Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The association of primary tumor site with acute adverse event and efficacy of definitive chemoradiotherapy for cStage II/III esophageal cancer: an exploratory analysis of JCOG0909

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Esophagus Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

JCOG0909 is a phase II trial of definitive chemoradiotherapy including salvage treatment for cStage II–III thoracic esophageal cancer; the radiation field for elective regional lymph node irradiation, which can affect patient outcome and adverse event, varied based on the primary tumor site, i.e., upper (Ut), middle (Mt), and lower thoracic (Lt) esophagus. The impact of different primary sites on the safety and efficacy of definitive chemoradiotherapy in JCOG0909 is not well characterized.

Methods

Patients were categorized into three groups (Ut, Mt, and Lt) according to the primary tumor location. We compared acute adverse events during definitive chemoradiotherapy, complete response (CR) rate, 3-year progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) among the 3 groups.

Results

Out of the 96 patients enrolled in JCOG0909 between April 2010 and August 2014, 94 patients (16, 59, and 19 patients in the Ut, Mt, and Lt groups, respectively) were included in this exploratory analysis. The proportion of patients with cStage III was 25% in the Ut, 37% in the Mt, and 47% in the Lt group. Grade 3–4 leukopenia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia were more frequently observed in the Mt (66%, 54%, and 15%) and Lt groups (84%, 68%, and 16%) than in the Ut group (38%, 44%, and 0%). There was no significant between-group difference with respect to 3-year OS (73.3%, 77.9%, and 57.9%), 3-year PFS (60.0%, 59.3%, and 47.4%), or CR rate (62.5%, 62.7%, and 42.1%).

Conclusions

In JCOG0909, the incidence of severe hematological toxicity had a trend toward higher in the Mt and Lt than the Ut esophageal cancer; however, no remarkable difference by primary sites was observed with respect to efficacy endpoints.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68:394–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. van Hagen P, Hulshof MC, van Lanschot JJ, et al. Preoperative chemoradiotherapy for esophageal or junctional cancer. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:2074–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ando N, Kato H, Igaki H, et al. A randomized trial comparing postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil versus preoperative chemotherapy for localized advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus (JCOG9907). Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19:68–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Sjoquist KM, Burmeister BH, Smithers BM, et al. Survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy for resectable oesophageal carcinoma: an updated meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2011;12:681–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kranzfelder M, Schuster T, Geinitz H, et al. Meta-analysis of neoadjuvant treatment modalities and definitive non-surgical therapy for oesophageal squamous cell cancer. Br J Surg. 2011;98:768–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Lordick F, Mariette C, Haustermans K, et al. Oesophageal cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2016;27:v50–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ohtsu A, Boku N, Muro K, et al. Definitive chemoradiotherapy for T4 and/or M1 lymph node squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17:2915–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ishikura S, Ohtsu A, Shirao K, et al. A phase I/II study of nedaplatin and 5-fluorouracil with concurrent radiotherapy in patients with T4 esophageal cancer: Japan Clinical Oncology Group trial (JCOG 9908). Esophagus. 2005;2:133–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ishida K, Ando N, Yamamoto S, et al. Phase II study of cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil with concurrent radiotherapy in advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus: a Japan Esophageal Oncology Group (JEOG)/Japan Clinical Oncology Group trial (JCOG9516). Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2004;34:615–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ito Y, Takiuchi H, Ogawa G, et al. A single-arm confirmatory study of definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) including salvage treatment in patients (pts) with clinical (c) stage II/III esophageal carcinoma (EC) (JCOG0909). J Clin Oncol. 2018;36(15 suppl):4051. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2018.36.15_suppl.4051.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Minsky BD, Pajak TF, Ginsberg RJ, et al. INT 0123 (Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 94-05) phase III trial of combined-modality therapy for esophageal cancer: high-dose versus standard-dose radiation therapy. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20:1167–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Al-Sarraf M, Martz K, Herskovic A, et al. Progress report of combined chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone in patients with esophageal cancer: an intergroup study. J Clin Oncol. 1997;15:277–84.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA, et al. New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000;92:205–16.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kuwano H, Nishimura Y, Ohtsu A, et al. Guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of carcinoma of the esophagus April 2007 edition: part I Edited by the Japan Esophageal Society. Esophagus. 2008;5:61–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Okuno T, Wakabayashi M, Kato K, et al. Esophageal stenosis and the Glasgow Prognostic Score as independent factors of poor prognosis for patients with locally advanced unresectable esophageal cancer treated with chemoradiotherapy (exploratory analysis of JCOG0303). Int J Clin Oncol. 2017;22:1042–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Mac Manus M, Lamborn K, Khan W, et al. Radiotherapy-associated neutropenia and thrombocytopenia:analysis of risk factors and development of a predictive model. Blood. 1997;89:2303–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Mauch P, Constine L, Greenberger J, et al. Hematopoietic stem cell compartment:acute and late effects of radiation therapy and chemotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1995;31:1319–39.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Yamashita H, Okuma K, Wakui R, et al. Details of recurrence sites after elective nodal irradiation (ENI) using 3D-conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) combined with chemotherapy for thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma–a retrospective analysis. Radiother Oncol. 2011;98:255–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kato K, Nakajima TE, Ito Y, et al. Phase II study of concurrent chemoradiotherapy at the dose of 50.4 Gy with elective nodal irradiation for Stage II–III esophageal carcinoma. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2013;43:608–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to the members of the JCOG Data Center and JCOG Operations Office for their support in data management, and oversight of the study management. JCOG0909 was supported in part by a National Cancer Center Research and Development Fund (20S-3, 23-A-16, 23-A-19, 26-A-4, 29-A-3, 2020-J-3). The authors would like to thank Enago (www.enago.jp) for the English language review.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shuichi Hironaka.

