Abstract
Background
Chronic pain affects 20% of the adult population, and pain-related consultations comprise a significant amount of all primary care visits.
Objective
The purpose of this study was to describe health care utilization by primary care physicians for patients with a consultation for pain and to compare subsequent health care utilization and costs for a physician trained in the McKenzie method, or mechanical diagnosis and therapy (MDT), with a group of physicians that were not trained in MDT.
Design, setting, and participants
This study was a single-center retrospective quality and cost metrics data analysis performed at a community regional health-care system; patients seen by primary care physicians for a consultation for pain had subsequent health care utilization and costs compared for a physician trained in MDT with a group of 19 physicians who were not trained in MDT. A total of 22,907 continuously eligible patients were seen during the 12-month period for a pain-related complaint; 1282 patients (6%) were seen by the physician trained in MDT, and 21,625 patients (94%) were seen by the group of physicians that were not trained in MDT (n = 19).
Key results
The patients seen by the physician trained in MDT had a decreased likelihood of medication use including both opioids and non-opioid pain pills, diagnostic imaging, electromyography/nerve conduction velocity testing, specialty referrals, injections (joint and spinal injections), surgeries, emergency room visits, and inpatient admissions. Also, patients who were seen by the physician trained in MDT cost significantly less to the system ($3481 per member per year versus $4852, p < 0.001), despite being older and having more medical problems and pain complaints.
Conclusions
Although further research is necessary to either support or refute these findings, these results may have important implications for health policy decisions for designing optimal primary care models and consideration of MDT in primary care.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Almeida M, Saragiotto B, Richards B, Maher CG (2018) Primary care management of non-specific low back pain: key messages from recent clinical guidelines. Med J Aust 208:272–275
Clare H, Adams R, Maher C (2004) A systematic review of efficacy of McKenzie therapy for spinal pain. Australian J Physiother 50:209–216
Courtney P, Doherty M (2002) Key questions concerning paracetamol and NSAIDs for osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 61:767–773
Dahlhamer J, Lucas J, Zelaya C, Nahin R, Mackey S, DeBar L, Kerns R, Von Korff M, Porter L, Helmick C (2018) Prevalence of chronic pain and high-impact chronic pain among adults — United States, 2016. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 67:1001–1006. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6736a2externalicon.
Deyo R, Mirza S, Martin B (2006) Back pain prevalence and visit rates: estimates from U.S. national surveys, 2002. Spine 31:2724–2727
Dieleman JL, Baral R, Birger M, Bui AL, Bulchis A, Chapin A, Hamavid H, Horst C, Johnson EK, Joseph J, Lavado R, Lomsadze L, Reynolds A, Squires E, Campbell M, DeCenso B, Dicker D, Flaxman AD, Gabert R, Highfill T, Naghavi M, Nightingale N, Templin T, Tobias MI, Vos T, Murray CJ (2016) US spending on personal health care and public health, 1996–2013. JAMA 316:2627–2646. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.16885
Dowell D, Haegerich TM, Chou R (2016) CDC guideline for prescribing opioids for chronic pain—United States. MMWR Recomm Rep 65:1–49. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.rr6501e1.
Franklin GM, Stover BD, Turner JA, Fulton-Kehoe D, Wickizer TM, Disability Risk Identification Study Cohort (2008) Early opioid prescription and subsequent disability among workers with back injuries: the Disability Risk Identification Study Cohort. Spine 33:199–204
Henry SG, Bell RA, Fenton JJ, Kravitz RL (2018) Communication about chronic pain and opioids in primary care: impact on patient and physician visit experience. Pain 159:371–379
Hoy DG, Smith E, Cross M, Sanchez-Riera L, Buchbinder R, Blyth FM, Brooks P, Woolf AD, Osborne RH, Fransen M, Driscoll T, Vos T, Blore JD, Murray C, Johns N, Naghavi M, Carnahan E, March LM (2014) The global burden of musculoskeletal conditions for 2010: an overview of methods. Ann Rheum Dis 73:982–989
Lovecchio F, Premkumar A, Stepan JG, Albert TJ (2019) Fighting back: institutional strategies to combat the opioid epidemic: a systematic review. HSS J 15:66–71
Maeng DD, Baylor K, Bulger JB, Han JJ (2018) A multidisciplinary pain management program on patient care utilization and cost of care. J of Pain Res 11:2375–2383
McKenzie R, May S (1990) The cervical & thoracic spine: mechanical diagnosis & therapy. Spinal Publications, Waikanae, New Zealand
McKenzie RA, May S (2003) The lumbar spine: mechanical diagnosis and therapy, 2nd edn. Spinal Publications, Waikanae, New Zealand
Oliveira CB, Maher CG, Pinto RZ, Traeger AC, Lin CC, Chenot JF, van Tulder M, Koes BW (2018) Clinical practice guidelines for the management of non-specific low back pain in primary care: an updated overview. Eur Spine J 27:2791–2803. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-018-5673-2
Pirmohamed M, James S, Meakin S, Green C, Scott AK, Walley TJ, Farrar K, Park BK, Breckenridge AM (2004) Adverse drug reactions as cause of admission to hospital: prospective analysis of 18 820 patients. BMJ 329:15–19
Qaseem A, Wilt TJ, RM ML, Forciea MA, Clinical Guidelines Committee of the American College of Physicians (2017) Noninvasive treatments for acute, subacute, and chronic low back pain: a clinical practice guideline from the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med 166:514–530. https://doi.org/10.7326/M16-2367
Webster BS, Cifuentes M (2010) Relationship of early magnetic resonance imaging for work-related acute low back pain with disability and medical utilization outcomes. J Occup Environ Med 52:900–907
Webster BS, Verma SK, Gatchel RJ (2007) Relationship between early opioid prescribing for acute occupational low back pain and disability duration, medical costs, subsequent surgery and late opioid use. Spine 32:2127–2132
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
This study was conducted according to the guidelines laid down in the Declaration of Helsinki and the procedures involving human subjects/patients were approved by the Institutional Review Board of Mosaic Life Care, Saint Joseph, Missouri. Due to the retrospective nature of the study informed consent was not required.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Agarwal, V., Schenk, R. & Ross, M. Primary care management of patients with pain complaints and the influence of physician training in mechanical diagnosis and therapy. J Public Health (Berl.) 30, 1265–1271 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-020-01386-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-020-01386-w