Skip to main content
Log in

Is 2 % the optimal inflation rate for the Euro Area?

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Economics and Economic Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

According to the relevant literature, monetary policy implications concerning the optimal inflation rate can be derived by examining the relationship between inflation and the Relative Price Variability (RPV). This paper studies this issue for selected Euro Area (EA) countries, using monthly data for the Harmonized Index of Consumer Prices. In particular, semi-parametric estimations are employed so as to find the accurate form of the inflation-RPV relationship. The results indicate that this relationship exhibits a U-shape functional profile. Furthermore, the optimal inflation rates for the EA, France, Germany and Spain are also calculated. For all countries and the EA, we find that although the European Central Bank’s “below but close to 2 %” inflation target is optimal for the EA average, it is not the optimum inflation rate for the individual counties.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. According to the Maastricht treaty (1992), the ECB’s main task is to ensure price stability. The ECB defines this task as “the year-on-year increase in the Harmonised Index of Consumer Prices (HICP) for the Euro Area below, but close to 2 % over the medium term” (ECB 2004). However, amongst others, Fendel and Frenkel (2009) find that when EA inflation differentials were high, the ECB was reluctant to combat inflation.

  2. See Sheshinski and Weiss (1977), Rotemberg (1983) and and Caplin and Leahy (1991).

  3. See Caraballo and Dabús (2008) for a review of the literature.

  4. As our data sample ends in 2010, Estonia is not included as it joined the EA in 2011.

  5. In other words, in what follows, RPV alone refers to RPV-3 digits.

  6. This methodology is similar to that of Fielding and Mizen (2008) and Caraballo and Dabús (2012).

  7. In Fig. 1, MSFE has been multiplied by 106.

References

  • Barro RJ (1976) Rational expectations and the role of monetary policy. J Monet Econ 2:1–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bick A, Nautz D (2008) Inflation threshold and relative price variability: Evidence from U.S. cities. Int J Cent Bank 4:61–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruno M, Easterly W (1998) Inflation crises and long-run growth. J Monet Econ 41:3–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caplin A, Leahy J (1991) State Dependent Pricing and the Dynamics of Money and Output. Q J Econ 106:683–708

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caraballo MA, Dabús C (2008) The determinants of relative price variability: further evidence from Argentina. Cuad Econ-Lat Am J Econ 45:235–255

    Google Scholar 

  • Caraballo MA, Dabús C (2012) Optimal inflation, price dispersion and inflation expectations: the Spanish case. J Appl Econ (forthcoming)

  • Choi C (2010) Reconsidering the relationship between inflation and relative price variability. J Money Credit Bank 42:769–798

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cukierman A (1983) Relative Price Variability and Inflation: a Survey and Further Results. In: Brunner K, Meltzer AH (eds) Variability in Employment, Prices and Money. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • ECB (2004) The Monetary Policy of the ECB (second edition, January 2004). Frankfurt

  • Fendel R, Frenkel M (2009) Inflation differentials in the Euro Area: did the ECB care? Appl Econ 41:1293–1302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fielding D, Mizen P (2008) Evidence on the functional relationship between relative price variability and inflation with implications for monetary policy. Economica 75:683–699

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hercowitz Z (1981) Money and the dispersion of relative prices. J Polit Econ 89:328–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas RE (1973) Some international evidence on output-inflation tradeoffs. Am Econ Rev 63:326–335

    Google Scholar 

  • Nautz D, Scharff J (2005) Inflation and relative price variability in a low inflation country: Empirical evidence from Germany. Ger Econ Rev 6:507–523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nautz D, Scharff J (2012) Inflation and relative price variability in the Euro-area: Evidence from a panel threshold model. Appl Econ 44:449–460

    Google Scholar 

  • Parks RW (1978) Inflation and relative price variability. J Polit Econ 86:79–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rotemberg J (1983) Aggregate consequences of fixed costs of price adjustment. Am Econ Rev 73:433–463

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheshinski E, Weiss Y (1977) Inflation and costs of price adjustment. Rev Econ Stud 44:287–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vining DR, Elwertowski TC (1976) The Relationship between Relative Prices and General Price Level. Am Econ Rev 66:699–708

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ma Ángeles Caraballo.

Additional information

Acknowledgments

The authors thank two anonymous referees for their valuable comments, as well as financial support from Junta de Andalucía (CICE, Proyecto de Excelencia SEJ-4546). The usual disclaimer applies.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Caraballo, M.Á., Efthimiadis, T. Is 2 % the optimal inflation rate for the Euro Area?. Int Econ Econ Policy 9, 235–243 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10368-012-0212-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10368-012-0212-9

Keywords

JEL classification

Navigation