chem 99(32):12335–12340
Rapaport DC (2004) The art of molecular dynamics simulation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Stone HA, Stroock AD, Ajdari A (2004) Engineering flows in small devices: microfluidics toward a lab-on-a-chip. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 36:381–411
Sun M, Ebner C (1992) Molecular-dynamics simulation of compressible fluid flow in two-dimensional channels. Phys Rev A 46(8):4813–4819
Sushko N, Cieplak M (2001) Motion of grains, droplets, and bubbles in fluid-filled nanopores. Phys Rev E 64(21):021061–021008
Thompson PA, Troia SM (1997) A general boundary condition for liquid flow at solid surfaces. Nature 389:360–362
Travis KP, Todd BD, Evans DJ (1997) Departure from Navier–Stokes hydrodynamics in confined liquids. Phys Rev E 55(4):4288–4295
Triplett KA, Ghiaasiaan SM, Abdel-Khalik SI, Sadowski DL (1999) Gas–liquid two-phase flow in microchannels Part I: two-phase flow patterns. Int J Multiph Flow 25(3):377–394
Wang L, Ge W, Chen F (2007) Pseudo-particle modeling for gas flow in microchannels. Chin Sci Bull 52(4):450–455
Xu JL, Zhou ZQ (2004) Molecular dynamics simulation of liquid argon flow at platinum surfaces. Heat Mass Transf 40:859–869
Xu JL, Zhou ZQ, Xu XD (2004) Molecular dynamics simulation of micro-Poiseuille flow for liquid argon in nanoscale. Int J Numer Methods Heat Fluid Flow 14(5/6):664–688
Yang ZL, Palm B, Sehgal BR (2002) Numerical simulation of bubbly two-phase flow in a narrow channel. Int J Heat Mass Transf 45:631–639
Yarin AL, Yazicioglu AG, Megaridisb CM (2005) Theoretical and experimental investigation of aqueous liquids contained in carbon nanotubes. J Appl Phys 97:124309–124313
Acknowledgments
This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under the grant nos. 20336040, 20490201 and 20221603, and the Chinese Academy of Sciences under the grant KJCX-SW-L08.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chen, F., Ge, W., Wang, L. et al. Numerical study on gas–liquid nano-flows with pseudo-particle modeling and soft-particle molecular dynamics simulation. Microfluid Nanofluid 5, 639–653 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10404-008-0280-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10404-008-0280-x