Skip to main content
Log in

New Laparoscopic Double-Stapling Technique

  • Technical Notes
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

Background

Laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer has been shown by several randomized, controlled trials to be an acceptable alternative to open surgery; however, laparoscopic rectal surgery has not been evaluated in a randomized trial. One of the most serious problems associated with laparoscopic rectal surgery are bowel clamping, irrigation, and transection of the rectum, and laparoscopic rectal surgery has not been as reliable as open rectal surgery.

Materials and Methods

We present our new technique, the laparoscopic double-stapling technique, which eliminates these problems. This technique uses curved Doyen forceps introduced through the wound just above pubis symphysis for clamping the rectal wall at the anal side of the tumor. An endolinear stapler (length 60  mm) is inserted through the same wound, applied at the rectal wall parallel and caudal to the Doyen forceps, and transects the rectum under pneumoperitoneum. We used this technique for eight cases of rectal surgery.

Results and Discussion

The laparoscopic double-stapling technique provided secure bowel clamping and rectal irrigation. The number of cartridges used in laparoscopic double-stapling technique cases was not more than 2, with an average of 1.6 per patient. None of the laparoscopic double-stapling technique cases experienced major complications.

Conclusion

We consider that many cases of rectal cancer that are suitable for laparoscopic low anterior resection can undergo laparoscopic surgery by using this technique, which will improve the quality of rectal surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3

References

  1. Furuhata T, Hata F, Tsuruma T, et al. Endo-bowel clamp (PL540S) for safe rectal irrigation in laparoscopy-assisted rectal resection. Surg Today 2004;34:882–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hanai T, Uyama I, Maruta M, et al. A new technique of laparoscopic surgery for rectal disease. Rev Gastroenterol Peru 2004;24:29–33.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ishii Y, Hasegawa H, Nishibori H, Endo T, Kitajima M. The application of a new stapling device for open surgery (Contour™ Curved Cutter Stapler) in the laparoscopic resection of rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 2006;20:1329–31.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Fukunaga Y, Higashino M, Tanimura S, et al. A novel laparoscopic technique for stapled colon and rectal anastomosis. Tech Coloproctol 2003;7:192–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Heald RJ, Ryall RD. Recurrence and survival after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Lancet 1986;1:1479–82.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hermanek T, Junginger T. The circumferential resection margin in rectal carcinoma surgery. Tech Coloproctol 2005;9:193–200.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Weiser MR, Milsom JW. Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision with autonomic nerve preservation. Semin Surg Oncol 2000;19:396–403.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Koh PK, Seow-Choen F, Kwek BH. Total mesorectal excision: the unrecognized pelvic plane. Dis Colon Rectum 2006;49:280–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group. A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 2004;350:2050–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H, et al. MRC CLASICC trial group. Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2005;365:1718–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lacy AM, Garcia-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S, et al. Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet 2002;359:2224–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Veldkamp R, Kuhry E, Hop WC, et al. Colon Cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection Study Group (COLOR). Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short–term outcomes of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 2005;6:477–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lezoche E, Guerrieri M, De Sanctis A, et al. Long-term results of laparoscopic versus open colorectal resections for cancer in 235 patients with a minimum follow-up of 5 years. Surg Endosc 2006;20:546–53.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Dulucq JL, Wintringer P, Stabilini C, Mahajna A. Laparoscopic rectal resection with anal sphincter preservation for rectal cancer: long-term outcome. Surg Endosc 2005;19:1468–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Jenner DC, de Boer WB, Clarke G, Levitt MD. Rectal washout eliminates exfoliated malignant cells. Dis Colon Rectum 1998;41:1432–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Sayfan J, Averbuch F, Koltun L, Benyamin N. Effect of rectal stump washout on the presence of free malignant cells in the rectum during anterior resection for rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 2000;43:1710–2.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Maeda K, Maruta M, Hanai T, Sato H, Horibe Y. Irrigation volume determines the efficacy of “rectal washout.” Dis Colon Rectum 2004;47:1706–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Vignali A, Fazio VW, Lavery IC, et al. Factors associated with the occurrence of leaks in stapled rectal anastomoses: a review of 1,014 patients. J Am Coll Surg 1997;185:105–13.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Carlsen E, Schlichting E, Guldvog I, Johnson E, Heald RJ. Effect of the introduction of total mesorectal excision for the treatment of rectal cancer. Br J Surg 1998;85:26–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Leroy J, Jamali F, Forbes L, et al. Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (TME) for rectal cancer surgery: long-term outcomes. Surg Endosc 2004;18:281–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Morino M, Giraudo G. Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision: the Turin experience. Recent Results Cancer Res 2005;165:167–79.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Sato H, Maeda K, Hanai T, Matsumoto M, Aoyama H, Matsuoka H. Modified double-stapling technique in low anterior resection for lower rectal carcinoma. Surg Today 2006;36:30–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Knight CD, Griffen FD. An improved technique for low anterior resection of the rectum using the EEA stapler. Surgery 1980;88:710–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Kapiteijn E, Marijnen CA, Nagtegaal ID, et al. Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group. Preoperative radiotherapy combined with total mesorectal excision for resectable rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 2001;345:638–46.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Bosset JF, Collette L, Calais G, et al. EORTC Radiotherapy Group Trial 22921. Chemotherapy with preoperative radiotherapy in rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 2006;355:1114–23.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Hayne D, Vaizey CJ, Boulos PB. Anorectal injury following pelvic radiotherapy. Br J Surg 2001;88s:1037–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Hamada M, Nishioka Y, Nishimura T, Ozaki K, Nakamura T. Laparoscopic IO-Double Stapling Technique with Doyen intestinal forceps for rectal cancer [in Japanese]. J Jpn Soc Endosc Surg 2007;12:215–19.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The preliminary version of our LDST technique has been published in Japanese.27

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Madoka Hamada M.D..

About this article

Cite this article

Hamada, M., Nishioka, Y., Kurose, Y. et al. New Laparoscopic Double-Stapling Technique. Dis Colon Rectum 50, 2247–2251 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-007-9035-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-007-9035-0

Key words

Navigation