Skip to main content
Log in

Life Table analysis of stomal complications following colostomy

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study was designed to evaluate the longterm complication rate of left iliac fossa end sigmoid colostomies and to determine etiologic factors. METH-ODS: A retrospective chart review and actuarial analysis were performed. RESULTS: The crude and actuarial risks of paracolostomy complications in 203 patients were 51.2 percent and 58.1 percent at 13 years, respectively. Paracolostomy hernia was the most common complication (36.7 percent at 10 years). Siting the stoma through the belly of the rectus abdominis muscle did not reduce the risk of hernia, but an extraperitoneal course had a significantly lower risk of herniation when compared with a transperitoneal course and intestinal obstruction was marginally less frequent. Paracolostomy hernias were otherwise more likely in the elderly, and in those with other abdominal wall hernias. Mesenteric fixation did not reduce the subsequent chance of prolapse. The reduction in the risk of intestinal obstruction when lateral space closure was employed was not statistically significant (4 percent vs. 10 percent,P < 0.1), and all three patients with stomal retraction had had lateral space closure. CONCLUSION: The evidence in this study that spans a 22-year period questions much surgical technical dogma and raises the possibility that parastomal hernias may, like inguinal hernias, represent a failure in the transversalis fascia that might technically be avoidable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cutler SJ, Ederer EF. Maximum utilization of the life table method in analyzing survival. J Chronic Dis 1958;8:699–712.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hawley PR. Permanent colostomy. In: Todd IP, ed. Intestinal stomas. London: Heinemann Medical Books, 1978:1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Miles RM, Greene RS. Review of colostomy in a community hospital. Am Surg 1983;49:182–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Marks CG, Ritchie JK. The complications of synchronous combined excision for adenocarcinoma of the rectum at St. Mark's Hospital. Br J Surg 1975;62:901–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kronborg O, Kramhoft J, Bajer O, Sprechler M. Late complications following operations for cancer of the rectum and anus. Dis Colon Rectum 1974;17:750–3.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Von Smitten K, Husa A, Kyllonen L. Long term results of sigmoidostomy in patients with anorectal malignancy. Acta Chir Scand 1986;152:211–3.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Leenen L, Kuypers J. Some factors influencing the outcome of stoma surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 1989;32:500–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Griek W, Postel A, Syarse A, Localio S. An evaluation of colonic stoma management without irrigation. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1964;118:1234–42.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hawley PR, Ritchie JK. Complications of ileostomy and colostomy following excisional surgery. Clin Gastroenterol 1979;8:403–14.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Goligher JC. Surgery of the anus, colon and rectum. 5th ed. London: Ballieré Tindall, 1984:702–5.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kodner IJ. Stoma complications. In: Fazio V, ed. Current therapy in colon and rectal surgery. Toronto: BC Decker, 1990:420–5.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kodner IJ, Fleshman JW, Fry RD. Intestinal stomas. In: Schwartz S, Ellis H, eds. Maingot's abdominal operations. 9th ed. Norwalk: Appleton-Lange, 1989:1143–52.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Turnbull RB, Weakley FL. Atlas of intestinal stomas. St. Louis: CV Mosby, 1967:145.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Block GE. Abdominoperineal resection. In: Zuidema GS, ed. Shackelford's surgery of the alimentary tract. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1990:213–20.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Green E. Colostomy and its complications. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1966;122:1230–42.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Read RC. Attenuation of the rectus sheath in inguinal herniation. Am J Surg 1970;120:610–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Peacock EE, Madden J. Studies in biology and treatment of recurrent inguinal hernia. II. Morphological changes. Ann Surg 1974;179:567–71.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Cannon DJ, Read RC. Metastatic emphysema: a mechanism for acquiring hernia. Ann Surg 1981;194:270–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Goligher JC. Extraperitoneal colostomy or ileostomy. Br J Surg 1958;46:97–103.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Sames CP. Extraperitoneal colostomy. Lancet 1958;1:567–8.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Porter JA, Salvati E, Rubin R, Eisenstat T. Complications of colostomy. Dis Colon Rectum 1989;32:299–303.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Londono-Schimmer, E.E., Leong, A.P.K. & Phillips, R.K.S. Life Table analysis of stomal complications following colostomy. Dis Colon Rectum 37, 916–920 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02052598

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02052598

Key words

Navigation