Abstract
PURPOSE
The present study evaluated the effect of rectal washout in reducing local recurrence after resection for rectal cancer.
METHODS
A literature search was performed on studies published since 1989 that compared rectal washout to no washout for rectal cancer resection. Primary end point was local cancer recurrence. Random-effect meta-analysis was used and subgroup analysis was performed.
RESULTS
Five studies matched the selection criteria, and reported on 176 patients who underwent rectal washout and 256 who did not undergo washout. Different washout solutions were used in every study, and total mesorectal excision was not universally applied. Overall local recurrence rate was 8 percent (33/432). Local recurrence rate for rectal washout patients was 4.8 percent compared with 10.2 percent for patients who did not undergo rectal washout, a difference that was not statistically significant (odds ratio = 0.64; 95 percent confidence interval = 0.2–2.04). When only studies using total mesorectal excision were considered, there was no significant difference between the two groups (odds ratio = 1.21; 95 percent confidence interval = 0.37–3.92).
CONCLUSIONS
Although no definitive conclusions may be drawn because of the nonrandomized nature of the included studies, rectal washout is relatively risk-free and adds little to the operative time. This may be performed until a randomized, controlled trial is undertaken to resolve this contentious issue.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
McGregor JR, Galloway DJ, McCulloch P, et al. Anastomotic suture materials and implantation metastasis: an experimental study. Br J Surg 1989;76:331–4.
Hubens G, Lafullarde T, Van Marck E, et al. Implantation of colon cancer cells on intact and damaged colon mucosa and serosa: an experimental study in the rat. Acta Chir Belg 1994;94:258–62.
McCall JL, Cox MR, Wattchow DA. Analysis of local recurrence rates after surgery alone for rectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis 1995;10:126–32.
Gertsch P, Baer HU, Kraft R, et al. Malignant cells are collected on circular staplers. Dis Colon Rectum 1992;35:238–41.
Umpleby HC, Fermor B, Symes MO, et al. Viability of exfoliated colorectal carcinoma cells. Br J Surg 1984;71:659–63.
Tsunoda A, Shibusawa M, Tsunoda Y, et al. Implantation on the suture material and efficacy of povidone-iodine solution. Eur Surg Res 1997;29:473–80.
Clarke M, Horton R. Bringing it all together: Lancet-Cochrane collaborate on systematic reviews. Lancet 2001;357:1728.
Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, et al. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA 2000;283:2008–12.
Mantel N, Haenszel W. Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. J Natl Cancer Inst 1959;22:719–48.
Yusuf S, Peto R, Lewis J, et al. Beta blockade during and after myocardial infarction: an overview of the randomized trials. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 1985;27:335–71.
Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, et al. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 1997;315:629–34.
Egger M, Smith GD. Misleading meta-analysis. BMJ 1995;311:753–4.
DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 1986;7:177–88.
Agaba EA. Does rectal washout during anterior resection prevent local tumor recurrence? Dis Colon Rectum 2004;47:291–6.
Byrne CM, Perera DS, King DW. Does rectal washout during anterior resection prevent local tumor recurrence? Dis Colon Rectum 2005;48:172–4.
Fukuda I, Kameyama M, Imaoka S, et al. [Prevention of local recurrence after sphincter-saving resection for rectal cancer]. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho 1991;18:1965–7.
Jenner DC, de Boer WB, Clarke G, et al. Rectal washout eliminates exfoliated malignant cells. Dis Colon Rectum 1998;41:1432–4.
Long RT, Edwards RH. Implantation metastasis as a cause of local recurrence of colorectal carcinoma. Am J Surg 1989;157:194–201.
Maeda K, Maruta M, Hanai T, et al. Irrigation volume determines the efficacy of “rectal washout”. Dis Colon Rectum 2004;47:1706–10.
Sayfan J, Averbuch F, Koltun L, et al. Effect of rectal stump washout on the presence of free malignant cells in the rectum during anterior resection for rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 2000;43:1710–2.
Terzi C, Unek T, Sagol O, et al. Is rectal washout necessary in anterior resection for rectal cancer? A prospective clinical study. World J Surg 2006;30:233–41.
Orrom WJ, Hayashi AH, Kuechler D, et al. The surgical management of rectal cancer: a comparison of treatment methods and outcomes over 2 time periods in the same geographic region. Am J Surg 2007;193:623–6.
Liang YC, Qing SH, Ding WX, et al. [Total mesorectal excision versus conventional radical surgery for rectal cancer: a meta analysis]. Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi 2007;10:43–8.
Docherty JG, McGregor JR, Purdie CA, et al. Efficacy of tumoricidal agents in vitro and in vivo. Br J Surg 1995;82:1050–2.
Petitti DB. Of babies and bathwater. Am J Epidemiol 1994;140:779–82.
Shapiro S. Is there is or is there ain’t no baby? Dr. Shapiro replies to Drs. Petitti and Greenland. Am J Epidemiol 1994;140:788–91.
Longnecker MP. Point/counterpoint: meta-analysis of observational studies. Am J Epidemiol 1995;142:779–82.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
About this article
Cite this article
Constantinides, V.A., Cheetham, D., Nicholls, R.J. et al. Is Rectal Washout Effective for Preventing Localized Recurrence After Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer?. Dis Colon Rectum 51, 1339–1344 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-008-9308-2
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-008-9308-2