Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Intra-Abdominal Use of Taurolidine or Heparin as Alternative Products to an Antiadhesive Barrier (Seprafilm®) in Adhesion Prevention: An Experimental Study on Mice

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

Purpose

Seprafilm® (Genzyme Biosurgery, Cambridge, MA) remains a widely used product in postoperative adhesion prevention. This study was designed to compare the antiadhesive effects of taurolidine, heparin, and Seprafilm® in a murine cecal abrasion model.

Methods

Sixty male Balb/c mice underwent a cecal abrasion procedure and were randomized into four groups (n = 15 in each). Groups T, H, and S animals intraperitoneally received taurolidine, heparin, and Seprafilm®, respectively, and Group C animals were reserved as control. Animals were killed on Day 21, and the severity of adhesions was evaluated with a scoring system ranging between 0 to 5. In addition, the localizations of the adhesions were questioned.

Results

Five (1 in Group S and 4 in Group H) animals died before they were killed. The deaths were related to intra-abdominal bleeding, and mortality rate was significantly higher in Group H than those in other groups (P < 0.05 for each comparison). The severity of adhesions was significantly less in the study groups than Group C, and in Group H than Groups T and S (P < 0.05 for each comparison). In addition, adhesions located cecum over itself were significantly less in the study groups than the control group, and those between small bowel and cecum were significantly lower in Groups T and S than the control group (P < 0.05 for each comparison).

Conclusions

All products are effective in adhesion prevention. Heparin use provides the best results but may be associated with a higher mortality rate related to intra-abdominal bleeding. Taurolidine may be an alternative product to Seprafilm®, but further studies are required.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Risberg B. Adhesions preventive strategies. Eur J Surg Suppl 1997;577:32–9

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Foster NM, McGory ML, Zingmond DS, Ko CY. Small bowel obstruction: a population-based appraisal. J Am Coll Surg 2006;203:170–6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Margenthaler JA, Longo WE, Virgo KS, et al. Risk factors for adverse outcomes following surgery for small bowel obstruction. Ann Surg 2006;243:456–64

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ellis H. The magnitude of adhesion related problems. Ann Chir Gynaecol 1998;1:9–11

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hammoud A, Gago LA, Diamond MP. Adhesions in patients with chronic pelvic pain: a role for adhesiolysis? Fertil Steril 2004;82:1483–91

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Peters AA, Trimbos-Kemper GC, Admiraal C, Trimbos JB, Hermans J. A randomized clinical trial on the benefit of adhesiolysis in patients with intraperitoneal adhesions and chronic pelvic pain. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1992;99:59–62

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ray NF, Larsen JW, Stillman RJ, Jacobs RJ. Economic impact of hospitalizations for lower abdominal adhesiolysis in the United States in 1988. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1993;176:271–7

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ray NF, Denton WG, Thamer M, Hernderson SC, Perry S. Abdominal adhesiolysis: inpatient care and expenditures in the U.S. in 1994. J Am Coll Surg 1998;186:1–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Oncel M, Remzi FH, Senagore AJ, Connor JT, Fazio VW. Comparison of a novel liquid (Adcon-P) and a sodium hyaluronate and carboxymethylcellulose membrane (Seprafilm) in postsurgical adhesion formation in a murine model. Dis Colon Rectum 2003;46:187–91

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Becker JM, Dayton MT, Fazio VW, et al. Prevention of postoperative abdominal adhesions by a sodium hyalurinate-based bioresorbable membrane: a prospective, randomized, double-blinded multicenter study. J Am Coll Surg 1996;183:297–306

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Fazio VW, Cohen Z, Fleshman JW, et al. Reduction in adhesive small-bowel obstruction by Seprafilm adhesion barrier after intestinal resection. Dis Colon Rectum 2006;49:1–11

