Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Transperineal Rectocele Repair with Polyglycolic Acid Mesh: A Case Series

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

Purpose

This study was designed to evaluate the outcome of transperineal rectocele repair using polyglycolic acid mesh.

Methods

Eighty-three consecutive females with predominant, symptomatic Stage II or Stage III rectocele underwent transperineal rectocele repair using polyglycolic acid (Soft PGA Felt®) mesh and finished their six-month follow-up. No additional interventions, including levatoroplasty or perineorraphy, were performed. The preoperative and postoperative symptom scores and stages of the posterior vaginal wall prolapse were recorded. The end points were reassessed at six months, postoperatively.

Results

Preoperatively, 39 patients had Stage II and 44 patients had Stage III rectocele. The mean total symptom score was 9.87 ± 1.93, which was reduced to 1.62 ± 0.59 postoperatively (P < 0.0001). Objective evaluation of anatomic repair revealed that 74 patients (89.2 percent) had anatomic cure. Surgical complications were seen in a total of seven patients (8.4 percent), including hemorrhage (3.6 percent) and wound infection (4.8 percent). Mesh erosion, mesh infection, or worsening of sexual function was not noted.

Conclusions

Transperineal repair of rectocele with the polyglycolic acid mesh is an efficient therapy for patients with rectocele. It is highly successful in eliminating symptoms of obstructed defecation, and it is free of significant complications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Olsen AL, Smith VJ, Bergstrom JO, Colling JC, Clark AL. Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 1997;89:501–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Segal JL, Karram MM. Evaluation and management of rectoceles. Curr Opin Urol 2002;12:345–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Zbar AP, Lienemann A, Fritsch H, Beer-Gabel M, Pescatori M. Rectocele: pathogenesis and surgical management. Int J Colorectal Dis 2003;18:369–84.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kahn MA, Stanton SL. Posterior colporrhaphy: its effects on bowel and sexual function. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1997;104:82–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Mellgren A, Anzen B, Nilsson BY, et al. Results of rectocele repair: a prospective study. Dis Colon Rectum 1995;38:7–13.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Sullivan ES, Leaverton GH, Hardwick CE. Transrectal perineal repair: an adjunct to improved function after anorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 1968;11:106–14.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Sehapayak S. Transrectal repair of rectocele: an extended armamentarium of colorectal surgeons. A report of 355 cases. Dis Colon Rectum 1985;28:422– 33.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Khubchandani IT, Clancey JP, Rosen L, Riether RD, Stasik JJ. Endorectal repair rectocele revisited. Br J Surg 1997;84:89–91.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Cundiff GW, Weidner AC, Visco AG, Addison WA, Bump RC. An anatomic and functional assessment of the discrete defect rectocele repair. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998;179:1451–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Porter WE, Steele A, Walsh P, Kohli N, Karram MM. The anatomic and functional outcomes of defect-specific rectocele repairs. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999;181:1353–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kenton K, Shott S, Brubaker L. Outcome after rectovaginal fascia reattachment for rectocele repair. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999;181:1360–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Watson SJ, Loder PB, Halligan S, Bartram CI, Kamm MA, Phillips RK. Transperineal repair of symptomatic rectocele with Marlex mesh: a clinical, physiological and radiologic assessment of treatment. J Am Coll Surg 1996;183:257–61.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Parker MC, Phillips RK. Repair of rectocele using Marlex mesh. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1993;75:193–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Oster S, Astrup A. A new vaginal operation for recurrent and large rectocele using dermis transplant. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1981;60:493–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kohli N, Miklos JR. Dermal graft-augmented rectocele repair. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2003;14:146–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Mercer-Jones MA, Sprowson A, Varma JS. Outcome after transperineal mesh repair of rectocele: a case series. Dis Colon Rectum 2004;47:864–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Iglesia CB, Fenner DE, Brubaker L. The use of mesh in gynecologic surgery. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 1997;8:105–15.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Lim YN, Rane A, Muller R. An ambispective observational study in the safety and efficacy of posterior colporrhaphy with composite Vicryl-Prolene mesh. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2005;16:126–31.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Sand PK, Koduri S, Lobel RW, et al. Prospective randomized trial of polyglactin 910 mesh to prevent recurrence of cystoceles and rectoceles. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001;184:1357–62.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. American Gastroenterological Association Medical Position Statement: Guidelines on constipation. Gastroenterology 2000;119:1761–78.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Bump RC, Mattiasson A, Bo K, et al. The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996;175:10–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. van Dam JH, Schouten WR, Ginai AZ, Huisman WM, Hop WC. The impact of anismus on the clinical outcome of rectocele repair. Int J Colorectal Dis 1996;11:238–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Paraiso MF, Weber A, Walters M, Ballard L, Piedmonte M, Skibinski C. Anatomic and functional outcome after posterior colporrhaphy. J Pelvic Surg 2001;7:335–9.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Maher C, Baessler K. Surgical management of posterior vaginal wall prolapse: an evidence-based literature review. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2006;17:84–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Yamana T, Takahashi T, Iwadare J. Clinical and physiologic outcomes after transvaginal rectocele repair. Dis Colon Rectum 2006;49:661–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Richardson AC. The rectovaginal septum revisited: its relationship to rectocele and its importance in rectocele repair. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1993;36:976–83.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Singh K, Cortes E, Reid WM. Evaluation of the fascial technique for surgical repair of isolated posterior vaginal wall prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 2003;101:320–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Abramov Y, Gandhi S, Goldberg RP, Botros SM, Kwon C, Sand PK. Site-specific rectocele repair compared with standard posterior colporrhaphy. Obstet Gynecol 2005;105:314–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Sullivan ES, Longaker CJ, Lee PY. Total pelvic mesh repair: a ten-year experience. Dis Colon Rectum 2001;44:857–63.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. von Theobald P, Labbe E. Three-way prosthetic repair of the pelvic floor. Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod 2003;32:562–70.

