Abstract
Aim
Nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC) is the most common form of cancer in white-skinned populations. However, there is a lack of comprehensive research on the general population’s knowledge about NMSC.
Subjects and methods
As part of wave 8 of the German National Cancer Aid Monitoring (NCAM), 4000 participants aged 16–65 years (49.3% female) were interviewed by telephone about NMSC. Questions included awareness of (colloquial) terms for NMSC, its signs, consequences, risk factors, prevalence, and severity.
Results
Colloquial terms for skin cancer were heard of more often than medical terms (60.9–82.1% vs. 22.6–51.5%). In our sample, there was little familiarity with signs (15.8–36.4%), possible consequences (14.7–56.3%), prevalence (27.4%), and severity (29.0%) of NMSC. Most participants knew about UV-related risk factors for NMSC (73.0–78.7%). Women, those with higher education levels, full-time employment, lighter skin type, presence of more than 40 nevi, frequent childhood sunburns, or frequent intentional tanners achieved a higher knowledge score. Concern about NMSC was associated with more NMSC knowledge.
Conclusion
We found knowledge gaps regarding signs, consequences, and prevalence of NMSC. To ensure early recognition and treatment, the general population should be further educated, specifically targeting male, less educated, and unemployed individuals.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Knowledge about a disease has been found to be associated with preventive behavior (Park et al. 2018; Renner and Schwarzer 2003; Sessa et al. 2008; Taghipour et al. 2019; Werner 2003). This was also shown for skin cancer: increased knowledge about preventive behavior and risk factors for skin cancer was positively associated with better sun-protection behavior (Meyer et al. 2021; Turrisi et al. 2004; Ziehfreund et al. 2019). Therefore, enhancing individual knowledge and health-related competencies is important for promoting and maintaining good health (World Health Organization 2021).
Nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC), which most commonly occurs in the form of basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) (Lomas et al. 2012), is the most prevalent form of cancer in white-skinned populations (Zink 2017), and its incidence is expected to further increase (Madan et al. 2010). Despite its high prevalence, research on the general population’s knowledge about NMSC is scarce. Earlier research showed that the general population had low levels of awareness of the terms BCC and actinic keratosis (AK), precursor lesions of SCC, but high awareness of the association between skin cancer and sun exposure (Fernandez Figueras 2017; Halpern and Kopp 2005; MacKie 2004). In a recent study, qualitative interviews with individuals aged 55 to 85 years revealed a substantial knowledge gap, especially regarding the accurate definition of NMSC, its prevalence, possible signs, and potential risks (Brokmeier et al. 2023). To date, there has been no extensive research on what the general population knows about NMSC.
Previous research on knowledge about skin cancer in general identified differences depending on sociodemographic characteristics: Women and those with higher education had higher knowledge about skin cancer-related risk factors (Miles et al. 2005). However, research has yet to investigate possible associations between knowledge about NMSC and sociodemographic characteristics.
Besides knowledge, being concerned about a disease has been shown to be related to preventive behaviors (Kiviniemi and Ellis 2014; Sobkow et al. 2020), which underlines the importance of adequate education. A recent European study revealed that 46% of the general population was concerned about skin cancer in general (MacKie 2004). In an international comparison study, participants who lived in countries with a higher prevalence of BCC and AK had not only higher levels of awareness about skin cancer but also expressed more concerns (Halpern and Kopp 2005). However, we are not aware of any research that has specifically explored concerns regarding NMSC and its association with knowledge about NMSC.
Although NMSC is the most common form of cancer in white-skinned populations (Lomas et al. 2012; Zink 2017), to date, there is a lack of data reflecting what the general population knows about NMSC, whether they are aware of its signs and risks, and how they perceive its severity. For prevention measures, it is important to understand the current state of knowledge to develop tailored campaigns on knowledge and health literacy regarding NMSC. The goal should be to increase awareness and enhance preventive behavior, with the long-term aim of reducing the incidence of NMSC. Therefore, the present study had three aims: (1) to explore the general population’s knowledge about NMSC, including knowledge of its signs, potential consequences, prevalence, severity, and potential factors contributing to its pathogenesis; (2) to investigate whether NMSC knowledge is associated with sociodemographic characteristics, skin-related characteristics, and tanning behavior; and (3) to examine whether knowledge about NMSC is related to concerns about NMSC.
