Skip to main content
Log in

Reliability of intraocular pressure measurement with the Goldmann applanation tonometer in epidemiological studies

  • Clinical Investigation
  • Published:
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The reproducibility of intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement with the Goldmann applanation tonometer was investigated as part of a population-based epidemiological study. Sixty-two subjects were examined in a first measurement session. The IOP was measured three times consecutively in both eyes according to a fixed protocol. The mean standard deviation (SD) of these measurements was 0.8 mmHg. The mean intraobserver variation for the first measurement was 1.64 (SD 2.07) mmHg. For the median of the three measurements the intra-observer variation was 1.50 (SD 1.96) mmHg. The mean inter-observer values were 1.79 (SD 2.41) mmHg for the first measurement and 1.60 (SD 2.15) mmHg for the median measurement. The correlation coefficient between the median values of the three measurements of both observers was 0.81. No systematic differences were found between the two observers. Using the median value of three consecutive measurements reduced the inter-observer variation by 11% and the intra-observer variation by 9% compared with a single measurement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bechrakis E von (1966) Über den spontanen Druckabfall bei Applanation-Tonometrie. Ophthalmologica 151:604–614

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bengtsson B (1981) The prevalence of glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol 65:46–49

    Google Scholar 

  3. Berry V, Drance SM, Wiggins RL, Schulzer M (1966) A study of the errors of applanation tonometry and tonography on two groups of normal people. Can J Ophthalmol 1:213–220

    Google Scholar 

  4. Frenkel REP, Hong YJ, Shin DH (1988) Comparison of the Tono-Pen to the Goldmann applanation tonometer. Arch Ophthalmol 106:750–753

    Google Scholar 

  5. Goldmann H, Schmidt T (1957) Über Applanationstonometrie. Ophthalmologica 134:221–242

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hills M, Armitage P (1979) The two-period cross-over clinical trial. Br J Clin Pharmacol 8:7–20

    Google Scholar 

  7. Holman A, Grobbee DE, de Jong PTVM, van de Ouweland FA (1991) Determinants of disease and disability in the elderly: The Rotterdam Elderly Study. Eur J Epidemiol 74:403–422

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hollows FC, Graham PA (1966) Intra-ocular pressure, glaucoma, and glaucoma suspects in a defined population. Br J Ophthalmol 50:570–586

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kahn HA, Leibowitz HM, Ganley JP, Kini MM, Colton T, et al. (1977) The Framingham Eye Study. 1. Outline and major prevalence findings. Am J Epidemiol 106:17–32

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kao SF, Lichter PR, Bergstrom TJ, Rowe S, Musch DC (1987) Clinical comparison of the Oculab Tono-Pen to the Goldmann applanation tonometer. Ophthalmology 94:1541–1544

    Google Scholar 

  11. Klein BEK, Klein R, Sponsol WE, Franke T, Cantor LB, et al. (1992) Prevalence of glaucoma. The Beaver Dam Eye Study. Ophthalmology 99:1499–1504

    Google Scholar 

  12. Krakau CET, Wilke K (1971) On repeated tonometry. Acta Ophthalmol 49:611–614

    Google Scholar 

  13. Leske MS, Connell AMS, Kehoe R (1989) A pilot project of glaucoma in Barbados. Br J Ophthalmol 73:365–369

    Google Scholar 

  14. Moses RA (1958) The Goldmann applanation tonometer. Am J Ophthalmol 46: 865–869

    Google Scholar 

  15. Moses RA (1961) Repeated applanation tonometry. Ophthalmologica 142:663–668

    Google Scholar 

  16. Moses RA, Liu CH (1968) Repeated applanation tonometry. Am J Ophthalmol 66:89–91

    Google Scholar 

  17. Motolko MA, Feldman F, Hyde M, Hudy D (1982) Sources of variability in the results of applanation tonometry. Can J Ophthalmol 173:93–95

    Google Scholar 

  18. Phelps CD, Phelps GK (1976) Measurement of intraocular pressure: a study of its reproducibility. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 198:39–43

    Google Scholar 

  19. Quigley HA, Langham ME (1975) Comparative intraocular pressure measurements with the pneumotonograph and Goldmann tonometer. Am J Ophthalmol 80:266–273

    Google Scholar 

  20. Roper DL (1980) Applanation tonometry with and without fluorescein. Am J Ophthalmol 90:668–671

    Google Scholar 

  21. Shields MB (1982) The intraocular pressure. In: Shields MB (ed) A study guide for glaucoma. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, pp 56–60, 141–143, 163

    Google Scholar 

  22. Shiose Y, Komuro K, Itoh T, Amano M, Kawase Y (1981) New system for mass screening of glaucoma, as part of automated multiphasic health testing services. Jpn J Ophthalmol 25:160–177

    Google Scholar 

  23. Tielsch JM, Sommer A, Katz J, Royall RM, Quigley HA, et al. (1991) Racial variations in the prevalence of primary open-angle glaucoma. The Baltimore Eye Survey. JAMA 266:369–374

    Google Scholar 

  24. Thorburn W (1978) The accuracy of clinical applanation tonometry. Acta Ophthalmol 56:1–5

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dielemans, I., Vingerling, J.R., Hofman, A. et al. Reliability of intraocular pressure measurement with the Goldmann applanation tonometer in epidemiological studies. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 232, 141–144 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00176782

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00176782

Keywords

Navigation