Notes
There was no intervention in the second quarter of 2004.
The collateralized overnight interest rate (end of month) was lowered from 0.34 in December 1998 to 0.22 in January 1999 and 0.07 in February 1999. The rate was raised to the 0.20–25 range for a few months in late 2000 and early 2001, but again lowered to below 0.01 for most of 2001 and through September 2004.
The monetary base (percent changes from a year earlier in average amounts outstanding) rose 25.7% in 2002, 16.4% in 2003, 13.8% in 2004Q1 and 6.1% in 2004Q2.
Nominal GDP rose 0.3 percent in 2003 and at a similar annual rate in the first half of 2004. Real GDP growth, by contrast, indicated some recovery of the economy in 2003 and early 2004. (2003 real GDP growth was 3.2 percent).
The Foreign Exchange and Foreign Trade Law stipulates that the “Minister of Finance shall endeavor to stabilize the external value of the yen through foreign exchange trading and other measures” (Article 7, Section 3).
Foreign exchange interventions are usually conducted in the Tokyo market. However, as most of the trading shifts to European markets after around 5:00 p.m. JST and then to the New York market, the BOJ requests foreign monetary authorities to conduct interventions on behalf of the Bank. The final decision to use this method is made by the MOF. The MOF also determines the details of the intervention including the amount, currency pair, and method of intervention (Bank of Japan, “Frequently Asked Questions: Outline of the Bank of Japan’s Foreign Exchange Intervention Operations.” July 2000).
There are five types of Financial Bills (FBs), each of which is associated with some Special Account or the General Account of the Government of Japan’s budget. The FBs associated with the Foreign Exchange Funds Special Account accounts for the largest share in the amount of outstanding FBs, usually more than 90%.
See Ito (2003) for a detailed discussion.
The issue of massive foreign exchange market intervention was not even a topic addressed in the “Japan: Selected Issues” of the IMF Country Report No. 03/282 on Japan published in September 2003.
The U.S. Treasury Notes were sold by the Bank of Japan back to the FEFSA by the end of June (as per the terms of the original agreement).
The amount of foreign currency assets was 4.2 trillion yen at end-September 2003.
Reference
Bank of Japan (2004) Annual Review 2004
Dominguez KM (2003) Foreign exchange intervention: did it work in the 1990s? In: Bergsten F, Williamson J (eds) Dollar overvaluation and the world economy. Institute for International Economics, Washington DC
Dominguez KM, Frankel JA (1993) Does foreign exchange intervention work? Institute for International Economics, Washington, DC
Edison HJ (1993) The effectiveness of central bank intervention: a survey of post 1982 literature, essays in international finance. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Fatum R, Hutchison MM (2003) Effectiveness of Official Daily Foreign Exchange Market Intervention Operations in Japan, NBER Working Paper # 9648, and forthcoming in the Journal of International Money and Finance
Fatum R, Hutchison MM (2004) Sample Selection and Foreign Exchange Market Intervention: A Matching Methods Investigation of Official Bank of Japan Intervention, mimeo
Galati G, Melick W, Micu M (2003) Foreign Exchange Market Intervention and Expectations: An Empirical Study of the Yen/Dollar Exchange Rate, forthcoming in the Journal of International Money and Finance
Ito T (2003) Is Foreign Exchange Intervention Effective?: The Japanese Experience in the 1990s In: Mitzen P (ed) Monetary History, Exchange Rates and Financial Markets, Essays in Honour of Charles Goodhart, vol 2, Edward Elgar, UK, and NBER Working Paper No. 8914
Ito T (2004) The Yen and the Japanese Economy, 2004. Institute for International Economics, Washington DC
Sarno L, Taylor MP (2001) Official intervention in the foreign exchange markets: is it effective and, if so, how does it work? J Econ Lit 34:839–868
Spiegel M (2003) Japanese Foreign Exchange Intervention, FRBSF Economic Letter No. 2003–36
Truman EM (2003) The Limits of Exchange Market Intervention In: Bergsten CF, Williamson J (eds.) Dollar overvaluation and the world economy. Institute for International Economics, Washington DC
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fatum, R., Hutchison, M.M. Foreign exchange intervention and monetary policy in Japan, 2003–04. IEEP 2, 241–260 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10368-005-0036-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10368-005-0036-y