Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Waist Circumference is an Independent Risk Factor for the Development of Parastomal Hernia After Permanent Colostomy

  • Original Contribution
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

Purpose

This study was performed to evaluate the risk factors of parastomal hernia after abdominoperineal rectal amputation.

Methods

This was a retrospective study of consecutive patients who underwent abdominoperineal rectal amputation for rectal cancer between January 1999 and August 2006. The effects of age, sex, surgical approach, chemotherapy, waist circumference, and body mass index on the development of a parastomal hernia were analyzed.

Results

Forty-one patients underwent 19 open and 22 laparoscopic abdominoperineal rectal amputations. A parastomal hernia developed in 19 patients (46 percent) after a median follow-up period of 31 (range, 5–80) months. We observed ten hernias in the open group and nine in the laparoscopic group (P = 0.453). There were no significant differences in the type of surgical approach, age, sex, or adjuvant therapy in patients who developed a parastomal hernia compared with those who did not. Waist circumference proved to be an independent risk factor (P = 0.011). When the waist circumference exceeds the calculated threshold of 100 cm, there is a 75 percent probability to develop a parastomal hernia.

Conclusions

Abdominal obesity increases the risk of developing a parastomal hernia, therefore, it might be advisable to place a prophylactic mesh during colostomy formation when the patient’s waist exceeds 100 cm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Carne PW, Robertson GM, Frizelle FA. Parastomal hernia. Br J Surg 2003;90:784–93.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Kouba E, Sands M, Lentz A, Wallen E, Pruthi RS. Incidence and risk factors of stomal complications in patients undergoing cystectomy with ileal conduit urinary diversion for bladder cancer. J Urol 2007;178:950–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Sjödahl R, Anderberg B, Bolin T. Parastomal hernia in relation to site of the abdominal stoma. Br J Surg 1988;75:416–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Londono-Schimmer EE, Leong AP, Phillips RK. Life table analysis of stomal complications following colostomy. Dis Colon Rectum 1994;37:916–20.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Etherington RJ, Williams JG, Hatward MW, Hughes LE. Demonstration of para-ileostomy herniation using computed tomography. Clin Radiol 1990;41:333–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. de Ruiter P, Bijnen AB. Successful local repair of paracolostomy hernia with a newly developed prosthetic device. Int J Colorectal Dis 1992;7:132–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Allen-Mersh TG, Thomson JP. Surgical treatment of colostomy complications. Br J Surg 1988;75:416–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Cheung MT, Chia NH, Chiu WY. Surgical treatment of parastomal hernia complicating sigmoid colostomies. Dis Colon Rectum 2001;44:266–70.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Rubin MS, Schoetz DJ Jr, Matthews JB. Parastomal hernia. Is stoma relocation superior to fascial repair? Arch Surg 1994;129:413.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Janes A, Cengiz Y, Israelsson LA. Preventing parastomal hernia with a prosthetic mesh. Arch Surg 2004;139:1356–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Steele SR, Lee P, Martin MJ, Mullenix PS, Sullivan ES. Is parastomal hernia repair with polypropylene mesh safe? Am J Surg 2003;185:436–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. de Ruiter P, Bijnen AB. Ring-reinforced prosthesis for paracolostomy hernia. Dig Surg 2005;22:152–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Longman RJ, Thomson WH. Mesh repair of parastomal hernias: a safety modification. Colorectal Dis 2005;7:292–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hofstetter WL, Vukasin P, Ortega AE, Anthone G, Beart RW Jr. New technique for mesh repair of paracolostomy hernias. Dis Colon Rectum 1998;41:1054–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Stelzner S, Hellmich G, Ludwig K. Repair of paracolostomy hernias with a prosthetic mesh in the intraperitoneal onlay position: modified Sugarbaker technique. Dis Colon Rectum 2004;47:185–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. van Sprundel TC, Gerritsen van der Hoop A. Modified technique for parastomal hernia repair in patients with intractable stoma-care problems. Colorectal Dis 2005;7:445–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Berger D, Bientzle M. Laparoscopic repair of parastomal hernias: a single surgeon’s experience in 66 patients. Dis Colon Rectum 2007;50:1668–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Mancini GJ, McClusky 3rd, Khaitan L, et al. Laparoscopic parastomal hernia repair using a nonslit mesh technique. Surg Endosc 2007;21:1487–91.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yves Van Nieuwenhove M.D., Ph.D..

Additional information

Reprints are not available.

About this article

Cite this article

De Raet, J., Delvaux, G., Haentjens, P. et al. Waist Circumference is an Independent Risk Factor for the Development of Parastomal Hernia After Permanent Colostomy. Dis Colon Rectum 51, 1806–1809 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-008-9366-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-008-9366-5

Key words

Navigation