Ethics declarations

Ethical Statement

All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1964 and later versions.

Informed consent

Informed consent or substitute for it was obtained from all patients for being included in the study.

Conflict of interest

Dr. Hironaka reports personal fees from Tsumura & Co., Bristol-Myers Squibb Japan, Yakult Honsha, Daiichi Sankyo, Eli Lilly, Ono Pharmaceutical, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Chugai Pharma, Nihonkayaku, outside the submitted work; Dr. Machida reports grants from Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Japan, during the conduct of the study; Dr. Ogawa reports grants from Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Japan, grants from Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED), during the conduct of the study; Dr. Kato reports other from Ono Pharmaceuticals, personal fees from BMS, Eli Lilly, other from MSD, Shionogi, Beigene, Oncolys BioPharma, Merck Biopharma, outside the submitted work; Dr. Nakamura reports personal fees from Chugai, Taiho, Bayer, outside the submitted work; Dr. Hara reports grants from Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED), during the conduct of the study; grants from Astrazeneca, Dainippon Sumitomo Pharma, Merck Biopharma, Eisai, LSK BioPharma, Incyte, Pfizer, Boehringer-ingelheim, Beigene, grants and personal fees from Daiichi Sankyo, MSD, Taiho, Chugai, Ono, BMS, personal fees from Lilly, Yakult Honsha, Sanofi, Takeda, Astellas, outside the submitted work; Dr. Nakamura reports personal fees from Chugai, personal fees from Taiho, personal fees from Bayer, outside the submitted work; Dr. Fukuda reports grants from National Cancer Center and the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan, during the conduct of the study; personal fees from Taiho Pharma, personal fees from Chugai Pharmaceutical, outside the submitted work; Dr. Kitagawa reports grants from Pfizer Japan Inc., Yakult Honsha Co. Ltd., Kyowa Hakko Kirin Co., Ltd., during the conduct of the study; grants from Kyowa Hakko Kirin Co., Ltd., Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Yakult Honsha Co., Ltd., Daiichi Sankyo Company Ltd., Merck Serono Co., Ltd., Asahi Kasei Co., Ltd., EA Pharma Co., Ltd., Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Otsuka Pharmaceutical Factory Inc., Shionogi & Co., Ltd., Kaken Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd, Kowa Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Astellas Pharma Inc., Medicon Inc., Dainippon Sumitomo Pharma Co., Ltd., Taisho Toyama Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Kyowa Hakko Kirin Co., Ltd., Pfizer Japan Inc., ONO Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Nihon Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Japan Blood Products Organization, Medtronic Japan Co., Ltd., Sanofi K.K., Eisai Co., Ltd., Tsumura & Co., KCI Licensing, Inc., Abbott Japan Co., Ltd., Fujifilm Toyama Chemical Co., Ltd., outside the submitted work; Dr. Komori, Dr. Ito, Dr. Takeuchi, Dr. Onozawa, Dr. Minashi, Dr. Yano, Dr. Tsushima, Dr. Nozaki, Dr. Ura, and Dr. Chin has nothing to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hironaka, S., Komori, A., Machida, R. et al. The association of primary tumor site with acute adverse event and efficacy of definitive chemoradiotherapy for cStage II/III esophageal cancer: an exploratory analysis of JCOG0909. Esophagus 17, 417–424 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10388-020-00741-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10388-020-00741-w

Keywords

Navigation