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Beck DE, Cohen Z, Fleshman JW, Kaufman HS, van Goor H, Wolff BG. Adhesion Study Group Steering Committee. A prospective, randomized, multicenter, controlled study of the safety of Seprafilm adhesion barrier in abdominopelvic surgery of the intestine. Dis Colon Rectum 2003;46:1310–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Remzi FH, Oncel M, Church JM, Senagore AJ, Delaney CP, Fazio VW. An unusual complication after hyaluronate-based bioresorbable membrane (Seprafilm) application. Am Surg 2003;69:356–7

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Takeuchi H, Kitade M, Kikuchi I, Shimanuki H, Kinoshita K. A novel instrument and technique for using seprafilm hyaluronic acid/carboxymethylcellulose membrane during laparoscopic myomectomy. Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2006;16:497–502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Oncel M, Kurt N, Remzi FH, et al. The effectiveness of systemic antibiotics in preventing postoperative, intraabdominal adhesions in an animal model. J Surg Res 2001;101:52–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Opitz I, Sigrist B, Hillinger S, et al. Taurolidine and povidone-iodine induce different types of cell death in malignant pleural mesothelioma. Lung Cancer 2007; 56:327–36

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Opitz I, van der Veen HC, Braumann C, Ablassmaier B, Fuhrer K, Jacobi CA. The influence of adhesion prophylactic substances and taurolidine/heparin on local recurrence and intraperitoneal tumor growth after laparoscopic-assisted bowel resection of colon carcinoma in a rat model. Surg Endosc 2003;17:1098–104

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Treutner KH, Bertram P, Lerch MM, et al. Prevention of postoperative adhesions by single intraperitoneal medication. J Surg Res 1995;59:764–71

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Erpek H, Tuncyurek P, Soyder A, Boylu S. Hyaluronic acid/carboxymethylcellulose membrane barrier versus taurolidine for the prevention of adhesions to polypropylene mesh. Eur Surg Res 2006;38:414–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kutlay J, Ozer Y, Isik B, Kargici H. Comparative effectiveness of several agents for preventing postoperative adhesions. World J Surg 2004;28:662–5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Vela AR, Littleton JC, O'Leary JP. The effects of minidose heparin and low molecular weight heparin on peritonitis in the rat. Am Surg 1999;65:473–7

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Arikan S, Adas G, Barut G, et al. An evaluation of low molecular weight heparin and hyperbaric oxygen treatment in the prevention of intra-abdominal adhesions and wound healing. Am J Surg 2005;189:155–60

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Oncel M, Remzi FH, Connor J, Fazio VW. Comparison of cecal abrasion and multiple-abrasion models in generating intra-abdominal adhesions for animal studies. Tech Coloproctol 2005;9:29–33

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Mazuji MK, Calambaheti K, Pover B. Prevention of adhesion with polivinil pyrrolidone. Arch Surgery 1964;89:1011–5

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Becker JM, Dayton MT, Fazio VW, et al. Prevention of postoperative abdominal adhesions by a sodium hyaluronate based bioresorbable membrane: a prospective, randomized, double-blind multicenter study. J Am Coll Surg 1996;183:297–306

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Oncel M, Remzi FH, Senagore AJ, Connor JT, Fazio VW. Application of Adcon-P or Seprafilm in consecutive laparotomies using a murine model. Am J Surg 2004;187:304–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Jacobi CA, Sabat R, Ordemann J, Wenger F, Volk HD, Muller JM. Peritoneal instillation of taurolidine and heparin for preventing intraperitoneal tumor growth and trocar metastases in laparoscopic operations in the rat model. Langenbecks Arch Chir 1997;382:31–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Metin Kement M.D..

Additional information

Presented at the Coloproctology Symposium Adana, Turkey, April 14 to 16, 2005.

Reprints are not available.

About this article

Cite this article

Bahadir, I., Oncel, M., Kement, M. et al. Intra-Abdominal Use of Taurolidine or Heparin as Alternative Products to an Antiadhesive Barrier (Seprafilm®) in Adhesion Prevention: An Experimental Study on Mice. Dis Colon Rectum 50, 2209–2214 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-007-9074-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-007-9074-6

Key words

Navigation