Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Stage III esophageal adenocarcinoma: definitive chemoradiation vs. chemoradiation plus surgery

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Updates in Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The optimal management of patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer remains under debate. We aimed to compare the long-term survival outcomes between definitive chemoradiation (dCR) and chemoradiation plus surgery (CRS) in patients with stage III esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). Using the National Cancer Institute Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program registry, adults (≥ 18 years old) with diagnosis of AJCC 6th edition stage III EAC (T3/N1, T4/N0, and T4/N1) between 2004 and 2014 were included. A multivariable Cox regression was used to assess the effect of dCR and CRS on mortality. Of the 2633 patients included, 1115 (42%) underwent Dcr, and 1518 (58%) underwent CRS. The 5-year survival rate was 13% for patients undergoing dCR and 27% for patients undergoing CRS (p < 0.0001). Our observational data suggest that patients with stage III EAC may benefit by the use of esophagectomy after chemoradiotherapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hur C, Miller M, Kong CY et al (2013) Trends in esophageal adenocarcinoma incidence and mortality. Cancer 119(6):1149–1158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Arnold M, Laversanne M, Brown LM et al (2017) Predicting the future burden of esophageal cancer by histological subtype: international trends in incidence up to 2030. Am J Gastroenterol 112(8):1247–1255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. National Cancer Institute Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (2017) Cancer stats facts: esophageal cancer. https://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/esoph.html. Accessed 27 Dec 2017

  4. Stahl M, Budach W, Meyer HJ, Cervantes A, ESMO Guidelines Working Group (2010) Esophageal cancer: clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 21(Suppl 5):v46–v49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hernan MA, Sauer BC, Hernandez-Diaz S et al (2016) Specifying a target trial prevents immortal time bias and other self-inflicted injuries in observational analyses. J Clin Epidemiol 79:70–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Stahl M, Stuschke M, Lehmann N et al (2005) Chemoradiation with and without surgery in patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. J Clin Oncol 23(10):2310–2317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bedenne L, Michel P, Bouché O et al (2007) Chemoradiation followed by surgery compared with chemoradiation alone in squamous cancer of the esophagus: FFCD 9102. J Clin Oncol 25(10):1160–1168

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Vellayappan BA, Soon YY, Ku GY et al (2017) Chemoradiotherapy versus chemoradiotherapy plus surgery for esophageal cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 8:CD010511

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Shao MS, Wong AT, Schwartz D et al (2016) Definitive or preoperative chemoradiation therapy for esophageal cancer: patterns of care and survival outcomes. Ann Thorac Surg 101(6):2148–2154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Sepesi B, Schmidt HE, Lada M et al (2016) Survival in patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma undergoing trimodality therapy is independent of regional lymph node location. Ann Thorac Surg 101(3):1075–1080

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wood MD, Zaki BI, Gordon SR et al (2013) Trimodality therapy for stage II–III carcinoma of the esophagus: a dose-ranging study of concurrent capecitabine, docetaxel, and thoracic radiotherapy. J Thorac Oncol 8(4):487–494

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funding was received for the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francisco Schlottmann.

Ethics declarations

The study was IRB exempted for using de-identified data of a national database.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no financial or non-financial conflicts of interests.

Research involving human participants and/or animals

This study does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

For this type of study informed consent is not required.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schlottmann, F., Strassle, P.D., Gaber, C. et al. Stage III esophageal adenocarcinoma: definitive chemoradiation vs. chemoradiation plus surgery. Updates Surg 70, 423–426 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-018-0541-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-018-0541-5

Keywords

Navigation