Materials and methods
Sample and data collection
Data for this manuscript were collected within the eighth wave of the National Cancer Aid Monitoring (NCAM) between October and December 2022. NCAM is a nationwide monitoring assessing UV-related risk behavior in a representative population sample in Germany. Cross-sectional data were collected from 4000 individuals aged 16 to 65 years via standardized computer-assisted telephone interviews (CATI; response rate 3 based on American Association for Public Opinion Research, 29.4%). A sample size of 4000 was determined by a sample size calculation using the analysis PROC POWER SAS software (SAS Institute Inc.). Participants were selected using a two-stage random sampling procedure (Diehl et al. 2022). All participants gave informed verbal consent prior to the interviews.
Outcome variables
To assess awareness of skin cancer, participants indicated with “yes” or “no” whether they had heard the following terms before: “White skin cancer,” “light skin cancer” (both German colloquial terms for NMSC), “black skin cancer” (German colloquial term for malignant melanoma [MM]), “basal cell carcinoma,” “squamous cell carcinoma,” and “malignant melanoma.” Items were presented in a randomized order.
Knowledge about NMSC was assessed with three item sets focusing on signs (four items), potential consequences (five items), and potential factors contributing to its development (four items). Answer options for each item were “yes,” “no,” and “I don’t know.” The items were derived from a qualitative study on NMSC conducted previously (Brokmeier et al. 2023) and pretested in cognitive interviews (n = 15). To build a score of knowledge about NMSC, responses were coded as correct or incorrect, with the response “I don’t know” always coded as incorrect. Afterward, the correct answers were summed up, resulting in a score with values ranging from 0 to 12.
We included two questions on the comparison of NMSC and MM, asking which kind of cancer is perceived as (1) more severe and as (2) more prevalent. Answer categories were “more,” “just as,” “less,” and “I don’t know.” The correct answers would be less severe (American Cancer Society 2022) and more prevalent (Urban et al. 2021), respectively. Further, one item assessed whether participants were concerned about developing NMSC themselves (“yes,” “no,” and “I have never thought about it”).
Covariates
As sociodemographic characteristics, we included sex (coded as male/female), age (in years), migration background (yes/no; based on (Schenk et al. 2006)), school education (low/medium/high), employment (none/part-time/full-time), partnership status (with/without), and current or former outdoor occupation (yes vs. no). Moreover, participants were asked about risk factors for developing NMSC, i.e., their skin type following Fitzpatrick (1975) grouped into categories I–II vs. III–VI, high number of nevi (less vs. more than 40), as well as self-reported tanning behavior (current tanning bed use [yes vs. no] and intentional tanning in the sun), previous sunburns (before and after the 15th year of life [each not often vs. often]). Intentional tanning outdoors was operationalized as the number of occasions (on workdays, on weekends, on vacation) on which participants indicated to sunbathe outdoors in order to get a tan (3 occasions vs. 2 vs. 1 vs. never).
Statistical analysis
Data were weighted by sex, age, and geographic region to represent the German population according to official data from the German micro-census (Statista 2023). We conducted descriptive analysis of the included variables. Chi-square tests were performed to test for sex differences. T tests and ANOVAs were used to identify associations between the knowledge score and covariates. In the case of high variance heterogeneity, Welch tests were interpreted. Linear regression models were fitted to further examine these associations: model I included sociodemographic characteristics, model II skin-related risk factors, model III tanning behavior, and model IV all covariates from models I to III significantly associated with knowledge score values. To test for associations between knowledge and concern about, perceived severity, and prevalence of NMSC, ANOVAs were conducted. Missing data were excluded from analyses. All analyses were performed using SPSS version 29 (IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA) with a predefined two-sided level of significance of p < 0.05.
Results
Four thousand individuals (49.3% female) aged 16–65 years (M 42.43, SD 14.02) participated in the survey. Sociodemographic and skin-related characteristics of participants stratified by sex are described in Table 1. Women reported higher levels of education, less full-time employment and outdoor occupation, and were more often in a relationship (each p < 0.001). Furthermore, they displayed more skin-related risk factors, i.e., lighter skin type (p = 0.012), more than 40 nevi (p < 0.001), frequent sunburns before (p = 0.008) and after the age of 15 (p = 0.042), and current tanning bed use (p = 0.003).