    Google Scholar 

  31. de Tayrac R, Picone O, Chauveaud-Lambling A, Fernandez H. A 2-year anatomical and functional assessment of transvaginal rectocele repair using a polypropylene mesh. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2006;17:100–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. de Tayrac R, Devoldere G, Renaudie J, Villard P, Guilbaud O, Eglin G. Prolapse repair by vaginal route using a new protected low-weight polypropylene mesh: 1-year functional and anatomical outcome in a prospective multicentre study. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2007;18:251–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Lyons TL, Winer WK. Laparoscopic rectocele repair using polyglactin mesh. Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 1997;4:381–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Wolf SE, Ridgeway CA, Van Way CW, Reddy BA, Papasian CJ, Helling TS. Infectious sequelae in the use of polyglycolic acid mesh for splenic salvage with intraperitoneal contamination. J Surg Res 1996;61:433–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Ellis CN. Anterior levatoroplasty for the treatment of chronic anal fissure in females with a rectocele: a randomized, controlled trial. Dis Colon Rectum 2004;47:1170–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Ting KH, Mangel E, Eibl-Eibesfeldt B, Muller-Lissner SA. Is the volume retained after defecation a valuable parameter at defecography. Dis Col Rectum 1992;35:762–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Halligan S, Batram CI. Is barium trapping in rectoceles significant? Dis Col Rectum 1995;38:764–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Lienemann A. An easy approach to functional magnetic resonance imaging of pelvic floor disorders. Tech Coloproctol 1998;2:131–4.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Lienemann A, Anthuber C, Baron A, Kohz P, Reiser M. Diagnosing enteroceles using dynamic magnetic resonance imaging. Dis Colon Rectum 2000;43:205–12.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. Bülent Menteş M.D..

Additional information

Reprints are not available.

About this article

Cite this article

Leventoğlu, S., Menteş, B.B., Akın, M. et al. Transperineal Rectocele Repair with Polyglycolic Acid Mesh: A Case Series. Dis Colon Rectum 50, 2085–2095 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-007-9067-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-007-9067-5

Key words

Navigation