Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Improved prediction of fellow-eye response in one-eye trials using multiple intraocular pressure measurements

  • Clinical Investigation
  • Published:
Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To examine the effects of multiple intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements on the correlation of response to glaucoma medication between fellow eyes.

Methods

Latanoprost was applied to the first eye and then to both eyes of 16 patients with either primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension. IOP measurements were performed twice on different days for each of three periods: at baseline, during treatment of the first eye only and for both eyes. IOP decreases in the first and second eyes were evaluated with ∆IOP 1 (=IOP at baseline − IOP after treatment) and ∆IOP 2 (=∆IOP 1 − IOP fluctuation of the contralateral eye). The correlation of IOP decreases between the fellow eyes was analyzed by linear regression analysis using the Pearson correlation coefficient, r.

Results

No significant correlations of ∆IOP1 between fellow eyes were found regardless of the number of IOP measurements. ∆IOP2 was significantly correlated between fellow eyes using two post-treatment IOP measurements, but not with a single post-treatment IOP.

Conclusions

Using multiple post-treatment IOP measurements may improve the prediction of a fellow eye’s response to glaucoma medication in one-eye trials.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Glaucoma Panel, Preferred Practice Patterns Committee. Primary Open-angle Glaucoma. San Francisco: American Academy of Ophthalmology; 2005. p. 13.

  2. Shieds MB. Principles of medical therapy for glaucoma. In: Textbook of glaucoma, 4th edn. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1998. p. 378.

  3. Ritch R, Shields MB, Krupin T. Chronic open-angle glaucoma: treatment overview. The glaucomas, 2nd edn. St Louis: Mosby; 1996. p. 1512.

  4. Realini T, Fechtner RD, Atreides SP, Gollance S. The uniocular drug trial and second-eye response to glaucoma medications. Ophthalmology. 2004;111:421–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Chaudhary O, Adelman RA, Shields MB. Predicting response to glaucoma therapy in one eye based on response in the fellow eye: the monocular trial. Arch Ophthalmol. 2008;126:1216–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Dayanir V, Cakmak H, Berkit I. The one-eye trial and fellow eye response to prostaglandin analogues. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol. 2008;36:136–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Takahashi M, Higashide T, Sakurai M, Sugiyama K. Discrepancy of the intraocular pressure response between fellow eyes in one-eye trials versus bilateral treatment: verification with normal subjects. J Glaucoma. 2008;17:169–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Dielemans I, Vingerling JR, Hofman A, Grobbee DE, de Jong PT. Reliability of intraocular pressure measurement with the Goldmann applanation tonometer in epidemiological studies. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1994;232:141–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Realini T. A prospective, randomized, investigator-masked evaluation of the monocular trial in ocular hypertension or open-angle glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 2009;116:1237–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tomomi Higashide.

About this article

Cite this article

Wakabayashi, Y., Higashide, T. & Sugiyama, K. Improved prediction of fellow-eye response in one-eye trials using multiple intraocular pressure measurements. Jpn J Ophthalmol 55, 480–485 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10384-011-0054-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10384-011-0054-y

Keywords

Navigation