Of the entire sample, 82.1% had heard of the term “black skin cancer” (women 86.2%, men 78.0%, p < 0.001), 72.8% of “white skin cancer” (women 78.2%, men 67.5%, p < 0.001), 60.9% of “light skin cancer” (women 64.3%, men 57.5%, p < 0.001), 51.5% of “malignant melanoma” (women 58.5%, men 44.8%, p < 0.001), 30.7% of “basal cell carcinoma” (women 37.9%, men 23.7%, p < 0.001), and 22.6% of “squamous cell carcinoma” (women 26.9%, men 18.4%, p < 0.001) before.
The proportion of participants who correctly answered the items regarding signs, possible consequences, and factors contributing to the development of NMSC ranged between 14.7% (disagreeing that NMSC can progress to MM) and 78.7% (answering that sunbathing can contribute to the development of NMSC, Table 2).
Overall knowledge about NMSC was assessed by summing up correct answers to the items displayed in Table 2 (M 6.15, SD 2.48, range 0–12). The achieved knowledge score values were significantly associated with all covariates but outdoor occupation (Table 3). Characteristics associated with higher knowledge score values were female sex, age between 26 and 35 years, no immigrant background, higher levels of education, being employed, having a partner, lighter skin type, more than 40 nevi, frequent sunburns before and after the age of 15, and current tanning bed use. Intentionally tanning outdoors on two or three occasions was associated with higher knowledge scores compared to never tanning outdoors.
To simultaneously account for characteristics significantly associated with achieved knowledge score values, linear regression models were fitted (Table 4). Model IV showed a significant association with sex, indicating that men had a lower knowledge score (p < 0.001). Those with higher levels of education (each p < 0.001) and working full-time (p = 0.048) were more likely to have a high knowledge score than their counterparts. Regarding individual risk factors, lighter skin type (p = 0.010), more than 40 nevi (p < 0.001), frequent sunburns before the age of 15 (p < 0.001), and intentional tanning on two (p = 0.006) or three occasions (p = 0.001; each compared to those who never tanned outdoors) were associated with a higher knowledge score.
Approximately one quarter assumed NMSC to be more prevalent (27.4%) and less severe than MM (29.0%), and indicated to be concerned about NMSC (25.0%, Table 5). ANOVAs revealed significant differences in the knowledge score by the perceived NMSC prevalence (p < 0.001) and severity (p < 0.001, Table 5) compared to MM. Those who were concerned about NMSC achieved the highest knowledge score (p < 0.001) compared to those who were not concerned or had never thought about it before. Those who answered the questions on prevalence, severity, and concern with “I don’t know” or “I have never thought about it”, respectively, showed the lowest knowledge scores.
Discussion
In our nationwide representative sample, we found higher familiarity with colloquial terms for skin cancer than with medical terms. Signs and possible consequences of NMSC were less known, but the association of UV-related risk factors with NMSC was agreed with by most participants. However, only about three out of ten participants estimated NMSC to be more prevalent and less severe than MM. Women, those with higher education levels, full-time employment, lighter skin types, more than 40 nevi, frequent sunburns during childhood, and intentional outdoor tanners achieved higher knowledge scores. Furthermore, concern about NMSC was associated with more NMSC knowledge.
The higher familiarity with colloquial terms for NMSC and MM compared to medical terms seems not surprising given that the target group was the general population and not health professionals. However, a quarter of the participants had never heard even the colloquial terms before, which is in contrast to the high incidence and prevalence of NMSC. These findings underline the importance of considering health literacy and the current state of knowledge of individuals, e.g., in physician–patient communication (Sim et al. 2016), and of enhancing knowledge about NMSC in future prevention campaigns addressing the general population.
More than eight out of ten individuals were unaware that light or white spots on the skin are not typical signs of NMSC (Navarrete-Dechent et al. 2016). This may be explained by the German colloquial use of the term “white skin cancer” to describe NMSC. Although the introduction of the term “light skin cancer” into the German language was considered an attempt to avoid this misunderstanding, our sample was much less familiar with this term compared to other colloquial terms. The fact that most participants were unfamiliar with the potential signs of NMSC may indicate that they would not be able to identify NMSC, and consequently, would not seek medical care. In addition, the majority believed that NMSC could progress to MM and that NMSC is less prevalent than or equally prevalent as MM. This underestimation has also been shown in previous qualitative research (Brokmeier et al. 2023) and was confirmed in the general population in this representative study. Future health education should focus on clarifying terms, clinical signs, and eliminating misconceptions; for example, “white skin cancer” is not synonymous with white spots on the skin, and NMSC cannot progress to MM (Clark et al. 1984). Data from other countries should be gathered to investigate whether these misconceptions exist only in Germany.
