Skip to main content
Log in

Urethral support with PelviSoft™ after artificial urinary sphincter erosion at revision procedures

Die Verstärkung der Harnröhre mit Pelvisoft™ bei rezidiveeingriffen nach künstlichem harnröhrensphinkter mit arrosion

  • Original article
  • Published:
Wiener Medizinische Wochenschrift Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Die Implantation einer künstlicher hydraulischer Sphinktermanschette (AMS 800) wird als chirurgischer Goldstandard bei abwesender Restfunktion des Schließmuskels betrachtet. Nach einer Harnröhrenarosion bei liegender künstlicher hydraulischer Sphinktermanschette (AMS 800) muss das gesamte System ausgebaut werden. In dem die Harnröhre über die Schwachstelle, nach Abheilung, mit einem acellulären Kollagen BioMesh (PelviSoft™) verstärkt wird kann neuerlich ein künstliches Schließmuskelsystem implantiert werden. Die Kurzzeitergebnisse sind ermutigend. Die Funktion des Sphinktersystems scheint durch die Harnröhrenwandverstärkung nicht gefährdet zu sein, bzw. die Manschette kann die Harnröhre genügend komprimieren um die Kontinenz zu gewährleisten.

Summary

An artificial urinary sphincter cuff (AMS 800™) is regarded the gold standard for surgically treating urinary incontinence without residual sphincter function. After erosion of an AMS 800™ into the urethral lumen the whole system has to be explanted. When the urethral wall is supported and covered after healing with a porcine dermal acellular collagen matrix BioMesh (PelviSoft™), a new artificial urinary sphincter may be implanted. The follow-up of up to two years seems promising in preventing erosion of the new cuff through the strengthened urethra wall, without compromising the functionality of the artificial urinary sphincter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Blaivas JG, Sandhu J (2004) Urethral reconstruction after erosion of slings in women. Curr Opin Urol 14: 335–338

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Guralnick ML, Miller E, Toh KL, Webster GD (2002) Transcorporal artificial urinary sphincter cuff placement in cases requiring revision for erosion and urethral atrophy. J Urol 167: 2075–2078; discussion 2079

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gillon G, Boucaut HA, Mundy AR (1989) Urethral salvage following erosion of an artificial sphincter cuff in female patients. Br J Urol 63: 555–556

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carpio FG, Cespedes RD (1999) Urethral diverticulectomy and cadaveric pubourethral sling after artificial urinary sphincter erosion and prostatectomy. J Urol 162: 1379–1380

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dell JR, O'Kelley KR (2005) PelviSoft BioMesh augmentation of rectocele repair: the initial clinical experience in 35 patients. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 16: 44–47; discussion 47

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Frank I, Elliott DS, Barrett DM (2000) Success of de novo reimplantation of the artificial genitourinary sphincter. J Urol 163: 1702–1703

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Motley RC, Barrett DM (1990) Artificial urinary sphincter cuff erosion. Experience with reimplantation in 38 patients. Urology 35: 215–218

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schreiter F (1985) Bulbar artificial sphincter. Eur Urol 11: 294–299

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kendirci M, Gupta S, Shaw K, Morey A, Jones L, Hakim L, Hellstrom WJ (2006) Synchronous prosthetic implantation through a transscrotal incision: an outcome analysis. J Urol 175: 2218–2222

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Rehder.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rehder, P., Pinggera, GM., Mitterberger, M. et al. Urethral support with PelviSoft™ after artificial urinary sphincter erosion at revision procedures. Wien Med Wochenschr 157, 170–172 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10354-007-0406-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10354-007-0406-x

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation