Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Focused Helical CT Using Rectal Contrast Material Only as the Preferred Technique for the Diagnosis of Suspected Acute Appendicitis: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Study Comparing Three Different Techniques

  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Purpose

Focused helical CT using rectal contrast material only has emerged recently as an accurate diagnostic tool for the evaluation of suspected acute appendicitis. This study was designed to prospectively compare the efficacy of rectal contrast CT to other commonly used contrast-enhanced and nonenhanced CT techniques for the detection of acute appendicitis.

Methods

A total of 232 patients with clinically suspected appendicitis were randomly assigned to one of three focused helical CT techniques: noncontrast enhanced CT, CT using rectal contrast material only, and dual-contrast CT using both oral and intravenous material. All scans were interpreted by the on-call residents and reported immediately to the surgeon. The sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and overall accuracy rates were compared between the protocols.

Results

One hundred eleven patients (48 percent) had acute appendicitis. The sensitivity and specificity rates of rectal contrast CT were 93 and 95 percent, respectively, with overall accuracy of 94 percent. The sensitivity and specificity rates of dual-contrast CT were 100 and 89 percent, respectively, with overall accuracy of 94 percent. The sensitivity and specificity of noncontrast enhanced CT were 90 and 86 percent, respectively, but the overall accuracy was significantly lower (70 percent) compared with the other studies.

Conclusions

Rectal contrast CT is as accurate, although less sensitive, compared with dual-contrast CT and significantly superior to noncontrast-enhanced CT for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Rectal contrast CT may be performed rapidly, saves resources, and may avoid the diagnostic delay and potential allergic reactions associated with oral and intravenous-enhanced studies, and, therefore, may be the preferred initial technique in the diagnostic workup of suspected acute appendicitis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. DG Addiss N Shaffer BS Fowler RV Tauxe (1990) ArticleTitleThe epidemiology of appendicitis and appendectomy in the United States Am J Epidemiol 132 910–925 Occurrence Handle2239906 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:By6D2M7kvFI%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. SG Rothrock SM Green M Dobson SA Colucciello CM Simmons (1995) ArticleTitleMisdiagnosis of appendicitis in nonpregnant women of childbearing age J Emerg Med 13 1–8 Occurrence Handle7782616 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0736-4679(94)00104-9 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByqA3c7oslA%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. JD Calder H Gajraj (1995) ArticleTitleRecent advances in the diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis Br J Hosp Med 54 129–133 Occurrence Handle7582361 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BymD2cnptFc%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. DM Hardin SuffixJr (1999) ArticleTitleAcute appendicitis: review and update Am Fam Physician 60 2027–2034 Occurrence Handle10569505

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. JR Izbicki WT Knoefel DK Wilker et al. (1992) ArticleTitleAccurate diagnosis of acute appendicitis: a retrospective and prospective analysis of 686 patients Eur J Surg 158 227–231 Occurrence Handle1352137 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:By2A3MvhtlM%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. PM Rao JT Rhea RA Novelline AA Mostafavi CJ McCabe (1998) ArticleTitleEffect of computed tomography of the appendix ontreatment of patients and use of hospital resources N Engl J Med 338 141–146 Occurrence Handle9428814 Occurrence Handle10.1056/NEJM199801153380301 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1c%2FotVelsw%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. DL Stroman CV Bayouth JA Kuhn et al. (1999) ArticleTitleThe role of computed tomography in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis Am J Surg 178 485–489 Occurrence Handle10670858 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0002-9610(99)00223-8 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c7jsVeiug%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. PM Rao JT Rhea RA Novelline et al. (1997) ArticleTitleHelical CT technique for the diagnosis of appendicitis: prospective evaluation of a focused appendix CT examination Radiology 202 139–144 Occurrence Handle8988203 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByiC2c7psFc%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. IR Kamel SN Goldberg MT Keogan MP Rosen V Raptopoulos (2000) ArticleTitleRight lower quadrant pain and suspected appendicitis: nonfocused appendiceal CT: review of 100 cases Radiology 217 159–163 Occurrence Handle11012439 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3cvmsVGitA%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. PM Rao JT Rhea DW Rattner LG Venus RA Novelline (1999) ArticleTitleIntroduction of appendiceal CT: impact on negative appendectomy and appendiceal perforation rates Ann Surg 229 344–349 Occurrence Handle10077046 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00000658-199903000-00007 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1M7nsVKltg%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. JT Rhea PM Rao RA Novelline CJ McCabe (1997) ArticleTitleA focused appendiceal CT technique to reduce the cost of caring for patients with clinically suspected appendicitis AJR Am J Roentgenol 169 113–118 Occurrence Handle9207509 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByiA2M7it1M%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. PM Rao JT Rhea RA Novelline AA Mostafavi JN Lawrason CJ McCabe (1997) ArticleTitleHelical CT combined with contrast material administered only through the colon for imaging of suspected appendicitis AJR Am J Roentgenol 169 1275–1280 Occurrence Handle9353441 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1c%2FhsVOlug%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. S Walker W Haun J Clark K McMillin F Zeren T Gilliland (2000) ArticleTitleThe value of limited computed tomography with rectal contrast in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis Am J Surg 180 450–454 Occurrence Handle11182396 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0002-9610(00)00540-7 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M7lvVWqtw%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. J Peck A Peck C Peck J Peck (2000) ArticleTitleThe clinical role of noncontrast helical computed tomography in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis Am J Surg 180 133–136 Occurrence Handle11044529 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0002-9610(00)00435-9 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M%2FjvFCrtQ%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. MJ Lane DM Liu MD Huynh RB Jefferey RE Mindelzun DS Katz (1999) ArticleTitleSuspected acute appendicitis: nonenhanced helical CT in 300 consecutive patients Radiology 213 341–346 Occurrence Handle10551210 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c%2FhvV2jtQ%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. DD Hershko G Sroka H Bahouth E Ghersin A Mahajna MM Krausz (2002) ArticleTitleThe role of selective computed tomography in the diagnosis and management of suspected acute appendicitis Am Surg 68 1003–1007 Occurrence Handle12455796