Although knowledge about NMSC was associated with several sociodemographic determinants, there was no association with outdoor occupation. This finding is of concern because outdoor occupation is a known risk factor for SCC (Loney et al. 2021; Schmitt et al. 2011) owing to the high exposure to UV radiation. Consequently, the official German guideline for skin cancer prevention demands the education of outdoor workers by their employers regarding skin cancer risks and prevention (Leitlinienprogramm Onkologie 2021). Thus, we would have expected higher knowledge score values among outdoor compared to indoor workers. This may point to a deficit in current educational measures in the outdoor occupation sector. It seems necessary to increase knowledge about the risk factors, signs, and consequences of NMSC in outdoor workers to obey prevention guidelines and, ideally, to enhance sun protective behavior.
In line with previous research (Miles et al. 2005), women were more familiar with both medical and colloquial terms for skin cancer and achieved higher knowledge scores. This raises concern since men seem to be at greater risk of developing SCC (Schmitt et al. 2011). As outlined before, outdoor occupation is a known risk factor for SCC (Schmitt et al. 2011) and more men than women work outdoors, as reflected in our sample. Another explanation could be found in behavioral differences between men and women: Men seem to be less aware of the consequences of unprotected UV exposure and are less likely to engage in sun-protective behavior (Görig et al. 2018; Haluza et al. 2016; Miles et al. 2005), which might lead to a higher incidence of NMSC among men. Furthermore, higher education levels and full-time employment were associated with increased knowledge about NMSC, which is in line with previous studies on skin cancer knowledge (Duarte et al. 2018; Keeney et al. 2009; Miles et al. 2005). In Germany, higher education levels are associated with better health literacy in general (Schaeffer et al. 2017). Since education and employment are interrelated (Gangl 2003), this might further explain the lower levels of NMSC-knowledge among unemployed participants in our sample. Therefore, future prevention measures should tailor their content to male, lower educated, and unemployed individuals.
In addition, we found that potential risk factors for skin cancer, i.e., lighter skin type, more than 40 nevi, and frequent sunburns before the age of 15 were associated with more knowledge. In short, those at risk for skin cancer were better informed about NMSC. However, from our data, we cannot determine whether this vulnerable group uses better measures for sun protection. Nonetheless, a literature review showed that those with lighter skin types were most likely to engage in sun protection behaviors (Kasparian et al. 2009). Another risk factor for NMSC is UV-related risk behavior (Gordon 2013). We found more knowledge about NMSC among those who reported intentional tanning compared to those who did not intentionally tan. Previous research has shown similar patterns with regard to tanning bed use. Tanning bed users showed better knowledge of potential risks of UV radiation than non-users (Altsitsiadis et al. 2012; Schneider et al. 2009). Such findings can complicate prevention efforts because those who know the most are engaging in risky behaviors despite their knowledge.
We found higher knowledge score values among those who reported to be concerned about NMSC. This may imply that information and education about NMSC could lead to greater concern about NMSC in the general population. Concerns and worries about a disease have been shown to be associated with greater intentions to engage in preventive behaviors (Sobkow et al. 2020) and actual protective behaviors (Kiviniemi and Ellis 2014). However, our results are based on cross-sectional data and we cannot deduce causality regarding the association between knowledge and concern. Furthermore, ethical implications must be considered when using worry and fear in prevention campaigns (Chapman 2018). Since NMSC is rarely fatal (Leiter et al. 2017), the key to successful prevention of NMSC should not be based on people’s worries and fears. Rather, it should be based on informing and educating the general population in a sensitive way to learn more about NMSC, to be able to classify risks and signs, and to seek medical help if needed.
Limitations
Our nationally representative findings are based on self-reported data and we cannot rule out a social desirability bias (Nederhof 1985). As a result, our findings may overestimate the knowledge about NMSC in the general population, which implies that the actual level of knowledge in the population is even lower. Another weakness of self-reported data could be a recall bias, especially for questions that target behaviors or events in the distant past (e.g., sunburns before the age of 15). To enhance the generalizability of our findings, we followed the highest methodological standards, including a two-stage sampling method, non-responder analysis, and data weighting to reflect the general German population. Finally, intentional tanning, outdoor occupation, and use of tanning beds were the only UV-related behaviors included in this study. Thus, other ways of being exposed to UV radiation, e.g., outdoor physical activity, should be explored in future research as potential correlates of knowledge about NMSC.
