Abstract
Objective
This study aims to explore within-country heterogeneity in the causal relationship between body mass and labour income. We focus on Mexico, which is an emerging country where overweight is predominant and hunger has become marginal.
Subjects and methods
Based on the working-age population from the Mexican Family Life Survey (2002–2012), we use a regression discontinuity design to test for significant discontinuities along the body mass-income relationship. More specifically, we investigate the presence of income gaps along the body mass distribution.
Results
Our findings suggest that the overweight status is not particularly penalised in the Mexican labour market. By contrast, the obesity status decreases hourly wages by about 15%. Regarding heterogeneity, obesity-related wage penalties are stronger for female than male employees and higher in service employments, urban areas and the latest survey.
Conclusion
We conclude on a co-occurrence of pro- and anti-fat social norms in emerging countries. Our results might be generalised to other middle-income economies with similar nutritional patterns where hunger is marginal and overweight predominant.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
BMI = [weight(kg)/height(m)2]. The World Health Organisation classifies the BMI for an adult as follows (WHO 2000): underweight (<18.5 kg/m2); normal weight (18.5–25 kg/m2); overweight (25–30 kg/m2); obesity (>30 kg/m2).
For example, in the US, Robinson and Christiansen (2014) observe a social acceptance process for obesity in areas where overweight has become the physical norm. It is likely that this process is also occurring in emerging countries where overweight and obesity rates have reached the same level as in the US.
The MxFLS reports five work statuses in Mexican cities: (1) inactive and unemployed people; (2) unpaid workers; (3) employees; (4) self-employed workers; (5) employers.
Given the relatively low proportion of self-employed workers in the Mexican labour force, the potential heterogeneity within this sample is not investigated.
Apart from these three occupational groups, we also identify four outlier occupations in Fig. 1 that we cannot classify in any specific group (transport workers, street vendors, security workers and domestic workers). Despite their singularities, these outlier employees have one thing in common: high rates of overweight and obesity (probably due to the sedentary, monotonous and/or stressful nature of their occupation).
This Spanish-speaking term refers to occupations that derive from academic and engineering studies.
Available online: http://dof.gob.mx/nota_detalle.php?codigo=5154226&fecha=04/08/2010. Note that we aggregate individuals initially classified as “underweight” into the “normal-weight” category because of the low proportion of underweight workers in Mexico. In our sample, only 2% of the labour force is underweight (Table A.1 of the Appendix).
By contrast, a fuzzy RDD must be implemented when the cut-off between control and treatment groups is more ambiguous (Imbens and Lemieux 2008).
\( \mathrm{Hourly}\ \mathrm{income}=\frac{\mathrm{monthly}\ \mathrm{income}}{\frac{\mathrm{weekly}\ \mathrm{working}\ \mathrm{hours}}{7}\times 30,5} \).
The relevance of both thresholds is tested using a placebo procedure. This test shows that 25 kg/m2 and 30 kg/m2 are the unique BMI cut-offs that lead to significant earning gaps for self-employed and salaried workers, respectively.
The score varies from 0 to 6 from a low level to a high level of infrastructural development. It takes into account the presence (or absence) of public transportation, a health centre, a refuse collection service, a sewage system, a hydraulic system and hard roads in the municipality.
Since we did not observe any local effect of overweight on hourly wage, only local effects of obesity are presented in this part of the study. Remember that only the employee sample is segmented into different sub-samples.
