Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Rehabilitation of Fecal Incontinence After Sphincter-Saving Surgery for Rectal Cancer: Encouraging Results

  • Original Contribution
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

Purpose

Some patients, having undergone sphincter-saving operations for rectal cancer, may suffer from fecal incontinence. This study was designed to evaluate the results of rehabilitative treatment in patients with fecal incontinence after sphincter-saving operations and to identify the negative factors that influence therapeutic success.

Methods

Between January 2000 and June 2007, 88 incontinent patients (54 women; age range, 47–73 years; 69 had received a low anterior rectal resection; 19 a straight coloanal anastomosis) were included in the study. After a preliminary clinical evaluation, including the Wexner Incontinence Scale score, anorectal manometry was performed. All 88 patients underwent rehabilitative treatment according to the “multimodal rehabilitative program” for fecal incontinence. At the end of program, all 88 patients were reassessed by means of a clinical evaluation and anorectal manometry; their results were compared with the clinical and manometric data from ten healthy control subjects. Postrehabilitative Wexner Incontinence Scale scores were used for an arbitrary schedule of patients divided into three classes: Class I, good (score ≤3); Class II, fair (score >3 to ≤6); Class III, poor (score >6).

Results

After rehabilitation, there was a significant improvement in the overall mean Wexner Incontinence Scale score (P < 0.03) for both surgical operation types (low anterior rectal resection: P < 0.05; coloanal anastomosis: P < 0.02). Only 21 patients (23.8 percent) were symptom-free, and 37 (42 percent) were considered Class III. A significant postrehabilitative direct correlation was found between: 1) Wexner Incontinence Scale score and degree of genital relaxation (rρ s 0.78; P < 0.001); 2) Wexner Incontinence Scale score and irradiation (rρ s 0.72; P < 0.01); and 3) Wexner Incontinence Scale score and pelvic (rρ s 0.65; P < 0.01) or anal surgery (rρ s 0.68; P < 0.01). No significant differences were found between prerehabilitative and postrehabilitative anal pressures in low anterior rectal resection and coloanal anastomosis patients.

Conclusions

After rehabilitation, some patients become symptom-free, many patients show an improvement in the Wexner Incontinence Scale score, and others exhibit the highest grades of fecal incontinence. Genital relaxation, radiotherapy, and previous pelvic, and/or anal surgery are impeding factors to rehabilitative success.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Brown SR, Seow Choen F. Preservation of rectal function after low anterior resection with formation of a neorectum. Semin Surg Oncol 2000;19:376–85.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Pucciani F, Bologna A, Cianchi F, Cortesini C. Anorectal physiology following sphincter saving operations for rectal cancer. Dig Surg 1993;10:33–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Allgayer H, Christoph FD, Rohde W, Koch GH, Tuschhoff T. Prospective comparison of short- and long-term effects of pelvic floor exercise/biofeedback training in patients with fecal incontinence after surgery plus irradiation versus surgery alone for rectal cancer: clinical, functional and endoscopic/endosonographic findings. Scand J Gastroenterol 2005;40:1168–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bassotti G, De Roberto G, Chistolini G, Morelli A, Pucciani F. Case report: colonic manometry reveals abnormal propulsive behaviour in anterior resection of the rectum. Dig Liver Dis 2005;37:124–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hassan I, Larson DW, Gaw JU, et al. Does timing of pelvic radiotherapy affect long-term function and quality of life after coloanal anastomosis for distal rectal cancers? Dis Colon Rectum 2005;48:609.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lundby L, Krogh K, Jensen VJ, et al. Long-term anorectal dysfunction after postoperative radiotherapy for rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 2005;48:1343–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Chiarioni G, Ferri B, Morelli A, Iantorno G, Bassotti G. Bio-feedback treatment of fecal incontinence: where are we, and where are we going? World J Gastroenterol 2005;11:4771–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Pucciani F. Rehabilitation and biofeedback. In: Ratto C, Doglietto GB. Fecal incontinence: diagnosis and treatment. Milan: Springer, 2007:167–70.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Dubovyi VA. Biofeedback training in the treatment of anterior resection syndrome. Lik Sprava 2006;5–6:55–60.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Pucciani F, Iozzi L, Masi A, Cianchi F, Cortesini C. Multimodal rehabilitation of faecal incontinence: experience of an Italian centre devoted to faecal disorder rehabilitation. Tech Coloproctol 2003;7:139–47.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Bump RC, Mattiasson A, Bo K, et al. The standardization of terminology of female pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996;175:10–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Jorge JM, Wexner SD. Etiology and management of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 1993;36:77–97.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Temple LK, Bacik J, Savatta SG, et al. The development of a validated instrument to evaluate bowel function after sphincter-preserving surgery for rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 2005;48:1353–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. De Caro R. Perineum: functional anatomy. In: Altomare DF, Pucciani F. Rectal prolapse: diagnosis and clinical management. Milan: Springer, 2007:5–7.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Pucciani F, Rottoli ML, Bologna A, et al. Anterior rectocele and anorectal dysfunction. Int J Colorectal Dis 1996;11:1–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Martelli H, Devroede G, Arhan P, Duguay C, Dornic C, Faverdin C. Some parameters of large bowel motility in normal man. Gastroenterology 1978;75:612–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Williamson ME, Lewis WG, Finan PJ, Miller AS, Holdsworth PJ, Johnston D. Recovery of physiologic and clinical function after low anterior resection of the rectum for carcinoma: myth or reality? Dis Colon Rectum 1995;38:411–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Pary PB, Enker WE, Cohen AM, Minsky BD, Friedlander-Klar H. Long-term functional results of colorectal anastomosis for rectal cancer. Am J Surg 1994;167:90–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Altomare DF, Rinaldi M, Giardiello DD, et al. Italian translation and prospective validation of fecal incontinence quality of life (FIQL) index. Chir Ital 2005;57:153–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Pucciani F, Boni D, Perna F, Bassotti G, Bellini M. Descending perineum syndrome: are abdominal hysterectomy and bowel habits linked? Dis Colon Rectum 2006;48:2094–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Petros PE. The female pelvic floor function, dysfunction and management according to the integral theory. Heidelberg: Springer, 2004:180–90.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Filippo Pucciani M.D..

About this article

Cite this article

Pucciani, F., Ringressi, M.N., Redditi, S. et al. Rehabilitation of Fecal Incontinence After Sphincter-Saving Surgery for Rectal Cancer: Encouraging Results. Dis Colon Rectum 51, 1552–1558 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-008-9312-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-008-9312-6

Key words

Navigation