Conclusion
This study was among the first to comprehensively assess the knowledge about NMSC in the general population. Our findings have implications for practical applications. While familiarity with colloquial terms for skin cancer and UV-related risk behaviors as risk factors for NMSC was comparably high, knowledge about signs, consequences, prevalence, and severity of NMSC was rather low. This suggests that individuals might not recognize NMSC on their skin, stressing the importance of educational interventions and skin cancer screening. Besides public health campaigns, expert recommendations, e.g., from general practitioners or dermatologists, can be effective in informing individuals about health behaviors (Sheeran et al. 2020) and may help individuals identify skin alterations by raising awareness about NMSC. However, health professionals should pay attention to their choice of words, as medical terms have been shown to be less familiar to the general population. Furthermore, educational campaigns should target male, less educated, and unemployed individuals, as they tended to know less about NMSC.
Availability of data and material
Data are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Code availability
Not applicable.
References
Altsitsiadis E, Undheim T, de Vries E, Hinrichs B, Stockfleth E, Trakatelli M and Group obotE (2012) Health literacy, sunscreen and sunbed use: an uneasy association. Br J Dermatol 167(s2):14-21.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2133.2012.11082.x
American Cancer Society (2022) Cancer facts & figures 2022. American Cancer Society. https://www.cancer.org/content/dam/cancer-org/research/cancer-facts-and-statistics/annual-cancer-facts-and-figures/2022/2022-cancer-facts-and-figures.pdf. Accessed 07.12.2023
Brokmeier LL, Diehl K, Spähn BA, Jansen C, Konkel T, Uter W, Görig T (2023) “Well, to be honest, i don’t have an idea of what it might be”—a qualitative study on knowledge and awareness regarding nonmelanoma skin cancer. Curr Oncol 30(2):2290–2299. https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol30020177
Chapman S (2018) Is it unethical to use fear in public health campaigns? Am J Public Health 108(9):1120–1122. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2018.304630
Clark WH, Elder DE, Guerry D, Epstein MN, Greene MH, Van Horn M (1984) A study of tumor progression: the precursor lesions of superficial spreading and nodular melanoma. Hum Pathol 15(12):1147–1165. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0046-8177(84)80310-X
Diehl K, Thoonen K, Breitbart EW, Pfahlberg AB and Görig T (2022) Sun protection and tanning behaviors in caregivers: prevalence, determinants, and associations with children’s behaviors. Int J Environ Res Public Health 19(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19116876
Duarte AF, Nagore E, Silva JNM, Picoto A, Pereira AC, Correia OJC (2018) Sun protection behaviour and skin cancer literacy among outdoor runners. Eur J Dermatol 28(6):803–808. https://doi.org/10.1684/ejd.2018.3450
Fernandez Figueras MT (2017) From actinic keratosis to squamous cell carcinoma: pathophysiology revisited. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 31(S2):5–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/jdv.14151
Firnhaber JM (2012) Diagnosis and treatment of basal cell and squamous cell carcinoma. Am Fam Physician 86(2):161–168
Fitzpatrick T (1975) Soleil et peau. J De Medecine Esthetique 2:33–34
Gangl M (2003) Bildung und Übergangsrisiken beim Einstieg in den Beruf. Z Erzieh 6(1):72–89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11618-003-0005-6
Gordon R (2013) Skin cancer: an overview of epidemiology and risk factors. Semin Oncol Nurs 29(3):160–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soncn.2013.06.002
Görig T, Diehl K, Greinert R, Breitbart EW, Schneider S (2018) Prevalence of sun-protective behaviour and intentional sun tanning in German adolescents and adults: results of a nationwide telephone survey. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 32(2):225–235. https://doi.org/10.1111/jdv.14376
Halpern AC, Kopp LJ (2005) Awareness, knowledge and attitudes to non-melanoma skin cancer and actinic keratosis among the general public. Int J Dermatol 44(2):107–111. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-4632.2005.02090.x
Haluza D, Simic S, Höltge J, Cervinka R, Moshammer H (2016) Gender aspects of recreational sun-protective behavior: results of a representative, population-based survey among Austrian residents. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed 32(1):11–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/phpp.12213
