Abstract
The empirical evidence about the temporal precedence between foreign direct investment (FDI) and economic growth in open developing economies is mixed. In this research effort, we explored the FDI-growth nexus for 16 developing countries of Latin American and the Caribbean countries during the last three decades, a period in which many of these countries introduced various economic and financial reforms. As a departure from many previous studies, the current analysis uses the Granger noncausality test procedure recently developed by Toda and Yamamoto (J Econ 66:225–250, 1995), and Dolado and Lutkepohl (Econ Rev 15:369–386, 1996)–TYDL. Our results suggest that the null hypothesis that ‘FDI does not Granger cause economic growth’ is rejected for all countries except Dominican Republic, Trinidad and Tobago, and Jamaica. There is also evidence of unidirectional causality from growth to FDI for all countries except Bolivia, Colombia, Costa Rica, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, El Salvador, Guatemala, and Jamaica. We found bidirectional causality for Argentina, Brazil, Mexico, Peru and Venezuela.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Also, FDI may have a negative effect on growth prospect of the recipient economy if they give rise to substantial reverse flows in the form of profit remittances, dividends and if the transnational corporations obtain concessions from the host country.
The lack of causality between FDI and growth in these countries might not be unconnected to the postulations by Borensztein et al. (1998) and Balasubramanyan et al. (1996). Borensztein et al. (1998) argued that the spillover effect of FDI on economic growth can only be successful if certain characteristics exit in the host country. They show that adoption of new technologies and management skills is possible only when there is a certain minimum or threshold level of human capital available in the host country. Further, Balasubramanyan et al. (1996) opine that the process of technologies spillover may be more efficient in the presence of well functioning markets. The absence of these characteristics in some developing countries under investigation may partly explain why FDI does not cause growth in these countries.
References
Alfaro L, Chanda A, Kalemli-Ozcan S, Sayek S (2004) FDI and economic growth: the role of local financial markets. J Int Econ 64(1):113–134
Balasubramanya VN, Salisu M, Sapsford D (1996) Foreign direct investment and growth in EP and IS countries. Econ J 106(No 1):92–105
Basu P, Chakraborty C, Reagle D (2003) Liberalization, FDI, and growth in developing countries: a panel cointegration approach. Econ Inq 41(3):510–516
Blomstrom M, Lipsey RE, Zejan, M (1994) What explains developing country growth? NBER Working Papers No 4132, National Bureau of Economic Research
Boresztein EJ, Gregorio D, Lee JW (1998) How does foreign direct investment affect economic growth? J Int Econ 45:115–135
Buckley P, Clegg J, Wang C, Cross C (2002) Foreign direct investment, regional differences and economic growth: panel data evidence from China. Transl Corp 11(No. 1)
Carkovic M and Levine R (2002) Does foreign direct investment accelerate economic growth? Working Paper, University of Minnesota
Carkovic M and Levine R (2005) Does foreign direct investment accelerates economic growth? In: Moran T, Graham E and Blomström M (eds) Does Foreign Direct Investment Promote Development? Peterson Institute for International Economics
Caves R (1996) Multinational Enterprise and Economic Analysis. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press
Choe JI (2003) Do foreign direct investment and gross domestic investment promote economic growth? Rev Dev Econ 7:44–57
Chowdhury A and Mavrotas G (2005) FDI and growth: a causal relationship, UNUWIDER Research Paper No. 2005/25, UNU-WIDER
De Backer K and Sleuwagen L (2003) Does foreign direct investment crowd out domestic entrepreneurship quest? Rev Ind Organ 22(1):67–102
De Mello Jr Luiz R (1997) Foreign direct investment-led growth: evidence from time series and panel data. Oxf Econ Pap 51:133–154
De Mello Jr Luiz R (1999) Foreign direct investment in developing countries and growth: a selective survey. J Dev Stud 34(1):1–34
Dickey D, Fuller W (1979) Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root. J Am Stat Assoc 74:427–431
Dickey D, Fuller W (1981) Likelihood ratio statistics for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Econometrica 49:1057–72
Dolado J, Lutkepohl H (1996) Making wald tests work for co-integrated VAR systems. Econ Rev 15:369–386
Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC): CEPAL Report 2012
Fortanier F (2007) Foreign direct investment and host country economic growth: does the investor’s country of origin play a role? Transl Corp 16(No. 2)
Granger CWJ (1969) Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross spectral methods. Econometrica 37:424–438
Greene W (2008) Econometric analysis, 6th edn. Pearson Educational Limited
Hanson G (2001) Should countries promote foreign direct investment? UNCTAD: G-24 Discussion Paper Series No. 9, UNCTAD, Geneva
Hansen H, Rand J (2006) On the causal links between fdi and growth in developing countries. World Econ 29(No. 1)
Hein S (1992) Trade strategy and the dependency hypothesis: a comparison of policy, foreign investment, and economic growth in Latin America. Econ Dev Cult Chang 40(3):495–521
Hermes N, Lensink R (2003) Foreign direct investment, financial development and economic growth. J Dev Stud 40(1):142–163
Holtz-Eakin D, Newey W, Rosen HS (1988) Estimating Vector Autoregressions with panel data. Econometrica 56(6):1371–1395
International Monetary Fund (2009) International Financial Statistics CD-ROM, Washington DC
Johansen S (1988) Statistical analysis of Co-integrating Vectors. J Econ Dyn Control 12:231–254
Johansen S, Juselius K (1990) Maximum likelihood estimation and inference on cointegration with applications to demand for money. Oxford Bull Econ Stat 52:169–210
Kholdy S, Sohrabian A (2005) Financial Markets, FDI and Economic Growth: Granger Causality Tests in Panel Data Model. Working Paper, California State Polytechnic University
Kwiatkowski et al. (1992) Testing the null hypothesis of stationarity against the alternative of a unit root. J Econ 54:159–178
Lipsey RE (2002) Home and host country effects of foreign direct investment. Paper presented at ISIT Conference on Challenges to Globalization, Lidingo, Sweden
OECD (2002) Foreign direct investment for development: maximizing benefits, minimizing costs. OECD Policy Brief. OECD, Paris
Phillips PCB, Perron P (1988) Testing for a unit root in time series regression. Biometrika 75(2):336–346
Schmidt P, Phillips P (1992) LM Tests for a Unit Root in the Presence of Deterministic Trends. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 54(3) pp 257–287
Shan J, Tian GG and Sun F (1997) The FDI-led growth hypothesis: Further Econometric evidence from China. Economic Division Working Papers 97/2, NSDS, Australia
Sims CA (1972) Money, income and causality. Am Econ Rev 62:540–552
Singh H, Jun KW (1995) Some new evidence on determinants of foreign direct investment in developing countries. World Bank, Policy Research Working Paper 1531, Washington, D.C
Toda HY, Yamamoto (1995) Statistical inference in Vector Autoregressions with possibly integrated processes. J Econ 66:225–250
UNCTAD. World Investment Report 2011 and 2012. UNCTAD, Geneva
World Bank (2009) World development indicators, Washington DC
World Bank (2012) Latin American and the Caribbean region; Global Economic Prospects. Latin American and the Caribbean Annex, January
Zhang KH (2001) Does foreign direct investment promote economic growth? Evidence from East Asia and Latin America. Contemp Econ Policy 19:175–185
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Oladipo, O.S. Does foreign direct investment cause long run economic growth? Evidence from the Latin American and the Caribbean countries. Int Econ Econ Policy 10, 569–582 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10368-012-0225-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10368-012-0225-4