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. EK Paulson MF Kalady TN Pappas (2003) ArticleTitleSuspected appendicitis N Engl J Med 348 236–242 Occurrence Handle12529465 Occurrence Handle10.1056/NEJMcp013351

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. EB Wilson JC Cole ML Nipper DR Cooney RW Smith (2001) ArticleTitleComputed tomography and ultrasonography in the diagnosis of appendicitis Arch Surg 136 670–675 Occurrence Handle11387006 Occurrence Handle10.1001/archsurg.136.6.670 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MzlvVekuw%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. J Perez JE Barone TO Wilbanks D Jorgensson PR Corvo (2003) ArticleTitleLiberal use of computed tomography scanning does not improve diagnostic accuracy in appendicitis Am J Surg 185 194–197 Occurrence Handle12620554 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0002-9610(02)01364-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. GM DeArmond DL Dent JG Myers et al. (2003) ArticleTitleAppendicitis: selective use of abdominal CT reduces negative appendectomy rate Surg Infect 4 213–218 Occurrence Handle10.1089/109629603766957013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. R Wijejtuga BS Tan JC Rouse GW Bigg-Wither BD Doust (2001) ArticleTitleDiagnostic accuracy of focused appendiceal CT in clinically equivocal cases of acute appendicitis Radiology 221 747–753 Occurrence Handle10.1148/radiol.2213001581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. SL Lee AJ Walsh HS Ho (2001) ArticleTitleComputed tomography and ultrasonography do not improve and may delay the diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis Arch Surg 136 556–562 Occurrence Handle11343547 Occurrence Handle10.1001/archsurg.136.5.556 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3Mzht1OnsA%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. MJ Weyant SR Eachempati MA Maluccio et al. (2000) ArticleTitleInterpretation of computed tomography does not correlate with laboratory or pathologic findings in surgically confirmed acute appendicitis Surgery 128 145–152 Occurrence Handle10922984 Occurrence Handle10.1067/msy.2000.107422 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3cvhsFOisQ%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. DR Flum A Morris T Koepsell EP Dellinger (2001) ArticleTitleHas misdiagnosis of appendicitis decreased over time? A population-based analysis JAMA 286 1748–1753 Occurrence Handle11594900 Occurrence Handle10.1001/jama.286.14.1748 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3Mrmt1Smuw%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. AJ Malone CR Wolf AS Malmed BF Melliere (1993) ArticleTitleDiagnosis of acute appendicitis: value of unenhanced CT AJR Am J Roentgenol 160 763–766 Occurrence Handle8456661

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. MJ Lane DS Katz BA Ross et al. (1997) ArticleTitleUnenhanced helical CT for suspected acute appendicitis AJR Am J Roentgenol 168 405–409 Occurrence Handle9016216 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByiC28fmt1c%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery A, Rambam Medical Center and the Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, 31096, Israel

    Dan D. Hershko M.D., Nibal Awad M.D., Ahmad Mahajna M.D., Shlomo H. Israelit M.D., Ph.D. & Michael M. Krausz M.D.

  2. Department of Radiology, Rambam Medical Center and the Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel

    Doron Fischer M.D. & Ludmila Guralnik M.D.

Authors
  1. Dan D. Hershko M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Nibal Awad M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Doron Fischer M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ahmad Mahajna M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ludmila Guralnik M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Shlomo H. Israelit M.D., Ph.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Michael M. Krausz M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dan D. Hershko M.D..

Additional information

Reprints are not available.

About this article

Cite this article

Hershko, D.D., Awad, N., Fischer, D. et al. Focused Helical CT Using Rectal Contrast Material Only as the Preferred Technique for the Diagnosis of Suspected Acute Appendicitis: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Study Comparing Three Different Techniques. Dis Colon Rectum 50, 1223–1229 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-007-0272-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-007-0272-z

Key words

Search

Navigation