Jones OT, Ranmuthu CKI, Hall PN, Funston G, Walter FM (2020) Recognising skin cancer in primary care. Adv Ther 37(1):603–616. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-019-01130-1
Kasparian NA, McLoone JK, Meiser B (2009) Skin cancer-related prevention and screening behaviors: a review of the literature. J Behav Med 32(5):406–428. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-009-9219-2
Keeney S, McKenna H, Fleming P, McIlfatrick S (2009) Attitudes, knowledge and behaviours with regard to skin cancer: a literature review. Eur J Oncol Nurs 13(1):29–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejon.2008.11.004
Kiviniemi MT, Ellis EM (2014) Worry about skin cancer mediates the relation of perceived cancer risk and sunscreen use. J Behav Med 37(6):1069–1074. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-013-9538-1
Leiter U, Keim U, Eigentler T, Katalinic A, Holleczek B, Martus P, Garbe C (2017) Incidence, mortality, and trends of nonmelanoma skin cancer in Germany. J Invest Dermatol 137(9):1860–1867. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jid.2017.04.020
Leitlinienprogramm Onkologie (2021) Leitlinienprogramm Onkologie. S3-Leitlinie Prävention von Hautkrebs, Langversion 2.0 Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft, Deutsche Krebshilfe, AWMF. AWMF Registernummer: 032/052OL. https://www.leitlinienprogramm-onkologie.de/leitlinien/hautkrebs-praevention/. Accessed
Lomas A, Leonardi-Bee J, Bath-Hextall F (2012) A systematic review of worldwide incidence of nonmelanoma skin cancer. Br J Dermatol 166(5):1069–1080. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2133.2012.10830.x
Loney T, Paulo MS, Modenese A, Gobba F, Tenkate T, Whiteman DC, Green AC, John SM (2021) Global evidence on occupational sun exposure and keratinocyte cancers: a systematic review. Br J Dermatol 184(2):208–218. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjd.19152
MacKie RM (2004) Awareness, knowledge and attitudes to basal cell carcinoma and actinic keratoses among the general public within Europe. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 18(5):552–555. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-3083.2004.00993.x
Madan V, Lear JT, Szeimies R-M (2010) Non-melanoma skin cancer. Lancet 375(9715):673–685. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61196-X
Meyer SR, Rudzki-Senet A, Emde N-L, Imhof L, Dummer R, Barysch MJ (2021) Results of a 10-year web-based health promotion campaign against skin cancer in Switzerland. Eur J Dermatol 31(4):530–537. https://doi.org/10.1684/ejd.2021.4094
Miles A, Waller J, Hiom S, Swanston D (2005) SunSmart? Skin cancer knowledge and preventive behaviour in a British population representative sample. Health Educ Res 20(5):579–585. https://doi.org/10.1093/her/cyh010
Navarrete-Dechent C, Bajaj S, Marchetti MA, Rabinovitz H, Dusza SW, Marghoob AA (2016) Association of shiny white blotches and strands with nonpigmented basal cell carcinoma: evaluation of an additional dermoscopic diagnostic criterion. JAMA Dermatol 152(5):546–552. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamadermatol.2015.5731
Nederhof AJ (1985) Methods of coping with social desirability bias: a review. Eur J Soc Psychol 15(3):263–280. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420150303
Park J, Lim MK, Yun EH, Oh J-K, Jeong BY, Cheon Y, Lim S (2018) Influences of tobacco-related knowledge on awareness and behavior towards smoking. J Korean Med Sci 33(47):e302. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2018.33.e302
Renner B, Schwarzer R (2003) Social-cognitive factors in health behavior change. In: Suls J, Wallston KA (eds) Social psychological foundations of health and illness. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 169–196
Schaeffer D, Berens EM, Vogt D (2017) Health literacy in the German population. Dtsch Arztebl Int 114(4):53–60. https://doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.2017.0053
Schenk L, Bau AM, Borde T, Butler J, Lampert T, Neuhauser H, Razum O, Weilandt C (2006) Mindestindikatorensatz zur Erfassung des Migrationsstatus. Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz 49(9):853–860. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00103-006-0018-4
Schmitt J, Seidler A, Diepgen TL, Bauer A (2011) Occupational ultraviolet light exposure increases the risk for the development of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Dermatol 164(2):291–307. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2133.2010.10118.x
Schneider S, Zimmermann S, Diehl K, Breitbart EW, Greinert R (2009) Sunbed Use in German adults: risk awareness does not correlate with behaviour. Acta Derm Venereol 89(5):470–475. https://doi.org/10.2340/00015555-0689
