Abstract
Aim
In India the public health-care system is unable to keep pace with the growing need, and the country has witnessed unprecedented growth in the number of private health-care institutions. However, the pattern of utilization of public and private health-care facilities and the cost of treatment in these hospitals remains unclear; thus, this is the main objective of this study.
Subjects and methods
The study explores the data of 6,726 inpatients hospitalized for treatment of diarrheal diseases, heart disease, tuberculosis, urological diseases and gynecological disorders from a nationally representative survey on health care conducted by the National Sample Survey Organization (NSSO, 2006) in its 60th round in 2004. A multilevel model, with patients (first level) nested in states (second level), was used to unearth the adjusted costs of hospitalization for people of different backgrounds. Logistic regression was used to obtain the adjusted odds of choosing public facilities compared to private facilities by ailment type, hospital characteristics and patient backgrounds.
Results
The analysis revealed that more than 58 percent of the patients have utilized private health-care facilities in India. As expected, the mean cost of treatment in private hospitals is Rs. 5,019 after adjusting for confounders compared to Rs. 1,307 for public hospitals. The mean adjusted cost of treatment of heart diseases is Rs. 5,981, followed by Rs. 5,402, Rs. 4,616, Rs. 2,478 and Rs. 891 for urological diseases, gynecological disorders, tuberculosis and diarrheal diseases, respectively. Better off patients incurred the highest out-of-pocket costs, in the range of Rs. 4,967 to Rs. 8,457. It is evident that for the diseases considered in the study, the private sector plays an important role in providing health facilities.
Conclusion
The cost of hospitalization in private health facilities is considerably higher compared to that of public facilities as far as the five ailments are concerned. Among the ailments, chronic conditions were seen to consume higher costs of treatment. However, more people opted for the unregulated private facilities.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Benzaquen BS, Eisenberg MJ, Challapali R, Nguyen T, Brown KJ and Topol EJ (1998) Correlates of in-hospital cost among patients undergoing abdominal aortic aneursym repair. Am Heart J 136 (4), part 1: 696–702
Bertakis KD, Azari R, Callahan EJ, Helms LJ, Robbins JA (1999) The impact of physician practice style on medical charges. J Fam Pract 48:31–36
Bhat R (1993) The private/public mix in health care in India. Health Policy Plan 8(1):43–56
Bhat R, Jain N (2006) Analysis of public and private healthcare expenditures. Econ Polit Wkly January 7:57–68
Bhatia JC, Cleland J (2004) Health care of female outpatients in south-central India: comparing public and private sector provision. Health Policy Plan 19(6):402–409
Duggal R, Amin S (1989) Cost of health care: a household survey in an Indian district. The Foundation for Research in Community Health, Bombay
Kamat VR (2001) Private practitioners and their role in the resurgence of malaria in Mumbai (Bombay) and Navi Mumbai (New Bombay), India: serving the affected or aiding an epidemic? Soc Sci Med 52:885–909
Liu K, Dong H, Sauerborn R (2005) Cost analysis of pneumonia treatment in the Philippines. Int J Health Plann Manag 18:221–231
McLughlin CG, Normolle DP, Wolfe RA, McMahon LF Jr, Griffith JR (1989) Small-area variation in hospital discharge. Do socioeconomic variables matter? Med Care 27:507–521
Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (2005) Report of the National Commission on Macroeconomics and Health. Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, New Delhi, India
National Sample Survey Organization (2000) Survey on consumer expenditure. Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation, Government of India
National Sample Survey Organization (2006) Survey on morbidity, health care and the condition of the aged. Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation, Government of India
Ruger JP, Kim HJ (2007) Out-of-pocket healthcare spending by the poor and chronically ill in the Republic of Korea. Am J Public Health 97(5):804–811
Smith LR, Milano CA, Molter BS, Elbeery JR, Sabiston Jr. DC and Smith PK (1994) Preoperative determinants of postoperative cost associated with coronary-artary by pass graft-surgery. Circulation 90 (5), part 2: 124–128
Uplekar M, Pathania V, Raviglione M (2001) Private practitioners and public health: weak links in tuberculosis control. Lancet 358:912–916
World Bank. World Development Report (1993) Investing in Health. Oxford University Press, New York
Yesudian CAK (1990) Utilization pattern of health services and its implications for urban health policy. Takemi Program in International Health, Harvard School of Public Health, December. Draft
Acknowledgement
The author would like to thank to the two reviewers for their valuable comments in improving the paper.
Conflict of interest
The author confirms that there are no relevant associations that might pose a conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Singh, C.H. The public-private differential in health care and health-care costs in India: the case of inpatients. J Public Health 17, 401–407 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-009-0268-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-009-0268-3