References
Almond D, Lee A, Schwartz AE (2016) Impacts of classifying New York City students as overweight. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 113:3488–3491. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1518443113
Andalón M (2011) Oportunidades to reduce overweight and obesity in Mexico? Health Econ 20(Suppl 1):1–18. https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.1773
Bleidorn W, Arslan RC, Denissen JJA et al (2016) Age and gender differences in self-esteem-a cross-cultural window. J Pers Soc Psychol 111:396–410. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000078
Bourdieu P (1986) Distinction: a social critique of the judgement of taste, 1 edition. Routledge
Brewis AA, Wutich A, Falletta-Cowden A, Rodriguez-Soto I (2011) Body norms and fat stigma in global perspective. Curr Anthropol 52:269–276. https://doi.org/10.1086/659309
Caliendo M, Gehrsitz M (2016) Obesity and the labor market: a fresh look at the weight penalty. Econ Hum Biol 23:209–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ehb.2016.09.004
Card D, Mas A, Rothstein J (2008) Tipping and the dynamics of segregation. Q J Econ 123:177–218
Cawley J (2004) The impact of obesity on wages. J Hum Resour 39:451–474
Classen T (2017) Changes over time in the relationship of obesity to education accumulation. East Econ J 43:496–519. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41302-016-0079-5
DeBeaumont R (2009) Occupational differences in the wage penalty for obese women. J Socio-Econ 38:344–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2008.10.001
Dinda S, Gangopadhyay PK, Chattopadhyay BP et al (2006) Height, weight and earnings among coalminers in India. Econ Hum Biol 4:342–350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ehb.2005.10.003
Glick P, Sahn DE (1998) Health and productivity in a heterogeneous urban labour market. Appl Econ 30:203–216
Gong X, van Soest A, Villagomez E (2004) Mobility in the urban labor market: a panel data analysis for Mexico. Econ Dev Cult Chang 53:1–36. https://doi.org/10.1086/edcc.2004.53.issue-1
Guendelman S, Ritterman-Weintraub ML, Fernald LCH, Kaufer-Horwitz M (2011) Weight perceptions among overweight and obese women: a US-Mexico binational perspective. Obes Silver Spring Md 19:2440–2443. https://doi.org/10.1038/oby.2011.194
Hazuda HP, Haffner SM, Stern MP, Eifler CW (1988) Effects of acculturation and socioeconomic status on obesity and biabetes in Mexican Americans. Am J Epidemiol 128:1289–1301. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115082
Huang C-C, Yabiku ST, Ayers SL, Kronenfeld JJ (2016) The obesity pay gap: gender, body size, and wage inequalities—a longitudinal study of Chinese adults, 1991–2011. J Popul Res 33:221–242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12546-016-9170-3
Imbens GW, Lemieux T (2008) Regression discontinuity designs: a guide to practice. J Econ 142:615–635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2007.05.001
Johar M, Katayama H (2012) Quantile regression analysis of body mass and wages. Health Econ 21:597–611. https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.1736
Levasseur P (2015) Causal effects of socioeconomic status on central adiposity risks: evidence using panel data from urban Mexico. Soc Sci Med 136–137:165–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.05.018
Mancilla-Díaz JM, López-Aguilar X, Franco-Paredes K et al (2012) Role of peer influence and thin-ideal internalization on body dissatisfaction and disordered eating in Mexican girls. Rev Colomb Psicol 21:343–353
Moscoe E, Bor J, Bärnighausen T (2015) Regression discontinuity designs are underutilized in medicine, epidemiology, and public health: a review of current and best practice. J Clin Epidemiol 68:132–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.06.021
Pan J, Qin X, Liu GG (2013) The impact of body size on urban employment: evidence from China. China Econ Rev 27:249–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2012.04.006
Pinkston JC (2017) The dynamic effects of obesity on the wages of young workers. Econ Hum Biol 27:154–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ehb.2017.05.006
Poulain J-P (2017) The sociology of food: eating and the place of food in society. Bloomsbury Publishing, London, England.
Robinson E, Christiansen P (2014) The changing face of obesity: exposure to and acceptance of obesity. Obes Silver Spring Md 22:1380–1386. https://doi.org/10.1002/oby.20699
Schultz TP (2003) Wage rentals for reproducible human capital: evidence from Ghana and the Ivory Coast. Econ Hum Biol 1:331–366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ehb.2003.08.004
Shimokawa S (2008) The labour market impact of body weight in China: a semiparametric analysis. Appl Econ 40:949–968. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036840600771239
Slade P (2017) Body mass and wages: new evidence from quantile estimation. Econ Hum Biol 27:223–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ehb.2017.07.001
WHO (2000) Obesity: preventing and managing the global epidemic. WHO Tech Rep 894:5–37
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
The author declares that he has no financial and non-financial conflict of interest. No ethical approval is required to use the Mexican Family Life Survey. This database is anonymous and does not contain personal information. Please see the website for more information about the data: www.ennvih-mxfls.org. The author is responsible for all remaining errors.
Additional information
Key points
Overweight status is not particularly penalised in the Mexican labour market.
Obesity status decreases hourly wages by about 15%.
Obesity-related wage penalties are stronger for female than male employees and higher in service employments, urban areas and the latest survey.
Electronic supplementary material
ESM 1
(DOCX 77 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Levasseur, P. Implementing a regression discontinuity design to explore the heterogeneous effects of obesity on labour income: the case of Mexico. J Public Health (Berl.) 27, 89–101 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-018-0925-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-018-0925-5