Sessa A, Abbate R, Di Giuseppe G, Marinelli P, Angelillo IF (2008) Knowledge, attitudes, and preventive practices about colorectal cancer among adults in an area of Southern Italy. BMC Cancer 8:171. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-8-171
Sheeran P, Goldstein AO, Abraham C, Eaker K, Wright CE, Villegas ME, Jones K, Avishai A, Miles E, Gates KM, Noar SM (2020) Reducing exposure to ultraviolet radiation from the sun and indoor tanning: a meta-analysis. Health Psychol 39(7):600–616. https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0000863
Sim D, Yuan SE, Yun JH (2016) Health literacy and physician-patient communication: a review of the literature. Int J Commun Health 10:101–114
Sobkow A, Zaleskiewicz T, Petrova D, Garcia-Retamero R and Traczyk J (2020) Worry, risk perception, and controllability predict intentions toward COVID-19 preventive behaviors. Front Psychol 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.582720
Statista (2023) Bevölkerung in Deutschland I. Statistisches Bundesamt. https://de.statista.com/statistik/studie/id/7661/dokument/bevoelkerung-in-deutschland-i-statista-dossier/. Accessed 14.02.2023
Taghipour A, Shahroudi M, Tabesh H, Safari-Moradabadi A, Alipour Anbarani M (2019) The effect of educational intervention based on the theory of planned behavior and stages of change construct on women’s physical activity. J Educ Health Prom 8(1):195–195. https://doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_45_19
Turrisi R, Hillhouse J, Heavin S, Robinson J, Adams M, Berry J (2004) Examination of the short-term efficacy of a parent-based intervention to prevent skin cancer. J Behav Med 27(4):393–412. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOBM.0000042412.53765.06
Urban K, Mehrmal S, Uppal P, Giesey RL, Delost GR (2021) The global burden of skin cancer: a longitudinal analysis from the global burden of disease study, 1990–2017. JAAD Inter 2:98–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdin.2020.10.013
Veness MJ, Delishaj D, Barnes EA, Bezugly A, Rembielak A (2019) Current role of radiotherapy in non-melanoma skin cancer. Clin Oncol 31(11):749–758. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clon.2019.08.004
Werner P (2003) Knowledge about symptoms of Alzheimer’s disease: correlates and relationship to help-seeking behavior. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 18(11):1029–1036. https://doi.org/10.1002/gps.1011
World Health Organization (2021) Health Promotion glossary of terms 2021. World Health Organization. Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240038349. Accessed 20.07.2023
Ziehfreund S, Schuster B, Zink A (2019) Primary prevention of keratinocyte carcinoma among outdoor workers, the general population and medical professionals: a systematic review updated for 2019. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 33(8):1477–1495. https://doi.org/10.1111/jdv.15525
Zink A (2017) Nichtmelanozytärer Hautkrebs. Hautarzt 68(11):919–928. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00105-017-4058-5
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL. The National Cancer Aid Monitoring has been supported by the German Cancer Aid (project grant numbers: 70113366, 70113371). The German Cancer Aid was not involved in the study preparation, data collection, or analysis.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
KD, TG, and EWB were responsible for study conception and design. Material preparation was performed by KD, TG, BAS, and LLB. LLB and KD conducted the analyses. LLB, KD, TG, MH, and EWB were responsible for the interpretation of results. LLB and KD wrote the main manuscript text and prepared all tables. All authors reviewed the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
The present work was performed in partial fulfillment of the requirements for obtaining the degree “Dr. rer. biol. hum.” (LLB) at the Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU).
Ethics approval
The Ethics Committee II of the Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University (2017-662N-MA, Mannheim, December 6, 2017) approved the design and procedures of this study.
Consent to participate
All participants gave consent to take part in the study.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Conflicts of interest
The authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Brokmeier, L.L., Görig, T., Spähn, B.A. et al. What does the general population know about nonmelanoma skin cancer? Representative cross-sectional data from Germany. J Public Health (Berl.) (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-024-02280-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-024-02280-5